Component selection in revision total hip Arthroplasty

Orthopedic Clinics of North America

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 275-286

  Chen, Antonia F ^a   Hozack, William J ^a  

^a ROTHMAN INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acetabular augments; Cages; Fully porous coated stems; Modular components; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Trabecular metal

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ACETABULAR AUGMENT; ALLOGRAFT PROSTHETIC COMPOSITE; BONE DEFECT; CAGE; CEMENTLESS PROSTHESIS; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONSTRAINED LINER; CUSTOM TRIFLANGE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DUAL MOBILITY LINER; ELEVATED LINER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FULLY POROUS COATED CYLINDRICAL STEM; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MODULAR TAPERED STEM; ORTHOPEDIC SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; PROXIMAL FEMORAL REPLACEMENT; PSEUDARTHROSIS; REVIEW; REVISION ACETABULAR CUP; REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ACETABULAR AUGMENTS; CAGES; FULLY POROUS COATED STEMS; MODULAR COMPONENTS; REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; TRABECULAR METAL;

ACETABULUM; ALLOGRAFTS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CEMENTATION; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

EID: 84903379159     PISSN: 00305898     EISSN: 15581373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2014.03.001     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Valle C.J., Paprosky W.G. Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. JBone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85(Suppl 4):1-6.
2. Sheth N.P., Nelson C.L., Paprosky W.G. Femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. JAm Acad Orthop Surg 2013, 21(10):601-612.
3. McAuley J.P., Szuszczewicz E.S., Young A., et al. Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years and younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, (418):119-125.
4. Weeden S.H., Paprosky W.G. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. JArthroplasty 2002, 17(4 Suppl 1):134-137.
5. Chung L.H., Wu P.K., Chen C.F., et al. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects. Orthopedics 2012, 35(7):e1017-e1021.
6. Sporer S.M., Paprosky W.G. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, (417):203-209.
7. Sporer S.M., Paprosky W.G. Extensively coated cementless femoral components in revision total hip arthoplasty: an update. Surg Technol Int 2005, 14:265-274.
8. Moon K.H., Kang J.S., Lee S.H., et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty using an extensively porous coated femoral stem. Clin Orthop Surg 2009, 1(2):105-109.
9. Garcia-Cimbrelo E., Garcia-Rey E., Cruz-Pardos A., et al. Stress-shielding of the proximal femur using an extensively porous-coated femoral component without allograft in revision surgery: a 5- to 17-year follow-up study. JBone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92(10):1363-1369.
10. Restrepo C., Mashadi M., Parvizi J., et al. Modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469(2):476-482.
11. Kopec M.A., Pemberton A., Milbrandt J.C., et al. Component version in modular total hip revision. Iowa Orthop J 2009, 29:5-10.
12. Jones R.E. Modular revision stems in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, (420):142-147.
13. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Study Group Acomparison of modular tapered versus modular cylindrical stems for complex femoral revisions. JArthroplasty 2013, 28(8 Suppl):71-73.
14. Munro J.T., Garbuz D.S., Masri B.A., et al. Role and results of tapered fluted modular titanium stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. JBone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94(11 Suppl A):58-60.
15. Palumbo B.T., Morrison K.L., Baumgarten A.S., et al. Results of revision total hip arthroplasty with modular, titanium-tapered femoral stems in severe proximal metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone loss. JArthroplasty 2013, 28(4):690-694.
16. Wang L., Dai Z., Wen T., et al. Three to seven year follow-up of a tapered modular femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013, 133(2):275-281.
17. Jibodh S.R., Schwarzkopf R., Anthony S.G., et al. Revision hip arthroplasty with a modular cementless stem: mid-term follow up. JArthroplasty 2013, 28(7):1167-1172.
18. Klauser W., Bangert Y., Lubinus P., et al. Medium-term follow-up of a modular tapered noncemented titanium stem in revision total hip arthroplasty: a single-surgeon experience. JArthroplasty 2013, 28(1):84-89.
19. Skytta E.T., Eskelinen A., Remes V. Successful femoral reconstruction with a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Scand J Surg 2012, 101(3):222-226.
20. Van Houwelingen A.P., Duncan C.P., Masri B.A., et al. High survival of modular tapered stems for proximal femoral bone defects at 5 to 10 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471(2):454-462.
21. Lakstein D., Eliaz N., Levi O., et al. Fracture of cementless femoral stems at the mid-stem junction in modular revision hip arthroplasty systems. JBone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(1):57-65.
22. Efe T., Schmitt J. Analyses of prosthesis stem failures in noncemented modular hip revision prostheses. JArthroplasty 2011, 26(4):665.e7-665.e12.
23. Mayle R.E., Paprosky W.G. Massive bone loss: allograft-prosthetic composites and beyond. JBone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94(11 Suppl A):61-64.
24. Liptak J.M., Pluhar G.E., Dernell W.S., et al. Limb-sparing surgery in a dog with osteosarcoma of the proximal femur. Vet Surg 2005, 34(1):71-77.
25. Gross A.E., Hutchison C.R. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1998, 21(9):999-1001.
26. Babis G.C., Sakellariou V.I., O'Connor M.I., et al. Proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis composites in revision hip replacement: a 12-year follow-up study. JBone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92(3):349-355.
27. Maurer S.G., Baitner A.C., Di Cesare P.E. Reconstruction of the failed femoral component and proximal femoral bone loss in revision hip surgery. JAm Acad Orthop Surg 2000, 8(6):354-363.
28. Parvizi J., Tarity T.D., Slenker N., et al. Proximal femoral replacement in patients with non-neoplastic conditions. JBone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89(5):1036-1043.
29. Sewell M.D., Hanna S.A., Carrington R.W., et al. Modular proximal femoral replacement in salvage hip surgery for non-neoplastic conditions. Acta Orthop Belg 2010, 76(4):493-502.
30. Malkani A.L., Settecerri J.J., Sim F.H., et al. Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders. JBone Joint Surg Br 1995, 77(3):351-356.
31. Al-Taki M.M., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P., et al. Quality of life following proximal femoral replacement using a modular system in revision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469(2):470-475.
32. Haentjens P., De Boeck H., Opdecam P. Proximal femoral replacement prosthesis for salvage of failed hip arthroplasty: complications in a 2-11 year follow-up study in 19 elderly patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1996, 67(1):37-42.
33. Parvizi J., Sim F.H. Proximal femoral replacements with megaprostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, (420):169-175.
34. Chalkin B., Minter J. Limb salvage and abductor reattachment using a custom prosthesis with porous tantalum components. JArthroplasty 2005, 20(1):127-130.
35. Levine B., Della Valle C.J., Jacobs J.J. Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. JAm Acad Orthop Surg 2006, 14(12):646-655.
36. Sheth N.P., Nelson C.L., Springer B.D., et al. Acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. JAm Acad Orthop Surg 2013, 21(3):128-139.
37. Deirmengian G.K., Zmistowski B., O'Neil J.T., et al. Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. JBone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(19):1842-1852.
38. Paprosky W.G., Perona P.G., Lawrence J.M. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. JArthroplasty 1994, 9(1):33-44.
39. Yu R., Hofstaetter, Sullivan T., et al. Validity and reliability of the Paprosky acetabular defect classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471(7):2259-2265.
40. Hanzlik J.A., Day J.S., Acknowledged Contributors: Ingrowth Retrieval Study Group Bone ingrowth in well-fixed retrieved porous tantalum implants. JArthroplasty 2013, 28(6):922-927.
41. Jafari S.M., Bender B., Coyle C., et al. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468(2):459-465.
42. Welldon K.J., Atkins G.J., Howie D.W., et al. Primary human osteoblasts grow into porous tantalum and maintain an osteoblastic phenotype. JBiomed Mater Res A 2008, 84(3):691-701.
43. Bobyn J.D., Stackpool G.J., Hacking S.A., et al. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. JBone Joint Surg Br 1999, 81(5):907-914.
44. Della Valle C.J., Berger R.A., Rosenberg A.G., et al. Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, (420):96-100.
45. Della Valle C.J., Shuaipaj T., Berger R.A., et al. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at fifteen to nineteen years, of a previous report. JBone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(8):1795-1800.
46. Hallstrom B.R., Golladay G.J., Vittetoe D.A., et al. Cementless acetabular revision with the Harris-Galante porous prosthesis. Results after a minimum of ten years of follow-up. JBone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86(5):1007-1011.
47. Blom A.W., Wylde V., Livesey C., et al. Impaction bone grafting of the acetabulum at hip revision using a mix of bone chips and a biphasic porous ceramic bone graft substitute. Acta Orthop 2009, 80(2):150-154.
48. Levai J.P., Boisgard S. Acetabular reconstruction in total hip revision using a bone graft substitute. Early clinical and radiographic results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, (330):108-114.
49. Nehme A., Lewallen D.G., Hanssen A.D. Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, (429):201-208.
50. Bilgen O.F., Bilgen M.S., Oncan T., et al. Acetabular reconstruction by impacted cancellous allografts in cementless total hip arthroplasty revision. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2012, 46(2):120-125.
51. Lee P.T., Clayton R.A., Safir O.A., et al. Structural allograft as an option for treating infected hip arthroplasty with massive bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469(4):1016-1023.
52. Van Kleunen J.P., Lee G.C., Lementowski P.W., et al. Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(Suppl 6):64-68.
53. Siegmeth A., Duncan C.P., Masri B.A., et al. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467(1):199-205.
54. Abolghasemian M., Tangsataporn S., Sternheim A., et al. Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review. Bone Joint J Br 2013, 95(2):166-172.
55. Borland W.S., Bhattacharya R., Holland J.P., et al. Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone loss. Acta Orthop 2012, 83(4):347-352.
56. Gill K., Wilson M.J., Whitehouse S.L., et al. Results using trabecular metal augments in combination with acetabular impaction bone grafting in deficient acetabula. Hip Int 2013, 23:522-528.
57. Ballester Alfaro J.J., Sueiro Fernandez J. Trabecular metal buttress augment and the trabecular metal cup-cage construct in revision hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Hip Int 2010, 20(Suppl 7):S119-S127.
58. Gehrke T., Bangert Y., Schwantes B., et al. Acetabular revision in THA using tantalum augments combined with impaction bone grafting. Hip Int 2013, 23(4):359-365.
59. Berry D.J., Muller M.E. Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. JBone Joint Surg Br 1992, 74(5):711-715.
60. Gill T.J., Sledge J.B., Muller M.E. The Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results. JBone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80(6):946-953.
61. Hansen E., Shearer D., Ries M.D. Does a cemented cage improve revision THA for severe acetabular defects?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469(2):494-502.
62. Paprosky W.G., Sporer S.S., Murphy B.P. Addressing severe bone deficiency: what a cage will not do. JArthroplasty 2007, 22(4 Suppl 1):111-115.
63. Sembrano J.N., Cheng E.Y. Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466(7):1657-1665.
64. Malhotra R., Kancherla R., Kumar V., et al. Trabecular metal acetabular revision system (cup-cage construct) to address the massive acetabular defects in revision arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 2012, 46(4):483-486.
65. Kosashvili Y., Backstein D., Safir O., et al. Acetabular revision using an anti-protrusion (ilio-ischial) cage and trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with pelvic discontinuity. JBone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91(7):870-876.
66. Taunton M.J., Fehring T.K., Edwards P., et al. Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470(2):428-434.
67. DeBoer D.K., Christie M.J., Brinson M.F., et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity. JBone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89(4):835-840.
68. Joshi A.B., Lee J., Christensen C. Results for a custom acetabular component for acetabular deficiency. JArthroplasty 2002, 17(5):643-648.
69. Burroughs B.R., Hallstrom B., Golladay G.J., et al. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. JArthroplasty 2005, 20(1):11-19.
70. Nevelos J., Johnson A., Heffernan C., et al. What factors affect posterior dislocation distance in THA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471(2):519-526.
71. Alberton G.M., High W.A., Morrey B.F. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. JBone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84(10):1788-1792.
72. Cobb T.K., Morrey B.F., Ilstrup D.M. The elevated-rim acetabular liner in total hip arthroplasty: relationship to postoperative dislocation. JBone Joint Surg Am 1996, 78(1):80-86.
73. Cobb T.K., Morrey B.F., Ilstrup D.M. Effect of the elevated-rim acetabular liner on loosening after total hip arthroplasty. JBone Joint Surg Am 1997, 79(9):1361-1364.
74. Marchetti E., Krantz N., Berton C., et al. Component impingement in total hip arthroplasty: frequency and risk factors. A continuous retrieval analysis series of 416 cup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011, 97(2):127-133.
75. Shon W.Y., Baldini T., Peterson M.G., et al. Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components. JArthroplasty 2005, 20(4):427-435.
76. Philippot R., Camilleri J.P., Boyer B., et al. The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop 2009, 33(4):927-932.
77. Lachiewicz P.F., Watters T.S. The use of dual-mobility components in total hip arthroplasty. JAm Acad Orthop Surg 2012, 20(8):481-486.
78. Stulberg S.D. Dual poly liner mobility optimizes wear and stability in THA: affirms. Orthopedics 2011, 34(9):e445-e448.
79. Hailer N.P., Weiss R.J., Stark A., et al. Dual-mobility cups for revision due to instability are associated with a low rate of re-revisions due to dislocation: 228 patients from the Swedish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 2012, 83(6):566-571.
80. Wegrzyn J., Thoreson A.R., Guyen O., et al. Cementation of a dual-mobility acetabular component into a well-fixed metal shell during revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical validation. JOrthop Res 2013, 31(6):991-997.
81. Philippot R., Boyer B., Farizon F. Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471(3):965-970.
82. Lombardi A.V. Constrained liners in revision: total hip arthroplasty an overuse syndrome: in opposition. JArthroplasty 2006, 21(4 Suppl 1):126-130.
83. Fricka K.B., Marshall A., Paprosky W.G. Constrained liners in revision total hip arthroplasty: an overuse syndrome: in the affirmative. JArthroplasty 2006, 21(4 Suppl 1):121-125.
84. Khoury J.I., Malkani A.L., Adler E.M., et al. Constrained acetabular liners cemented into cages during total hip revision arthroplasty. JArthroplasty 2010, 25(6):901-905.
85. Klein G.R., Rapuri V., Hozack W.J., et al. Caution on the use of combined constrained liners and cages in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2007, 30(11):970-971.
86. Munro J.T., Vioreanu M.H., Masri B.A., et al. Acetabular liner with focal constraint to prevent dislocation afterk THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471(12):3883-3890.