Component impingement in total hip arthroplasty: Frequency and risk factors. A continuous retrieval analysis series of 416 cup

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 127-133

  Marchetti, E ^a,b   Krantz, N ^a,b   Berton, C ^a,b   Bocquet, D ^a,b   Fouilleron, N ^a,b   Migaud, H ^a,b   Girard, J ^a,b  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

^b LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Dislocation; Hip prosthesis; Impingement; Instability; Retrieval analysis; Wear

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR NECK; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; JOINT INSTABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORBIDITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OSTEOLYSIS; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DEVICE REMOVAL; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 79953772088     PISSN: 18770568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Walker P.S., Salvati E., Hotzler R.K. The wear on removed McKee-Farrar total hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1974, 56:92-100.
2. Amstutz H.C., Lodwig R.M., Schurman D.J., Hodgson A.G. Range of motion studies for total hip replacements: a comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. Clin Orthop 1975, 111:124-130.
3. Chandler D.R., Glousman R., Hull D., McGuire P.J., Kim I.S., Clarke I.C., et al. Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement: the effect of head and neck geometry. Clin Orthop 1982, 166:284-291.
4. Krushell R.J., Burke D.W., Harris W.H. Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty: the impact of modular head neck components. J Arthroplasty 1991, 6:97-101.
5. Murray D.W. Impingement and loosening of the long posterior wall acetabular implant. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1992, 74:377-379.
6. Hall R.M., Siney P., Unsworth A., Wroblewski B.M. Prevalence of impingement in explanted Charnley acetabular components. J Orthop Sci 1998, 3:204-208.
7. Yamaguchi M., Akisue T., Bauer T.W., Hashimoto Y. The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15:305-313.
8. Wiadrowski T.P., McGee M., Cornish B.L., Howie D.W. Peripheral wear of Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 1991, 6:103-107.
9. Shon W.Y., Baldini T., Peterson M.G., Wright T.M., Salvati E.A. Impingement in total hip arthroplasty, a study of retrieved acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:427-435.
10. Birman M.V., Noble P.C., Conditt M.A., Li S., Mathis K.B. Cracking and impingement in ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular liners. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:87-92.
11. Tanino H., Harman M.K., Banks S.A., Hodge W.A. Association between dislocation, impingement, and articular geometry in retrieved acetabular polyethylene cups. J Orthop Res 2007, 25:1401-1407.
12. Kluess D., Martin H., Mittelmeier W., Schmitz K.P., Bader R. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Med Eng Phys 2007, 29:465-471.
13. Gondi G., Roberson J.R., Ganey T.M., Shahriari A., Hutton W.C. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion. J South Orthop Ass 1997, 6:266-272.
14. Migaud H., Girard J., Jobin A., Pinoit Y., Herent S., Laffargue P., et al. Couple de frottement métal-métal en grand diamètre au cours des arthroplasties totales de hanches: avantages et inconvénients. Rev Chir Orthop 2007, 93:310-311.
15. Delaunay C., Migaud H., Laffargue P. Couples Metasul™en 28mm: gare aux jupes !. Rev Chir Orthop 2007, 93:306-307.
16. Yoshimine F. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone. J Biomech 2005, 38:125-132.
17. Yoshimine F. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. J Biomech 2006, 39:1315-1323.
18. Nadzadi M.E., Pedersen D.R., Callaghan J.J., Brown T.D. Effects of acetabular component orientation on dislocation propensity for small-head-size total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2002, 17:32-40.
19. Onda K., Nagoya S., Kaya M., Yamashita T. Cup-neck impingement due to the malposition of the implant as a possible mechanism for metallosis in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2008, 31:396.
20. Usrey M.M., Noble P.C., Rudner L.J., Conditt M.A., Birman M.V., Santore R.F., et al. Does neck/liner impingement increase wear of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene liners?. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(6 Suppl. 2):65-71.
21. Holley K.G., Furman B.D., Babalola O.M., Lipman J.D., Padgett D.E., Wright T.M. Impingement of acetabular cups in a hip simulator, comparison of highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:77-86.
22. Girard J., Laffargue P., Decoulx J., Migaud H. Reliability of porous coating metal-backed cups: advantages and adverse effect of a posterior elevated rim polyethylene liner. Rev Chir Orthop 2005, 91:432-438.
23. Lewinnek G.E., Lewis J.L., Tarr R., Compere C.L., Zimmerman J.R. Incidence of dislocation following hip arthroplasty for patients in the rehabilitation setting. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1978, 60:217-220.
24. Seki M., Yuasa N., Ohkuni K. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. J Orthop Res 1998, 16:513-517.
25. Widmer K.H., Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2004, 22:815-821.
26. Nishii T., Sugano N., Miki H., Koyama T., Takao M., Yoshikawa H. Influence of component positions on dislocation. Computed tomographic evaluations in a consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:162-166.
27. Pierchon F., Pasquier G., Cotten A., Fontaine C., Clarisse J., Duquennoy A. Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994, 76:45-48.
28. Ala Eddine T.A., Migaud H., Chantelot C., Cotten A., Fontaine C., Duquennoy A. Variations of pelvic anteversion in the lying and standing positions: analysis of 24 control subjects and implications for CT measurement of position of a prosthetic cup. Surg Radiol Anat 2001, 23:105-110.
29. Pinoit Y., May O., Girard J., Laffargue P., Ala Eddine T., Migaud H. Low accuracy of the anterior pelvic plane to guide the position of the cup with imageless computer assistance: variation of position in 106 patients. Rev Chir Orthop 2007, 93:455-460.
30. Migaud H., Ala Eddine T., Duquennoy A. Équilibre pelvien et mesure tomodensitométrique de la position d'une cupule de prothèse totale de hanche. Ann Orthop Ouest 2002, 34:231-234.
31. Lecerf G., Fessy M.H., Philippot R., et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Rev Chir Orthop Traumatol 2009, 95:210-219.
32. Kapandji I.A. Physiologie articulaire 1985, Maloine SA, Paris. 5th ed.
33. Laffargue P., Pinoit Y., Tabutin J., Giraud F., Puget J., Migaud H. Computer-assisted positioning of the acetabular cup for total hip arthroplasty based on joint kinematics without prior imaging: preliminary results with computed tomographic assessment. Rev Chir Orthop 2006, 92:316-325.
34. Leenders T., Vandevelde D., Mahieu G., Nuyts R. Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study. Comp Aid Surg 2002, 7:99-106.
35. Parratte S., Argenson J.N., Flecher X., Aubaniac J.M. Computer-assisted surgery for acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: comparative prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop 2007, 93:238-246.
36. Lautridou C., Lebel B., Burdin G., Vielpeau C. Survival of the cementless Bousquet dual mobility cup: minimum 15-year follow-up of 437 total hip arthroplasties. Rev Chir Orthop 2008, 94:731-739.
37. Yamamoto T., Saito M., Ueno M., Hananouchi T., Tokugawa Y., Yonenobu K. Wear analysis of retrieved ceramic-on-ceramic articulations in total hip arthroplasty: femoral head makes contact with the rim of the socket outside of the bearing surface. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005, 73:301-307.
38. Malik A., Maheshwari A., Dorr L.D. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007, 89:1832-1842.
39. Bader R., Barbano R., Mittelmeier W. Treatment of recurrent dislocation associated with impingement after revision total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2005, 71:98-101.
40. Barrack R.L., Schmalzried T.P. Impingement and rim wear associated with early osteolysis after a total hip replacement, a case report. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002, 84:1218-1220.
41. Fontes D., Benoit J., Lortat-Jacob A., Didry R. Luxation of total hip prosthesis. Statistical validation of a modelization, à propos of 52 cases. Rev Chir Orthop 1991, 77:163-170.
42. Chen P.Y., Wu C.T., Hou C.H., Hou S.M. Loosening of total hip arthroplasty with a prosthesis employing a skirted femoral head. J Formos Med Assoc 2005, 104:370-373.
43. Kligman M., Furman B.D., Padgett D.E., Wright T.M. Impingement contributes to backside wear and screw-metallic shell fretting in modular acetabular cups. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:258-264.
44. Malik A., Dorr L.D., Long W.T. Impingement as a mechanism of dissociation of a metasul metal-on-metal liner. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:323.
45. Duffy G.P., Wannomae K.K., Rowell S.L., Muratoglu O.K. Fracture of a cross-linked polyethylene liner due to impingement. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:158-159.