On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 1, Issue JAN, 2011, Pages

  Dove, Guy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Concepts; Embodied cognition; Imageability; Language; Representation; Symbol grounding

Indexed keywords

EID: 82455200557     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242     Document Type: Article

References (140)

1. Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Cooper, G., and Damasio, A. R. (2000). A role for somatosensory cortices in the visual recognition of emotion as revealed by three-dimensional lesion mapping. J. Neurosci. 20, 2683-2690.
2. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: evidence for continuous mapping models. J. Mem. Lang. 38, 419-439.
3. Altmann, G. T. M., and Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73, 247-264.
4. Bak, T. H., O'Donovan, D. G., Xuereb, J. H., Boniface, S., and Hodges, J. R. (2001). Selective impairment of verb processing associated with pathological changes in Brodmann areas 44 and 45 in the motor neurone disease-dementia-aphasia syndrome. Brain 124, 103-120.
5. Barr, R. A., and Caplan, L. J. (1987). Category representations and their implications for category structure. Mem. Cogn. 10, 82-93.
6. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 577-660.
7. Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 358, 1177-1187.
8. Barsalou, L. W., and Prinz, J. J. (1997). " Mundane creativity in perceptual symbol systems," in Conceptual Structures and Processes: Emergence, Discovery, and Change, eds T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, and J. Vaid (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association), 267-307.
9. Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A, Simmons, W. K., and Wilson, C. D. (2008). " Language and simulation in conceptual processing," in Symbols, Embodiment, and Meaning, eds M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, and A. C. Graesser (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 245-284.
10. Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., and Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 84-91.
11. Barsalou, L. W., and Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). " Situating abstract concepts," in Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thought, eds D. Pecher and R. Zwaan (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 129-163.
12. Bates, E., and Wulfeck, B. (1989). Comparative aphasiology: a cross-linguistic approach to language breakdown. Aphasiology 3, 111-142.
13. Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., and MacWhinney, B. (1991). Cross-linguistic studies of aphasia: an overview. Brain Lang. 41, 123-148.
14. Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., Burton, M. W., and Mitchum, C. C. (2002). Grammatical class and imageability in aphasic word production: their effects are independent. J. Neurolinguistics 15, 353-371.
15. Binder, J., Westbury, C., McKiernan, K., Possing, E., and Medler, D. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 905-917.
16. Bird, H., Franklin, S., and Howard, D. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words. Behav. Res. Methods 33, 73-79.
17. Bird, H., Howard, D., and Franklin, S. (2003). Verbs and nouns: the importance of being imageable. J. Neurolinguistics 16, 113-149.
18. Block, N. (1986). Advertisement for a semantics for psychology. Midwest Stud. Philos. 10, 615-78.
19. Bookheimer, S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 151-188.
20. Borghi, A. M. (2005). " Object concepts and action," in Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, eds D. Pecher and R. A. Zwaan (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 8-34.
21. Borghi, A. M., and Cimatti, F. (2009). " Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings," in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, eds N. Taatgen and H. van Rijn (Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society), 2304-2309.
22. Borghi, A. M., Glenberg, A. M., and Kaschak (2004). Putting words in perspective. Mem. Cogn. 32, 863-873.
23. Boroditsky, L., and Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychol. Sci. 13, 185-189.
24. Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V., and Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. Cogn. Brain Res. 24, 355-363.
25. Camp, E. (2009). Putting thoughts to work: concepts, systematicity, and stimulus-independence. Philos. Phenomenol. Res. 78, 275-311.
26. Caplan, D., Hildebrandt, N., and Makris N. (1996). Location of lesions in stroke patients with deficits in syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Brain 119, 933-949.
27. Caramazza, A., and Mahon, B. Z. (2006). The organization of conceptual knowledge in the brain: the future's past and some future directions. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 23, 13-38.
28. Carey, S., and Sarnecka, B. W. (2006). " The development of human conceptual representations: a case study," in Processes of Change in Brain and Cognitive Development, eds Y. Munakata and M. Johnson (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 473-496.
29. Carruthers, P. (2002). The cognitive functions of language. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 657-674.
30. Casasanto, D., and Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: using space to think about time. Cognition 106, 579-593.
31. Chao, L. L., and Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12, 478-484.
32. Chatterjee, A. (2010). Disembodying cognition. Lang. Cogn. 2, 79-116.
33. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper and Row.
35. Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Clark, A. (1998). " Embodied, situated, and distributed cognition," in A Companion to Cognitive Science, eds W. Bechtel and G. Graham (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers), 506-517.
37. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38. Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., and Marshall, J. C. (eds). (1980). Deep Dyslexia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
39. Crepaldi, D., Aggujaro, S., Arduino, L. S., Zonca, G., Ghirardi, G., Inzaghi, M. G., Colombo, M., Chierchia, G., and Luzatti, C. (2006). Noun-verb dissociation in aphasia: The role of imageability and functional location of the lesion. Neuropsychologia 44, 73-89.
40. Crutch, S. J., and Warrington, E. K. (2005). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain 128, 615-627.
41. Damasio, A. R., and Damasio, H. (1994). " Cortical systems for retrieval of concrete knowledge: the convergence zone framework," in Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain. Computational neuroscience, eds C. Koch and J. L. Davis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 61-74.
42. Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., and Tviskin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science 284, 970-974.
43. Deñabeitia, J. A., Aviles, A., Afonso, O., Scheepers, C., and Carreiras, M. (2009). Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: evidence from the visual-word paradigm. Cognition 110, 284-292.
44. Dennett, D. (1996). Kinds of Minds: Toward an Understanding of Consciousness. New York: Harper Collins.
45. Dick, F., Bates, E. Wulfeck, B., Utman, J. A., Dronkers, N., and Gernsbacher, M. A. (2001). Language deficits, localization, and grammar: evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. Psychol. Rev. 108, 759-788.
46. Dove, G. O. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: a call for representational pluralism. Cognition 110, 412-431.
47. Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., and Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 15, 399-402.
48. Finger, S. (1994). Origins of Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Fodor, J. A., and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis. Cognition 28, 3-71.
52. Fowler, C. A., Brown, J. M., Sabadini, L., and Weihing, J. (2003). Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. J. Mem. Lang. 4, 396-410.
53. Geschwind, N. (1970). The organization of language and the brain. Science 170, 940-944.
54. Giesbrecht, B., Gamblin, C., and Swaab, T. (2004). Separable effects of semantic priming and imageability on word processing in human cortex. Cereb. Cortex 14, 521-529.
55. Glenberg, A. M., de Vega, M., and Graesser, A. C. (2008). " Framing the debate," in Symbols, Embodiment, and Meaning, eds M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, and A. C. Graesser (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 1-10.
56. Glenberg, A. M., and Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 558-565.
57. Glenberg, A. M., and Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Process. 28, 1-26.
58. Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., and Buccino, G. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 905-919.
59. Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., and Schneider, W. (2006). Distinct and common cortical activations for multimodal semantic categories. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 6, 214-222.
60. Goldin-Meadow, S. (ed.). (2003). Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
61. Grèzes, J., and Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 12, 1-19.
62. Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: language use without Broca's area. Behav. Brain Sci. 23, 1-71.
63. Grossman, M., Koenig, P., DeVita, C., Glosser, G., Alsop, D., Detre, J., and Gee, J. (2002). The neural basis for category-specific knowledge: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 15, 936-948.
64. Harman, G. (1982). Conceptual role semantics. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 28, 252-256.
65. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42, 335-346.
66. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. and Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41, 301-307.
67. Holcomb, P. J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J. E., and West, W. C. (1999). Dual-coding, context- availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25, 721-742.
68. Huang, H., Lee, C., and Federmeier (2010). Imagine that! ERPs provide evidence for distinct hemispheric contributions to the processing of concrete and abstract concepts. Neuroimage 49, 1116-1123.
69. Jackendoff, R. (1992). Languages of the Mind: Essays on Mental Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Jeannerod, M. (1995). Mental imagery in the motor context. Neuropsychologia 33, 1419-1432.
71. Jessen, F., Heun, R., Erb, M., Granath, D.-O., Klose, U., Papassotiropoulos, A., and Grodd, W. (2000). The concrétense effect: evidence for dual coding and context availability. Brain Lang. 74, 103-112.
72. Kiehl, K. A., Liddle, P. F., Smith, A. M., Mendrek, A., Forster, B. B., and Hare, R. D. (1999). Neural Pathways involved in the processing of concrete and abstract words. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7, 225-233.
73. Kellenbach, M. L., Wijers, A. A., Hovis, M., Mulder, J., and Mulder, G. (2002). Neural differentiation of lexico-syntactic categories or semantic features? Event related potential evidence for both. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14, 561-577.
74. Kemmerer, D. (2010). " How words capture visual experience: the perspective from cognitive neuroscience," in Words and the World: How Words Capture Human Experience, eds B. Malt and P. Wolff (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 287-327.
75. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Kosslyn, S. M., and Shwartz, S. P. (1977). A simulation of visual imagery. Cogn. Sci. 1, 265-295.
77. Kounios, J., and Holcomb, P. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20, 804-823.
78. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
80. Landauer, T. K., and Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: the Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychol. Rev. 104, 211-240.
81. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., and Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Process 25, 259-284.
82. Liberman, A. M., and Whalen, D. H. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trenes Cogn. Sci. 4, 187-196.
83. Louwerse, M., and Jeuniaux, P. (2008). " Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic," in Symbols, Embodiment, and Meaning, eds M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, and A. C. Graesser (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 309-326.
84. Luzzatti, C., Raggi, R., Zonca, G., Pistarini, C., Contardi, A., and Pinna, G. (2002). Verb-noun double dissociation in aphasic lexical impairments: the role of word frequency and imageability. Brain Lang. 81, 432-444.
85. Machery, E. (2007). Concept empiricism: a methodological critique. Cognition 104, 19-46.
86. Machery, E. (2010). Précis of " doing without concepts." Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 195-244.
87. Maguire, M. J., and Dove, G. O. (2008). " Speaking of events: event word learning and event representation," in Understanding Events: How Humans See, Represent, and Act on Events, eds T. F. Shipley and J. Zacks (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 193-218.
88. Mahon, B. Z., and Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. J. Physiol. Paris 102, 59-70.
89. Markman, A., and Dietrich, E. (2000). In defense of representation. Cogn. Psychol. 40, 138-171.
90. Marshall, J., Pring, T., Chiat, S., and Robson, J. (1996). Calling a salad a federation: an investigation of semantic jargon. Part 1 - nouns. J. Neurolinguistics 9, 237-250.
91. Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., and Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 379, 649-652.
92. McGurk, H., and MacDonald, T. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264, 746-748.
93. Mellet, E., Tzourio, N., Denis, M., and Mazoyer, B. (1998). Cortical anatomy of mental imagery of concrete nouns based on their dictionary definition. Neuroreport 9, 803-808.
94. Murphy, G. L. (1996). On metaphoric representation. Cognition 60, 173-204.
95. Murphy, G. L. (1997). Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric representation. Cognition 62, 99-108.
96. Nishitani, N., Schürmann, M., Amunts, K., and Hari, R. (2005). Broca's region: from action to language. Physiology 20, 60-69.
97. Noppeney, U., and Price, C. J. (2004). Retrieval of abstract semantics. Neuroimage 22, 164-170.
98. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
99. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual-Coding Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
100. Pecher, D., Van Dantzig, S., and Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2009). Concepts are not represented by conscious imagery. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 914-919.
101. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., and Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying properties from different modalities for concepts produces switching costs. Psychol. Sci. 14, 119-124.
102. Perani, D., Cappa, S., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., Collina, S., Rosa, M., and Fazio, F. (1999). The neural correlates of verb and noun processing: a PET study. Brain 122, 2337-2344.
103. Petito, L. A., Zatorre, R. J., Gauna, K., Nikelski, E. J., Dostie, D., and Evans, A. C. (2000). Speech-like cerebral activity in profoundly deaf people processing signed languages: implications for the neural basis of human language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 13961-13966.
104. Pezzulo, G., and Castelfranchi, C. (2007). The symbol detachment problem. Cogn. Process 8, 115-131.
105. Pinker, S. (1994). Language Instinct. New York: Harper Collins.
106. Posner, M. I., and Raichle, M. E. (1994). Images of Mind, 2nd Edn. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.
107. Prinz, J. J. (2002). Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
108. Pulvermüller, F (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 576-582.
109. Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., Ilmonlemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. Eur. J. Neurosci. 21, 793-797.
110. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain: a critique of mental imagery. Psychol. Bull. 80, 1-24.
111. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychol. Rev. 88, 16-45.
112. Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., and McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cogn. Sci. 27, 767-780.
113. Sabsevitz, D., Medler, D., Seidenberg, M., and Binder, J. (2005). Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. Neuroimage 27, 188-200.
114. Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Ibanez, V., Deiber, M., Dold, G., and Hallett, M. (1996). Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature 380, 526-528.
115. Sadoski, M., and Paivio, A. (2004). " A dual coding theoretical model of reading," in Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 5th Edn., eds R. B. Ruddell and N. J. Unrau (Newark, DE: International Reading Association), 1329-1362.
116. Saffran, E. M. (2000). Aphasias and the relationship of language and brain. Semin. Neurol. 20, 409-418.
117. Schwanenflugel, P. J., and Shoben, E. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 9, 82-102.
118. Scorolli, C. (2009). Language and Embodiment: Sensory-Motor and Linguistic-Social Experience. Evidence on Sentence Comprehension (Doctoral dissertation). Available at: http://en.scientificcommons.org/55511932
119. Scorolli, C., and Borghi, A. M. (2007). Sentence comprehension and action: effector specific modulation of the motor system. Brain Res. 1130, 119-124.
120. Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., and Glenberg, A. M. (2009). Language-induced motor activity in bimanual object lifting. Exp. Brain Res. 193, 43-53.
121. Simmons, W. K., and Barsalou, L. W. (2003). The similarity-in-topography principle: reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 20, 451-486.
122. Simmons, W. K., Ramjee, V., Beauchamp, M. S., McRae, K., Martin, A., and Barsalou, L. W. (2007). A common neural substrate for perceiving and knowing about color. Neuropsychologia 45, 2802-2810.
123. Spivey, M., and Richardson, D. (2009). " Language processing embodied and embedded," in The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, eds P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 382-400.
124. Spivey, M., Tanenhaus, M., Eberhard, K., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Eye-movements and spoken language-comprehension: effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cogn. Psychol. 45, 447-481.
125. Stanfield, R. A., and Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychol. Sci. 12, 153-156.
126. Swaab, T., Baynes, K., and Knight, R. (2002). Separable effects of priming and imageability on word processing: an ERP study. Cogn. Brain Res. 15, 99-103.
127. Taddeo, M., and Floridi, L. (2005). The symbol grounding problem: a critical review of fifteen years of research. J. Exp. Artif. Intell. 17, 419-445.
128. Tanenhaus, M., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., and Sedivy, J. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268, 1632-1634.
129. Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V. Danna, M., Scifo, P., Fazio, F., Rizzolatti, G., Cappa, S., and Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 273-281.
130. Thoenissen, D., Zilles, K., and Toni, I. (2002). Differential involvement of parietal and precentral regions in movement preparation and motor intention. J. Neurosci. 22, 9024-9034.
131. Toglia, M. P., and Battig, W. F. (1978). Handbook of Semantic Word Norms. New York: Erlbaum.
132. Toni, I., de Lange, F. P., Noordzij, M., and Hagoort, P. (2008). Language beyond action. J. Physiol. Paris 102, 71-79.
133. Tyler, L. K., Russell, R., Fadili, J., and Moss, H. (2001). The neural representation of nouns and verbs: PET studies. Brain, 124, 1619-1634.
134. van Dantzig, S., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., and Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing. Cogn. Sci. 32, 579-590.
135. Wattenmaker, W., and Shoben, E. (1987). Context and the recallability of concrete and abstract sentences. J. Exp. Psychol. 13, 140-150.
136. Weiskopf, D. (2007). Concept empiricism and the vehicles of thought. J. Conscious. Stud. 14, 156-183.
137. West, W. C., and Holcomb, P. J. (2000). Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: an electrophysiological investigation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 1024-1037.
138. Wiemer-Hastings, K., and Xu, X. (2005). Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts. Cogn. Sci. 29, 719-736.
139. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 625-636.
140. Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A. K., and Gardner, H. (1976). The development of metaphoric understanding. Dev. Psychol. 12, 289-297.