Intentionally mobile pedagogy: The M-COPE framework for mobile learning in higher education

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 397-419

  Dennen, Vanessa P ^a   Hao, Shuang ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Informed design; Instructional design; Mobile learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905635473     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2014.943278     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Ahmed, S., & Parsons, D. (2013). Abductive science inquiry using mobile devices in the classroom. Computers & Education, 63, 62-72. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.017
2. Ahn, J., Bivona, L. K., & DiScala, J. (2011). Social media access in K-12 schools: Intractable policy controversies in an evolving world. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48, 1-10. doi:10.1002/meet.2011.14504801044
3. Ally, M., Grimus, M., & Ebner, M. (2014). Preparing teachers for a mobile world, to improve access to education. PROSPECTS, 44, 43-59. doi:10.1007/s11125-014-9293-2
4. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
5. Buchanan, E. A., & Hvizdak, E. E. (2009). Online survey tools: Ethical and methodological concerns of human research ethics committees. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(2), 37-48. doi:10.1525/jer.2009.4.2.37
6. Burnett, B., & Meadmore, P. (2002, December). Streaming lectures: Enhanced pedagogy or simply ‘bells and whistles’? Paper presented at the International Education Research Conference, Brisbane.
7. Chen, R.-J. (2010). Investigating models for preservice teachers’ use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55, 32-42. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.015
8. Chen, W., Tan, N., Looi, C., Zhang, B., & Seow, P. (2008). Handheld computers as cognitive tools: Technology enhanced environmental learning. Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3, 231-252.
9. Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., & Sheu, J. P. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 347-359. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00036.x
10. Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59, 1054-1064. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
11. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54, 289-297.
12. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55, 1618-1627. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.004
13. Cochrane, T. D. (2010). Exploring mobile learning success factors. Research in Learning Technology, 18, 133-148. doi:10.1080/09687769.2010.494718
14. Cochrane, T. D. (2014). Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile Web 2.0. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 65-82.
15. Cochrane, T. D., & Bateman, R. (2010). Smartphones give you wings: Pedagogical affordances of mobile Web 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 1-14.
16. de-Marcos, L., Hilera, J. R., Barchino, R., Jiménez, L., Martínez, J. J., Gutiérrez, J. A., et al. (2010). An experiment for improving students’ performance in secondary and tertiary education by means of m-learning auto-assessment. Computers & Education, 55, 1069-1079. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.003
17. Dede, C. (2011). Emerging technologies, ubiquitous learning, and educational transformation. In C. Kloos, D. Gillet, R. Crespo García, F. Wild, & M. Wolpers (Eds.), Towards ubiquitous learning (pp. 1-8). Berlin: Springer.
18. Denk, M., Weber, M., & Belfin, R. (2007). Mobile learning: Challenges and potentials. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisations, 1, 122-139.
19. Dennen, V. P., & Hao, S. (2014). Paradigms of use, learning theory, and app design. In C. Miller, & A. Doering (Eds.), The new landscape of mobile learning (pp. 20-41). New York, NY: Routledge.
20. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
21. Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Integrating technologies into educational ecosystems. Distance Education, 29, 127-140. doi:10.1080/01587910802154939
22. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In M. S. Khine, & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning (pp. 525-552). New York, NY: Springer.
23. Furió, D., González-Gancedo, S., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Costa, M. (2013). The effects of the size and weight of a mobile device on an educational game. Computers & Education, 64, 24-41. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.015
24. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
25. Gay, G., Rieger, R., & Bennington, T. (2002). Using mobile computing to enhance field study. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 507-528). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18-26. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002
27. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (1997). Revisioning models of instructional development. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(3), 73-89.
28. Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, H.-F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56, 1023-1031. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002
29. Jones, A. C., Scanlon, E., & Clough, G. (2013). Mobile learning: Two case studies of supporting inquiry learning in informal and semiformal settings. Computers & Education, 61, 21-32. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.008
30. Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20, doi:10.3402/ rlt.v20i0.14406.
31. Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
32. Kim, S.-W., & Lee, M.-G. (2012). Utilization of digital textbooks in Korea. In T.-T. Goh, B.-C. Seet, & P.-C. Sun (Eds.), E-books & e-readers for e-learning (pp. 90-125). Victoria, NZ: Victoria Business School.
33. Koole, M. L. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 25-47). Athabasca: AU Press.
34. Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Jones, C. (2012). The next generation: Design and the infrastructure for learning in a mobile and networked world. In A. D. Olofsson, & J. O. Lindberg (Eds.), Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching (pp. 57-78). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
36. Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Innovation in mobile learning: A European perspective. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1, 13-35. doi:10.4018/jmbl.2009010102
37. Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design. New York, NY: Routledge.
38. Liu, Y., Han, S., & Li, H. (2010). Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption: A literature review. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27, 210-226. doi:10.1108/ 10650741011073761
39. Martin, S., Diaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., & Peire, J. (2011). New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence. Computers & Education, 57, 1893-1906. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.003
40. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
41. Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 43-59.
42. Merrill, M. D., Barclay, M., & van Schaak, A. (2008). Prescriptive principles for instructional design. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 173-184). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42 (5), 34-37.
44. Motiwalla, L. M. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49, 581-596.
45. Nicholas, D., Clark, D., Rowlands, I., & Jamali, H. R. (2013). Information on the go: A case study of European mobile users. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 1311-1322. doi:10.1002/asi.22838
46. Nworie, J., & Haughton, N. (2008). Good intentions and unanticipated effects: The unintended consequences of the application of technology in teaching and learning environments. TechTrends, 52(5), 52-58. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0197-y
47. O’Bannon, B. W., & Thomas, K. (2014). Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: Age matters! Computers & Education, 74, 15-25. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.006
48. Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 78-102.
49. Peng, H., Su, Y. J., Chou, C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Ubiquitous knowledge construction: Mobile learning re-defined and a conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 171-183. doi:10.1080/14703290902843828
50. Perkins, D. N., & Unger, C. (1999). Teaching and learning for understanding. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. III (pp. 91-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: New paradigm of instuctional theory, Vol. II (pp. 5-29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009a). Understanding instructional theory. In C. M. Reigeluth, & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Vol. III (pp. 3-26). New York, NY: Routledge.
53. Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (Eds.) (2009b). Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. III). New York, NY: Routledge.
54. Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. W. (1999). Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. II (pp. 633-651). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Reigeluth, C. M., & Keller, J. B. (2009). Understanding instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth, & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Vol. III (pp. 27-39). New York, NY: Routledge.
56. Roger, Y., Connelly, K., Hazlewood, W., & Tedesco, L. (2010). Enhancing learning: A study of how mobile devices can facilitate sensemaking. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 111-124. doi:10.1007/s00779-009-0250-7
57. Rogers, E. (2003). The diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
58. Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Estrella, G., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S. (2010). From handheld collaborative tool to effective classroom module: Embedding CSCL in a broader design framework. Computers & Education, 55, 1018-1026. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.012
59. Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34, 177-193. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00044-5
60. Sharples, M. (2013). Mobile learning: Research, practice and challenges. Distance Education in China, 3(5), 5-11.
61. Smaldino, S. E., Russell, J. D., Heinich, R., & Molenda, M. (2005). Instructional technology and media for learning (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
62. Smith, A., Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2011). College students and technology. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
63. Taylor, R. P. (1980). Introducation. In R. P. Taylor (Ed.), The computer in school: Tutor, tool, tutee (pp. 1-10). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
64. Terras, M. M., & Ramsay, J. (2012). The five central psychological challenges facing effective mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 820-832.
65. Tripp, S. D., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 31-44. doi:10.1007/BF02298246
66. Vahey, P., & Crawford, V. (2002). Palm Education Pioneers Program: Final evaluation report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
67. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39-61. doi:10.1007/BF02504993
68. Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2009). Meeting the challenges in evaluating mobile learning: A 3-level evaluation framework. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1 (2), 54-75.
69. Wallace, S., Clark, M., & White, J. (2012). ‘It’s on my iPhone’: Attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open, 2 (4), 1-7. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001099
70. Weider, B. (2012). States move slowly toward digital textbooks. Retrieved from Stateline: The daily news service of the Pew Charitable Trusts website: http://www.pewstates.org/projects/stateline/headlines/states-move-slowly-toward-digital-textbooks-85899382069
71. Wishart, J. (2013). Why ethical issues in researching mobile learning are a concern and ways forward. QScience Proceedings, 2013(3), 37. doi:10.5339/qproc.2013.mlearn.37
72. Wu, W.-H., Wu, Y.-C., Chen, C.-Y., Kao, H. K., Lin, C.-H., & Huang, S.-H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59, 817-827. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.016
73. Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2007). A conceptual framework based on Activity Theory for mobile CSCL. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 211-235. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00580.x.