Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics

Cortex

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 788-804

  Meteyard, Lotte ^a   Cuadrado, Sara Rodriguez ^b   Bahrami, Bahador ^c,d,e   Vigliocco, Gabriella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Categories; Concepts; Embodiment; Grounding; Multiple semantics; Representation; Semantic; Sensory motor; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EMBODIMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; SEMANTICS;

CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEUROSCIENCES; SEMANTICS;

EID: 84861885202     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (116)

1. Acres K. The Organisation of the Ventral Temporal Object Processing Stream. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cambridge, Pembroke College, 2008.
2. Amedi A., Floel A., Knetch S., Zohary E., Cohen L.G. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the occipital pole interferes with verbal processing in blind subjects. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7(11):1266-1270.
3. Andrews M., Vinson D., Vigliocco G. Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review 2009, 116(3):463-498.
4. Bak T.H., Hodges J.R. Motor neurone disease, dementia and aphasia: Coincidence, co-occurrence or continuum?. Journal of Neurology 2001, 248:260-270.
5. Bak T.H., O'Donoval D.G., Xuereb J.H., Boniface S., Hodges J.R. Selective impairment of verb processing associated with pathological changes in Brodmann areas 44 and 45 and the motor neurone disease-dementia-aphasia syndrome. Brain 2001, 124:103-120.
6. Bar M., Tootell R.B.H., Schacter D.L., Greve D.N., Fischl B., Mendola J.D., et al. Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit visual object recognition. Neuron 2001, 29(2):529-535.
7. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Brain and Behavioural Sciences 1999, 22:577-660.
8. Barense M.D., Bussey T.J., Lee A.C.H., Rogers T.T., Davies R.R., Saksida L.M., et al. Functional specialization in the human medial temporal lobe. The Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(44):10239-10246.
9. Barsalou L.W., Santos A., Simmons W.K., Wilson C.D. Language and simulation in conceptual processing. Symbols, Embodiment, and Meaning 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford. M. De Vega, A.M. Glenberg, A. Graesser (Eds.).
10. Bedny M., Caramazza A., Grossman E., Pascual-Leone A., Saxe R. Concepts are more than percepts: The case of action verbs. The Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(44):11347-11353.
11. Beilock S.L., Lyons I.M., Mattarella-Micke A., Nusbaum H.C., Small S.L. Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 2008, 105:13269-13273.
12. Bergen B., Wheeler K. Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language 2010, 112:150-158.
13. Boulenger V., Mechtouff L., Thobois S., Broussolle E., Jeannerod M., Nazir T.A. Word processing in Parkinson's disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns. Neuropsychologia 2007, 46(2):743-756.
14. Bright P., Moss H., Tyler L.K. Unitary vs multiple semantics: PET studies of word and picture processing. Brain and Language 2004, 89(3):417-432.
15. Buccino G., Riggio L., Melli G., Binkofski F., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioural study. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 24:355-363.
16. Caramazza A., Hillis A.E., Rapp B.C., Romani C. The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions?. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1990, 7(3):161-189.
17. Caramazza A., Mahon B.Z. The organization of conceptual knowledge: The evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(8):354-361.
18. Chatterjee A. The neural organization of spatial thought and language. Seminars in Speech and Language 2008, 29:226-238.
19. Chatterjee A. Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition 2010, 2(1):79-116.
20. Clark A. Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again 1998, MIT Press, London, UK.
21. Collins A.M., Loftus E.F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 1975, 82(6):407-428.
22. Corbett F., Jefferies E., Ehsan S., Lambon Ralph M.A. Different impairments of semantic cognition in semantic dementia and semantic aphasia: Evidence from the non-verbal domain. Brain 2009, 132(Pt 9):2593-2608.
23. Cotelli M., Manenti R., Cappa S.F., Geroldi C., Zanetti O., Rossini P.M., et al. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on action naming in patients with Alzheimer disease. Archives of Neurology 2006, 63:1602-1604.
24. Crescentini C., Mondolo F., Biasutti E., Shallice T. Supervisory and routine processes in noun and verb generation in nondemented patients with Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(2):434-447.
25. Damasio A.R. The brain binds entities and events by multiregional activation from convergence zones. Neural Computation 1989, 1:123-132.
26. Damasio A.R., Damasio H. Cortical systems for retrieval of concrete knowledge: The convergence zone framework. Large-scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain 1994, Chapter 4, MIT Press, London, UK. C. Koch, J.L. Davis (Eds.).
27. De Volder A.G., Toyama H., Kimura Y., Kiyosawa M., Nakano H., Vanlierde A., et al. Auditory triggered mental imagery of shape involves visual association areas in early blind humans. NeuroImage 2001, 14:129-139.
28. Devlin J.T., Russell R.P., Davis M.H., Price C.J., Wilson J., Moss H.E., et al. Susceptibility-induced loss of signal: Comparing PET and fMRI on a semantic task. NeuroImage 2000, 11:589-600.
29. Farah M.J., McClelland J.L. A computational model of semantic impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1991, 120(4):339-357.
30. Fodor J.A. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind 1987, MIT Press, London, Cambridge, MA.
31. Fodor J.A. The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology 1983, MIT Press, London.
32. Frith C. Making up the Mind: How the Brain Creates our Mental World 2007, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
33. Gallese V., Lakoff G. The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005, 22(3/4):455-479.
34. Glenberg A.M., Kaschak M.P. The body's contribution to language. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 2003, vol. 43:93-126. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. B.H. Ross (Ed.).
35. Glenberg A.M., Robertson D.A. Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 2000, 43:379-401.
36. Glenberg A.M., Sato M., Cattaneo L. Use-induced motor plasticity affects the processing of abstract and concrete language. Current Biology 2008, 18:R290-R291.
37. Rothi L.J., Heilman K.M., Watson R.T. Pantomime comprehension and ideomotor apraxia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1985, 48(3):207-210.
38. Harnad S. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 1990, 42:335.
39. Hauk O., Shtyrov Y., Pulvermuller F. The time course of action and action-word comprehension in the human brain as revealed by neurophysiology. Journal of Physiology - Paris 2008, 102:50-58.
40. Jackendoff R. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. (Large format paperback) ed 2002, Oxford University Press.
41. Jefferies E., Patterson K., Jones R.W., Lambon Ralph M.A. Comprehension of concrete and abstract words in semantic dementia. Neuropsychology 2009, 4:492-499.
42. Johnson-Laird P. The Computer and the Mind: An Introduction to Cognitive Science 1993, Fontana Press, Glasgow.
43. Kemmerer D. Visual and motor features of the meanings of action verbs: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. In Roberto G de Almeida and Christina Manouilidou (Eds), Verb Concepts: Cognitive Science Perspectives on Verb Representation and Processing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, in press.
44. Kemmerer D. How words capture visual experience: The perspective from cognitive neuroscience. Words and the Mind: How Words Capture Human Experience, Chapter 14 2010, 289-329. Oxford University Press. B. Malt, P. Wolff (Eds.).
45. Kemmerer D., Castillo J.G., Talavage T., Patterson S., Wiley C. Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: Evidence from fMRI. Brain and Language 2008, 107(1):16-43.
46. Kossyln S.M., Thompson W.L., Kim I.J., Alpert N.M. Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex. Cognitive Neuroscience: A Reader 2000, 202-208. Blackwell, Oxford. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
47. Kousta S-T, Vigliocco G, Vinson DP, Andrews M, and Del Campo E. The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, in press.
48. Kousta S.-T., Vinson D.P., Vigliocco G. The role of emotional valence in the processing of words. Cognition 2009, 112:473-481.
49. Lakoff G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind 1987, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
50. Landauer T.K., Dumais S.T. A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 1997, 104(2):211-240.
51. Lambon Ralph M.A., Graham K., Patterson K., Hodges J. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Evidence from concept definitions by patients with semantic dementia. Brain and Language 1999, 70(3):309-335.
52. Lerner Y., Hendler T., Ben-Bashat D., Harel M., Malach R. A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2001, 11(4):287-297.
53. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation 1989, MIT Press, London, England.
54. Liepmann H. Der weitere Krankheitsverlauf bei dem einseitig Apraktischen und der Gehirnbefund auf Grund von Serienschnitten. Monatsschrift fur Psychiatrie und Neurologie 1905, 17:283-311.
55. Lyons I.M., Mattarella-Micke A., Cieslak M., Nusbaum H.C., Small S.L., Beilock S.L. The role of personal experience in the neural processing of action-related language. Brain and Language 2009, 112(3):214-222.
56. Maetzig S., Druks J., Masterson J., Vigliocco G. Object vs. action naming: A double dissociation?. Cortex 2009, 45:738-758.
57. Mahon B.Z., Anzaellotti S., Schwarzbach J., Zampini M., Caramazza A. Category-specific organization in the human brain does not require visual experience. Neuron 2009, 63:397-405.
58. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology - Paris 2008, 102(1-3):59-70.
59. Martin A. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology 2007, 58:25-45.
60. Martin A., Wiggs C.L., Ungerleider L.G., Haxby J.V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 1996, 379:649-652.
61. Meteyard L., Bahrami B., Vigliocco G. Motion detection and motion verbs: Language affects low-level visual perception. Psychological Science 2007, 18(11).
62. Meteyard L., Vigliocco G. The role of sensory and motor information in semantic representation: A review. Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach, Chapter 15 2008, 293-312. Elsevier, London. P. Calvo, T. Gomila (Eds.).
63. Morsella, Miozzo Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2002, 28(3):555-563.
64. Murray E.A., Bussey T.J. Perceptual-mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3(4):142-151.
65. McRae K., de Sa V.R., Seidenberg M.S. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1997, 126(2):99-130.
66. Navarrete, Costa Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 53:359-377.
67. Negri G.A.L., Rumiatti R.I., Zadini A., Ukmar M., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2007, 24(8):795-816.
68. Newell A. Physical symbol systems. Cognitive Science 1980, 4:135-183.
69. Newell A., Simon H.A. Human Problem Solving 1972, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
70. Ochipa C., Rothi L.J.G., Heilman K.M. Conceptual apraxia in alzheimer's disease. Brain 1992, 115(4):1061-1071.
71. Oliveri M., Finocchiaro C., Shapiro K., Gangitano M., Caramazza A., Pascual-Leone A. All talk and no action: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of motor cortex activation during action word production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16(3):374-381.
72. Paivio A. Imagery and Verbal Processes 1971, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
73. Paivio A. Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford Psychology Series 1986, 9.
74. Patterson K., Nestor P.J., Rogers T.T. Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2007, 8:976-987.
75. Pinker S. The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature 2007, Penguin Group, London.
76. Plaut D.C. Graded modality-specific specialisation in semantics: A computational account of optic aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2002, 19:603-639.
77. Pobric G., Lambon-Ralph M., Jefferies E. The role of the anterior temporal lobes in the comprehension of concrete and abstract words: rTMS evidence. Cortex 2009, 45:1104-1110.
78. Pulvermüller F., Harle M., Hummel F. Walking or talking? Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain and Language 2001, 78:143-168.
79. Pulvermüller F., Hauk O., Nikulin V., Ilmoneimi R.J. Functional interaction of language and action: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 21:793-797.
80. Pulvermüller F. Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:253-336.
81. Pulvermüller F. Brain reflections of words and their meaning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5(12):517-524.
82. Pylyshyn Z.W. Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science 1985, MIT Press, London, England. 2nd ed.
83. Quillian M.R. Semantic memory. Semantic Information Processing 1968, 216-271. MIT Press, London, England. M. Minsky (Ed.).
84. Rapp B.C., Hillis A.E., Caramazza A. The role of representations in cognitive theory: More or multiple semantics and the agnosias. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1993, 10(3):235-249.
85. Rogers T.T., Lambon Ralph M.A., Garrard P., Bozeat S., McClelland J.L., Hodges J.R., et al. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review 2004, 111(1):205-235.
86. Sahin N., Pinker S., Cash S.S., Schomer D., Halgren E. Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca's area. Science 2009, 326:445-449.
87. Schnur T.T., Schwartz M.F., Kimberg D.Y., Hirshorn E., Coslett H.B., Thompson-Schill S.L. Localizing interference during naming: Convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca's area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 2009, 106(1):322-327.
88. Schwarzbauer C., Mildner T., Heinke W., Brett M., Deichmann R. Dual echo EPI - The method of choice for fMRI in the presence of magnetic field inhomogeneities?. NeuroImage 2010, 49(1):316-326.
89. Searle J. Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1980, 3:417-457.
90. Simmons K.W., Barsalou L.W. The similarity-in-topography principle: Reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20(3/4/5/6):451-486.
91. Simmons W.K., Hamann S.B., Harenski C.N., Hu X.P., Barsalou L.W. fMRI evidence for word association and situated simulation in conceptual processing. Journal of Physiology - Paris 2008, 102:106-119.
92. Simmons W.K., Martin A. The anterior temporal lobes and the functional architecture of semantic memory. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2009, 15(5):645-649.
93. Simon H.A. Information processing models of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 1979, 30:363-396.
94. Siri S., Tettamanti M., Cappa S., Della Rosa P., Saccuman C., Scifo P., et al. The neural substrate of naming events. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:171-177.
95. Smith E.E., Shoben E.J., Rips L.J. Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review 1974, 81(3):214-241.
96. Speer N.K., Reynolds J.R., Swallow K.M., Zacks J.M. Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences. Psychological Science 2009, 20(8):989-999.
97. Thompson-Schill S.L. Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: Inferring " how" from " where" Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:280-292.
98. Toni I., de Lange F.P., Noordzij M.L., Hagoort P. Language beyond action. Journal of Physiology - Paris 2008, 102(1-3):71-79.
99. Tyler L.K., Moss H.E. Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5(6):244-252.
100. Tyler L.K., Stamatakis E.A., Bright P., Acres K., Abdallah S., Rodd J.M., et al. Processing objects at different levels of specificity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16(3):351-362.
101. Taylor K.I., Stamatakis E.A., Tyler L.K. Crossmodal integration of object features: Voxel-based correlations in brain-damaged patients. Brain 2009, 132(3):671-683.
102. van Elk M., van Schie H.T., Zwaan R.A., Bekkering H. The functional role of motor activation in language processing: Motor cortical oscillations support lexical-semantic retrieval. NeuroImage 2010, 50(2):665-677.
103. Vigliocco G., Meteyard L., Andrews M., Kousta S. Towards a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition 2009, 1(2):219-247.
104. Vigliocco G., Vinson D.P., Druks J., Barber H., Cappa S.F. Nouns and verbs in the brain? A review of behavioural, electrophysiological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews 2011, 35(3):407-426.
105. Vigliocco G., Vinson D.P., Lewis W., Garrett M.F. Representing the meaning of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology 2004, 48:422-488.
106. Varela F.J., Thompson E., Rosch E. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience 1991, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
107. Vigliocco G., Warren J., Siri S., Arciuli J., Scott S., Wise R. The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16:1790-1796.
108. Vogt P. The physical symbol grounding problem. Cognitive Systems Research 2002, 3(3):429-457.
109. Wallentin M., Ellegaard T., Ostergaard S., Ostergaard L., Roepstorff A. Motion verb sentences activate left posterior middle temporal cortex despite static context. NeuroReport 2005, 16(6):649-652.
110. Warrington E.K., Shallice T. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 1984, 107(Pt 3):829-854.
111. Willems R.M., Hagoort P., Casasanto D. Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right- and left-handers. Psychological Science 2010, 21:67-74.
112. Willems R.M., Toni I., Hagoort P., Casasanto D. Neural dissociations between action verb understanding and motor imagery. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 22(10):2387-2400.
113. Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9(4):625-636.
114. Wu L.L., Barsalou L.W. Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica 2009, 132:173-189.
115. Zwaan R. Time in language, situation models and mental simulation. Language Learning 2008, 58(S1):13-26.
116. Zwaan R., Ross B.H. The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 2004, vol. 44:35-62. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.