Investigating models for preservice teachers' use of technology to support student-centered learning

Computers and Education

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 32-42

  Chen, Rong Ji ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Elementary education; Improving classroom teaching; Pedagogical issues; Secondary education

Indexed keywords

CONTEXTUAL FACTORS; DESIGN AND ANALYSIS; ELEMENTARY EDUCATION; FIELD EXPERIENCE; IMPROVING CLASSROOM TEACHING; OBSERVED DATA; PATH MODELS; PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES; PERCEIVED VALUE; PRE-SERVICE TEACHER; SELF EFFICACY; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; STUDENT-CENTERED; STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING; TEACHER EDUCATION; TEACHER PREPARATION; TEACHING AND LEARNING; TEACHING WITH TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY USE;

COMPUTER CRIME; EDUCATION COMPUTING; PERSONNEL TRAINING; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; STUDENTS; TECHNOLOGY;

TEACHING;

EID: 77949659785     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.015     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Baek Y., Jung J., and Kim B. What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education 50 (2008) 224-234
2. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 191-215
3. Bauer J., and Kenton J. Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn't happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 13 4 (2005) 519-546
4. Becker H.J. How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research in Computing in Education 26 3 (1994) 291-321
5. Bollen K.A. Structural equations with latent variables (1989), John Wiley & Sons, New York
6. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (Becta). (2009). Leading next generation learning. Accessed 02.03.2009.
7. Bullock D. Moving from theory to practice: An examination of the factors that preservice teachers encounter as they attempt to gain experience teaching with technology during field placement experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 12 2 (2004) 211-237
8. Cassidy S., and Eachus P. Developing the Computer User Self-Efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research 26 2 (2002) 133-153
9. Chen C.-H. Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration?. Journal of Educational Research 102 1 (2008) 65-75
10. Chen R.-J., and Ferneding K. Technology as a heuristic: How pre-service teachers learn to think about mathematics instruction using technology. In: Crawford C., Davis N., Price J., and Webber R. (Eds). Proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting of the society for information technology & teacher education (2003), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Norfolk, VA 3441-3444
11. Chen Y.-L. Modeling the determinants of Internet use. Computers & Education 51 (2008) 545-558
12. Clausen J.M. Beginning teachers' technology use: First-year teacher development and the institutional context's affect on new teachers' instructional technology use with students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39 3 (2007) 245-261
13. Cuban L. Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920 (1986), Teachers College Press, New York
14. Cuban L. Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom (2001), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
15. Czerniak C., Lumpe A., Haney J., and Beck J. Teachers' beliefs about using educational technology in the science classroom. International Journal of Educational Technology 1 2 (1999) 1-18
16. David F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (1989) 982-1003
17. Demetriadis S., Barbas A., Molohides A., Palaigeorgiou G., Psillos D., Vlahavas I., et al. "Cultures in negotiation": Teachers' acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of technology into schools. Computers & Education 41 1 (2003) 19-37
18. Dexter S., and Riedel E. Why improving preservice teacher educational technology preparation must go beyond college's walls. Journal of Teacher Education 54 4 (2003) 334-346
19. Drent M., and Meelissen M. Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively?. Computers & Education 51 (2008) 187-199
20. Ertmer P.A. Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?. Educational Technology Research and Development 53 4 (2005) 25-39
21. Ertmer P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich A., and York C.S. Exemplary technology-using teachers: Perceptions of factors influencing success. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 23 2 (2006) 55-61
22. Feather N.T. Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (1982), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
23. Ferneding K. Questioning technology: Electronic technologies and educational reform (2003), Peter Lang, New York
24. Franklin C. Factors that influence elementary teachers use of computers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 15 2 (2007) 267-293
25. Freidhoff J.R. Reflecting on the affordances and constraints of technologies and their impact on pedagogical goals. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 24 4 (2008) 117-122
26. Guerrero S., Walker N., and Dugdale S. Technology in support of middle grade mathematics: What have we learned?. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 23 1 (2004) 5-20
27. Harrison C., Comber C., Fisher T., Haw K., Lewin C., Lunzer E., et al. Impact2: The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment (2002), Becta, Coventry, UK
28. Henning J.E., Robinson V.L., Herring M.C., and McDonald T. Integrating technology during student teaching: An examination of teacher work samples. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 23 2 (2006) 71-76
29. Hermans R., Tondeur J., van Braak J., and Valcke M. The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education 51 4 (2008) 1499-1509
30. Higgins T.E., and Spitulnik M.W. Supporting teachers' use of technology in science instruction through professional development: A literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17 (2008) 511-521
31. Hu P.J.-H., Clark T.H.K., and Ma W.W. Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information & Management 41 (2003) 227-241
32. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2008). National Educational Technology Standards. Accessed 12.06.2009.
33. Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. (2005), Guilford Press, New York
34. Lim C.P., and Chai C.S. Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology 39 5 (2008) 807-828
35. Masalski W.J., and Elliott P.C. Technology-supposed mathematics learning environment: NCTM sixty-seven yearbook (2005), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA
36. McGinnis J.R., Kramer S., Shama G., Graeber A.O., Parker C.A., and Watanabe T. Undergraduates' attitudes and beliefs about subject matter and pedagogy measured periodically in a reform-based mathematics and science teacher preparation program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 8 (2002) 713-737
37. Mims C., Polly D., Shepherd C., and Inan F. Examining PT3 projects designed to improve preservice education. TechTrends 50 3 (2006) 16-24
38. Norton S., McRobbie C., and Cooper T. Exploring secondary mathematics teachers' reasons for not using computers in their teaching: Five case studies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 33 1 (2000) 87-109
39. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. (GPO Rep. No. 052-003-01409-2) (1995), United States Congress Report, Washington, DC
40. Pedhazur E.J. Multiple regression in behavioral research. 3rd ed. (1997), Harcourt Brace, Orlando, FL
41. Ropp M. Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in pre-service teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 31 4 (1999) 402-424
42. Russell M., Bebell D., O'Dwyer L., and O'Connor K. Examing teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education 54 4 (2003) 297-310
43. Sandholtz J.H., and Reilly B. Teachers, not technicians: Rethinking technical expectations for teachers. Teachers College Record 106 3 (2004) 487-512
44. Schmidt M. Middle grade teachers' beliefs about calculator use: Pre-project and two years later. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 21 1 (1999) 18-34
45. Schrum L. Technology professional development for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development 47 4 (1999) 83-90
46. Smith, P., Rudd, P., & Coghlan, M. (2008). Harnessing Technology: Schools Survey 2008 Accessed 12.01.2009.
47. Tearle P. ICT implementation: What makes the difference?. British Journal of Educational Technology 34 5 (2003) 567-583
48. Teo T. Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education 52 (2009) 302-312
49. Tondeur J., Valcke M., and van Braak J. A multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in primary education: Teacher and school characteristics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24 (2008) 494-506
50. Wang Y.-S., Wu M.-C., and Wang H.-Y. Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 40 1 (2009) 92-118
51. Wigfield A. Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review 6 (1994) 49-78
52. Wozney L., Venkatesh V., and Abrami P.C. Implementing computer technologies: Teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 14 1 (2006) 173-207