UK Research Assessment Exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity?

Scientometrics

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 153-161

  Moed, Henk F ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37549067006     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-0108-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Bence, V., Oppenheim, C. (2004). The role of academic journal publications in the UK Research Assessment Exercise. Learned Publishing, 17: 53-68.
2. Butler, L. (2002). A list of published papers is no measure of value. Nature, 419: 877.
3. Garfield, E. (1996). How can impact factors be improved? British Medical Journal, 313: 411-413.
4. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430: 311-316.
5. Lipsett, A., Fazackerley, A. (2005). RAE shifts focus from prestige journals. Times Higher Education Supplement, 22 July.
6. Moed, H. F., De Bruin, R. E., Van Leeuwen, Th. N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33: 381-442.
7. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
8. Seglen, P. O. (1994). Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45: 1-11.
9. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Measuring Science. In: Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (2004) (eds). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. Dordrecht (the Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers, 19-50.
10. Watkins, D. (2005). Authors per paper. Sigmetrics Digest, 19-20 May 2005-Special Issue (#2005-77).