A scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes

Scientometrics

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 307-321

  Coccia, Mario ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444481974     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-005-0276-1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ALTMAN, E. I. (1978), Financial application of discriminant analysis: a clarification, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 13 (1): 185-195.
2. BALL, R., WILKINSON, R. (1994), The use and abuse of performance indicators in UK higher education, Higher Education, 27:417-427.
3. COCCIA, M. (2001), A basic model for evaluating R&D performance: theory and application in Italy, R&D Management, 31 (4):453-464.
4. COCCIA, M. (2004), Models for measuring the research performance and identifying the productivity of public research institutes, R&D Management, 34 (3): 267-280.
5. COCCIA, M., ROLFO, S. (2002), Technology transfer analysis in the Italian National Research Council, Technovation, 22: 291-299.
6. DAST CNR (2003), CNR Report, D'Anselmi (Ed.), Rome.
7. DIETZ J. S., BOZEMAN, B. (2005), Academic carrers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital, Research Policy, 34 (3): 349-367.
8. ETZKOWITZ, H., LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000), The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29 (2): 109-123.
9. GEISLER, E. (1995), An integrated cost-performance model of research and development evaluation, Omega, 23 (3): 281-294.
10. GEISLER, E. (2000), The Metrics of Science and Technology. Westport, Connecticut, London: Quorum Books.
11. GUAN, J., WANG, J. (2004), Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency, Scientometrics, 59: 131-155.
12. HARE, P. G., WYATT, G. J. (1988), Modelling the determinant of research output in British universities. Research Policy, 17: 315-28.
13. HARRIS, G., KAINE, G. (1994), The determinants of research performance: a study of Australian university economists, Higher Education, 27: 191-201.
14. HART, O., HOLMSTROM, B. (1985), Theory of contracts. In: T. BEWLEY (Ed.), Advances in Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. HERBST M. (2004), Governance and Management of Research Universities: Funding and Budgeting as Instruments of Change. Center for science and technology studies, 4, Bern, CH.
16. JOHNES, G. (1992), Performance indicators in higher education: A survey of recent work, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 8 (2): 19-34.
17. LEE, C. K. (2003) A scientometric study of the research performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore, Scientometrics, 56: 95-110.
18. LEIBENSTEIN, H. (1966), Allocative efficiency versus «X- Efficiency», The American Economic Review, 56:392-415.
19. LEVINTHAL, D. (1988) A survey of agency models of Organizations, Journal Economic Behavior and Organization, 153-186.
20. LUNDVALL, B. (1992) National Systems of Innovation, Pinter Publishers, London.
21. LUWEL, M., NOYONS, C. M., MOED, F. (1999), Bibliometric assessment of research performance in Flanders; policy background and implications, R&D Management, 29 (2): 133-141.
22. MASSART, D. L., VANDEGINSTE, B. G. M., DEMING, S. N., MICHOTTE, Y., KAUFMAN, L. (1988), Chemometrics: A Textbook, Elsevier.
23. MORENO A. A., TADEPALLI, R. (2002), Assessing academic department efficiency at a public university. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23: 385-397.
24. Morris Report (1990), Performance Indicators, Report of a Committee Enquiry chaired by Mr. Alfred Morris, PCFC.
25. NAGPAUL, P. S., ROY, S. (2003), Constructing a multi-objective measure of research performance, Scientometrics, 56:383-402.
26. NARIN, F., HAMILTON, K. S. (1996), Bibliometric performance measures, Scientometrics, 36: 293-310.
27. th European Association for Institutional Research Forum. Trier, 27-30 August.
28. RADNER, R. (1987), Decentralization and incentives. In: T. GROVES, R. RADNER, S. REITER (Eds), Information, Incentives and Economic Mechanisms. Oxford: Blackwell.
29. ROMER, P. M. (1990), Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): 71-102.
30. RUBENSTEIN, A., GEISLER, E. (1991), Evaluating the Outputs and Impacts of R&D/Innovation, International Journal of Technology Management, Special publication on the Role of Technology in Corporate Policy, 181-204.
31. SENKER, J. (2001), Changing organisation of public sector research in Europe - implications for benchmarking human resources in RTD, Paper prepared for Human resources in RTD session of the "The contribution of European socio-economic research to the benchmarking of RTD policies in Europe". Conference: Brussels, March 15-16.
32. SEXTON, T. R. (1986), The methodology of data envelopment analysis. In: R. H. SILKMAN (Ed.), Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
33. STAINER, A., NIXON, B. (1997), Productivity and performance measurement in R&D, International Journal of Technology Management, 13 (5-6): 486-496.