Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

British Medical Journal

Volumn 314, Issue 7079, 1997, Pages 498-502

  Seglen, Per O ^a  

^a Inst Studs Res and Higher Educ   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BIBLIOMETRICS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; SPECIALTIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 0031049280     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Hansen HF, Jørgensen BH. Styring af forskning: kan forskningsindikatorer anvendes? Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur, 1995.
2. Cole S, Cole JR, Simon GA. Chance and consensus in peer review. Science 1981;214:881-6.
3. Ernst E, Saradeth T, Resch KL. Drawbacks of peer review. Nature 1993;363:296.
4. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 1972;178:471-9.
5. Calza L, Garbisa S. Italian professorships. Nature 1995;374:492.
6. Drettner B, Seglen PO, Sivertsen G. Inverkanstal soin fördelningsinstrument: ej accepterat av tidskrifter i Norden. Läkartidningen 1994;91:744-5.
7. Gøtzsche PC, Krog JW, Moustgaard R. Bibliometrisk analyse af dansk sundhedsvidenskabelig forskning 1988-1992. Ugeskr laeger 1995;157:5075-81.
8. Taubes G. Measure for measure in science. Science 1993;260:884-6.
9. Vinkler P. Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications. Scientometrics 1986;10:157-77.
10. Maffulli N. More on citation analysis. Nature 1995;378:760.
11. Seglen PO. The skewness of Science. J Am Soc Information Sci 1992;43:628-38.
12. Seglen PO. Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. J Am Soc Information Sci 1994;45:1-11.
13. Gordon MD. How authors select journals: a test of the reward maximization model of submission behaviour. Social Studies of Science 1984;14:27-43.
14. Braun T, Glänzel W, Grupp H. The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989-1993. Part II. Life sciences. Scientometrics 1996;34:207-37.
15. Magri M-H, Solari A. The SCI Journal Citation Reports: a potential tool for studying journals? I. Description of the JCR journal population based on the number of citations received, number of source items, impact factor, immediacy index and cited half-life. Scientometrics 1996;35:93-117.
16. Moed HF, Van Leeuwen TN. Impact factors can mislead. Nature 1996;381:186.
17. Moed HF, Van Leeuwen TN, Reedijk J. A critical analysis of the journal impact factors of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Inaccuracies in published impact factors based on overall citations only. Scientometrics 1996;37:105-16.
18. Bourke P, Butler L. Standard issues in a national bibliometric database: the Australian case. Scientometrics 1996;35:199-207.
19. Seglen PO. Evaluation of scientists by journal impact. In: Weingart P, Sehringer R, Winterhager M, eds. Representations of science and technology. Leiden: DSWO Press, 1992;240-52.
20. Sengupta IN. Three new parameters in bibliometric research and their application to rerank periodicals in the field of biochemistry. Scientometrics 1986;10:235-42.
21. Semenza G. Editorial. FEBS Lett 1996;389:1-2.
22. Seglen PO. Kan siteringsanalyse og andre bibliometriske metoder brukes [i] evaluering av forskningskvalilet? NOP-Nytt (Helsingfors) 1989;15:2-20.
23. Metcalfe NB. Journal impact factors. Nature 1995;77:260-1.
24. Mord HF, Burger WJM, Frankfort JG, Van Raan AFJ. The application of bibliometric indicators: important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered. Scientometrics 1985;8:177-203.
25. Lange L. Effects of disciplines and countries on citation habits. An analysis of empirical papers in behavioural sciences. Scientometrics 1985;8:205-15.
26. Sorokin NI. Impact factors of Russian journals. Nature 1996;380:578.
27. Andersen H. ACTA Sociologica på den internationale arena-livad kan SSCI fortælle? Dansk Sociologi 1996;2:72-8.
28. Moed HF, Burger WJM, Frankfort JG, Van Raan AFJ. On the measurement of research performance: the use of bibliometric indicatiors. Leiden: Science Studies Unit, LISBON-Institute, University of Leiden, 1987.
29. Sivertsen G. Norsk forskning på den internasjonale arena. En sammenlikning av 18 OECD-lands artikler og siteringer i Science Citation Index 1973-86. Oslo: Institute for Studies in Resesearch and Higher Education, 1991.
30. Andersen H. Tidsskriftpublicering og forskningsfvaluering. Biblioteksarbejde 1996;17:19-26.
31. Korevaar JG, Moed HF. Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematics. Scientometrics, 1996;37:117-30.
32. Bauin S, Rothman H. "Impact" of journals as proxies for citation counts. In: Weingart P, Sehringer R, Winterhager M, eds. Representations of science and technology. Leiden: DSWO Press, 1992;222-39.
33. Narin F, Hamilton KS. Bibliometric performance measures. Scientometrics 1996;6:293-310.
34. Artus HM. Science indicators derived from databases. Scientometrics 1996;37:297-311.
35. Møller AP. National citations. Nature 1990;348:480.
36. Hamilton DP. Research papers, who's uncited now. Science 1991;251:25.
37. Hamilton DP. Publishing by - and for? - the numbers. Science 1990; 250:1331-2.
38. Marton J. Obsolescence or immediacy? Evidence supporting Price's hypothesis. Scientometrics 1985;7:145-153.
39. Hargens LL, Felmlee DH. Structural determinants of stratification in science. Am Sociol Rev 1984;49:685-97.
40. Vinkler P. Relationships between the rate of scientific development and citations. The chance for a citedness model. Scientometrics 1996;35:375-86.
41. Gomperts MC. The law of constant citation for scientific literature. J Documentation 1968;24:113-7.
42. Seglen PO. Bruk av siteringsanalyse og andre bibliometriske metoder i evaluering av forskningsaktivitel. Tidskr Nor Laegeforen 1989;31:3229-34.
43. Seglen PO. Evaluering av forskningskvalitet ved hjelp av siteringsanalyse og andre bibliometriske metoder. Nordisk Medicin 1989;104:331-5.
44. Narin F, Pinski G, Gee HH. Structure of the biomedical literature. J Am Soc Inform Sci 1976;27:25-45.
45. Folly G, Hajtman B, Nagy JI, Ruff L Some methodological problems in ranking scientists by citation analysis. Scientometrics 1981;3:135-47.
46. Schubert A, Braun T. Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators. Scientometrics 1996;36:311-24.
47. Lewison G, Anderson J, Jack J. Assessing track records. Nature 1995;377:671.
48. Vinkler P. Model for quantitative selection of relative sciemometric impact indicators. Scientometrics 1996;36:223-36.
49. Segleni PO. How representative is the journal impact factor? Research Evaluation 1992;2:143-9.
50. Martin BR. Hie use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics 1996;36:343-62.
51. MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR. Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. J Am Information Sci 1989;40:342-9.
52. Seglen PO. Siteringer og tidsskrift-impakt sum kvaliletsmal for forskning. Klinisk Kemi i Norden 1995;7:59-63.
53. Brenner S. Cited [incorrectly] in: Strata P. Citation analysis. Nature 1995;375:624.