Social media access in K-12 schools: Intractable policy controversies in an evolving world

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 48, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Ahn, June ^a   Bivona, Lauren K ^a   Discala, Jeffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Education policy; Educational technology; Information policy; Media literacy; Social media; Youth

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861453645     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15508390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801044     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Ahn, J. (2011). The effect of social network sites on adolescents' social and academic development: Current theories and controversies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1435-1445.
2. Ahn, J. (in press). Digital divides and social network sites: Which students participate in social media? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45 (2).
3. Aldine Independent School District. (2009). Aldine independent school district internet acceptable use guidelines and consent form. Retrieved from https://www.aldine.k12.tx.us/ePortal/document-management/docs/ 2009-Student-AUP-English.pdf.
4. Anchorage School District. (2010). Anchorage School District: Internet & electronic communication guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.asdk12.org/ forms/uploads/InternetGuidelines.pdf.
5. Anne Arundel County Public Schools. (n. d.). Student handbook: A guide to student rights and responsibilities, 2010-2011. Retrieved from http://www.aacps.org/html/studt/studenthandbook.pdf.
6. Atlanta Public Schools. (n. d.). 10|11 student handbook: Journey to excellence. Retrieved from http://www.atlantapublicschools.us/18611010817122770/ lib/18611010817122770/Student-Handbook-2010-2011-08242010.pdf.
7. Bertot, J. C., McClure, C. R., & Jaeger, P. T. (2008). The impacts of free public internet access on public library patrons and communities. Library Quarterly, 78(3), 285-301.
8. Birdville Independent School District. (n. d.). Guidelines: District educational social networking sites. Retrieved from http://schools. birdvilleschools.net/it/lib/it/Guidelines-for-Social-Media.pdf.
9. Boston Public Schools Communications Office. (2010). 2010-2011 Guide to the Boston Public Schools for Families and Students. Retrieved from http://www.bostonpublicschools.org/files/BPS%20Guide%20SY11%20English.pdf.
10. Braman, S. (2011). Defining information policy. Journal of Information Policy, 1, 1-5.
11. Cambron-McCabe, N. H. (2009). Students' speech rights in an electronic age. West's Education Law Reporter, 242, 493-503.
12. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools. (2005). Student internet use. (Policy code IJNDB-R). Retrieved from http://www.cms.k12.nc.us/cmsdepartments/ts/Documents/ Internet%20Acceptable%20Use%20Policy.pdf.
13. Consortium for School Networking. (n. d.). Acceptable use policies in web 2.0 & mobile era. Retrieved on May 18, 2011 from http://www.cosn.org/ Initiatives/Web2/AUPGuide/tabid/8139/Default.aspx.
14. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
15. Cyber Safety Campaign. (n. d.). Family resources. Retrieved on May 23, 2011 from http://www.bpscybersafety.org/familyresources.htm.
16. Dill, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2003). Ethics-related technology policies in schools. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 326-339.
17. Doninger v. Niehoff, 527 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2008).
18. th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10), 413-422.
19. Duxbury Public Schools. (2010). Internet connectivity and technology tools: Duxbury Public Schools acceptable use guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.duxbury.k12.ma.us/documents/AUG5-12-2010.pdf.
20. Flowers, B. F. & Rakes, G. C. (2000). Analyses of acceptable use policies regarding the Internet in selected K-12 schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(3), 351-365.
21. Granite School District. (2010). Article X. C.3. social networking policy. Retrieved from http://www.graniteschools.org/departments/superintendent/ districtpolicies/Instructional%20Technology/3.%20Social%20Networking%20policy. pdf.
22. Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2010). Trust online: Young adults' evaluation of web content. International Journal of Communication, 4, 468-494.
23. Houston Independent School District. (n. d.) Acceptable Use Policy for Electronic Services for Students. Retrieved from http://www.houstonisd.org/ HISDConnectEnglish/Images/PDF/StudentAUP-2010.pdf.
24. Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., boyd, d., & Cody R., et al. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: The MacArthur Foundation.
26. J. S. v. Blue Mountain School District, 593 F.3d 286 (3d Cir. 2010).
27. Kennedy, T. L. M., Smith, A., Wells, A. T., & Wellman, B. (2008) Networked families. Washington DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
28. Layshock v. Hermitage School District, 593 F. 3d 249 (3d Cir. 2010).
29. Lemke, C., Coughlin, E., Garcia, L., Reifsneider, D., & Baas, J. (2009). Leadership for Web 2.0 in education: Promise and reality. Culver City, CA: Metiri Group.
30. Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Washington DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
31. Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers' use of social networking site for intimacy, privacy, and self-expression. New Media & Society 10(3), 393-411.
32. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/ NatAtRisk/index.html.
33. New York City Department of Education. (n. d.). Internet acceptable use policy. Retrieved from http://schools.nyc.gov/Offices/EnterpriseOperations/DIIT/ WebServices/iaup/default.htm# preamble.
34. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35. Office of the Vice President. (1997). Statement of the vice president on the FCC E-rate decision. Retrieved on January 13, 2011 from http://www2.ed.gov/ PressReleases/05-1997/97-05-07.html.
36. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
37. st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/pdfs/SU09NationalFindingsStudents&Parents. pdf.
38. Quinn, D. A. (2003). Legal issues in educational technology: Implications for the legal system. Education Administration Quarterly, 39(2), 187-207.
39. Rowlands, I. (1996). Understanding information policy: Concepts, frameworks, and research tools. Journal of Information Science, 22(1), 13-25.
40. Rowlands, I., Eisenschitz, T., & Bawden, D. (2002). Frame analysis as a tool for understanding information policy. Journal of Information Science, 28(1), 31-38.
41. Sable, J., Plotts, C., and Mitchell, L. (2010). Characteristics of the 100 largest public elementary and secondary school districts in the United States: 2008-09 (NCES 2011-301). U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
42. Schon, D. A., & Rein, M. (1995). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
43. U. S. Department of Education. (2009). Digest of education statistics: 2009. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved on January 15, 2011 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/tables/dt09-425. asp.
44. U. S. Department of Education. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Washington DC: Office of Educational Technology, National Education Technology Plan 2010.
45. Verga, R. J. (2007). Policing their space: The First Amendment parameters of school discipline of student cyberspeech. Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal, 23.
46. Wisniewski v. Board of Education of Weedsport Central School District, 494 F.3d 34 (2d Cir. 2007).