Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 32, Issue 25, 2012, Pages 8443-8453

  Sohoglu, Ediz ^a   Peelle, Jonathan E ^b   Carlyon, Robert P ^a   Davis, Matthew H ^a  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; KNOWLEDGE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STIMULUS; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CUES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FRONTAL LOBE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KNOWLEDGE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862849269     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5069-11.2012     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Alink A, Schwiedrzik CM, Kohler A, Singer W, Muckli L (2010) Stimulus predictability reduces responses in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 30:2960-2966.
2. Anwander A, Tittgemeyer M, von Cramon DY, Friederici AD, Knösche TR (2007) Connectivity-based parcellation of Broca's area. Cereb Cortex 17:816-825.
3. Arnal LH, Morillon B, Kell CA, Giraud AL (2009) Dual neural routing of visual facilitation in speech processing. J Neurosci 29:13445-13453.
4. Arnal LH, Wyart V, Giraud AL (2011) Transitions in neural oscillations reflect prediction errors generated in audiovisual speech. Nat Neurosci 14:797-801.
5. Bar M, Kassam KS, Ghuman AS, Boshyan J, Schmid AM, Schmidt AM, Dale AM, Hämäläinen MS, Marinkovic K, Schacter DL, Rosen BR, Halgren E (2006) Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:449-454.
6. Binder JR, Liebenthal E, Possing ET, Medler DA, Ward BD (2004) Neural correlates of sensory and decision processes in auditory object identification. Nat Neurosci 7:295-301.
7. Booth JR, Burman DD, Meyer JR, Gitelman DR, Parrish TB, Mesulam MM (2002) Functional anatomy of intra- and cross-modal lexical tasks. Neuroimage 16:7-22.
8. Burton MW, Locasto PC, Krebs-Noble D, Gullapalli RP (2005) Asystematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing. Neuroimage 26:647-661.
9. Dale AM, Sereno MI (1993) Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cogn Neurosci 5:162-176.
10. Davis MH, Johnsrude IS (2003) Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J Neurosci 23:3423-3431.
11. Desroches AS, Newman RL, Joanisse MF (2009) Investigating the time course of spoken word recognition: electrophysiological evidence for the influences of phonological similarity. J Cogn Neurosci 21:1893-1906.
12. Epshtein B, Lifshitz I, Ullman S (2008) Image interpretation by a single bottom-up top-down cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:14298-14303.
13. Fodor J (1983) The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
14. Frankish C (2008) Precategorical acoustic storage and the perception of speech. J Mem Lang 58:815-836.
15. Frey S, Campbell JS, Pike GB, Petrides M (2008) Dissociating the human language pathways with high angular resolution diffusion fiber tractography. J Neurosci 28:11435-11444.
16. Friston K (2010) The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci 11:127-138.
17. Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ (2007) Evoked brain responses are generated by feedback loops. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:20961-20966.
18. Giraud AL, Kell C, Thierfelder C, Sterzer P, Russ MO, Preibisch C, Kleinschmidt A (2004) Contributions of sensory input, auditory search and verbal comprehension to cortical activity during speech processing. Cereb Cortex 14:247-255.
19. Grosjean F (1980) Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Percept Psychophys 28:267-283.
20. Hackett TA, Stepniewska I, Kaas JH (1999) Prefrontal connections of the parabelt auditory cortex in macaque monkeys. Brain Res 817:45-58.
21. Hannemann R, Obleser J, Eulitz C (2007) Top-down knowledge supports the retrieval of lexical information from degraded speech. Brain Res 1153:134-143.
22. Hauk O, Davis MH, Ford M, Pulvermüller F, Marslen-Wilson WD (2006) The time course of visual word-recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage 30:1383-1400.
23. Henson RN, Mouchlianitis E, Friston KJ (2009) MEG and EEG data fusion: simultaneous localisation of face-evoked responses. Neuroimage 47:581-589.
24. Hervais-Adelman A, Carlyon RP, Johnsrude IS, Davis MH (2012) Motor regions are recruited for effortful comprehension of noise-vocoded words: evidence from fMRI. Lang Cogn Process. In press.
25. Hickok G, Poeppel D (2007) The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:393-402.
26. Jacoby LL, Allan LG, Collins JC, Larwill LK (1988) Memory influences subjective experience: noise judgments. J Exp Psychol 14:240-247.
27. Kilner JM, Friston KJ (2010) Topological inference for EEG and MEG. Ann Appl Stat 4:1272-1290.
28. Litvak V, Friston K (2008) Electromagnetic source reconstruction for group studies. Neuroimage 42:1490-1498.
29. Loftus GR, Masson MEJ (1994) Using confidence intervals in withinsubject designs. Psychonom Bull Rev 1:476-490.
30. Lorch RF Jr., Myers JL (1990) Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. J Exp Psychol 16:149-157.
31. Luo H, Poeppel D (2007) Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron 54:1001-1010.
32. McClelland JL, Elman JL (1986) The TRACE model of speech perception. Cogn Psychol 18:1-86.
33. McClelland JL, Mirman D, Holt LL (2006) Are there interactive processes in speech perception? Trends Cogn Sci 10:363-369.
34. Miller G, Isard S (1963) Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 2:217-228.
35. Molins A, Stufflebeam SM, Brown EN, Hämäläinen MS (2008) Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation. Neuroimage 42:1069-1077.
36. Murray SO, Kersten D, Olshausen BA, Schrater P, Woods DL (2002) Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:15164-15169.
37. Nichols T, Brett M, Andersson J, Wager T, Poline JB (2005) Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage 25:653-660.
38. Norris D, McQueen JM, Cutler A (2000) Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary. Behav Brain Sci 23:299-325; discussion 325-370.
39. Obleser J, Kotz SA (2011) Multiple brain signatures of integration in the comprehension of degraded speech. Neuroimage 55:713-723.
40. Pascual-Marqui RD (2002) Standardized low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 24 [Suppl D]:5-12.
41. Peelle JE, Johnsrude IS, Davis MH (2010) Hierarchical processing for speech in human auditory cortex and beyond. Front Hum Neurosci 4:51.
42. Petrides M, Pandya DN (2009) Distinct parietal and temporal pathways to the homologues of Broca's area in the monkey. PLoS Biol 7:e1000170.
43. Phillips C, Mattout J, Rugg MD, Maquet P, Friston KJ (2005) An empirical Bayesian solution to the source reconstruction problem in EEG. Neuroimage 24:997-1011.
44. Price CJ (2000) The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging. J Anat 197:335-359.
45. Rao RP, Ballard DH (1999) Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat Neurosci 2:79-87.
46. Remez RE, Rubin PE, Pisoni DB, Carrell TD (1981) Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science 212:947-949.
47. Romanski LM, Bates JF, Goldman-Rakic PS (1999) Auditory belt and parabelt projections to the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 403:141-157.
48. Rubin N, Nakayama K, Shapley R (1997) Abrupt learning and retinal size specificity in illusory-contour perception. Curr Biol 7:461-467.
49. Saur D, Kreher BW, Schnell S, Kümmerer D, Kellmeyer P, Vry MS, Umarova R, Musso M, Glauche V, Abel S, Huber W, Rijntjes M, Hennig J, Weiller C (2008) Ventral and dorsal pathways for language. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:18035-18040.
50. Scott SK, Johnsrude IS (2003) The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends Neurosci 26:100-107.
51. Scott SK, Rosen S, Lang H, Wise RJ (2006) Neural correlates of intelligibility in speech investigated with noise vocoded speech-a positron emission tomography study. J Acoust Soc Am 120:1075-1083.
52. Shahin AJ, Bishop CW, Miller LM (2009) Neural mechanisms for illusory filling-in of degraded speech. Neuroimage 44:1133-1143.
53. Shannon RV, Zeng FG, Kamath V, Wygonski J, Ekelid M (1995) Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270:303-304.
54. Sharon D, Hämäläinen MS, Tootell RB, Halgren E, Belliveau JW (2007) The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex. Neuroimage 36:1225-1235.
55. Skipper JI, van Wassenhove V, Nusbaum HC, Small SL (2007) Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception. Cereb Cortex 17:2387-2399.
56. Sumby WH (1954) Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 26:212-215.
57. Summerfield C, Egner T (2009) Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 13:403-409.
58. Taulu S, Simola J, Kajola M (2005) Applications of the signal space separation method. IEEE Trans Signal Process 53:3359-3372.
59. van Wassenhove V, Grant KW, Poeppel D (2005) Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:1181-1186.
60. Wild CJ, Davis MH, Johnsrude IS (2012) Humanauditory cortex is sensitive to the perceived clarity of speech. Neuroimage 60:1490-1502.