Relations of relative scientometric indicators

Scientometrics

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 687-694

  Vinkler, Péter ^a  

^a CHEMICAL RESEARCH CENTER   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243198163     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006888.69146.24     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. AMIN M., MABE M. (2000), Impact factors: Use and abuse, Perspectives in Publishing, 1: 4-6.
2. BONITZ M. (2002), Ranking of nations and heightened competition in Matthew core journals: Two faces of the Matthew effect for countries, Library Trends, 50: 440-460.
3. BRAUN T., GLÄNZEL W. (1990), World Flash on Basic Research. A topographical approach to world publication output and performance in the sciences, 1981-1985, Scientometrics, 19: 159-165.
4. BRAUN T., GLÄNZEL W., SCHUBERT A. (1985), Scientometric Indicators. A 32 Country Comparison of Publication Productivity and Citation Impact, World Scientific Publishers, London, Singapore.
5. GARFIELD E., SHER I. H. (1963), New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing, American Documentation, 14: 195-201.
6. GLÄNZEL W., MOED H. F. (Eds) (2002), Journal Impact Measures, Selected Papers of the Special Day Session at the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Scientometrics, 53.
7. GLÄNZEL W., SCHUBERT A., BRAUN T. (2002), A relational charting approach to the world of basic research in twelve science fields at the end of the second millennium, Scientometrics, 55: 335-348.
8. MOED H. F., DE BRUIN R. E., VAN LEEUWEN TH. N. (1995), New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications, Scientometrics, 33: 381-422.
9. SALZARULO L., VON INS M. (2001), Bias, structure and quality in citation indexing, Scientometrics, 50: 289-299.
10. SCHUBERT A., GLÄNZEL W., BRAUN T. (1983), Relative citation rate: A new indicator for measuring the impact of publications, In: D. TOMOV, L. DIMITROVA (Eds), Proceedings of the First National Conference with International Participation on Scientometrics and Linguistics of Scientific Text, Varna, pp. 80 81.
11. SCHUBERT A., BRAUN T. (1986), Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact, Scientometrics, 9: 281-291.
12. VINKLER P. (1986), Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications, Scientometrics, 10: 157-177.
13. VINKLER P. (1997), Relations of relative scientometric impact indicators. The Relative Publication Strategy Index, Scientometrics, 40: 163-169.
14. VINKLER P. (1999), Letter to the Editor, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50: 958.
15. VINKLER P. (2001), An attempt for defining some basic categories of scientometric and classifying the indicators of evaluative scientometrics, Scientometrics, 50: 539-544.
16. VINKLER P. (2002), Subfield problems in applying the Garfield (Impact) Factors in practice, Scientometrics, 53: 237-279.
17. VINKLER P. (2002), Dynamic changes in the chance for citedness, Scientometrics, 54: 421-434.