The similarity-in-topography principle: Reconciling theories of conceptual deficits

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 20, Issue 3-6, 2003, Pages 451-486

  Simmons, W Kyle ^a   Barsalou, Lawrence W ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN NERVE CELL; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION;

EID: 0038147948     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643290342000032     Document Type: Review

References (128)

1. Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Cooper, G., & Damasio, A. R. (2000). A role for somatosensory cortices in the visual recognition of emotion as revealed by three-dimensional lesion mapping. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2683-2690.
2. Anderson, A. K., & Phelps, E. A. (2000). Perceiving emotion: There's more than meets the eye. Current Biology, 10, R551-R554.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition, 11, 211-227.
4. Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 629-654.
5. Barsalou, L. W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation:Advances in research and theory, Vol. 27 (pp. 1-64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
7. Barsalou, L. W. (in press-a). Abstraction as dynamic construal in perceptual symbol systems. In L. Gershkoff-Stowe & D. Rakison (Eds.), Building object categrories. Carnegie Symposium Series. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Barsalou, L. W. (in press-b). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes.
9. Barsalou, L. W., Sloman, S. A., & Chaigneau, S. E. (in press). The HIPE theory of function. In L. Carlson & E. van der Zee (Eds.), Representing functional features for language and space: Insights from perception, categorization and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Bechtel, W., & McCauley, R. N. (1999). Heuristic identity theory (or back to the future): The mind-body problem against the background of research strategies in cognitive neuroscience. Paper presented at the Twenty-First Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, New Jersey, USA.
11. Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (1993). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ganz, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual-pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information-processing. Psychological Review, 83, 1-36.
13. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ganz, L. (1977). Temporal studies with flashed gratings: Inferences about human transient and sustained channels. Vision Research, 17, 861-865.
14. Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 213-261.
15. Cappelletti, M., Waley-Cohen, H., Butterworth, B., & Kopelman, M. (2000). A selective loss of the ability to read and to write music. Neurocase, 6, 321-331.
16. Caramazza, A., Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B. C., & Romani, C. (1990). The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 161-189.
17. Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1-34.
18. Chen, X. (1995). Taxonomic changes and the particlewave debate in early 19th-century Britain. Studies in History and Philosopby of Science, 26, 251-271.
19. Cipolotti, L., Butterworth, B., & Denes, G. (1991). A specific deficit for numbers in a case of dense acalculia. Brain, 114, 2619-2637.
20. Coltheart, M., Inglis, L., Cupples, L., Michie, P., Bates, A., & Budd, B. (1998). A semantic subsystem of visual attributes. Neurocase, 4, 353-370.
21. Coslett, H. B., Brashear, H. R., & Heilman, K. M. (1984). Pure word deafness after bilateral primary auditory-cortex infarcts. Neurology, 34, 347-352.
22. Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (in press). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
23. Crosson, B., Moberg, P. J., Boone, J. R., Rothi, L. J., & Raymer, A. (1997). Category-specific naming deficit for medical terms after dominant thalamic/capsular hemorrhage. Brain and Language, 60, 407-442.
24. Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25-62.
25. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes'error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York. Grosset/Putnam.
26. Damasio, A. R., & Damasio, H. (1994). Cortical systems for retrieval of concrete knowledge: The convergence zone framework. In C. Koch & J. L. Davis (Eds.), Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain. Computational neuroscience (pp. 61-74). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
27. Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature, 380, 499-505.
28. Davidson, R. J. (2000). Cognitive neuroscience needs affective neuroscience (and vice versa). Brain and Cognition, 42, 89-92.
29. Davidson, R. J., Jackson, D. C., & Kalin, N. H. (2000). Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 890-906.
30. De Valois, R., & De Valois, K. (1988). Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. De Renzi, E., & Spinnler, H. (1967). Impaired performance on color tasks in patients with hemispheric damage. Cortex, 3, 194-217.
32. Dodd, J., & Kelly, J. P. (1991). Trigeminal system. In E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, & T. M. Jessell (Eds.), Principles of neural science (3rd ed., pp. 701-710). New York: Elsevier.
33. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Farah, M. J. (2000). The neural bases of mental imagery. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 965-974). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Farah, M. J. (2001). Consciousness. In B. Rapp (Ed.), The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 159-182). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
36. Farah, M. J., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 339-357.
37. Forde, E. M. E., Francis, D., Riddoch, M. J., Rumiati, R. I., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). On the links between visual knowledge and naming: A single case study of a patient with a category-specific impairment for living things. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 403-458.
38. Fujita, I., Tanaka, K., Ito, M., & Cheng, K. (1992). Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 360, 343-346.
39. Funnell, E., & De Mornay Davies, P. (1996). JBR: A reassessment of concept familiarity and a category-specific disorder for living things. Neurocase, 2, 461-474.
40. Gainotti, G., Silveri, M. C., Daniele, A., & Giustolisi, L. (1995). Neuroanatomical correlates of category-specific semantic disorders: A critical survey. Memory, 3, 247-264.
41. Garcia, J., & Koelling, R. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science, 4, 123-124.
42. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform "face area" increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 568-573.
43. Ghez, C. (1991). Voluntary movement. In E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, & T. M. Jessell (Eds.), Principles of neural science (3rd ed., pp. 609-625). New York: Elsevier.
44. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-18.
45. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558-565.
46. Gonnerman, L. M., Andersen, E. S., Devlin, J. T., Kempler, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). Double dissociation of semantic categories in Alzheimer's disease. Brain and Language, 57, 254-279.
47. Goulet, S., & Murray, E. A. (2001). Neural substrates of crossmodal association memory in monkeys: The amygdala versus the anterior rhinal cortex. Behavioral Neuroscience, 115, 271-284.
48. Grezes, J., & Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12, 1-19.
49. Hart, J., & Gordon, B. (1992). Neural subsystems for object knowledge. Nature, 359, 60-64.
50. Hasson, U., Hendler, T., Ben Bashat, D., & Malach, R. (2001). Vase or face? A neural correlate of shape-selective grouping processes in the human brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 744-753.
51. Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science, 293, 2425-2430.
52. Higuchi, S., & Miyashita, Y. (1996). Formation of mnemonic neuronal responses to visual paired associates in inferotemporal cortex is impaired by perirhinal and entorhinal lesions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 739-743.
53. Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation. Brain, 114, 2081-2094.
54. Hochberg, J. (1998) Gestalt theory and its legacy: Organization in eye and brain, in attention and mental representation. In J. Hochberg (Ed.), Perception and cognition at century's end: Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 253-306). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
55. Holdstock, J. S., Gutnikov, S. A., Gaffan, D., & Mayes, A. R. (2000). Perceptual and mnemonic matching-to-sample in humans: Contributions of the hippocampus, perirhinal and other medial temporal lobe cortices. Cortex, 36, 301-322.
56. Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. E. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 453-509.
57. Jeannerod, M. (1995). Mental-imagery in the motor context. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1419-1432.
58. Johnson, K. E., & Mervis, C. B. (1997). Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 248-277.
59. Kan, I. P., Barsalou, L. W., Solomon, K. O., Minor, J. K., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2003). Role of mental imagery in a property verification task: fMRI evidence for perceptual representations of conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 525-540.
60. Kandel, E. R. (1991). Perception of motion, depth, and form. In E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, & T. M. Jessell (Eds.), Principles of neural science (3rd ed., pp. 440-466). New York: Elsevier.
61. Kanwisher, N., Woods, R. P., Iacoboni, M., & Mazziotta, J. C. (1997). A locus inhuman extrastriate cortex for visual shape analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 133-142.
62. Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1989). The nature and occurrence of holistic processing. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 357-386). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
63. Kobatake, E., & Tanaka, K. (1994). Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the Macaque cerebral cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 71, 856-867.
64. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
65. Kosslyn, S. M., Alpert, N. M., Thompson, W. L., Chabris, C. F., Rauch, S. L., & Anderson, A. K. (1994). Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints: A PET investigation. Brain, 117, 1055-1071.
66. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., & Alpert, N. M. (1997). Neural systems shared by visual imagery and visual perception: A positron emission tomography study. NeuroImage, 6, 320-334.
67. Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science, 293, 1506-1509.
68. Kreiman, G., Koch, C., & Fried, I. (2000a). Category-specific visual responses of single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 946-953.
69. Kreiman, G., Koch, C., & Fried, I. (2000b). Imagery neurons in the human brain. Nature, 408, 357-361.
70. Laiacona, M., Barbarotto, R., & Capitani, E. (1993). Perceptual and associative knowledge in category-specific impairment of semantic memory: A study of two cases. Cortex, 29, 727-740.
71. Lambon Ralph, M., Howard, D., Nightingale, G., & Ellis, A. (1998). Are living and non-living category-specific deficits causally linked to impaired perceptual or associative knowledge? Evidence from a category-specific double dissociation. Neurocase, 4, 311-338.
72. Lambon Ralph, M. A., McClelland, J. L., Patterson, K., Galton, C. J., & Hodges, J. R. (2001). No right to speak? The relationship between object naming and semantic impairment: Neuropsychological evidence and a connectionist model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 341-356.
73. Lezak, M. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
75. Lorenzi, C., Wable, J., Moroni, C., Derobert, C., Frachet, B., & Belin, C. (2000). Auditory temporal envelope processing in a patient with left-hemisphere damage. Neurocase, 6, 231-244.
76. Martin, A. (2001). Functional neuroimaging of semantic memory. In R. Cabeza & A. Kingstone (Eds.), Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition (pp. 153-186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. Martin, A., & Chao, L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: structure and process. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 194-201.
78. Martin, A., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Category-specificity and the brain: The sensory-motor model of semantic representations of objects. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 1023-1036). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. McCauley, R. N., & Bechtel, W. (2001). Explanatory pluralism and heuristic identity theory. Theory and Psychology, 11, 736-760.
80. Macrae, C. N., & Lewis, H. L. (2002). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13, 194-196.
81. McRae, K., & Cree, G. S. (2002). Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. In E. M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category-specificity in mind and brain (pp. 211-249). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
82. Mishkin, M., Vargha-Khadem, F., & Gadian, D. G. (1998). Amnesia and the organization of the hippocampal system. Hippocampus, 8, 212-216.
83. Morrison, D. J., & Schyns, P. G. (2001). Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 454-469.
84. Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
86. Murray, E. A., & Bussey, T. J. (1999). Perceptual-mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 142-151.
87. Murray, E. A., Gaffan, D., & Mishkin, M. (1993). Neural substrates of visual stimulus association in Rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 4549-4561.
88. Murray, E. A., & Richmond, B. J. (2001). Role of perirhinal cortex in object perception, memory, and associations. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 188-193.
89. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
90. Nyberg, L., Habib, R., McIntosh, A. R., & Tulving, E. (2000). Reactivation of encoding-related brain activity during memory retrieval. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 11120-11124.
91. Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons tophenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92. Parker, A., & Gaffan, D. (1998). Lesions of the primate rhinal cortex cause deficits in flavour: Visual associative memory. Behavioural Brain Research, 93, 99-105.
93. Rackover, S. S. (2002). Featural vs. configurational information in faces: A conceptual and empirical analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 1-30.
94. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
95. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psycbology, 8, 382-439.
96. Samson, D., Pillon, A., & De Wilde, V. (1998). Impaired knowledge of visual and non-visual attributes in a patient with a semantic impairment for living entities: A case of a true category-specific deficit. Neurocase, 4, 273-290.
97. Sartori, G., & Job, R. (1988). The oyster with four legs: A neuropsychological study on the interaction of visual and semantic information. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 105-132.
98. Schreiner, C. E., Read, H. L., & Sutter, M. L. (2000). Modular organisation of frequency integration in primary auditory cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 501-529.
99. Schyns, P. G., Goldstone, R. L., & Thibaut, J. P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-54.
100. Schyns, P. G., & Murphy, G. L. (1994). The ontogeny of part representation in object concepts. In D. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 31, pp. 305-349). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
101. Shelton, P. A., Bowers, D., Duara, R., & Heilman, K. M. (1994). Apperceptive visual agnosia: A case study. Brain and Cognition, 25, 1-23.
102. Silveri, M. C., Gainotti, G., Perani, D., Cappelletti J. Y., Carbone, G., & Fazio, F. (1997). Naming deficit for non-living items: Neuropsychological and PET study. Neuropsychologia, 35, 359-367.
103. Solomon, K. O., & Barsalou, L. W. (2001). Representing properties locally. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 129-169.
104. Solomon, K. O., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Perceptual simulation in property verification. Manuscript under review.
105. Spivey, M., Tyler, M., Richardson, D., & Young, E. (2000). Eye movements during comprehension of spoken scene descriptions. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 487-492). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
106. Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153-156.
107. Tanaka, K. (1996). Representation of visual features of objects in the inferotemporal cortex. Neural Networks, 9, 1459-1475.
108. Tanaka, K. (1997a). Columnar organization in the inferotemporal cortex. In K. Rockland, J. Kaas, &A. Peters (Eds.), Cerebral cortex (pp. 469-498). New York: Plenum Press.
109. Tanaka, K. (1997b). Inferotemporal cortex and object recognition. In J. W. Donahoe & V. P. Dorsel (Eds.), Neural-network models of cognition: Biobehavioral foundations (Vol. 121, pp. 160-188). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers.
110. Tanaka, K. (1997c). Mechanisms of visual object recognition: Monkey and human studies. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 523-429.
111. Thomas, E., Van Hulle, M. M., & Vogels, R. (2001). Encoding of categories by noncategory-specific neurons in the inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 190-200.
112. Thompson, W. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2000) Neural systems activated during visual mental imagery. In A. W. Toga & J. Mazziotta (Eds.), Brain mapping: The systems (pp. 535-560). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
113. Tranel, D., Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2001). A neural basis for the retrieval of words for actions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 655-674.
114. Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). A neural basis for the retrieval of conceptual knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1319-1327.
115. Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1998). The neural basis of lexical retrieval. In R. W. Parks & D. S. Levine (Eds.), Fundamentals of neural network modeling: Neuropsychology and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 271-296). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
116. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
117. Tyler, L. K., & Moss, H. E. (2001). Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 244-252.
118. Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., & Levy, J. P. (2000). Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language, 75, 195-231.
119. Wang, G., Tanaka, K., & Tanifuji, M. (1996). Optical imaging of functional organization in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Science, 272, 1665-1668.
120. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. A. (1987). Categories of knowledge: Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain, 110, 1273-1296.
121. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. A. (1994). Multiple meaning systems in the brain: A case for visual semantics. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1465-1473.
122. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829-854.
123. Wheeler, M. E., Petersen, S. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2000). Memorys echo: Vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 11125-11129.
124. Wolfe, J. (2000). Visual attention. In K. K. De Valois (Ed.), Seeing (2nd ed., pp. 335-386). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
125. Wu, L., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Perceptual simulation in property generation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
126. Zeki, S. (1993). A vision of the brain. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
127. Zhou, H., Friedman, H. S., & Von der Heydt, R. (2000). Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 6594-6611.
128. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Do language comprehenders routinely represent the shapes of objects? Psychological Science, 13, 168-171.