Integrating technologies into educational ecosystems

Distance Education

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 127-140

  Dillenbourg, Pierre ^a,b  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b School of Computer and Communication Sciences

Author keywords

CSCL; Integrated learning; Teachers; Technology enhanced learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 46849101788     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910802154939     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson, A.H., O'Malley, C., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Langton, S., Newlands, A., Mullin, J., et al. (1997). The impact of VMC on collaborative problem solving: An analysis of task performance, communicative process, and user satisfaction. In K.E. Finn, A.J. Sellen, & S.B. Wilbur (Eds.), Video-mediated communication: Computers, cognition, and work (pp. 133-155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Sikes, J., Stephan, G., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Cao, J.J., & Nunamaker, F. (2004). Question answering on lecture videos: A multifaceted approach. In Proceedings of the 2004 Joint ACM/IEEE Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 214-215). New York: ACM.
4. Carles, L. (2001). Report No. 1 - State of the art: Benefits and limits of video channel on mediated interactions. Geneva, Switzerland: TECFA/University of Geneva. Retrieved March 31, 2008, from http://moodle.epfl. ch/file.php/8/slides/LaureREportV2.pdf
5. Churchill, E.F., Trevor, J., Bly, S., Nelson, L., & Cubranic, D. (2000). Anchored conversations: Chatting in the context of a document. In Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 454-461). New York: ACM.
6. Correia, N., & Chambel, T. (1999). Active video watching using annotation. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM International Conference on Multimedia (Part 2) (pp. 151-154). New York: ACM Press. Retrieved April 4, 2008, from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/319878.319919
7. Crouch, C.H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. The Physics Teacher, 69(9), 970-977.
8. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
9. Dillenbourg, P. (2005). Designing biases that augment socio-cognitive interactions. In R. Bromme, F. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication (pp. 243-264). New York: Springer.
10. Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 5-23.
11. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning - Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, Vol. 6, pp. 275-301). New York: Springer.
12. Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (2006). Sharing solutions: Persistence and grounding in multi-modal collaborative problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121-151.
13. Fidas, C., Komis, V., Avouris, N., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2002). Collaborative problem solving using an open modelling environment. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (pp. 654-655). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Fussell, S.R., Kraut, R.E., & Siegel, J. (2000). Coordination of communication: Effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. In Proceedings of CSCW 2000 (pp. 21-30). New York: ACM.
15. Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2005). The relation between prior knowledge and students' collaborative discovery learning processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 264-282.
16. Goodyear, P. (2002). Teaching online. In N. Hativa & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education (pp. 79-101). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
17. Hoppe, H.U., Lingnau, A., Machado, I., Paiva, A., Prada, R., & Tewissen, F. (2000). Supporting collaborative activities in computer integrated classrooms - The NIMIS approach. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Groupware (CRIWG '00) (p. 94). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
18. Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (1999). An analysis of learner arguments in a collective learning environment. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1999 Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (pp. 265-273). Palo Alto, CA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
19. Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2003). Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script. In G. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
20. Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (in press). Group mirrors to support interaction regulation in collaborative problem solving. Computers and Education.
21. Kaplan, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (in press). Scriptable classrooms. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
22. Office Fédéral de la Statistique. (2008). Statistique suisse - Indicateurs de la société de l'information, Neuchacirc;tel, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved April 5, 2008, from http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/fr/index/themen/16/04/key/approche_globale. indicator.30103.301.html?open=308#308
23. Olson, J.S., Olson, G.M., & Meader, D.K. (1995). What mix of video and audio is useful for remote real-time work. In I.R. Katz, R. Mack, L. Marks, M.B. Rosson, & J. Nielsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 362-368). New York: ACM Press/Addison Wesley.
24. Phillips, B. (2000). Should we take turns?: A test of CMC turn-taking formats. In Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 341-342). New York: ACM.
25. Roschelle, J., Penuel, W.R., & Abrahamson, A.L. (2004). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 50-54.
26. Russell, D., Streitz, N.A., & Winograd, T. (2005). Building disappearing computers. Communications of the ACM, 48(3), 42-28.
27. Salomon, G. (1998). Technology's promises and dangers in a psychological and educational context. Theory into Practice, 37(1), 4-10.
28. Suthers, D., Weiner, A., Connelly, J., & Paolucci, M. (1995). Belvedere: Engaging students in critical discussion of science and public policy issues. In Proceedings of AI-Ed 95, the 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 266-273). Washington, DC: AI-ED.
29. Waxman, H.C., Lin, M.-F., & Michko, G.M. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. Retrieved November 11, 2007, from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/effects2/waxman.pdf