Changing only the probability that spoken words will be distorted changes how they are recognized

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 509-517

  McQueen, James M ^a   Huettig, Falk ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC INFORMATION; DIFFERENT EFFECTS; EYE-TRACKING; SPEECH QUALITY; SPOKEN WORDS;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

ARTICLE; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; NOISE; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHONETICS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; RECOGNITION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHONETICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBABILITY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84855955647     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3664087     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models., J. Mem. Lang. 38, 419-439. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558 (Pubitemid 128348607)
2. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The Adaptive Character of Thought (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).
3. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., and Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items., J. Mem. Lang. 59, 390-412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
4. Barr, D. J. (2008). Analyzing visual world' eye tracking data using multilevel logistic regression., J. Mem. Lang. 59, 457-474. 10.1016/j.jml.2007. 09.002
5. Boersma, B., and Weenink, D. (2005). PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.14). Retrieved May 26, 2005, from http://www.praat.org.
6. Brouwer, S., Mitterer, H., and Huettig, F. (2011). Speech reductions change the dynamics of competition during spoken word recognition., Lang. Cognit. Processes, doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.555268.
7. Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears., J. Acoust. Soc.Am. 25, 975-979. 10.1121/1.1907229
8. Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., and Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition?, J. Mem. Lang. 32, 193-210. 10.1006/jmla.1993.1011
9. Desroches, A. S., Joanisse, M. F., and Robertson, E. K. (2006). Specific phonological impairments in dyslexia revealed by eyetracking., Cognition 100, B32-B42. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.09.001 (Pubitemid 43902766)
10. Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., and Morgan, J. L. (2009). The influence of categories on perception: Explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference., Psychol. Rev. 116, 752-782. 10.1037/a0017196
11. Fodor, J. A., and Bever, T. G. (1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments., J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 4, 414-420. 10.1016/S0022-5371(65)80081-0
12. Frauenfelder, U. H., Scholten, M., and Content, A. (2001). Bottom-up inhibition in lexical selection: Phonological mismatch effects in spoken word recognition., Lang. Cognit. Processes 16, 583-607. 10.1080/01690960143000146 (Pubitemid 33130106)
13. Huettig, F., and Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm., Cognition 96, B23-B32. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003
14. Huettig, F., and McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic, and shape information in language-mediated visual search., J. Mem. Lang. 57, 460-482. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.001
15. Luce, P. A., and Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model., Ear Hear. 19, 1-36. (Pubitemid 28092986)
16. Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., and Dahan, D. (2003). The time course of spoken word recognition and learning: Studies with artificial lexicons., J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 202-227. 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.202 (Pubitemid 37170590)
17. Marslen-Wilson, W., Moss, H. E., and van Halen, S. (1996). Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access., J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22, 1376-1392. 10.1037/0096-1523.22.6.1376 (Pubitemid 126420588)
18. Marslen-Wilson, W., and Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech., Cogn. Psychol. 10, 29-63. 10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-X
19. Marslen-Wilson, W., and Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets., J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 576-585. 10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.576
20. Matin, E., Shao, K. C., and Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccadic overhead., Percept. Psychophys. 53, 372-380. 10.3758/BF03206780
21. McClelland, J. L., and Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception., Cogn. Psychol. 18, 1-86. 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0
22. McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., and Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon., Cogn. Sci. 30, 1113-1126. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000-79
23. McQueen, J. M., and Viebahn, M. (2007). Tracking recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words., Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 60, 661-671. 10.1080/17470210601183890
24. Miller, G. A., and Licklider, J. C. R. (1950). The intelligibility of interrupted speech., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22, 167-173. 10.1121/1.1906584
25. Mirman, D., Yee, E., Blumstein, S., and Magnuson, J. S. (2011). Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling., Brain Lang. 117, 53-68. 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004
26. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition., Cognition 52, 189-234. 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4
27. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., and Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech., Cogn. Psychol. 47, 204-238. 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00006-9 (Pubitemid 37041619)
28. Norris, D., and McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition., Psychol. Rev. 115, 357-395. 10.1037/0033-295X. 115.2.357
29. Payton, K. L., Uchanski, R. M., and Braida, L. D. (1994). Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1581-1592. 10.1121/1.408545 (Pubitemid 24085759)
30. Reinisch, E., Jesse, A., and McQueen, J. M. (2010). Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: Lexical stress drives eye-movements immediately., Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 63, 772-783. 10.1080/17470210903104412
31. Saslow, M. G. (1967). Latency for saccadic eye movement., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 1030-1033. 10.1364/JOSA.57.001030
32. Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds., Science 167, 392-393 10.1126/science.167.3917.392
33. Yuille, A., and Kersten, D. (2006). Vision as Bayesian inference: Analysis by synthesis?, Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 301-308. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05. 002 (Pubitemid 44094226)
34. Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing., Cognition 32, 25-64.