Medium-Term Follow-Up of a Modular Tapered Noncemented Titanium Stem in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Single-Surgeon Experience

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 84-89

  Klauser, Wolfgang ^a   Bangert, Yannic ^a   Lubinus, Philipp ^b   Kendoff, Daniel ^a  

^a ENDO Klinik   (Germany)

^b Orthopaedic Department   (Germany)

Author keywords

Femoral revision surgery; Noncemented modular revision shaft; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE REMODELING; CEMENTLESS PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NONCEMENTED MODULAR REVISION SHAFT; OSTEOLYSIS; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE REMODELING; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; TITANIUM;

EID: 84870765948     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Malchau H., Herberts P., Eisler T., et al. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A(Suppl. 2):2.
2. Gruen T.A., McNeice G.M., Amstutz H.C. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979, 141:17.
3. Harris W.H. The problem is osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, 311:46.
4. Charnley J. Proceedings: the histology of loosening between acrylic cement and bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1975, 57-2:245.
5. Harris W.H., Schiller A.L., Scholler J.M., et al. Extensive localized bone resorption in the femur following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976, 58-5:612.
6. Huddleston H.D. Femoral lysis after cemented hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1988, 3-4:285.
7. Kwong L.M., Miller A.J., Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18-3(Suppl. 1):94.
8. Rodriguez J.A., Fada R., Murphy S.B., et al. Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24-5:751.
9. Tamvakopoulos G.S., Servant C.T., Clark G., et al. Medium-term follow-up series using a modular distal fixation prosthesis to address proximal femoral bone deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. A 5- to 9-year follow-up study. Hip Int 2007, 17-3:143.
10. Schofer M.D., Efe T., Heyse T.J., et al. Modular noncemented femoral stem system in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthopade 2009, 39-2:209.
11. Mallory T.H. Preparation of the proximal femur in cementless total hip revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 235:47.
12. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969, 51-4:737.
13. John J.F., Fisher P.E. Radiographic determination of the anatomic hip joint center. A cadaver study. Acta Orthop Scand 1994, 65-5:509.
14. Wagner H. Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss. Orthopade 1987, 16-4:295.
15. Jones R.E. Modular revision stems in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 420:142.
16. Tsiridis E., Haddad F.S., Gie G.A. The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements. Injury 2003, 34-2:95.
17. Valle C.J., Paprosky W.G. Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A(Suppl. 4):1.
18. Paprosky W.G., Burnett R.S. Extensively porous-coated femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty: rationale and results. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2002, 31(8):471. [Review].
19. Paprosky W.G., Burnett R.S. Assessment and classification of bone stock deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2002 Aug, 31(8):459.