Why authors think their papers are highly cited

Scientometrics

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 305-316

  Small, Henry ^a  

^a Thomson ISI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142733026     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034376.55800.18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. BURRELL, Q. L. (2003), Predicting future citation behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (5): 372-378.
2. CAMPANARIO, J. M. (1993), Consolation for the scientist: Sometimes it is hard to publish papers that are later highly-cited. Social Studies of Science, 23 (2): 342-362.
3. CAMPANARIO, J. M. (1996), Using Citation Classics to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery. Scientometrics, 37 (1): 3-24.
4. CANO, V., LIND, N. C. (1991), Citation life cycles of ten Citation Classics. Scientometrics, 22 (2): 297-312.
5. CASE, D. O., HIGGINS, G. M. (2000), How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (7): 635-645.
6. CHUBIN, D. E., PORTER, A. L., ROSSINI, F. A. (1984), Citation classics analysis: an approach to characterizing interdisciplinary research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35 (6): 360-368.
7. CRONIN, B., SHAW, D. (2002), Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics, 54 (1): 31-49.
8. FURBERG, C. D., et al. (2002), Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). Journal of the America Medical Association, 288 (23): 2981-2997.
9. GARFIELD, E. (1981), Citation Classics: four years of the human side of science. Current Contents, 22 (1 June 1981), 5-16. Reprinted in: Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 5 (Philadelphia: ISI Press), pp. 123-134.
10. GARFIELD, E. (1981), Citation Classics: four years of the human side of science. Current Contents, 22 (1 June 1981), 5-16. Reprinted in: Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 5 (Philadelphia: ISI Press), pp. 123-134.
11. GILBERT, G. N., MULKAY, M. (1984), Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists Discourse. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
12. GLÄNZEL, W. (1997), On the possibility and reliability of predictions based on stochastic citation processes. Scientometrics, 40 (3): 481-492.
13. KOLPIN, D. W., FURLONG, E. T., MEYER, M. T., THURMAN, E. M., ZAUGG, S. D., BARBER, L. B., BUXTONET, H. T. (2002), Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams, 1999-2000: a national reconnaissance. Environmental Science and Technology, 36 (6): 1202-1211.
14. LIU, M. (1993), Progress in documentation: the complexities of citation practice - a review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49 (4): 370-408.
15. MACROBERTS, M. H., MACROBERTS, B. R. (1996), Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36 (3): 435-444.
16. MERTON, R. K. (1957), Priorities in scientific discovery. American Sociological Review, 22 (6): 635-659. Reprinted in: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 286-324.
17. MERTON, R. K. (1957), Priorities in scientific discovery. American Sociological Review, 22 (6): 635-659. Reprinted in: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 286-324.
18. MORAVCSIK, M. J., Murugesan, P. (1975), Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5 (1): 86-92.
19. PENDLEBURY, D. A. (1991), Science, citation and funding. Science, 251 (5000): 1410-1411.
20. SMALL, H. (1978), Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8 (3): 327-340.
21. SMALL, H. (1982), Citation context analysis. Progress in Communication, 3: 287-310.
22. STENT, G. S. (1972), Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery. Scientific American, 227 (6): 84-93.
23. WHITE, H. D. (2001), Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (2): 87-108.