Abstract and concrete sentences, embodiment, and languages

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue SEP, 2011, Pages

  Scorolli, Claudia ^a   Binkofski, Ferdinand ^b   Buccino, Giovanni ^c   Nicoletti, Roberto ^a   Riggio, Lucia ^d   Borghi, Anna Maria ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY MAGNA GRAECIA OF CATANZARO   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^e INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

Author keywords

Abstract concepts; Cross language comparison; Embodiment; Parallel; Processing; Social linguistic experience

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867066751     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00227     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S., Rizzolatti, G., and Iacoboni, M. (2006). A comparison of premotor areas activated by action observation and action phrases. Curr. Biol. 16, 1818-1823.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 577-660.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol.59, 617-645.
4. Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., and Wilson, C. D. (2008). "Language and simulation in conceptual processing," in Symbols, Embodiment, and Meaning, edsM. DeVega, A. M. Glenberg, and A. C. Graesser (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 245-284.
5. Barsalou, L. W., and Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). "Situating abstract concepts," in Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thought, eds D. Pecher and R. Zwaan (New York: Cambridge University Press), 129-163.
6. Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernam, K. A., Possing, E. T., and Medler, D.A. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 905-917.
7. Bloom, P. (2000). How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Boot, I., and Pecher, D. (2011). Representation of categories: metaphorical use of the container schema. Exp. Psychol. 58, 167-170.
9. Borghi, A. M., and Cimatti, F. (2009). "Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings," in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, eds N. Taatgen and H. van Rijn (Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society), 2304-2309.
10. Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Cimatti, F., Marocco, D., and Scorolli, C. (2011). Manipulating objects and telling words: a study on concrete and abstract words acquisition. Front. Psychol. 2:15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00015.
11. Borghi, A. M., and Pecher, D. (2011). Introduction to the special topic Embodied and Grounded Cognition. Front. Psychol. 2:187. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00187.
12. Boroditsky, L. (2003). "Linguistic relativity," in Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, ed. L. Nadel (London: Macmillan), 917-922.
13. Brysbaert, M., Van Wijnendaele, I., and De Deyne, I. (2000). Age-ofacquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 104, 215-226.
14. Carey, S. (1978). "The child as a word learner," in Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, eds M. Halle, J. Bresnan, and G. Millen (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 264-293.
15. Celsis, P., Boulanouar, K., Doyon, B., Ranjeva, J. P., Berry, I., Nespoulous, J. L., and Chollet, F. (1999). Differential fMRI responses in the left posterior superior temporal gyrus and left supramarginal gyrus to habituation and change detection in syllables and tones. Neuroimage 9, 135-144.
16. Chatterjee, A. (2010). Disembodying cognition. Lang. Cogn. 2, 79-116.
17. Colombo, L., and Burani, C. (2002). The influence of age of acquisition, root frequency, and context availability in processing nouns and verbs. Brain Lang. 81, 398-411.
18. Desai, R. H., Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., and Seidenberg, M. S. (2010). Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension. Cereb. Cortex 20, 468-478.
19. Dove, G. (2009). Beyond conceptual symbols. A call for representational pluralism. Cognition 110, 412-431.
20. Dove, G. (2010). An additional heterogeneity hypothesis. Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 209-210.
21. Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D. P., Van Valin, R. D. Jr., Redfern, B. B., and Jaeger, J. J. (2004). Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition 92, 145-177.
22. Fischer, M., and Zwaan, R. (2008). Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 825-850.
23. Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts. Where Cognitive Science went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Gallese, V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: the neural exploitation hypothesis. Soc. Neurosci. 3, 317-333.
25. Gentner, D. (2003). "Why we're so smart," in Language in Mind eds D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 195-235.
26. Ghio, M., and Tettamanti, M. (2010). Semantic domain-specific functional integration for action-related vs. abstract concepts. Brain Lang. 112, 223-232.
27. Gibbs, R., and Steen, G. (1999). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. Gilhooly, K. J., and Gilhooly, M. L. (1980). The validity of age-ofacquisition ratings. Br. J. Psychol. 71, 105-110.
29. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behav. Brain Sci. 20, 1-55.
30. Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., and Buccino, G. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 905-919.
31. Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., and Firl, A. (2007). Google and the mind predicting fluency with pagerank. Psychol. Sci.18, 1069-1076.
32. Jirak, D., Menz, M., Buccino, G., Borghi, A. M., and Binkofski, F. (2010). Grasping language. A short story on embodiment. Conscious. Cogn. 19, 711-720.
33. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Lewis, M. B. (1999). Age of acquisition in face categorisation: is there an instance-based account? Cognition 71, B23-B39.
35. Louwerse, M. M., and Jeauniaux, P. (2008). "Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic," in Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition, eds M. de Vega, A. Glenberg, andA. C. Graesser (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 309-326.
36. Mellet, E., Tzourio, N., Denis, M., Mazoyer, B. (1998). Cortical anatomy of mental imagery of concrete nouns based on their dictionary definition. NeuroReport 9, 803-808.
37. Menz, M., Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., and Binkofski, F. (2011). An fMRI Study on Abstract and Concrete Sentences Processing. Available at: http://www.rossiproject.eu/.
38. Mestres-Missé, A., Munte, T. F., and Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2009). Functional neuroanatomy of contextual acquisition of concrete and abstract words. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 2154-2171.
39. Mirolli, M., and Parisi, D. (2009). Towards a Vygotskyan cognitive robotics: the role of language as a cognitive tool. New Ideas in Psychology. doi: 10.1016/j. Newideapsych. 2009.07.001.
40. Nelson, D. L., and Schreiber, T. A. (1992). Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall. J. Mem. Lang. 31, 237-260.
41. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 91-113.
42. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., and Winograd, T. (1998). The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web (Tech. Rep.). Stanford, CA: Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project.
43. Paivio, A. (1965). Abstractness, imagery, and meaningfulness in pairedassociate learning. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 4, 32-38.
44. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. New York: Oxford University.
45. Pattamadilok, C., Knierim, I. N., Kawabata Duncan, K. J., and Devlin, J. T. (2010). How does learning to read affect speech perception? J. Neurosci. 30, 8435-8444.
46. Pecher, D., Boot, I., and van Dantzig, S. (2011). "Abstract concepts: sensorymotor grounding, metaphors, and beyond," in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 54, ed. B. Ross (Burlington: Academic Press), 217-248.
47. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., and Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying properties from different modalities for concepts produces switching costs. Psychol. Sci. 14, 119-124.
48. Pezzulo, G., and Castelfranchi, C. (2007). The symbol detachment problem. Cogn. Process. 8, 115-131.
49. Prinz, J. (2002). Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Pulvermüller, F. (in press). Meaning and the brain: the neurosemantics of referential, interactive, and combinatorial knowledge. J. Neurolinguist. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011. 03.004.
51. Rüschemeyer, S. A., Brass, M., and Friederici, A. D. (2007). Comprehending prehending: neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems source. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 855-865.
52. Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M., and Binder, J. R. (2005). Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. Neuroimage 27, 188-200.
53. Schwanenflugel, P. (1991). "Why are abstract concepts hard to understand?" in The Psychology of Word Meanings, ed. P. Schwanenflugel (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 223-250.
54. Scorolli, C., Jacquet, P.O., Binkofski, F., Nicoletti, R., Tessari, A., and Borghi, A. (2011). "Involvement of primary motor cortex in abstract and concrete sentences processing," in Embodied and Situated Language Processing, Bielefeld.
55. Sha, G. (2010). Using Google as a super corpus to drive written language learning: a comparison with the British National Corpus. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 23, 377-393.
56. Tunik, E., Lo, O. Y., and Adamovich, S. V. (2008). Transcranial magnetic stimulation to the frontal operculum and supramarginal gyrus disrupts planning of outcome-based handobject interactions. J. Neurosci. 28, 14422-14427.
57. Turken, A. U., and Dronkers, N. F. (2011). The neural architecture of the language comprehension network: converging evidence from lesion and connectivity analyses. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 5:1. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00001.
58. Wauters, L. N., Tellings, A. E. J. M., Van Bon, W. H. J., and Van Haaften, A. W. (2003). Mode of acquisition of word meanings: the viability of a theoretical construct. Appl. Psycholinguist. 24, 385-406.
59. Wiemer-Hastings, K., Krug, J., and Xu, X. (2001). "Imagery, context availability, contextual constraints and abstractness," in Proceedings of 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, edsJ.D. Moore and K. Stenning (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 1106-1111.
60. Zevin, J. D., and Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. J. Mem. Lang. 47, 1-29.