Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study

Journal of the American Society for Information Science

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 115-131

  Noyons, E C M ^a   Moed, H F ^a   Luwel, M ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Ministry of the Flemish Community   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; DATA STRUCTURES; INFORMATION THEORY;

BIBLIOMETRICS; CITATION ANALYSIS;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032785723     PISSN: 00028231     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:2<115::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-J     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ABRC (1986). Evaluation of National Performance in Basic Research. A Review of Techniques for Evaluation of National Performance in Basic Research, with Case Studies in Genetics and Solid State Physics. ABRC Science Policy Studies, No. 1. London, UK: Department of Education and Science.
2. Baird, L.M., & Oppenheim, C. (1994). Do citations matter? Journal of Information Science, 20, 2-15.
3. Braam, R.R. (1991). Mapping of Science: Foci of Intellectual Interest in Scientific Literature. Thesis. Leiden. ISBN 90 9003903-1.
4. Braam, R.R., Moed, H.F., & Van Raan, A.F.J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis, I: Structural aspects and II: Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 233-266.
5. Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. London, UK: MacMillan Press Ltd.
6. Callon, M., Courtial, J.P., Turner, W.A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to poblematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22, 191-235.
7. De Bruin, R.E., Kint, A., Luwel, M., & Moed, H.F. (1993). A study of research evaluation and planning- The University of Ghent. Research Evaluation, 3, 1-14.
8. Garfield, E. (1983). How to use citation analysis for faculty evaluations, and when is it rRelevant. Current Contents, 44, 5-14.
9. Garfield, E., Malin, M.V., & Small, H. (1978). Citation data as science indicators. In: Elkana, Y., Lederberg, J., Merton, R.K., Thackray, A., & Zuckerman, H., (Eds.). Towards a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Glänzel, W. (1996). The needs for standards in bibliometric research and technology. Scientometrics, 35, 167-176.
11. Griffith, B.C., Small, H.G., Stonehill, J.A., & Dey, S. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures II: Toward a macro and micro structure for science. Science Studies, 4, 339-365.
12. Healey, P., Rothman, H., & Hoch, P.K. (1986). An experiment in science mapping for research planning. Research Policy, 15, 233-251.
13. Hicks, D. (1987). Limitations of co-ciation ananlysis as a tool for science policy. Social Studies of Science, 17, 295-316.
14. Irvine, J., & Martin, B.R. (1985). Basic research in east and west: A comparison of scientific performance of high-energy physics accelerators. Social Studies of Science, 15, 293-341.
15. Kostoff, R.N. (1996). Performance measures for government-sponsored research: Overview and background. Scientometrics, 36, 281-292.
16. Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J.P., & Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-words analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics, 14, 251-264.
17. Martin, B.R. (1996). The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, 36, 343-362.
18. Martin, B.R., & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research. Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy, 12, 61-90.
19. Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Ciation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity. National Science Foundation. (Monograph). Washington DC: NTIS AN: PB 2523397 AS.
20. Narin, F., & Hamilton, K.S. (1996). Bibliometric performance measures. Scientometrics, 36, 293-310.
21. Noyons, E.C.M., & Van Raan, A.F.J. (1998). Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: Self-organized structuring to map neural network research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 68-81.
22. Oberski, J.E.J. (1988). Some statistical aspects of co-citation analysis and a judgement of physicists. In: van Raan, A.F.J., (Ed.). Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology (pp. 253-273). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
23. Peters, H.P.F., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1993). Co-word based science maps of chemical engineering. Part I and II. Research Policy, 22, 23-71.
24. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269.
25. Small, H., & Griffith, B.C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4, 17-40.
26. Tijssen, R.J.W. (1992). Cartography of Science: Scientometric Mapping with Multidimensional Scaling Techniques. Thesis. DSWO Press, Leiden, ISBN 90 9004595-3.
27. Van Raan, A.F.J. (1997). Scientometrics: State of the art. Scientometrics, 38, 205-218.
28. Van Raan, A.F.J., & Tijssen, R.J.W. (1993). The neural net of neural network research. Scientometrics, 26, 169-192. 26, 1998.