Speech perception within an auditory cognitive science framework

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 42-46

  Holt, Lori L ^a   Lotto, Andrew J ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory cognitive science; Auditory perception; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 38849119693     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00545.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Diehl, R.L., Lotto, A.J., & Holt, L.L. (2004). Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 149-179. An accessible overview of important phenomena and theories of speech perception.
2. Liberman, A.M. (1996). Speech: A special code. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. A comprehensive review of research and theorizing relevant to the motor theory of speech perception.
3. McAdams, S., & Bigand, E. (Eds.) (2001). Thinking in sound: The cognitive psychology of human audition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. An edited volume surveying the cognitive psychology of audition.
4. Hauser, M.D., Newport, E.L. Aslin, R.N. (2001). Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: Statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins. Cognition, 78, B53 B64.
5. Hawkins, S. (2003). Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 373 405.
6. Holt, L.L. (2005). Temporally non-adjacent non-linguistic sounds affect speech categorization. Psychological Science, 16, 305 312.
7. Holt, L.L. (2006). The mean matters: Effects of statistically-defined non-speech spectral distributions on speech categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 2801 2817.
8. Holt, L.L. Lotto, A.J. (2006). Cue weighting in auditory categorization: Implications for first and second language acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 3059 3071.
9. Holt, L.L., Lotto, A.J. Diehl, R.L. (2004). Auditory discontinuities interact with categorization: Implications for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Americav, 116, 1763 1773.
10. Holt, L.L., Lotto, A.J. Kluender, K.R. (2001). Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: A case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 764 774.
11. Liberman, A.M. Mattingly, I.G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1 36.
12. Lotto, A.J. Kluender, K.R. (1998). General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 602 619.
13. Lotto, A.J., Kluender, K.R. Holt, L.L. (1997). Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1134 1140.
14. Mann, V.A. (1986). Distinguishing universal language-specific factors in speech perception: Evidence from Japanese listeners' perception of /1/ and /r/. Cognition, 24, 169 196.
15. McClelland, J.L., Mirman, D. Holt, L.L. (2006). Are there interactive processes in speech perception? Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 363 369.
16. Wade, T. Holt, L.L. (2005). Effects of later-occurring non-linguistic sounds on speech categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1701 1710.