Thinking in words: Language as an embodied medium of thought

Topics in Cognitive Science

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 371-389

  Dove, Guy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Action; Concepts; Embodied cognition; Language; Perceptual symbols; Simulation

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; SYMBOLISM; THINKING;

COGNITION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; SYMBOLISM; THINKING;

EID: 84905056807     PISSN: 17568757     EISSN: 17568765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tops.12102     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Adorni, R., & Proverbio, A. M. (2012). The neural manifestation of the word concreteness effect: An electrical neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 50, 880-891.
2. Altarriba, J., & Bauer, L. M. (2004). The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 389-410.
3. Amsel, B. D. (2011). Tracking real-time neural activation of conceptual knowledge using single-trial event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49, 970-983.
4. Amsel, B. D., & Cree, G. S. (2013). Semantic richness, concreteness, and object domain: An electrophysiological study. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 117-129.
5. Andrews, M., Frank, S., & Vigliocco, G. (in press). Reconciling embodied and distributional accounts of meaning in language. Topics in Cognitive Science, DOI: 10.1111/tops.10296. [Epub ahead of print]
6. Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review, 116, 463-498.
7. Barber, H. A., Otten, L. J., Kousta, S., & Vigliocco, G. (2013). Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task. Brain and Language, 125, 47-53.
8. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609.
9. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
10. Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245-284). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., Burton, M. W., & Mitchum, C. C. (2002). Grammatical class and imageability in aphasic word production: Their effects are independent. Journal of Neurolingusitics, 15, 353-371.
12. Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, 527-536.
13. Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 2728-2738.
14. Binder, J. R., Westbury, C., McKiernan, K., Possing, E., & Medler, D. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 905-917.
15. Bird, H., Howard, D., & Franklin, S. (2003). Verbs and nouns: The importance of being imageable. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 113-149.
16. Blei, D., Ng, A., & Jordan, M. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.
17. Bonner, M., Vesely, L., Price, C., Anderson, C., Richmond, L., Farag, C., Avants, B., & Grossman, M. (2009). Reversal of the concreteness effect in semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 568-579.
18. Bookheimer, S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 151-188.
19. Borghi, A. M. (2005). Object concepts and action. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory (pp. 8-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2009). Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2304-2309). Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society.
21. Boroditsky, L., & Prinz, J. (2008). What thoughts are made of. In G. Semin & E. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 98-115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Camp, E. (2009). Putting thoughts to work: Concepts, systematicity, and stimulus-independence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78, 275-311.
23. Carey, S., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2006). The development of human conceptual representations. In M. Johnson & Y. Munakata (Eds.), Processes of Change in Brain and Cognitive Development: Attention and Performance XXI (pp. 473-496). New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Carruthers, P. (2002). The cognitive functions of language. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(6), 657-674.
25. Chatterjee, A. (2010). Disembodying cognition. Language and. Cognition, 2, 79-116.
26. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27. Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., & Marshall, J. C. (Eds.) (1980). Deep Dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
28. Crepaldi, D., Aggujaro, S., Arduino, L. S., Zonca, G., Ghirardi, G., Inzaghi, M. G., Colombo, M., Chierchia, G., & Luzatti, C. (2006). Noun-verb dissociation in aphasia: The role of imageability and functional location of the lesion. Neuropsychologia, 44, 73-89.
29. Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tviskin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970-974.
30. Dennett, D. (1996). Kinds of minds: Toward an understanding of consciousness. New York: Harper Collins.
31. Dove, G. O. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110, 412-431.
32. Dove, G. O. (2011). On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition. Frontiers in Cognition, 1, 1-13. Article 242.
33. Fischer, M., & Zwaan, R. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825-850.
34. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Franklin, S., Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1995). Abstract word anomia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 549-566.
36. Gallese, V. (2009). Motor abstraction: A neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood. Psychological Research, 73, 486-498.
37. Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455-479.
38. Giesbrecht, B., Gamblin, C., & Swaab, T. (2004). Separable effects of semantic priming and imageability on word processing in human cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 521-529.
39. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
40. Glenberg, A. M. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 1, 586-596.
41. Glenberg, A. M., de Vega, M., & Graesser, A. C. (2008). Framing the debate. In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 1-10). Oxford, UK.: Oxford University Press.
42. Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, Comprehension and production. Cortex, 48, 905-922.
43. Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2006). Distinct and common cortical activations for multimodal semantic categories. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 214-222.
44. Goodglass, H., Hyde, M. R., & Blumsten, S. E. (1969). Frequency, picturability and availability of nouns in aphasia. Cortex, 5, 104-119.
45. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42, 335-346.
46. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301-307.
47. Holcomb, P. J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J. E., & West, W. C. (1999). Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 721-742.
48. Huang, H., Lee, C., & Federmeier, K. D. (2010). Imagine that! ERPs provide evidence for distinct hemispheric contributions to the processing of concrete and abstract concepts. Neuroimage, 49, 1116-1123.
49. Hurley, S. (2008). The shared circuits model (SCM): How control, mirroring, simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 1-58.
50. Jackendoff, R. (2007). Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The state of the art. The Linguistic Review, 24, 347-401.
51. Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006). Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: A case-series comparison. Brain, 129, 2132-2147.
52. Katz, R. B., & Goodglass, H. (1990). Deep dysphasia: Analysis of a rare form of repetition disorder. Brain and Language, 39, 153-185.
53. Kemmerer, D. (2010). How words capture visual experience: The perspective from cognitive neuroscience. In B. Malt & P. Wolff (Eds.), Words and the world: How words capture human experience (pp. 289-329). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54. Kounios, J., Green, D. L., Payne, L., Fleck, J. I., Grondin, R., & McRae, K. (2009). Semantic richness and the activation of concepts in semantic memory: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1282, 95-102.
55. Kousta, S., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 14-34.
56. Kousta, S., Vinson, D., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112, 473-481.
57. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
60. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
61. Lehmann, D., Pascual-Marqui, R., Strik, W., & Koenig, T. (2009). Core networks for visual-concrete and abstract thought content: A brain electric microstate analysis. Neuroimage, 49, 1073-1079.
62. Levy-Drori, S., & Henik, A. (2006). Concreteness and context availability in lexical decisión tasks. American Journal of Psychology, 119, 45-65.
63. Lindenberg, R., & Scheef, L. (2007). Supramodal language comprehension: Role of the left temporal lobe for listening and Reading. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2407-2415.
64. Loiselle, M., Rouleau, I., Nguyen, D. K., Dubeau, F., Macoir, J., Whatmough, C., Lepore, F., & Joubert, S. (2012). Comprehension of concrete and abstract words in patients with selective anterior temporal lobe resection and in patients with amygdalo-hippocamectomy. Neuropsychologia, 50, 630-639.
65. Louwerse, M. (2011). Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 273-302.
66. Louwerse, M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114, 96-104.
67. Louwerse, M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2008). Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic. In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 309-326). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
68. Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior and Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203-208.
69. Luzzatti, C., Raggi, R., Zonca, G., Pistarini, C., Contardi, A., & Pinna, G. (2002). Verb-noun double dissociation in aphasic lexical impairments: the role of word frequency and imageability. Brain and Language, 81, 432-444.
70. Machery, E. (2009). Doing without concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.
71. Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology. Paris, 102, 59-70.
72. Martin, N., & Saffran, E. M. (1990). Repetition and verbal STM in transcortical sensory aphasia: A case study. Brain and Language, 39, 254-288.
73. Mellet, E., Tzourio, N., Denis, M., & Mazoyer, B. (1998). Cortical anatomy of mental imagery of concrete nouns based on their dictionary definition. NeuroReport, 9, 803-808.
74. Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48, 788-804.
75. Mirolli, M., & Parisi, D. (2011). Towards a Vygotskyan cognitive robotics: The role of language as a cognitive tool. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 298-311.
76. Nittono, H., Suehiro, M., & Hori, T. (2002). Word imageability and N400 in an incidental memory paradigm. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 44, 219-229.
77. Noppeney, U., & Price, C. J. (2004). Retrieval of abstract semantics. Neuroimage, 22, 164-170.
78. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
79. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
80. Paivio, A. (2013). Dual coding theory, word abstractness, and emotion: A critical review of Kousta et al. (2011). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 282-287.
81. Papagno, C., Fogliata, A., Catricala, E., & Miniussi, C. (2009). The lexical processing of abstract and concrete nouns. Brain Research, 1263, 78-86.
82. Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., Siakaluk, P. D., Bodner, G. E., & Pope, J. (2008). There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 161-167.
83. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329-347.
84. Price, C. J. (2009). The anatomy of language: A review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 62-88.
85. Pulvermuller, F. (2001). Brain reflections of words and their meaning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 517-524.
86. Pulvermüller, F. (2010). Brain embodiment of syntax and grammar: Discrete combinatorial mechanisms spelt out in neuronal circuits. Brain and Language, 112(3), 167-179.
87. Rabovsky, M., Sommer, W., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2012). The time course of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1-9, Article 11.
88. Recchia, G., & Jones, M. N. (2012). The semantic richness of abstract concepts. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1-16.
89. Reilly, J., & Peelle, J. E. (2008). Effects of semantic impairment on language processing in semantic dementia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 32-43.
90. Richardson, J. (1975). Concreteness and imageability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 235-249.
91. Riordan, B., & Jones, M. N. (2010). Redundancy in perceptual and linguistic experience: Comparing feature-based and distributional models of semantic information. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 303-345.
92. Rowlands, M. (2003). Externalism: Putting mind and world back together again. Ithaca, NY: McGill-Queen's University Press.
93. Rowlands, M. (2010). The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
94. Rueschmeyer, S., van Rooji, D., Lindemann, O., Willems, R., & Bekkering, H. (2010). The function of words: distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1844-1851.
95. Sabsevitz, D., Medler, D., Seidenberg, M., & Binder, J. (2005). Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. Neuroimage, 27, 188-200.
96. Sakreida, K., Scorolli, C., Menz, M. M., Heim, S., Borghi, A., & Binkofski, F. (2013). Are abstract words embodied? An fMRI investigation at the interface between language and motor cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1-13.
97. Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1991). Why are abstract concepts hard to understand? In P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 223-250). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
98. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Different context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 82-102.
99. Scorolli, C., Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., Nicoletti, R., Riggio, L., & Borghi, A. (2011). Abstract and concrete sentences, embodiment and languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. Article 227.
100. Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2007). Sentence comprehension and action: effector specific modulation of the motor system. Brain Research, 1130, 119-124.
101. Shallice, T., & Cooper, R. (2013). Is there a semantic system for abstract words? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1-10.
102. Shallice, T., & Warrington, E. K. (1975). Word recognition in a phonemic dyslexic patient. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 187-199.
103. Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.
104. Simmons, K. W., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). The similarity-in-topography principle: Reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 451-486.
105. Swaab, T., Baynes, K., & Knight, R. (2002). Separable effects of priming and imageability on word processing: an ERP study. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 99-103.
106. Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., Fazio, F., Rizzolati, G., Cappa, S., & Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 273-281.
107. Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S. T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. (2013). The neural representation of abstract words: The role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex, [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht025.
108. Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M., & Kousta, S. (2009). Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition, 1, 219-247.
109. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioral, electrophysiological, neurophysiological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 407-426.
110. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 422-488.
111. Vygotsky, L. (2012). Thought and language (Revised and expanded edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
112. Wang, J., Conder, J. A., Blitzer, D. N., & Shinkareva, S. V. (2010). Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: a meta-analysis of imaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1459-1468.
113. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829-853.
114. Wattenmaker, W., & Shoben, E. (1987). Context and the recallability of concrete and abstract sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 140-150.
115. Weiskopf, D. (2007). Concept empiricism and the vehicles of thought. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 156-183.
116. Weiskopf, D. (2010). Embodied cognition and linguistic comprehension. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41, 294-304.
117. West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2002). Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 363-375.
118. Whitney, C., Kirk, M., O'Sullivan, J., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Jerfferies, E. (2011). The neural organization of semantic control: TMS evidence for a distributed network in left inferior and posterior middle temporal gyrus. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1066-1075.
119. Willems, R. M., & Casasanto, D. (2011). Flexibility in embodied understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. Article 116.
120. Willems, R. M., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2010). Body-specific representation of action words: Neural evidence from right- and left-handers. Psychological Science, 21, 67-74.
121. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625-636.
122. Wilson, R., & Foglia, L. (2011). Embodied Cognition. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/embodied-cognition/.
123. Yap, M. J., Pexman, P. M., Wellsby, M., Hargreaves, I. S., & Huff, M. J. (2012). An abundance of riches: cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1-10. Article 72.
124. Yap, M. J., Tan, S. E., Pexman, P. M., & Hargreaves, I. S. (2011). Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 742-750.
125. Yi, H. A., Moore, P., & Grossman, M. (2007). Reversal of the concreteness effect for verbs in semantic dementia. Neuropsychology, 21, 9-19.