How much of a difference do principals make? An analysis of between-schools variation in academic achievement in Hong Kong public secondary schools

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 602-628

  Walker, Allan David ^a   Lee, Moosung ^b   Bryant, Darren A ^a  

^a THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

Author keywords

academic achievement; between schools variation; Hong Kong; principals; quality assurance and accountability; resource management; utilization of communication structures

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905395495     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: 17445124     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2013.875044     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Barber, M., Whelan, F., & Clark, M. (2010). Capturing the leadership premium: How the world's top school systems are building leadership capacity for the future. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/Social_Sector/our_practices/Education/Knowledge_Highlights/~/media/Reports/SSO/schoolleadership_final.ashx.
2. Berk, R. A. (2006). An introduction to ensemble methods for data analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 34, 263-295.
3. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2008). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5. Bryant, D. A., Walker, A., & Lee, M. (2013). The impact of international, national, and local forces on the enactment of quality leadership preparation programs. In M. Brundrett (Ed.), Principles of school leadership (2nd ed., pp. 221-243). London: Sage.
6. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7. Caldwell, B. J. (1998). Strategic leadership, resource management and effective school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 36, 445-461.
8. Caldwell, B. J. (2003). A blueprint for successful leadership in an era of globalization on learning. In P. Hallinger (Ed.), Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development: A global perspective (pp. 23-39). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
9. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
10. Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 305-331.
11. Cassady, J. C. (2001). Self-reported GPA and SAT: A methodological note. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(12). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=12
12. Chan, Y.-C., & Cheng, Y. C. (1993), A study of principals' instructional leadership in Hong Kong secondary schools. Educational Research Journal, 8, 56-67.
13. Cheng, Y. C. (1993). Profiles of organizational culture and effective schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4, 85-110.
14. Cheng, Y. C. (1994a). Locus of control as an indicator of Hong Kong teachers' job attitudes and perceptions of organizational characteristics. The Journal of Educational Research, 87, 180-188.
15. Cheng, Y. C. (1994b). Principal's leadership as a critical factor for school performance: Evidence from multi-levels of primary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 299-317.
16. Cheng, Y. C. (1999). The pursuit of school effectiveness and educational quality in Hong Kong. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10, 10-30.
17. Cheng, Y. C. (2009a). Hong Kong educational reforms in the last decade: Reform syndrome and new developments. International Journal of Educational Management, 23, 65-86.
18. Cheng, Y. C. (2009b). Teacher management and educational reforms: Paradigm shifts. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 39, 69-89.
19. Cheng, Y. C., & Chan, M. T. (2000). Implementation of school-based management: A multi-perspective analysis of the case of Hong Kong. International Review of Education, 46, 205-232.
20. Cheung, W. M., & Cheng, Y. C. (1996). A multi-level framework for self-management in school. International Journal of Educational Management, 10(1), 17-29.
21. Chui, H. S., Sharpe, F. G., & McCormick, J. (1996). Vision and leadership of principals in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(3), 30-48.
22. Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., & Kington, A. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes (Research Report DCSF-RR108). Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
23. Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Leithwood, K., & Kington, A. (2008). Research into the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: Policy and research contexts. School Leadership & Management, 28, 5-25.
24. Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2005). Educational leadership: Culture and diversity. London: Sage.
25. Earley, P., Evans, J., Collarbone, P., Gold, A., & Halpin, D. (2002). Establishing the current state of school leadership in England (Research Report RR 336). Norwich: Queen's Printer.
26. Education Bureau. (2011). Press releases and publications: Secondary education. Hong Kong: Author.
27. Education Department. (2002). Guidelines for principals' continuing professional development. Hong Kong: Author.
28. Education and Manpower Bureau. (2003). Permanent Secretary for Education and Manpower's letter on enhancing school development and accountability through school self-evaluation and external school review. Hong Kong: Author.
29. Finnigan, K. S. (2010). Principal leadership and teacher motivation under high-stakes accountability policies. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 161-189.
30. Friedkin, N. E., & Slater, M. R. (1994). School leadership and performance: A social network approach. Sociology of Education, 67, 139-157.
31. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451.
32. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of the empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5-44.
33. Hallinger, P., & Lee, M. (2011). A decade of education reform in Thailand: Broken promise or impossible dream? Cambridge Journal of Education, 41, 139-158.
34. Hallinger, P., & Lee, M. (2013a). Exploring principal capacity to lead reform of teaching and learning quality in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Development, 33, 305-315.
35. Hallinger, P., & Lee, M. (2013b). Mapping instructional leadership in Thailand: Has education reform impacted principal practice? Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1741143213502196
36. Hallinger, P., Walker, A., & Bajunid, I. (2005). Educational leadership in East Asia: Implications for education in a global society. UCEA Review, XLVI(1), 1-4.
37. Hallinger, P., Walker, A., & Lee, M. (2010). A study of successful practices in the IB program continuum. Hong Kong: Asia Pacific Center for Leadership and Change, Hong Kong Institute of Education.
38. Heck, R., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 626-658.
39. Hobcraft, J., & Sigle-Rushton, W. (2009). Identifying patterns of resilience using classification trees. Social Policy and Society, 8, 87-98.
40. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Hong, S. D., & Kim, D.-I. (2008). Application of decision tree techniques for identifying the students with learning disabilities. Korean Journal of Special Education, 43(3), 211-231.
42. Horng, E., & Loeb, S. (2010). New thinking about instructional leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(3), 66-69.
43. Hoyle, E., & Wallace, M. (2005). Educational leadership: Ambiguity, professionals and managerialism. London: Sage.
44. Ingram, D., Louis, K. S., & Schroeder, R. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106, 1258-1287.
45. Jacobson, S. (2011). Leadership effects on student achievement and sustained school success. International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 33-44.
46. Knapp, M. S., & Feldman, S. B. (2012). Managing the intersection of internal and external accountability: Challenge for urban school leadership in the United States. Journal of Educational Administration, 50, 666-694.
47. Kwan, P. (2009a). Beginning teachers' perceptions of school human resource practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29, 373-386.
48. Kwan, P. (2009b). The vice-principal experience as a preparation for the principalship. Journal of Educational Administration, 47, 191-205.
49. Kwan, P., & Walker, A. (2008). Vice-principalship in Hong Kong: Aspirations, competencies and satisfaction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 73-97.
50. Kwan, P., & Walker, A. (2010). Secondary school vice-principals: Commitment, challenge, efficacy and synchrony. British Education Research Journal, 36, 531-548.
51. Lee, J. C., & Dimmock, C. (1999). Curriculum leadership and management in secondary schools: A Hong Kong case. School Leadership & Management, 19, 455-481.
52. Lee, J. C., & Lo, L, L.-K. (2007). The accelerated schools for quality education project: Experiences of school change in Hong Kong, Improving Schools, 10, 180-198.
53. Lee, M., & Hallinger, P. (2012). National contexts influencing principals' time use and allocation: Economic development, societal culture, and educational system. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 461-482.
54. Lee, M., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2012). A distributed perspective on instructional leadership in International Baccalaureate (IB) schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 664-698.
55. Lee, M., Louis, K. S., & Anderson, S. (2012). Local education authorities and student learning: The effects of policies and practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 133-158.
56. Lee, M., Walker, A., & Chui, Y. L. (2012). Contrasting effects of instructional leadership practices on student learning in a high accountability context. Journal of Educational Administration, 50, 586-611.
57. Lee, S.-Y. (2005). Effects of school organizational culture and moral leadership on teachers' professional zone of acceptance. The Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 23(1), 71-92.
58. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28, 27-42.
59. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1997). Explaining variation in teachers' perceptions of principals' leadership: A replication. Journal of Educational Administration, 35, 312-331.
60. Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 529-261.
61. Leithwood, K., Steinbach, R., & Jantzi, D. (2002). School leadership and teachers' motivation to implement accountability policies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 94-119.
62. Levin, B., & Fullan, F. (2008). Learning about system renewal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36, 289-303.
63. Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, S. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/140885/1/Learning-from-Leadership_Final-Research-Report_July-2010.pdf
64. Louis, K. S., & Robinson, V. M. (2012). External mandates and instructional leadership: School leaders as mediating agents. Journal of Educational Administration, 50, 629-665.
65. Ma, X. (2006). Cognitive and affective changes as determinants for taking advanced mathematics courses in high school. American Journal of Education, 113, 123-149.
66. Mac Ruairc, G. (2010). This way please! Improving school leadership: The OECD way. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 42, 223-246.
67. May, H., Huff, J., & Goldring, E. (2012). A longitudinal study of principals' activities and student performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 417-439.
68. Muijs, D. (2011). Leadership and organisational performance: From research to prescription? International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 45-60.
69. Mulford, B., & Silins, H. (2003). Leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes - What do we know? Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 175-195.
70. Ng, P. T., & Chan, D. (2008). A comparative study of Singapore's school excellence model with Hong Kong's school-based management. International Journal of Educational Management, 22, 488-505.
71. O'Day, J. A. (2002). Complexity, accountability and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 293-329.
72. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. Paris: Author.
73. Pang, N. S. K. (1996). School values and teachers' feelings: A LISREL model. Journal of Educational Administration, 34, 64-83.
74. Penlington, C., Kington, A., & Day, C. (2008). Leadership in improving schools: A qualitative perspective. School Leadership & Management, 28, 65-82.
75. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39, 451-461.
76. Quinn, D. M. (2002). The impact of principal leadership behaviors on instructional practice and student engagement. Journal of Educational Administration, 40, 447-467.
77. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78. Raudenbush, S.W., Rowan, B., & Cheong, Y. F. (1992). Contextual effects on the self-perceived efficacy of high school teachers. Sociology of Education, 65, 150-167.
79. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635-674.
80. Russ, G. S., Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1990). Media selection and managerial characteristics in organizational communications. Management Communication Quarterly. 4, 151-175.
81. Sammons, P., Gu, Q, Day, C., & Ko, J. (2011). Exploring the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: Results from a study of academically improved and effective schools in England. International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 83-101.
82. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
83. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
84. Ting, S.-C. (2011). The effect of internal marketing on organizational commitment: Job involvement and job satisfaction as mediators. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 353-382.
85. Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 458-495.
86. Walker, A. (2004). Constitution and culture: Exploring the deep leadership structures of Hong Kong schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25, 75-94.
87. Walker, A. (2006). Divided they stand, united they fall: Reform disconnection in Hong Kong. Unpublished manuscript.
88. Walker, A. (2007). Leading authentically at the cross-roads of culture and context. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 257-273.
89. Walker, A., Bryant, D., & Lee. M. (2013). International patterns in principal preparation: Commonalities and variations in pre-service programmes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41, 405-434.
90. Walker, A., & Chen, S. C. (2007). Leader authenticity in intercultural school contexts. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35, 185-204.
91. Walker, A., & Dimmock, C. (2000). One size fits all? Teacher appraisal in a Chinese culture. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14, 155-178.
92. Walker, A., Dimmock, C., Chan, A., Chan, W. K., Cheung, M. B., & Wong, Y. H. (2000). Key qualities of the principalship in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Centre for the Development of Educational Leadership.
93. Walker, A., & Ko, J. (2011). Principal leadership in an era of accountability: A perspective from the Hong Kong context. School Leadership & Management, 31, 369-392.
94. Walker, A., & Kwan, P. (2009). Linking professional, school, demographic, and motivational factors to desire for principalship. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 590-615.
95. Walker, A., & Qian, H. (2012). Reform disconnection in China. Peabody Journal of Education, 87, 162-177.
96. Walker, A., Quong, T., Chan, W. K., Cheung, M. B., Wong, Y. H., & Wong, S. L. (2003). A NAFPhk professional development program - serving principals needs analysis. Program conversation 1: Accountability. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong and Manpower Bureau, HKSAR.
97. Wong, K.-C., Lam, Y. R., & Ho, L.-M. (2002), The effects of schooling on gender differences, British Educational Research Journal, 28, 827-843.
98. Yu, H. (2002). A shift in Hong Kong principals' leadership conceptions. Asia Pacific Education Review 3, 37-47.
99. Yu, H. (2005). Implementation of school-based management in Hong Kong: Recent development and future challenges. Journal of Educational Change, 6, 253-275.