Using categorisations of citations when assessing the outcomes from health research

Scientometrics

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 357-379

  Hanney, Steve ^a   Frame, Iain ^b   Grant, Jonathan ^c   Buxton, Martin ^a   Young, Tracey ^a   Lewison, Grant ^d  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^d CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444506180     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-005-0279-y     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. AKSNES, D. W. (2003) A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics, 56 (2) : 235-246.
2. ALLEN, B., QIN, J., LANCASTER, F. W. (1994), Persuasive communities: a longitudinal analysis of references in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1665-1990. Social Studies of Science, 24:279-310.
3. BONZI, S., SNYDER, H. (1991), Motivations for citation: a comparison of self citation and citation to others. Scientometrics, 21 (2) : 245-254.
4. BROOKS, T. A. (1985), Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36 : 223-229.
5. BUXTON, M., HANNEY, S. (1996), How can payback from health services research be assessed? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 1(1): 35-43.
6. BUXTON, M., HANNEY, S. (1998), Evaluating the NHS R&D programme: will the programme give value for money? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 91 (s 35) : 2-6.
7. BUXTON, M., SCHNEIDER, W. (1999), Assessing the 'Payback' from AHFMR-funded Research. Edmonton, Canada: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.
8. CANO, V. (1989), Citation behavior: Classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (4) : 284-290.
9. CASE, D., HIGGINS, G. (2000), How can we investigate citation behaviour? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 : 635-645.
10. CHUBIN, D. E., MOITRA, S. D. (1975), Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5 : 423-441.
11. COMROE, J. H., DRIPPS, R. D. (1974), Ben Franklin and open heart surgery. Circulation Research, 35:661-669.
12. COMROE, J. H., DRIPPS, R. D. (1976), Scientific basis for the support of Biomedical Science. Science, 192:105-111.
13. COZZENS, S. E. (1985), Comparing the sciences: Citation context analysis of papers from neuropharmacology and the sociology of science. Social Studies of Science, 15 : 127-153.
14. COZZENS, S. E. (1997), The knowledge pool: measurement challenges in evaluating fundamental research programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20 : 77-89.
15. CRAGHILL, D., WILSON, T. D. (1987) The Impact of Information Research. British Library Research Paper 20. Sheffield: Department of Information Sciences, University of Sheffield.
16. CRONIN, B. (1981), Agreement and divergence on referencing practice. Journal of Information Sciences, 3(1): 27-33.
17. CRONIN, B. (1984), The Citation Process. The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication. London: Taylor Graham.
18. CROXSON, B., HANNEY, S., BUXTON, M. (2001), Routine Monitoring of performance: what makes health research and development different? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 6 (4) : 226-232.
19. DUNCAN, E. B., et al. (1981), Qualified citation indexing: its relevance to educational technology. In: DUNCAN, E. B., MCALEESE, A. (Eds). Information Retrieval in educational technology. Proceedings of the First Symposium on Information Retrieval in Educational Technology, 1 April 1981, Aberdeen. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen, pp. 70-79.
20. GAMI, A. S., MONTORI, V. M., WILCZYSKI, N. L., HAYNES, R. B. (2004), Author self-citation in the diabetes literature. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170 : 1925-1927.
21. GARFIELD, E. (1996), When to cite. Library Quarterly, 66 (4) : 449-458.
22. GILBERT, G. N. (1977), Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7 : 113-122.
23. GLÄNZEL, W., THUS, B., SCHLEMMER, B. (2004), A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication. Scientometrics, 59 (1) : 63-77.
24. GLÄSER, J., LAUDEL, G. (2001), Integrating scientometric indicators into sociological studies: methodical and methodological problems. Scientometrics, 52 (3) : 411-434.
25. GRANT, J., COTTERELL, R., CLUZEAU, F., FAWCETT, G. (2000), Evaluating "payback" on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: applied bibliometric study. BMJ, 320, 1107-1111.
26. GRANT, J., GREEN, L., MASON, B. (2003), From Bedside to Bench: Comroe and Dripps Revisited. HERG Research Report No 30. Uxbridge: Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University. Available as a pdf file from: http://www.brunel.ac.uk/depts/herg/publications/internal.htm
27. HANNEY, S., FRAME, I., GRANT, J., GREEN, P., BUXTON, M. (2003), From Bench to Bedside: Tracing the Payback Forwards from Basic or Early Clinical Research -A Preliminary Exercise and Proposals for a Future Study. HERG Research Report No 31. Uxbridge: Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University. Available as a pdf file from: http://www.brunel.ac.uk/depts/herg/publications/ internal.htm
28. HANNEY, S., GRANT, J., WOODING, S., BUXTON, M. J. (2004), Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: the impact of funding by the UK's 'Arthritis Research Campaign'. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2:4
29. [http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/pdf/1478-4505-2-4.pdf].
30. KIM, K. (2004), The motivation for citing specific references by social scientists in Korea: The phenomenon of co-existing references. Scientometrics, 59 (1) : 79-93.
31. KOSTOFF, R. N. (1998), The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 43 (1) : 27-43.
32. KUHN, T. S. (1970), The structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. LEWISON, G. (2002), From biomedical research to health improvement. Scientometrics, 54 (2) : 179-192.
34. LEWISON, G., WILCOX-JAY, K. (2003), Getting biomedical research into practice - the citations from UK clinical guidelines. Proceedings of the Ninth ISSI conference, Beijing, China, August 2003.
35. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1998), Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43 (1) : 5-25.
36. LIPETZ, B. A. (1965), Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through the inclusion of citation relationship indicators. American Documentation, 16 : 81-90.
37. MARTIN, B., IRVINE, J. (1983), Assessing basic research: some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy, 12 : 61-90.
38. MASON, B., GREEN, L., GRANT, J. (2001), Factors that lead to advances in neonatal intensive care: Comroe and Dripps revisited. Research Evaluation, 10 (2) : 121-127.
39. MARIČIĆ, S., SPAVENTI, J., PAVIČIĆ, L., PIFAT-MRZLJAK, G. (1997), Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 : 530-540.
40. MCCAIN, W. K., TURNER, K. (1989), Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics. Scientometrics, 17 (1-2) : 127-163.
41. MORAVCSIK, M. J., MURUGESAN, P. (1975), Function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5 : 86-92.
42. MORAVCSIK, M. J., MURUGESAN, P. (1979), Citation patterns in scientific revolutions. Scientometrics, 1(2): 161-169.
43. OPPENHEIM, C., RENN, S. P. (1978), Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29 : 225-231.
44. PICHAPPAN, P., SARAVADY, S. (2002), The other side of the coin: The intricacies of author self-citations. Scientometrics, 54 (2) : 285-290.
45. PRABHA, C. G. (1983), Some aspects of citation behavior: A pilot study in business administration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(3): 202-206.
46. RAITEN, D., BERMAN, S. (1993), Can the Impact of Basic Biomedical Research be Measured?: A Case Study Approach. Bethesda MD: Life Sciences Research Office, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
47. ROUSSEAU, R., (1987), The Gozinto theorem: using citations to determine influences on a scientific publication. Scientometrics, 11 (3-4) : 217-219.
48. SHADISH, W. R., TOLLIVER, D., GRAY, M., SEN GUPTA, S. K. (1995), Author judgments about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25 : 477-498.
49. SHINN, T. (2002), The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge: Prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Science, 32 (4) : 599-614.
50. SMALL, H. (1978), Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8 : 327-340.
51. SMALL, H. G. (1982), Citation context and content analysis. In: DERVIN, B., VOIGHT, M. (Eds), Progress in Communication Sciences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 3 : 287-310.
52. SMITH, R. (2001), Measuring the social impact of research. BMJ, 323 : 528.
53. STATA PRESS. (1999), STATA Reference Manual: Release 7.0. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
54. SPIEGEL-RÖSING, I. (1977), Science Studies: Bibliometric and Content Analysis. Social Studies of Science, 7:97-113.
55. VAN WEEL, C. (2002), Biomedical science matters for people - so its impact should be better assessed. Lancet, 360:1034-1035.
56. VINKLER, P. (1998), Comparative investigation of frequency and strength of motives towards referencing. The reference threshold model. Scientometrics, 43 (1) : 107-127.
57. WHITE, M. D., WANG, P. (1997), A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly, 67 (2) : 122-154.
58. WOODING, S., HANNEY, S., BUXTON, M., GRANT, J. (2005), Payback arising from research funding: evaluation of the Arthritis Research Campaign. Rheumatology, 44 : 1145-1156.