An alternative view of the mental lexicon

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 301-306

  Elman, Jeffrey L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLOSSARIES; SEMANTICS; SYNTACTICS;

MENTAL LEXICON; PHONOLOGY;

NEUROLOGY;

BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; DYNAMICS; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LONG TERM MEMORY; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL TASK; PHONETICS; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 3042826429     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Jackendoff R.S. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, and Evolution. 2002;Oxford University Press
2. Rumelhart D.E. Some problems with the notion that words have literal meanings. Ortony A. Metaphor and Thought. 1979;71-82 Cambridge University Press
3. Bresnan J. Lexical-Functional Syntax. 2001;Blackwell
4. Goldberg A.E. Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7:2003;219-224
5. Sag I., et al. Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction, Center for the Study of Language and Information. 2002;Stanford University
6. MacDonald M.C. Lexical representations and sentence processing: an introduction. Lang. Cogn. Processes. 12:1997;121-136
7. McRae K., et al. Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. J. Mem. Lang. 38:1998;283-312
8. Taraban R., McClelland J.L. Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: influences of content-based expectations. J. Mem. Lang. 27:1988;597-632
9. Bates E., Goodman J.C. On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: evidence from acquisition, aphasia, and real-time processing. Lang. Cogn. Processes. 12:1997;507-584
10. Tomasello M. The emergence of grammar in early child language. Givon T., Malle B. The Evolution of Language out of Prelanguage. 2002;309-328 John Benjamins
11. Cameron-Faulkner T., et al. A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cogn. Sci. 27:2003;843-874
12. Christiansen M.H., et al. Special issue Connectionist models of human language processing: progress and prospects. Cogn. Sci. 23:1999;415-415
13. Pustejovsky J. The Generative Lexicon. 1996;MIT Press
14. Chomsky N. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. 1986;Praeger
15. Jackendoff R.S. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. 1972;MIT Press
16. Rappaport Hovav M., Levin B. Building verb meanings. Butt M., Geuder W. The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. 1998;97-134 Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University
17. Elman J.L. Finding structure in time. Cogn. Sci. 14:1990;179-211
18. McClelland J.L., et al. Sentence comprehension: a parallel distributed processing approach. Lang. Cogn. Processes. 4:1989;287-336
19. Tabor W., Tanenhaus M.K. Dynamical systems for sentence processing. Christiansen M.H., Chater N. Connectionist Psycholinguistics. 2001;177-211 Ablex Publishing
20. Chomsky N. Syntactic Structures. 1957;Mouton, The Hague
21. Federmeier K.D., Kutas M. Meaning and modality: influences of context, semantic memory organization, and perceptual predictability on picture processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 27:2001;202-224
22. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature. 307:1984;161-163
23. Brent M.R., Cartwright T.A. Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition. 61:1996;93-125
24. Mintz T.H., et al. The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children. Cogn. Sci. 26:2002;393-424
25. Redington M., et al. Distributional information: a powerful cue for acquiring syntactic categories. Cogn. Sci. 22:1998;425-469
26. Gomez R.L., Gerken L.A. Artificial grammar learning by one-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition. 70:1999;109-135
27. Gomez R.L., Gerken L.A. Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4:2000;178-186
28. Gomez R.L. Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychol. Sci. 13:2002;431-436
29. Saffran J.R. Words in a sea of sounds: the output of infant statistical learning. Cognition. 81:2001;149-169
30. Saffran J.R. The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. J. Mem. Lang. 44:2001;493
31. Christiansen M.H., Chater N. Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cogn. Sci. 23:1999;157-205
32. Elman J.L. Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Mach. Learn. 7:1991;195-224
33. Elman J.L. Language as a dynamical system. Port R., van Gelder T. Mind as Motion: Dynamical Perspectives on Behavior and Cognition. 1995;195-225 MIT Press
34. Barsalou L.W. Adhoc ategories. Mem. Cogn. 11. 1983;211-227
35. Elman J.L. Generalization, Simple Recurrent Networks, and the Emergence of Structure. 1998;Erlbaum
36. Langacker R.W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. 1987;Stanford University Press
37. Goldberg A.E. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. 1995;University of Chicago Press
38. Tomasello M. First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. 1992;Cambridge University Press
39. Boden M., Wiles J. Context-free and context-sensitive dynamics in recurrent neural networks. Connect. Sci.: J. Neural Comput. Artif. Intell. Cogn. Res. 12:2000;197-210
40. Rodriguez P. Simple recurrent networks learn context-free and context-sensitive languages by counting. Neural Comput. 13:2001;2093-2118
41. Rodriguez P., et al. A recurrent neural network that learns to count. Connect. Sci. 11:1999;5-40
42. Siegelmann H.T., Sontag E.D. On the computational power of neural nets. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 50:1995;132-150
43. Steedman M. Connectionist sentence processing in perspective. Cogn. Sci. 23:1999;615-634
44. McCawley J.D. The role of semantics in a grammar. Bach E., Harms R.T. Universals in Linguistic Theory. 1968;124-169 Holt, Rinehart & Winston
45. Kamide Y., et al. The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: evidence from anticipatory eye movements. J. Mem. Lang. 49:2003;133-156
46. Gibson, E.J. (1969) Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development, Appleton Century Croft.
47. Brookes R.E. Intelligence without representation. Artif. Intell. 47:1991;139-159
48. MacDonald M.C., Christiansen M.H. Reassessing working memory. Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychol. Rev. 109:2002;35-54