The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators

The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-313

  Vinkler, Péter ^a  

^a Chemical Research Center (CRC)   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903413394     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1533/9781780630250     Document Type: Book

References (354)

1. Adam D. The counting house. Nature 2002, 415:726-729.
2. Adam D. RAE reveals drastic improvement in UK research. Nature Medicine 2002, 8:93-94.
3. Aksnes D.W. Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation 2003, 12:159-170.
4. Aksnes D.W., Sivertsen G. The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators. Scientometrics 2004, 59:213-224.
5. Aksnes D.W., Taxt R.E. Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university. Research Evaluation 2004, 13:33-41.
6. Allen B., Quin J., Lancaster F.W. Persuasive communities: a longitudinal analysis of references in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Social Studies of Science 1994, 24:279-310. 1665-1990.
7. Alvarez P., Escalona I., Pulgarin A. What is wrong with obsolescence?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2000, 51:812-815.
8. American Chemical Society Ethical Guidelines to Publication of Chemical Research 2006, http://www.pubs.acs.org/ethics/ethics.html.
9. Amin M., Mabe M. Impact factors: use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing 2000, 1:1-6.
10. Anderson R.C., Narin F., McAllister P. Publication ratings versus peer ratings of universities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1978, 29:91-101.
11. Applied Statistics Group State-of-the-art Report on Current Methodologies and Practices for Composite Indicator Development 2002, Joint Research Centre, European Commission; Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen Technological and Economic Risk Management, Italy, I-21020 Ispra (VA). http://www.jrc.cec.eu.int/uasa/prj-comp-ind.asp.
12. Archambault É., Larivière V. Origins of measures of journal impact: historical contingencies and their consequences on current use 2007, 45-51. CINDOC-CSIC, Madrid. D. Torres-Salinas, H.F. Moed (Eds.).
13. Archibugi D., Coco A. A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo). World Development 2004, 32:629-654.
14. Atkinson R. The citation as intertext: toward a theory of the selection process. Library Resources and Technical Services 1984, 28:109-119.
15. Bailòn-Moreno R., Jurado-Alameda E., Ruiz-Baños R., Courtial J.-P., Jiménez-Contreras E. The pulsing structure of science: Ortega y Gasset, Saint Matthew, fractality and transfractality. Scientometrics 2007, 71:3-24.
16. Baldi S., Hargens L.L. Re-examining Price's conjectures on the structure of reference networks: Results from the special relativity, spatial diffusion modeling and role analysis literatures. Social Studies of Science 1997, 27:669-687.
17. Barré R. S&T indicators for policy making in a changing science-society relationship. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems 2004, 115-131. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.).
18. Batista P.D., Campiteli M.G., Kinouchi O., Martinez A.S. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?. Scientometrics 2006, 68:179-189.
19. Bennion B.C., Karschamroon S. Multivariate regression models for estimating journal usefulness in physics. Journal of Documentation 1984, 40:217-227.
20. Bergstrom C. Scholarly communication. Eigenfactor: measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News 2007, 68:1-3. http://www.eigenfactor.org/about.htm.
21. Bernal J.D. The Social Function of Science 1939, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Bockris J., Hodko D. Is there evidence for cold fusion?. Chemistry & Industry 1990, 21:688-692.
23. Bonaccorsi A., Daraio C. A robust nonparametric approach to the analysis of scientific productivity. Research Evaluation 2003, 12:47-69.
24. Bonitz M. Ten years Matthew effect for countries. Scientometrics 2005, 64:375-379.
25. Bonitz M., Bruckner E., Scharnhorst A. Characteristics and impact of the Matthew effect for countries. Scientometrics 1997, 40:407-422.
26. Bordons M., Barrigón S. Bibliometric analysis of publications of Spanish pharmacologists in the SCI (1984-89) Part II. Scientometrics 1992, 25:425-446.
27. Bourke P., Butler L. Publication types, citation rates and evaluation. Scientometrics 1996, 37:473-494.
28. Boxenbaum H., Pivinski F., Ruberg S.J. Publication rates of pharmaceutical scientists: application of the Waring distribution. Drug Metabolism Reviews 1987, 18:553-571.
29. Bradford S.C. Documentation 1948, Crosby Lockwood, London.
30. Braun T. Keeping the gates of science journals. Gatekeeping indicators of national performance in the sciences. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems 2004, 95-114. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.).
31. Braun T., Bujdosó E., Schubert A. Literature of Analytical Chemistry: A Scientometric Evaluation 1987, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
32. Braun T., Glänzel W. Double impact - reply. Chemistry & Industry 1995, 18:718.
33. Braun T., Glänzel W., Grupp H. The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989-1993. Part I. and II. Scientometrics 1995, 33:263-293. 34, 207-37.
34. Braun T., Glänzel W., Schubert A. Scientometrics Indicators. A 32 Country Comparison of Publication Productivity and Citation Impact 1985, World Scientific Publishers, London.
35. Braun T., Glänzel W., Schubert A. Evaluation of citedness in analytical chemistry: How much is much?. Analytical Proceedings 1990, 27:38-41.
36. Braun T., Glänzel W., Schubert A., et al. How balanced is the Science Citation Index's journal coverage? A preliminary overview of macro-level statistical data. The Web of Knowledge. A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. ASIS Monograph Series 2000, 251-277. Information Today, Inc, Medford, NJ. B. Cronin, H.B. Atkins (Eds.).
37. Braun T., Glänzel W., Schubert A. A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics 2006, 69:169-173.
38. Brookes B.C. Obsolescence of special library periodicals: Sampling errors and utility contours. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1970, 21:320-329.
39. Brooks T.A. Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1985, 36:223-229.
40. Brooks T.A. Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1986, 37:34-36.
41. Brown P. The half-life of the chemical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1980, 31:61-63.
42. Burt R.S. Toward a Structural Theory of Action, Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action 1982, Academic Press, New York.
43. Burton R.E., Kebler R.W. The "half-life" of some scientific and technical literatures. American Documentation 1960, 11:18-22.
44. Butler L. What happens when funding is linked to publication counts?. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems 2004, 389-405. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.).
45. Campanario J.M. Consolation for the scientist: Sometimes it is hard to publish papers that are later highly-cited. Social Studies of Science 1993, 23:342-362.
46. Cano V. Citation behavior: Classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1989, 40:284-290.
47. Chapman A.J. Assessing research: citation-count shortcomings. The UGC Selectivity Exercise: Reactions from some psychologists. The Psychologist Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 1989, 8:336-344.
48. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E.L. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2:429-444.
49. Chew F.S., Relyea-Chew A. How research becomes knowledge in radiology: An analysis of citations to published papers. American Journal of Roentgenology 1988, 150:31-37.
50. Christensen-Szalanski J.J.J., Beach L.R. The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature. American Psychologist 1984, 39:75-78.
51. Chubin D.E., Moitra S.D. Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting. Social Studies of Science 1975, 5:423-441.
52. Clark K.E. The APA study of psychologists. American Psychologist 1954, 9:117-128.
53. Clark K.E. America's Psychologists: A Survey of a Growing Profession 1957, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
54. Coccia M. A scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes. Scientometrics 2005, 65:307-321.
55. Cole J.R., Cole S. Measuring the quality of sociological research: Problems in the use of the Science Citation Index. The American Sociologist 1971, 6:23-29.
56. Cole J.R., Cole S. The Ortega Hypothesis. Citation analysis suggests that only a few scientists contribute to scientific progress. Science 1972, 178:368-375.
57. Cole J.R., Cole S. Social Stratification in Science 1973, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
58. Cole S. The hierarchy of the sciences?. American Journal of Sociology 1983, 89:111-139.
59. Cole S., Cole J.R. Visibility and the structural bases of awareness of scientific research. American Sociological Review 1968, 33:397-413.
60. Colman A.M., Dhillon D., Coulthard B. A bibliometric evaluation of the research performance of British University Politics Departments: Publications in leading journals. Scientometrics 1995, 32:49-66.
61. Crane D. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities 1972, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
62. Croll R.P. The noncontributing author: An issue of credit and responsibility. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1984, 27:401-407.
63. Cronin B. Norms and functions in citation: The view of journal editors and referees in psychology. Social Science Information Studies 1982, 2:65-78.
64. Cronin B. The Citation Process, The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication 1984, Taylor Graham, London.
65. Cronin B., Overfelt K. Citation-based auditing of academic performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1994, 45:61-72.
66. Crouch D., Irvine J., Martin B.R. Bibliometric analysis for science policy: An evaluation of the United Kingdom's research performance in ocean currents and protein crystallography. Scientometrics 1986, 9:239-267.
67. Csajbók E., Berhidi A., Vasas L., Schubert A. Hirsch-index for countries based on Essential Science Indicators data. Scientometrics 2007, 73:91-117.
68. Day R.A. How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper 1983, ISI Press, Philadelphia, PA.
69. De Moya-Anegón F., Herrero-Solana V. Science in America Latina: A comparison of bibliometric and scientific-technical indicators. Scientometrics 1999, 46:299-320.
70. Denning P.J. The science of computing. A new paradigm for science. American Scientist 1987, 75:572-573.
71. Dewitt T.W., Nicholson R.S., Wilson M.K. Science Citation Index and chemistry. Scientometrics 1980, 2:265-275.
72. Dieks D., Chang H. Differences in impact of scientific publication: Some indices derived from a citation analysis. Social Studies of Science 1976, 6:247-267.
73. Dizon L.B., Sadorra M.S.M. Patterns of publication by the staff of an international fisheries research center. Scientometrics 1995, 32:67-75.
74. Donnell E.P. Growth and change of the world's chemical literature as reflected in Chemical Abstracts. Publishing Research Quarterly 1994, 10:38-46.
75. Doreian P. A measure of standing of journals in stratified networks. Scientometrics 1985, 8:341-363.
76. Dryden J. Quantifying technological advance: S&T indicators at the OECD - challenges for the 1990s. Science and Public Policy 1992, 19:281-290.
77. Earle P., Vickery B.C. Subject relations in science/technology literature. ASLIB Proceedings 1969, 21:237-243.
78. Egghe L. A theory of continuous rates and applications to the theory of growth and obsolescence rates. Information Processing and Management 1994, 30:279-292.
79. Egghe L. A noninformetric analysis of the relationship between citation age and journal productivity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2001, 52:371-377.
80. Egghe L. An explanation of disproportionate growth using linear 3-dimensional informetrics and its relation with the fractal dimension. Scientometrics 2005, 63:277-296.
81. Egghe L., Rao I.K.R., Rousseau R. On the influence of production on utilization functions: Obsolescence or increased use?. Scientometrics 1995, 34:285-315.
82. Egghe L., Rousseau R. Introduction to Informetrics. Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science 1990, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam.
83. Egghe L., Rousseau R. Generalized success-breeds-success principle leading to time-dependent informetric distributions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1995, 46:426-445.
84. Egghe L., Rousseau R. Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data. Journal of Information Science 1996, 22:165-170.
85. Egghe L., Rousseau R. Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization: Definitions and relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2000, 51:1004-1017.
86. Egghe L., Rousseau R. A general framework for relative impact indicators. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 2002/03, 27:29-48.
87. Ellwein L.B., Khachab M., Waldman R.H. Assessing research productivity: Evaluating journal publication across academic departments. Academic Medicine 1989, 64:319-325.
88. Feist G.J. Quantity, quality, and depth of research as influences on scientific eminence: Is quantity most important?. Creativity Research Journal 1997, 10:325-335.
89. Fernández-Cano A., Torralbo M., Vallejo M. Reconsidering Price's model of scientific growth: An overview. Scientometrics 2004, 61:301-321.
90. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 1954, 7:117-140.
91. Frame J.D. Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia 1977, 2:143-148.
92. Frame J.D. Quantitative indicators for evaluation of basic research programs/projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1983, 30:106-112.
93. Freedman B. Growth and change in the world's biological literature as reflected in BIOSIS publications. Publishing Research Quarterly 1995, 11:61-79.
94. Fussler H.H. Characteristics of the research literature used by chemists and physicists in the United States. Part II. Library Quarterly 1949, 19:119-143.
95. Garfield E. Significant journals of science. Nature 1976, 264:609-615.
96. Garfield E. Citation Indexing - Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities 1979, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
97. Garfield E. From citation indexes to informetrics: Is the tail now wagging the dog?. Libri 1998, 48:67-80.
98. Garfield E. Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. Journal of Information Science 2004, 30:119-145.
99. Garfield E., Sher J.H. New factors in evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation 1963, 14:195-201.
100. Garvey W.D. Communication: The Essence of Science 1979, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
101. Garvey W.D., Griffith B.C. Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge. American Psychologist 1971, 26:349-362.
102. Gee H.H., Narin F. An analysis of research publications supported by NIH 1973-1980 1986, NIH Program Evaluation Report, NIH Publication No. 86-2777, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
103. Geisler E. The Metrics of Science and Technology 2000, Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT.
104. Geller N.L., de Cani J.S., Davies R.E. Lifetime-citation rates to compare scientists' work. Social Science Research 1978, 7:345-365.
105. Geller N.L., de Cani J.S., Davies R.E. Lifetime-citation rates: A mathematical model to compare scientists' work. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1981, 32:3-15.
106. Ghosh J.S., Neufeld M.L. Uncitedness of articles in Journal of the American Chemical Society. Information Storage and Retrieval 1974, 10:365-369.
107. Gilbert G.N. Measuring the growth of science: A review of indicators of scientific growth. Scientometrics 1978, 1:9-34.
108. Glänzel W. On the possibility and reliability of predictions based on stochastic citation processes. Scientometrics 1997, 40:481-492.
109. Glänzel W. Towards a model for diachronous and synchronous citation analyses. Scientometrics 2004, 60:511-522.
110. Glänzel W. On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics 2006, 67:315-321.
111. Glänzel W. Characteristic sores and scales. A bibliometric analysis of subject characteristics based on long-term citation observation. Journal of Informetrics 2007, 1:92-102.
112. Glänzel W., Moed H.F. Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics 2002, 53:171-193.
113. Glänzel W., Schlemmer B., Thijs B. Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics 2003, 58:571-586.
114. Glänzel W., Schoepflin U. A stochastic model for aging of scientific literature. Scientometrics 1994, 30:49-64.
115. Glänzel W., Schoepflin U. Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ... and beyond?. Scientometrics 1994, 30:375-384.
116. Glänzel W., Schoepflin U. A bibliometric study on aging and reception processes of scientific literature. Journal of Information Science 1995, 21:37-53.
117. Glänzel W., Schoepflin U. A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing & Management 1999, 35:31-44.
118. Glänzel W., Schubert A. Some facts and figures on highly cited papers in the sciences, 1981-1985. Scientometrics 1992, 25:373-380.
119. Glänzel W., Schubert A. Predictive aspects of a stochastic model for citation processes. Information Processing & Management 1995, 31:69-80.
120. Glänzel W., Schubert A. A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics 2003, 56:357-367.
121. Glänzel W., Schubert A., Braun T. A relational charting approach to the world of basic research in twelve science fields at the end of the second millennium. Scientometrics 2002, 55:335-348.
122. Glänzel W., Schubert A., Schoepflin U., Czerwon H.-J. An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in journals covered by the SSCI database using reference analysis. Scientometrics 1999, 46:431-441.
123. Goffman W. Scientific Information Systems and the Principle of Selectivity 1980, Praeger, New York.
124. Gomperts M.C. The law of constant citation for scientific literature. Journal of Documentation 1968, 24:113-117.
125. Gross P.L.K., Gross E.M. College libraries and chemical education. Science 1927, 66:385-389.
126. Grupp H., Mogee M.E. Indicators for national science and technology policy. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems 2004, 75-94. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.).
127. Gupta B.M. Growth and obsolescence of literature in theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics 1998, 42:335-347.
128. Gupta B.M., Karisiddappa C.R. Modelling the growth of literature in the area of theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics 2000, 49:321-355.
129. Gupta B.M., Sharma L., Karisiddappa C.R. Modelling the growth of papers in a scientific specialty. Scientometics 1995, 33:187-201.
130. Gupta B.M., Sharma P., Karisiddappa C.R. Growth of research literature in scientific specialities. A modelling perspective. Scientometrics 1997, 40:507-528.
131. Gupta U. Obsolescence of physics literature: Exponential decrease of the density of citations to physical review articles with age. Journal of the American Information Society 1990, 41:282-287.
132. Hagstrom W.O. Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments. Sociology of Education 1971, 44:375-397.
133. Hamilton D.P. Research papers: Who's uncited now?. Science 1991, 251:25.
134. Hanney S., Frame I., Grant J., Buxton M., Young T., Lewison G. Using categorizations of citations when assessing the outcomes from health research. Scientometrics 2005, 65:357-379.
135. Harter S.P., Hooten P.A. Information science and scientists - JASIS, 1972-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1992, 43:583-593.
136. Hirst G. Discipline impact factors: A method for determining core journal lists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1978, 29:171-172.
137. Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102:16569-16572.
138. Hodder A.P.W., Balogh C. A citation study of significant papers in plate tectonics. Journal of Information Science 1984, 9:221-226.
139. Hodges S., Hodges B., Meadows A.J., Beaulieu M., Law D. The use of an algorithmic approach for the assessment of research quality. Scientometrics 1996, 35:3-13.
140. Holton G. Can science be measured?. Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators 1978, 39-68. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R.K. Merton, A. Thackray, H. Zuckerman (Eds.).
141. Howard G.S., Cole D.A., Maxwell S.E. Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist 1987, 42:975-986.
142. Hunt R. Trying an authorship index. Nature 1991, 352:187.
143. Huth E.J. Irresponsible authorship and wasteful publication. Annals of Internal Medicine 1986, 104:257-259.
144. Irvine J., Martin B.R. CERN: Past performance and future prospects II. The scientific performance of the CERN accelerators. Research Policy 1984, 13:247-284.
145. Jain A., Garg K.C. Laser research in India: Scientometric study and model projections. Scientometrics 1992, 23:395-415.
146. Jiménez-Contreras E., Anegón F.D., López-Cózar E.D. The evolution of research activity in Spain: The impact of the National Commission for Evaluation of Research Activity (CNEAI). Research Policy 2003, 32:123-142.
147. Kaplan N. The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation 1965, 16:179-184.
148. Katz J.S. Scale-independent bibliometric indicators. Measurement 2005, 3:24-28.
149. Katz J.S., Hicks D. How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics 1997, 40:541-554.
150. Katz J.S., Hicks D. Bibliometric indicators for national systems of innovation 2004, http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/sylvank/best/nsi/index.html.
151. Kealy T. The Economic Laws of Scientific Research 1996, Macmillan, London.
152. Kepler J. Letter to M. Maestlin. April 19. Johannes Kepler, Gesammelte Werke 1597, 432. Kepler-Kommission der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, München, Briefe 1590-1599 (1945). Vol. 1. M. Caspar (Ed.).
153. Kim M.J., Kim B.J. A bibliometric analysis of publications by the Chemistry Department, Seoul National University, Korea, 1992-1998. Journal of Information Science 2000, 26:111-119.
154. King D.A. The scientific impact of nations. What different countries get for their research spending. Nature 2004, 430:311-316.
155. King J. A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. Journal of Information Science 1987, 13:261-276.
156. Klaic B. The use of scientometric parameters for the evaluation of scientific contributions. Collection of Anthropology 1999, 23:751-770.
157. Kochen M. Models of scientific output. Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators 1978, 97-136. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R.K. Merton, A. Thackray, H. Zuckerman (Eds.).
158. Koenig M.E.D. Determinants of expert judgement of research performance. Scientometrics 1982, 4:361-378.
159. Koenig M.E.D. Bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1983, 34:136-145.
160. Koenig M.E.D. Information policy - the mounting tension (value additive versus uniquely distributable "public good"). Journal of Information Science 1995, 21:229-231.
161. Kostoff R.N. Research requirements for research impact assessment. Research Policy 1995, 24:869-882.
162. Kostoff R.N., Braun T., Schubert A., Toothman D.R., Humenik J.A. Fullerene data mining using bibliometrics and database tomography. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science 2000, 40:19-39.
163. Kostoff R.N., Martinez W.L. Is citation normalization realistic?. Journal of Information Science 2005, 31:57-61.
164. Krampen G., Becker R., Wahner U., Montada L. On the validity of citation counting in science evaluation: Content analyses of references and citations in psychological publications. Scientometrics 2007, 71:191-202.
165. Krauze T.K., Hillinger C. Citations, references and the growth of scientific literature: A model of dynamic interaction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1971, 21:333-336.
166. Kuhn T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1962, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
167. Lavalette D. Facteur d'impact: impartialité ou impuissance? 1996, Internal Report, INSERM U350, Institut Curie - Recherche, Bât. 112, Centre Universitaire, 91405 Orsay, France. http://www.curie.u-psud.fr/U350/.
168. Lawani S.M., Bayer A.E. Validity of citation criteria for assessing the influence of scientific publications: New evidence with peer assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1983, 34:59-66.
169. Lehmann S., Lautrup B., Jackson A.D. Citation networks in high energy physics. Physical Review 2003, E68:026113-1-026113-8.
170. Lewison G. The frequencies of occurrence of scientific papers with authors of each initial letter and their variation with nationality. Scientometrics 1996, 37:401-416.
171. Lindsey D. The corrected quality ratio: A composite index of scientific contribution to knowledge. Social Studies of Science 1978, 8:349-354.
172. Lindsey D. Using citation counts as a measure of quality in science: Measuring what's measurable rather than what's valid. Scientometrics 1989, 15:189-203.
173. Line M.B., Sandison A. "Obsolescence" and changes in the use of literature with time. Journal of Documentation 1974, 30:283-350.
174. Lukovits I., Vinkler P. Correct credit distribution: a model for sharing credit among coauthors. Social Indicators Research 1995, 36:91-98.
175. Luukkonen T., Ståhle B. Quality evaluations in the management of basic and applied research. Research Policy 1990, 19:357-368.
176. MacRoberts M.H., MacRoberts B.R. Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1989, 40:342-349.
177. MacRoberts M.H., MacRoberts B.R. Citation content analysis of a botany journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1997, 48:274-275.
178. Mansilla R., Köppen E., Cocho G., Miramontes P. On the behavior of journal impact factor rank-order distribution. Journal of Informetrics 2007, 1:155-160.
179. Maričić S., Spaventi J., Pavičić L., Pifat-Mrzljak G. Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1998, 49:530-540.
180. Marshakova-Shaikevich I. The Standard Impact Factor as an evaluation tool of science fields and scientific journals. Scientometrics 1996, 35:283-290.
181. Martin B.R. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics 1996, 36:343-362.
182. Martin B.R., Irvine J. Assessing basic research. Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy 1983, 12:61-90.
183. Martin B.R., Irvine J. CERN: Past performance and future prospects I. CERN's position in world high-energy physics. Research Policy 1984, 13:183-210.
184. Martin B.R., Irvine J. Evaluating the evaluators: A reply to our critics. Social Studies of Science 1985, 15:558-575.
185. May K.O. Quantitative growth of the mathematical literature. Science 1966, 154:1672-1673.
186. May R.M. The scientific wealth of nations. Science 1997, 275:793-796.
187. McAllister P.R., Narin F., Corrigan J.G. Programmatic evaluation and comparison based on standardized citation scores. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1983, 30:205-211.
188. McCain K.W., Turner K. Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics. Scientometrics 1989, 17:127-163.
189. McGranahan D. Measurement of development: research at the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. ISSJ 143/1995 1995, 39-59. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UNESCO 1995.
190. Meho L.I., Sonnenwald D.H. Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance: A case study of Kurdish scholarship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2000, 51:123-138.
191. Menard H.W. Science: Growth and Change 1971, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
192. Merton R.K. The Matthew effect in science. Science 1968, 159:56-63.
193. Merton R.K. The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations 1973, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
194. Miller R. The influence of primary task on R&D laboratory evaluation: A comparative bibliometric analysis. R&D Management 1992, 22:3-20.
195. Moed H.F. Bibliometric indicators reflect publication and management strategies. Scientometrics 2000, 47:323-346.
196. Moed H.F. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation 2005, Springer, Dordrecht.
197. Moed H.F. UK Research Assessment Exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity?. Scientometrics 2008, 74:153-161.
198. Moed H.F., de Bruin R.E., Van Leeuwen T.N. New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics 1995, 33:381-422.
199. Moed H.F., Burger W.J.M., Frankfort J.G., Van Raan A.F.J. The application of bibliometric indicators: Important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered. Scientometrics 1985, 8:177-203.
200. Moed H.F., Burger W.J.M., Frankfort J.G., Van Raan A.F.J. The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy 1985, 14:131-149.
201. Moed H.F., Van Leeuwen T.N. Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information's journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1995, 46:461-467.
202. Moed H.F., Van Leeuwen T.N. Impact factors can mislead. Nature 1996, 381:186.
203. Moed H.F., Van Leeuwen T.N., Reedijk J. A critical analysis of the journal impact factors of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Inaccuracies in published impact factors based on overall citations only. Scientometrics 1996, 37:105-116.
204. Moed H.F., Van Leeuwen T.N., Reedijk J. A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors. Journal of Documentation 1998, 54:387-419.
205. Moed H.F., Van Leeuwen T.N., Reedijk J. Towards appropriate indicators of journal impact. Scientometrics 1999, 46:575-589.
206. Moed H.F., Van Raan A.F.J. Observations and hypotheses on the phenomenon of multiple citation to a research group's oeuvre. Scientometrics 1986, 10:17-34.
207. Moore G.H., Shiskin J. Indicators of Business Expansion and Contractions 1967, Columbia University Press, New York.
208. Moravcsik M.J. The classification of science and the science of classification. Scientometrics 1986, 10:179-197.
209. Moravcsik M.J. Some contextual problems of science indicators. Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology 1988, 11-30. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam. A.F.J. Van Raan (Ed.).
210. Moravcsik M.J., Murugesan P. Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science 1975, 5:86-92.
211. Mullins N.C. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary Sociology 1973, Harper & Row, New York.
212. Mulkay M.J., Gilbert G.N., Woolgar S. Problem areas and research networks in science. Sociology - The Journal of the British Sociological Association 1975, 9:187-203.
213. Must Ü. "New" countries in Europe - Research, development and innovation strategies vs bibliometric data. Scientometrics 2006, 66:241-248.
214. Nakamoto H. Synchronous and diachronous citation distributions. Informetrics 87/88. Selected Proceedings of the First International Conference on Bibliometrics and Theoretical Aspects of Information Retrieval 1988, 157-163. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds.).
215. Nalimov V.V., Mulchenko G.M. Naukometriya 1969, Nauka, Moscow.
216. Narin F. Evaluative Bibliometrics. The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity 1976, PB-252 339. Prepared for National Science Foundation: Computer Horizons, Inc.
217. Narin F., Hamilton K.S., Olivastro D. The development of science indicators in the United States. The Web of Knowledge. A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. ASIS Monograph Series 2000, 337-360. Information Today, Inc, Medford, NJ. B. Cronin, H.B. Atkins (Eds.).
218. Narin F., Pinski G., Gee H.H. Structure of the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1976, 27:25-45.
219. Narin F., Shapiro R.T. The extramural role of the NIH as a research support agency. Federation Proceedings 1977, 36:2470-2476.
220. Nederhof A.J., Van Raan A.F.J. A validation study of bibliometric indicators: The comparative performance of cum laude doctorates in chemistry. Scientometrics 1989, 17:427-435.
221. Nederhof A.J., Van Raan A.F.J. A bibliometric analysis of six economics research groups: A comparison with peer review. Research Policy 1993, 22:353-368.
222. Noyons E.C.M. Bibliometric Mapping as a Science Policy and Research Management Tool 1999, DSWO Press, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
223. Noyons E.C.M., Moed H.F., Luwel M. Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1999, 50:115-131.
224. Oberski J.E.J. Some statistical aspects of co-citation cluster analysis and a judgment by physicists. Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology 1988, 431-462. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam. A.F.J. Van Raan (Ed.).
225. Oppenheim C. The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise ratings for British library and information science university departments. Journal of Documentation 1995, 51:18-27.
226. Oppenheim C., Renn S.P. Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1978, 29:225-231.
227. Persson O., Glänzel W., Danell R. Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics 2004, 60:421-432.
228. Peters H.P.F., Van Raan A.F.J. Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part I: Representations by direct multidimensional scaling. Research Policy 1993, 22:23-45.
229. Peters H.P.F., Van Raan A.F.J. Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part II: Representations by combined clustering and multidimensional scaling. Research Policy 1993, 22:47-71.
230. Peters H.P.F., Van Raan A.F.J. On determinants of citations scores: A case study in chemical engineering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1994, 45:39-49.
231. Peters H.P.F., Braam R.R., Van Raan A.F.J. Cognitive resemblance and citation relations in chemical engineering publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1995, 46:9-21.
232. Peterson C.J. Citation analysis of astronomical literature: Comments on citation half-lives. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1988, 100:106-115.
233. Planck M. Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers 1949, pp. 33-4, Philosophical Library, New York.
234. Plomp R. Statistical reliability of citation frequency as an indicator of scientific impact. Scientometrics 1989, 17:71-81.
235. Plomp R. The significance of the number of highly cited papers as an indicator of scientific prolificacy. Scientometrics 1990, 19:185-197.
236. Plomp R. The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research group's scientific performance. Scientometrics 1994, 29:377-393.
237. Pollmann T. Forgetting and the ageing of scientific publications. Scientometrics 2000, 47:43-54.
238. Popescu I.-I. On a Zipf's law extension to impact factors. Glottometrics 2003, 6:83-93.
239. Porter A.L. Citation analysis: queries and caveats. Social Studies of Science 1977, 7:257-267.
240. Pouris A. Evaluating academic science institutions in South Africa. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1989, 40:269-272.
241. Prabha C.G. Some aspects of citation behavior: A pilot study in business administration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1983, 34:202-206.
242. Price D.J.De Solla Science since Babylon 1961, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
243. Price D.J.De Solla Little Science, Big Science 1963, Columbia University Press, New York.
244. Price D.J.De Solla Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology and non-science. Communication among Scientists and Engineers 1970, 3-22. D.C. Heath and Company, Lexington, MA. C.E. Nelson, D.K. Pollock (Eds.).
245. Price D.J.De Solla A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1976, 27:292-306.
246. Price D.J.De Solla Toward a model for science indicators. Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators 1978, 69-95. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R.K. Merton, A. Thackray, H. Zuckerman (Eds.).
247. Price D.J.De Solla, Beaver D.B. Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist 1966, 21:1011-1018.
248. RAE Research Assessment Exercise: The Outcome. Description of the RAE results 2001, http://www.hero.ac.uk/rae/Pubs/4_01/sectionl.htm.
249. Rai L.P., Lal K. Indicators of the information revolution. Technology in Society 2000, 22:221-235.
250. Raisig L.M. Mathematical evaluation of the scientific serial. Science 1960, 131:1417-1419.
251. Ramanana-Rahary S., Zitt M., Rousseau R. Aggregation properties of relative impact and other classical indicators: Convexity issues and the Yule-Simpson Paradox 2007, 643-654. CINDOC-CSIC, Madrid. D. Torres-Salinas, H.F. Moed (Eds.).
252. Ramirez A.M., Garcia E.O., Del Río J.A. Renormalized impact factor. Scientometrics 2000, 47:3-9.
253. Rao I.K.R., Meera B.M. Growth and obsolescence of literature: An empirical study. Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Scientometrics and Informetrics 1992, 377-394. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, Bangalore, India. I.K.R. Rao (Ed.).
254. Rao I.K.R., Sahoo B.B. A study of rank distributions of journals and articles. Proceedings of ISSI 2005 - the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics 2005, 140-148. Karolinska University Press, Stockholm. P. Ingwersen, B. Larsen (Eds.).
255. Ravetz J.R. Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems 1971, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
256. Redner S. How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. The European Physical Journal B 1998, 4:131-134.
257. Relman A.S. Lessons from the Darsee affair. New England Journal of Medicine 1983, 308:1415-1417.
258. Rinia E.J., Van Leeuwen T.N., Van Vuren H.G., Van Raan A.F.J. Comparing a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria: Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands. Research Policy 1998, 27:95-107.
259. Rinia E.J. Scientometric studies and their role in research policy of two research councils in the Netherlands. Scientometrics 2000, 47:363-378.
260. Roose K.D., Andersen C.J. A Rating of Graduate Program 1970, American Council on Education, Washington, DC.
261. Rousseau R. Why am I not cited or, why are multi-authored papers more cited than others?. Journal of Documentation 1992, 48:79-80.
262. Rousseau R., Van Hooydonk G. Journal production and journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1996, 47:775-780.
263. Rousseau R., Smeyers M. Output-financing at LUC. Scientometrics 2000, 47:379-387.
264. Rousseau S., Rousseau R. Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators. Scientometrics 1997, 40:45-56.
265. Schubert A., Braun T. Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics 1986, 9:281-291.
266. Schubert A., Braun T. Reference standards for citation based assessments. Scientometrics 1993, 26:21-35.
267. Schubert A., Braun T. Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators. Scientometrics 1996, 36:311-324.
268. Schubert A., Csobádi P., Nagy J., Braun T. Scientometric Study of the Publication Activity of 85 Hungarian Research Institutes (in Hungarian) 1981, Magyar Tudomanyos Akadémia Könyvtara, Budapest.
269. Schubert A., Glänzel W. Statistical reliability of comparisons based on the citation impact of scientific publications. Scientometrics 1983, 5:59-73.
270. Schubert A., Glänzel W., Braun T. Relative citation rate: A new indicator for measuring the impact of publications. Proceedings of the First National Conference with International Participation on Scientometrics and Linguistics of the Scientific Text 1983, 80-81. Bulgarian Sociological Association, Varna. D. Tomov, L. Dimitrova (Eds.).
271. Schubert A., Glänzel W., Braun T. Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981-1985. Scientometrics 1989, 16:1-478.
272. Schubert A., Glänzel W., Braun T. World flash on basic research - scientometric datafiles supplementary indicators on 96 countries 1981-1985. 1. Distribution of publication types in an extended source set. Scientometrics 1990, 18:173-177.
273. Schummer J. Scientometric studies on chemistry I: The exponential growth of chemical substances, 1800-1995. Scientometrics 1997, 39:107-123.
274. Seglen P.O. The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1992, 43:628-638.
275. Seglen P.O. Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1994, 45:1-11.
276. Seglen P.O. Quantification of scientific article contents. Scientometrics 1996, 35:355-366.
277. Seglen P.O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal 1997, 314:498-502.
278. Sen B.K. Normalized Impact Factor. Journal of Documentation 1992, 48:318-329.
279. Sen B.K., Shailendra K. Evaluation of recent scientific research output by a bibliometric method. Scientometrics 1992, 23:31-46.
280. Sen S.K. Theoretical issues in citation process: A review. The International Journal of Scientometrics and Informetrics 1996, 2:159-198.
281. Shadish W.R., Tolliver D., Gray M., Sen Gupta S.K. Author judgments about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science 1995, 25:477-498.
282. Sharma P., Garg K.C. Research output of mathematics: Structure and dynamics. Emerging Trends in Scientometrics 1999, 129-140. Allied Publishers Ltd., New Delhi. P.S. Nagpaul, K.C. Garg, B.M. Gupta (Eds.).
283. Shrum W., Mullins N. Network analysis in the study of science and technology. Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology 1988, 107-133. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam. A.F.J. Van Raan (Ed.).
284. Singh U.N., Arunachalam S. Publication and citation patterns in the literature of liquide crystals with special reference to the contribution of India, Canada, Japan, United Kingdom and the Soviet Union. Scientometrics 1991, 20:197-220.
285. Sivertsen G. A bibliometric model for performance based budgeting of research institutions 2006, 133-135. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - Steunpunt O&O Statistieken, Leuven. B. Schlemmer (Ed.).
286. Small H. Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1999, 50:799-813.
287. Small H. Paradigms, citations, and maps of science: A personal history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54:394-399.
288. Small H. Why authors think their papers are highly cited. Scientometrics 2004, 60:305-316.
289. Small H. Tracking and predicting growth areas in science. Scientometrics 2006, 68:595-610.
290. Smith S.J. Drug information bulletins: An analysis of citations. Journal of Information Science 1996, 22:375-380.
291. Sokal R.R. Classification: Purposes, principles, progress, prospects. Science 1974, 185:1115-1123.
292. Sombatsompop N., Markpin T., Yochai W., Saechiew M. An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using Impact Factor Point Average (IFPA) index: Thailand case study. Scientometrics 2005, 65:293-305.
293. Sorenson O., Fleming L. Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Research Policy 2004, 33:1615-1634.
294. Spiegel-Rösing I. Science studies: Bibliometric and content analysis. Social Studies of Science 1977, 7:97-113.
295. Stinson E.R., Lancaster F.W. Synchronous versus diachronous methods in the measurement of obsolescence by citation studies. Journal of Information Science 1987, 13:65-74.
296. Tague J. Ranks and sizes: some complementarities and contrasts. Journal of Information Science 1990, 16:29-35.
297. Tague J., Beheshti J., Rees-Potter L. The law of exponential growth: Evidence, implications and forecasts. Library Trends 1981, 30:125-149.
298. Thorn F.C. The citation index: Another case of spurious validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1977, 33:1157-1161.
299. Todorov R., Glanzel W. Journal citation measures: A concise review. Journal of Information Science 1988, 14:47-56.
300. Trueba F.J., Guerrero H. A robust formula to credit authors for their publications. Scientometrics 2004, 60:181-204.
301. Van den Berghe H., Houben J.A., De Bruin R.E., Moed H.F., Kint A., Luwel M., Spruyt E.H.J. Bibliometric indicators of university research performance in Flanders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1998, 49:59-67.
302. Van Hooydonk G. Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1997, 48:944-945.
303. Van Hooydonk G. Standardizing relative impacts: Estimating the quality of research from citation counts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1998, 49:932-941.
304. Van Leeuwen T.N. Descriptive versus evaluative bibliometrics. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems 2004, 373-388. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. H.F. Moed, W. Glanzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.).
305. Van Leeuwen T.N., Moed H.F. Characteristics of journal impact factors: The effects of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors. Scientometrics 2005, 63:357-371.
306. Van Leeuwen T.N., Thed N., Moed H.F., Reedijk J. Critical comments on Institute for Scientific Information Impact Factors: A sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals. Journal of Information Science 1999, 25(6):489-498.
307. Van Leeuwen T.N., Van der Wurff L.J., Van Raan A.F.J. The use of combined bibliometric methods in research funding policy. Research Evaluation 2001, 10:195-201.
308. Van Leeuwen T.N., Visser M.S., Moed H.F., Nederhof T.J., Van Raan A.F.J. Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics 2003, 57:257-280.
309. Van Raan A.F.J. On growth, ageing, and fractal differentiation of science. Scientometrics 2000, 47:347-362.
310. Van Raan A.F.J. Measuring science. Capita selecta of current main issues. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems 2004, 19-50. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.).
311. Van Raan A.F.J. Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics 2006, 67:491-502.
312. Vinkler P. Management system for a scientific research institute based on the assessment of scientific publications. Research Policy 1986, 15:77-87.
313. Vinkler P. Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications. Scientometrics 1986, 10:157-177.
314. Vinkler P. A quasi-quantitative citation model. Scientometrics 1987, 12:47-72.
315. Vinkler P. An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes. Scientometrics 1988, 13:239-259.
316. Vinkler P. Bibliometric features of some scientific subfields and the scientometric consequences therefrom. Scientometrics 1988, 14:453-474.
317. Vinkler P. Possible causes of differences in information impact of journals from different subfields. Scientometrics 1991, 20:145-161.
318. Vinkler P. Magic triangle for three relative impact indicators. Scientometrics 1991, 21:143-146.
319. Vinkler P. Research contribution, authorship and team cooperativeness. Scientometrics 1993, 26:213-230.
320. Vinkler P. Model of manifested communication through publications. Scientometrics 1994, 31:223-239.
321. Vinkler P. Relationships between the rate of scientific development and citations. The chance for citedness model. Scientometrics 1996, 35:375-386.
322. Vinkler P. Model for quantitative selection of relative scientometric impact indicators. Scientometrics 1996, 36:223-226.
323. Vinkler P. Relations of relative scientometric impact indicators. The Relative Publication Strategy Index. Scientometrics 1997, 40:163-169.
324. Vinkler P. General performance indexes calculated for research institutes of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences based on scientometric indicators. Scientometrics 1998, 41:185-200.
325. Vinkler P. Comparative investigation of frequency and strength of motives toward referencing. The reference threshold model. Scientometrics 1998, 43:107-127.
326. Vinkler P. Ratio of short term and long term impact factors and similarities of chemistry journals represented by references. Scientometrics 1999, 46:621-633.
327. Vinkler P. Letter to the Editor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1999, 50:958.
328. Vinkler P. Publication velocity, publication growth and impact factor: An empirical model. The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. ASIS Monograph Series 2000, 163-176. Information Today, Inc, Medford, NJ. B. Cronin, H.B. Atkins (Eds.).
329. Vinkler P. Evaluation of the publication activity of research teams by means of scientometric indicators. Current Science 2000, 79:602-612.
330. Vinkler P. An attempt for defining some basic categories of scientometrics and classifying the indicators of evaluative scientometrics. Scientometrics 2001, 50:539-544.
331. Vinkler P. The institutionalization of scientific information. The Scientometric Model (ISI-S MODEL). Library Trends 2002, 50:553-569.
332. Vinkler P. Subfield problems in applying the Garfield (Impact) Factors in practice. Scientometrics 2002, 53:267-279.
333. Vinkler P. Dynamic changes in the chance for citedness. Scientometrics 2002, 54:421-434.
334. Vinkler P. Relations of relative scientometric indicators. Scientometrics 2003, 58:687-694.
335. Vinkler P. Characterization of the impact of sets of scientific papers: The Garfield (Impact) Factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2004, 55:431-435.
336. Vinkler P. Science indicators, economic development and the wealth of nations. Scientometrics 2005, 63:417-419.
337. Vinkler P. Composite scientometric indicators for evaluating publications of research institutes. Scientometrics 2006, 68:629-642.
338. Vinkler P. Introducing the Contemporary Contribution Index for characterizing the recent relevant impact of journals 2007, 753-760. CINDOC-CSIC, Madrid, (See also Scientometrics: 79 (2009) 409-20.). D. Torres-Salinas, H.F. Moed (Eds.).
339. Vinkler P. Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science 2007, 33:481-491.
340. Vinkler P. Correlation between the structure of scientific research, scientometric indicators and GDP in EU and non-EU countries. Scientometrics 2008, 74:237-254.
341. Vinkler P. The π-index. A new indicator for assessing scientific impact. Journal of Information Science 2009, 35:602-612.
342. Vinkler P. The π-index. A new indicator for characterizing impact of journals 2009, 274-276. Austrian Research Centers-ARC Vienna, Vienna, (To be published in Scientometrics). J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel (Eds.).
343. Virgo J.A. A statistical procedure for evaluating the importance of scientific papers. The Library Quarterly 1977, 47:415-430.
344. Vlachy J. Citation histories of scientific publications. The data sources. Scientometrics 1985, 7:505-528.
345. Warner J. A critical review of the application of citation studies to the Research Assessment Exercises. Journal of Information Science 2000, 26:453-460.
346. Watson A. UK research funding - Universities raise their game, but the money doesn't flow. Science 2001, 294:2448-2449.
347. Weiss C.H. Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection 1978, 23-81. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. L. Lynn (Ed.).
348. Winston R.B. A suggested procedure for determining order of authorship in research publications. Journal of Counseling and Development 1985, 63:515-518.
349. Wolfram D., Chu C.M., Lu X. Growth of knowledge: Bibliometric analysis using online database data. Informetrics 89/90 1990, 355-372. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam. L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds.).
350. Wuchty S., Jones B.F., Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 2007, 316:1036-1039.
351. Yanovsky V.I. Citation analysis of significance of scientific journals. Scientometrics 1981, 3:223-233.
352. Yi Su., Hou Li-Feng A new literature growth model: Variable exponential growth law of literature. Scientometrics 1998, 42:259-265.
353. Zitt M., Ramanana-Rahary S., Bassecoulard E. Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalization. Scientometrics 2005, 63:373-401.
354. Zuckerman H.A. Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. American Journal of Sociology 1968, 74:276-291.