Comparative investigation of frequency and strength of motives toward referencing. The reference threshold model

Scientometrics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 107-127

  Vinkler, P ^a  

^a CHEMICAL RESEARCH CENTER   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009231219     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02458400     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. R. ATKINSON, The citation as intertext: Toward a theory of the selection process, Library Resources and Technical Services, 28 (1984) 109-119.
2. A. L. PORTER, Citation analysis: Queries and caveats, Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 257-267.
3. K. O. MAY, Abuses of citation indexing, Science, 156 (1967) 890-892 .
4. D. DE SOLLA PRICE, Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology and non-science, In: Communication Among Scientists and Engineers, C. E. Nelson, D. K. Pollock (Eds), Heath & Co., Lexington, Mass., 1970.
5. N. KAPLAN, The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote, American Documentation, 3 (1965) 179-184.
6. R. K. MERTON, Social Theory and Social Structure, The Free Press, New York, 1968.
7. P. VINKLER, A természettudományos publikációk hivatkozásainak kvázikvantitív modellje, Kutatás-Fejlesztés, Tudományszervezési Tájékoztató, 4 (1986) 250-278.
8. M. H. MACROBERTS, B. R. MACROBERTS, Citation content analysis of a botany journal, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (1997) 274-275.
9. M. J. MORAVCSIK, P. MURUGESAN, Some results on the function and quality of citations, Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 86-92.
10. D. E. CHUBIN, S. D. MOITRA, Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting, Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 423-441.
11. C. G. PRABHA, Some aspects of citation behavior: A pilot study in business administration, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34 (1983) 202-206.
12. V. CANO, Citation behavior: Classification, utility, and location, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (1989) 284-290.
13. I. SPIEGEL-RÖSING, Science studies: Bibliometric and content analysis, Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 97-113.
14. C. OPPENHEIM, S. P. RENN, Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29 (1978) 225-231.
15. P. VINKLER, A quasi-quantitative citation model, Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 47-72.
16. W. R. SHADISH, D. TOLLIVER, M. GRAY, S. K. SEN GUPTA, Author judgements about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals, Social Studies of Science, 25 (1995) 477-498.
17. B. CRONIN, The Citation Process. The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication, Taylor Graham, London, 1984.
18. S. K. SEN, Theoretical issues in citation process: A review, The International Journal of Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2 (1996) 159-198.
19. T. A. BROOKS, Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36 (1985) 223-229.
20. T. A. BROOKS, Evidence of complex citer motivations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37 (1986) 34-36.
21. J. E. J. OBERSKI, Some statistical aspects of co-citation cluster analysis and a judgement by physicists, In: Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, A. F. J. van Raan, (Ed), Elsevier, 1988, pp. 431-462.
22. B. CRONIN, Norms and functions in citation: The view of journal editors and referees in psychology, Social Science Information Studies, 2 (1982) 65-78.
23. F. W. LANCASTER, M. PORTA, K. PLAGENZ, K. SZYMBORSKI, M. KREBS, Factors influencing sources cited by scientists: A case study for Cuba, Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 241-257.
24. A. J. CHAPMAN, Assessing research: Citation-count shortcomings, The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 8 (1989) 336-344 .
25. J. A. VIRGO, A statistical procedure for evaluating the importance of scientific papers, The Library Quarterly, 47 (1977) 415-430.
26. E. GARFIELD, Citation Indexing - Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York, 1979.
27. H. F. MOED, Bibliometric measurement of research performance and Price's theory of differences among the sciences, Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 473-483.
28. R. E. STERN, Uncitedness in the biomedical literature, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (1990) 193-196.
29. P. VINKLER, Possible causes of differences in information impact of journals from different subfields, Scientometrics, 20 (1991) 145-161.
30. H. P. F. PETERS, A. F. J. VAN RAAN On determinants of citations scores: A case study in chemical engineering, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45 (1994) 39-49.
31. M. J. LOVAGLIA, Status characteristics of journal articles for editor's decisions and citations. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, November 15-18, 1989, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA.
32. E. GARFIELD, A. WELLJAMS-DOROF, Citaton data: Their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy making, Science and Public Policy, 19 (1992) 321-327.
33. Z. LIU, Citation theories in the framework of international flow of information: New evidence with translation analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (1997) 80-87.
34. S. M. LAWANI, A. E. BAYER, Validity of citation criteria for assessing the influence of scientific publications: New evidence with peer assessment, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34 (1983) 59-66.
35. K. S. PUDER, J. P. MORGAN, Persuading by citation: An analysis of the references of fifty-three published reports of phenylpropanolamine's clinical toxicity, Clinical Pharmacology &Therapeutics, 42 (1987) 1-9.
36. J. COLE, S. COLE, Measuring the quality of sociological research: Problems in the use of the Science Citation Index, The American Sociologist, 6 (1971) 23-29.
37. A. J. NEDERHOF, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, A validation study of bibliometric indicators: The comparative performance of cum laude doctorates in chemistry, Scientometrics, 17 (1989) 427-435.
38. P. NIEMINEN, Type of empirical research reports as an explanatory factor in citation performance of psychiatric research, Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 309-320.
39. J. A. STEWART, Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles, Social Forces, 62 (1983) 166-189.
40. S. M. LAWANI, Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research, Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 13-25.
41. J. S. KATZ, D. HICKS, How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model, Scientometrics, 40 (1997) 541-554.
42. J. T. GUTHRIE, M. SEIFERT, L. MOSBERG, Research synthesis in reading: Topics, audiences, and citation rates, Reading Research Quarterly, 19 (1983) 16-27.
43. H. F. MOED, W. J. M. BURGER, J. G. FRANKFORT, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance, Research Policy, 14 (1985) 131-149.
44. S. P. HARTER, P. A. HOOTEN, Information science and scientists: JASIS, 1972-1990, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (1992) 583-593.
45. J. KING, A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation, Journal of Information Science, 13 (1987) 261-276.
46. L. EGGHE, I. K. RAVICHANDRA RAO, R. ROUSSEAU, On the influence of production on utilization functions: Obsolescence or increased use? Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 285-315.
47. P. VINKLER, Relationships between the rate of scientific development and citations. The chance for citedness model, Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 375-386.
48. L. EGGHE, On the influence of growth on obsolescence, Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 195-214.
49. L. EGGHE, Price index and its relation to the mean and median reference age, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (1997) 564-573.
50. B. R. MARTIN, J. IRVINE, Assessing basic research. Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy, Research Policy, 12 (1983) 61-90.
51. M. D. GORDON, Citation ranking versus subjective evaluation in the determination of journal hierarchies in the social sciences, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33 (1982) 55-57.
52. K. E. CLARK, America's Psychologists: A Survey of a Growing Profession, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1957.
53. W. O. HAGSTROM, Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments, Sociology of Education, 44 (1971) 375-397.
54. L. R. JAUCH, W. F. GLUECK, Evaluation of university professors' research performance, Management Science, 22 (1975) 66-75.
55. S. B. GOTTFREDSON, W. D. GARVEY, J. GOODNOW, Scientific quality and the journal article publication process, In: Communication: The Essence of Science, W. D. Garvey (Ed), Pergamon Press, 1979, pp. 231-255.
56. H. F. MOED, W. J. M. BURGER, J. G. FRANKFORT, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, A comparative study of bibliometric past performance analysis and peer judgement, Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 149-159.
57. J. T. WALLMARK, K. G. SEDIG, Quality of research measured by citation method and by peer review -A comparison, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 33 (1986) 218-222.
58. E. DEAN, J. DAVIES, Frequency of citation and reputational assessment of contributors in physical therapy, Physical Therapy, 66 (1986) 961-966.
59. A. J. NEDERHOF, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, A bibliometric analysis of six economics research groups: A comparison with peer review, Research Policy, 22 (1993) 353-368.
60. C. OPPENHEIM, The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British library and information science university departments, Journal of Documentation, 51(1995) 18-27.
61. G. SONNERT, What makes a good scientist? Determinants of peer evaluation among biologists, Social Studies of Science, 25 (1995) 35-55.
62. C. Y. K. SO, Citation ranking versus expert judgment in evaluating communication scholars: Effect of research speciality size and individual prominence, Scientometrics, 41 (1998) 325-333.
63. D. CROUCH, J. IRVINE, B. R. MARTIN, Bibliometric analysis for science policy: An evaluation of the United Kingdom's research performance in ocean currents and protein crystallography, Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 239-267.
64. B. R. MARTIN, N. MINCHIN, J. SKEA, T. PEACOCK, D. CROUCH, J. IRVINE, The assessment of scientific research. A case-study of CERN, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 12 (1987) 70-75.
65. D. HICKS, J. POTTER, Sociology of scientific knowledge: A reflexive citation analysis or science disciplines and disciplining science, Social Studies of Science, 21 (1991) 459-501.
66. R. MILLER, The influence of primary task on R & D laboratory evaluation: A comparative bibliometric analysis, R & D Management, 22 (1992) 3-20.
67. R. PLOMP, The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research group's scientific performance, Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 377-383.
68. S. M. LAWANI, Citation analysis and the quality of scientific productivity, BioScience 27 (1977) 26-31.
69. S. C. HAYES, When more is less: Quantity versus quality of publications in the evaluation of academic vitae, American Psychologist, 38 (1983) 1398-1400.
70. M. E. D. KOENIG, Bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34 (1983) 136-145.
71. H. F. MOED, R. E. DE BRUIN, TH. N. VAN LEEUWEN, New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications, Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 381-422.
72. J. H. WESTBROOK, Identifying significant research, Science, 132 (1960) 1229-1234.
73. R. DALPÉ, F. ANDERSON, National priorities in academic research-strategic research and contract in renewable energies, Research Policy, 24 (1995) 563-581.
74. J. R. COLE, S. COLE, The Ortega Hypothesis, Science, 178 (1972) 368-375.
75. S. COLE, J. COLE, Social Stratification in Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, 1973.
76. L. L. HARGENS, H. SCHUMAN, Citation counts and social comparisons: Scientists' use and evaluation of citation index data, Social Science Research, 19 (1990) 205-221.
77. C. R. MYERS, Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology, American Psychologist, 25 (1970) 1041-1048.
78. B. CRONIN, K. OVERFELT, Citation-based auditing of academic performance, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45 (1994) 61-72.