Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The state of the art

Linguistic Review

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 347-401

  Jackendoff, Ray ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37549047652     PISSN: 01676318     EISSN: 16133676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/TLR.2007.014     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Ackermann, Farrell, and Gert Webelhuth (1999). A Theory of Predicates. Stanford: CSLI.
2. Baynes, Kathleen, and Michael S. Gazzaniga (2005). Lateralization of language: Toward a biologically based model of language. The Linguistic Review 22: 303-326.
3. Bickerton, Derek (1990). Language and Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Bloom, Paul, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel, and Merrill F. Garrett (eds.) (1996). Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
5. Boeckx, Cedric, and Massimo Piattelli-Palmerini (2005). Language as a natural object - linguistics as a natural science. The Linguistic Review 22: 447-466.
6. Bolinger, Dwight (1965). The atomization of meaning. Language 41: 555-573.
7. Boroditsky, Lera (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75: 1-28.
8. Bybee, Joan, and James L. McClelland (2005). Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. The Linguistic Review 22: 381-410.
9. Cheney, Dorothy L., and Robert M. Seyfarth (2005). Constraints and preadaptations in the earliest stages of language evolution. The Linguistic Review 22: 135-160.
10. Chomsky, Noam (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
11. _ (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
12. _ (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Culicover, Peter W. (1999). Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases in Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. _ (2005). Linguistics, cognitive science, and all that jazz. The Linguistic. Review 22: 227-248.
15. Culicover, Peter W., and Ray Jackendoff (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Deacon, Terrence W. (1997). The Symbolic Species. New York: Norton.
17. di Sciullo, Anne-Marie, and Edwin Williams (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
18. Donald, Merlin (1991). Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Elman, Jeffrey (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14: 179-211.
20. Elman, Jeffrey, Elizabeth Bates, Mark Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi, and Kim Plunkett (1996). Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Feldman, Jerome A. (2006). From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Ferreira, Fernanda (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology 47: 164-203.
23. _ (2005). Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science. The Linguistic Review 22: 365-380.
24. Fitch, W. Tecumseh, Marc D. Hauser, and Noam Chomsky (2005). The evolution, of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition 97: 179-210.
25. Fodor, Jerry A. (1983). Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
26. _ (1987). Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. _ (1990). A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. _ (2000). The Mind Doesn't Work That Way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Frazier, Lyn, K. Carlson, and Charles Clifton (2006). Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10.6: 244-249.
30. Gallistel, Charles R. (1990). The Organization of Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Goldberg, Adele (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. _ (2005). Constructions at Work: Constructionist Approaches in Context. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Goldberg, Adele, and Alex Del Giudice (2005). Subject auxiliary inversion: A natural category. The Linguistic Review 22: 411-428.
34. Goldberg, Adele, and Ray Jackendoff (2004). The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80: 532-568.
35. Goldin-Meadow, Susan (2005). What language creation in the manual modality tells us about the foundations of language. The Linguistic Review 22: 199-226.
36. Gross, Steven (2005). The nature of semantics: On Jackendoff's arguments. The Linguistic Review 22: 249-270.
37. Hagoort, Peter (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 416-423.
38. Hale, Ken, and Samuel Jay Keyser (2002). Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Hauser, Marc D. (2000). Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think. New York: Henry Holt.
40. Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky, and W. Tecumseh Fitch (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569-1579.
41. Higginbotham, James (2003). Jackendoff's conceptualism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26: 68-681.
42. Hockett, Charles F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American 203: 88-111.
43. Jackendoff, Ray (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. _ (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. _ (1987). Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. _ (1988). Why are they saying these things about us? (Topic-Comment column) Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 435-442.
47. _ (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. _ (1992). Languages of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. _ (1994). Patterns in the Mind. New York: Basic Books.
50. _ (1996a). The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface. In Bloom et al. (1996), 1-30.
51. _ (1996b). How language helps us think. Pragmatics and Cognition 4: 1-24. (Slightly different version in Jackendoff (1997), chapter 8).
52. _ (1997). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. _ (2002a). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. _ (2002b). Review of Jerry Fodor, The Mind Doesn't Work That Way. Language 78: 164-170.
55. _ (2002c). English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax. In Verb-Particle Explorations, N. Dehé, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre, and S. Urban (eds.), 67-94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
56. _ (2007a). A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research 1146: 2-22.
57. _ (2007b). Language, Consciousness, Culture: Essays on Mental Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Jackendoff, Ray, and Fred Lerdahl (2006). The capacity for music: What's special about it? Cognition 100: 33-72.
59. Jackendoff, Ray, and Steven Pinker (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for the evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition 97: 211-225.
60. Klima, Edward S. (1964). Negation in English. In The Structure of Language, J. A. Fodor and J. J. Katz (eds.), 246-323. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
61. Kuperberg, Gina (2007). Neural, mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research 1146: 23-49.
62. Ladefoged, Peter (2005). Featureless phonetics. Plenary lecture at LSA annual meeting, Oakland, Calif. Written version: Features and parameters for different purposes. http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/ladefoge/ PLfeaturesParameters.pdf
63. Lakoff, George (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Lakoff, George, and Claudia Brugman (1987). The semantics of aux-inversion and anaphora constraints. Paper presented at LSA annual meeting, San Francisco, CA.
65. Landau, Barbara, and Ray Jackendoff (1993). "What" and "where" in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 217-238.
66. Langacker, Ronald (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. I. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
67. Lerdahl, Fred, and Ray Jackendoff (1983). A Generative Grammar of Tonal Music. Cambridge., MA.: MIT Press.
68. Levinson, Stephen C. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Li, Peggy, and Lila R. Gleitman (2002). Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83: 265-294.
70. Lieberman, Philip (1984). The Biology and Evolution of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
71. _ (2005). The pied piper of Cambridge. The Linguistic Review 22: 289-302.
72. MacDonald, Maryellen C., Neal J. Pearlmutter, and Mark S. Seidenberg (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101: 676-703.
73. MacNeilage, Peter F., and Barbara L. Davis (2005). Functional organization of speech across the life span: A critique of generative phonology. The Linguistic Review 22: 161-182.
74. Marantz, Alec. (2005). Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. The Linguistic Review 22: 429-446.
75. Marcus, Gary (1998). Rethinking eliminative connectionism. Cognitive Psychology 37: 243-82.
76. _ (2001). The Algebraic Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. _ (2004). The Birth of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.
78. Marr, David (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
79. Mielke, Jeff (2006) Emergent feature theory. CLS 41. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
80. Miller, George A., and Noam Chomsky (1963). Finitary models of language users. In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol. ii, R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (eds.), 419-492. New York: Wiley.
81. Myachykov, Andriy, Russell S. Tomlin, and Michael I. Posner (2005). Attention and empirical studies of grammar. The Linguistic Review 22: 347-364.
82. Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1998). Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83. Partee, Barbara, Alice ter Meulen, and Robert E. Wall (1993). Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
84. Patel, Aniruddh D. (2003). Language, music, syntax, and the brain. Nature Neuroscience 6: 674-681.
85. Phillips, Colin, and Ellen Lau (2004). Foundational issues (review article on Jackendoff 2002a). Journal of Linguistics 40: 1-21.
86. Pinker, Steven (1999). Words and Rules. New York: Basic Books.
87. Pinker, Steven, and Ray Jackendoff (2005). The faculty of language: What's special about it? Cognition 95: 201-236.
88. Piñango, Maria M., Edgar Zurif, and Ray Jackendoff (1999). Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax-semantics interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28: 395-414.
89. Piñango, Maria M., Jennifer Mack, and Ray Jackendoff (2006). Semantic combinatorial processes in argument structure: Evidence from light verbs. Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistics Society.
90. Poeppel, David, and David Embick (2005). Defining the relation between, linguistics and neuro-science. In Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones, A. Cutler (ed.), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. Pollack, Jordan B. (1990). Recursive distributed representations. Artificial Intelligence 46: 77-105.
92. Port, Robert F., and Adam P. Leary (2005). Against formal phonology. Language 81: 927-964.
93. Pullum, G. K., and Barbara Scholz (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review 19: 9-50.
94. Pylkkänen, Liina, and Brian McElree (2006). The syntax-semantic s interface: On-line composition of sentence meaning. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2d ed.), M.. Traxler and M. A. Gernsbacher (eds.), 537-577. New York: Elsevier.
95. Rey, Georges (2006). The intentional inexistence of language - but not cars. In Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science, R. J. Stainton (ed.), 237-255. Maiden, MA.: Blackwell.
96. Ritter, Nancy (2005a). On the status of linguistics as a cognitive science. The Linguistic Review 22: 117-134.
97. Ritter, Nancy (ed.) (2005b). Special theme issue: The Role of Linguistics in Cognitive Science. The Linguistic. Review 22(2-4).
98. Rumelhart, David E., and James L. McClelland (1986). On learning the past tense of English verbs. In Parallel Distributed Processing, vol. ii, J. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, and the PDP Research Group (eds.), 2.16-71. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99. Seyfarth, Robert, and Dorothy Cheney (2003). The structure of social knowledge in monkeys. In Animal Social. Complexity: Intelligence, Culture, and individualized Societies, F. de Waal and P. Tyack (eds.), 207-229. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100. Shastri, Lokanda, and V. Ajjanagadde (1993). From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables, and bindings using temporal synchrony. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 417-494.
101. Slobin, Dan I. (1996). From "thought and language" to "thinking to speaking." In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (eds.), 70-96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
102. Smolensky, Paul, and Géraldine Legendre (2006) The Harmonic Mind: From Neural Computation to Optimality-Theoretic Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
103. Tanenhaus, Michael, M. J. Spivey-Knowlton, K. M. Eberhard, and J. C. Sedivy (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268: 1632-1634.
104. Tomasello, Michael (2005). Beyond formalities: The case of language acquisition. The Linguistic Review 22: 183-198.
105. van der Velde, Frank, and Marc de Kamps (2006). Neural blackboard architectures of combinatorial structures in cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29: 37-70.
106. Walenski, Matthew, and Michael T. Ullman (2005). The science of language. The Linguistic Review 22: 327-346.
107. Wilkins, Wendy K. (2005). Anatomy matters. The Linguistic Review 22: 271-288.
108. Wilson, Edward O. (1980). Sociobiology: The Abridged Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
109. Yip, Moira (2006). The search for phonology in other species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 442-446.
110. Zaidel, Eran (1978). Lexical organization in the right hemisphere. In Cerebral Correlates of Conscious Experience, P. Buse and A. Rougeul-Buser (eds.), 177-197. Amsterdam: Elsevier.