A critical analysis of the journal impact factors of angewandte chemie and the journal of the American chemical society: Inaccuracies in published impact factors based on overall citations only

Scientometrics

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 105-116

  Moed, H F ^a   Van Leeuwen, Th N ^a   Reedijk, J ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001460104     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02093487     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. H. F. MOED, TH. N. VAN LEEUWEN, On the Accuracy of the Institute for Scientific Information's Journal Impact Factors, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, (1995) 461-467.
2. E. GARFIELD, Why are the impacts of leading medical journals so similar yet so different: Item-by item audits reveal a diversity of editorial materials, Current Contents, 1987, January 12.
3. a) T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, The Sweet and Sour of Journal Citation Rates, The Chemical Intelligencer 1 (1995) 31-32.
4. 3c Chemistry & Industry, (1995) 718.
5. c) P. GÖLITZ, Double Impact (letter to the Editor), Chemistry & Industry (1995) 718.
6. a) A. GRIMSON, The Scientist April 1, (1991) 14.
7. b) D. PENDLEBURY, The Scientist. September 19, (1988) 19.
8. Journal Citation Reports, ISI, annual publications; since 1990 available on microfiche.
9. a) I. A. WILLIAMS, Chem. Britain, 32, (1996) 31-33.
10. b) L. M. BAIRD, C. OPPENHEIM, J. Inf. Sci. 20, (1994) 2.
11. H. SMALL, In: Proc. 5th Biann. Conf. of the Int. Soc. for Scientometrics and Informetrics; N. J. MEDFORD (ed), Learned Information (1995), 525-530.
12. T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT, Scientometrics, 15, (1989) 325-330.