The Institutionalization of Scientific Information: A Scientometric Model (ISI-S Model)

Library Trends

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 553-569

  Vinkler, Peter ^a  

^a CHEMICAL RESEARCH CENTER   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25844435707     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Alvarez, P.; Escalona, I.; & Pulgarin, A. (2000). What is wrong with obsolescence? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 57(9), 812-815.
2. Atkinson, R. (1984). The citation as intertext: Toward a theory of the selection process. Library Resources and Technical Services, 25(2), 109-119.
3. Barton, D., & Ollis, W. D. (Eds.) (1979). Comprehensive organic chemistry. New York: Pergamon Press.
4. Bockris, J., & Hodko, D. (1990). Is there evidence for cold fusion? Chemistry and Industry, 21, 688-692.
5. Bourke, P., & Butler, L. (1996). Publication types, citation rates and evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(3), 473-494.
6. Brown, P. R., & Grushka, E. (Eds.) (1998). Advances in chromatography. New York: Marcel Dekker.
7. Bynum, W. F.; Browne, E. J.; & Porter R. (Eds.) (1981). Dictionary of the history of science. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
8. Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1968). Visibility and the structural bases of awareness of scientific research. American Sociological Review, 33(3), 397-413.
9. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10. Earle, P., & Vickery, B. C. (1969). Subject relations in science/technology literature. ASLIB Proceedings, 21(6), 237-243.
11. Egghe, L. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization: Definitions and relations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(11), 1004-1017.
12. Egghe, L., & Rao, I. K. R. (1992). Classification of growth models based on growth rates and its applications. Scientometrics, 25(1), 5-46.
13. Garvey, W. D. (1979). Communication: The essence of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
14. Garvey, W. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1971). Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge. American Psychologist, 26(4), 349-362.
15. Gilbert, G. N. (1978). Measuring the growth of science: A review of indicators of scientific growth. Scientometrics, 1(1), 9-34.
16. Goffman, W., & Warren, K. S. (1980). Scientific information systems and the principle of selectivity. New York: Praeger.
17. Gupta, B. M., & Karisiddappa, C. R. (2000). Modelling the growth of literature in the area of theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics, 49(2), 321-355
18. Gupta, B. M.; Sharma Praveen; & Karisiddappa C. R. (1997). Growth of research literature in scientific specialities. A modeling perspective. Scientometrics, 40(3), 507-528.
19. Hamilton, D. P. (1991). Research papers: Who's uncited now? Science, 251(4987), p. 25.
20. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Menard, H. W. (1971). Science: Growth and change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press.
23. Mulkay, M. J.; Gilbert, G. N.; & Woolgar, S. (1975). Problem areas and research networks in science. Sociology, 9(2), 187-203.
24. Mullins, N. C. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. New York: Harper and Row.
25. Nalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya (in Russian). Moscow: Izd. Nauka.
26. Neumūller, O. A. (Ed.) (1981). Römpps chemie-lexikon. Stuttgart: Franck'sche Verlagshandlung, Kosmos-Verlag.
27. Price, D. J. de Solla (1963). Little science, bigsdence. New York: Columbia University Press.
28. Rescher, N. (1978). Scientific progress: A philosophical essay on the economics of research in natural science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
29. Singh, U. N., & Arunachalam, S. (1991). Publication and citation patterns in the literature of liquide crystals with special reference to the contribution of India, Canada, Japan, United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union. Scientometrics, 20(1), 197-220.
30. Sykes, A. G. (Ed.) (1994). Advances in inorganic chemistry. San Diego: Academic Press.
31. van Raan, A. F. J. (2000). On growth, ageing, and fractal differentiation of science. Scientometrics, 47(2), 347-362.
32. Vinkler, P. (1997). Relations of relative scientometric impact indicators. The Relative Publication Strategy Index. Scientometrics, 40(1), 163-169.
33. Vinkler, P. (1998). Comparative investigation of frequency and strength of motives toward referencing. The reference threshold model. Scientometrics, 43(1) 107-127.
34. Vinkler, P. (1999). Ratio of short-term and long-term impact factors and similarities of chemistry-journals represented by references. Scientometrics, 46(3), 621-633.
35. Vinkler, P. (2000). Publication velocity, publication growth and impact factor: An empirical model. In B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge (pp. 173-176). ASIS Monograph Series. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
36. Vinkler, P. (2002). Dynamic changes in the chance for citedness. Scientometrics, 54(3) (in press).
37. nd International Conference on Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics, London, Ontario, Canada) (pp. 355-372). Amsterdam: Elsevier.