Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Limits of Fully Coated Stems

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 417, Issue , 2003, Pages 203-209

  Sporer, Scott M ^a   Paprosky, Wayne G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DEFECT; BONE GRAFT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERIAL COATING; OSTEOLYSIS; POROSITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0345060423     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Berry DJ: Femoral revision: Distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1):142-146, 2002.
2. Bircher HP, Riede U, Luem M, Ochsner PE: [The value of the Wagner SL revision prosthesis for bridging large femoral defects]. Orthopade 30:294-303, 2001.
3. Blackley HR, Davis AM, Hutchison CR, Gross AE: Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip: A nine to fifteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 83A:346-354, 2001.
4. Bohm P, Bischel O: Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: Evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg 83A: 1023-1031, 2001.
5. Dartmouth Medical School: Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences: The Dartmouth Atlas of Musculoskeletal Health Care. Ed 1. Chicago, American Hospital Publishing 203, 1996.
6. Dohmae Y, Bechtold JE, Sherman RE, Puno RM, Gustilo RB: Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 236:214-220, 1988.
7. Duncan CP, Masterson EL, Masri BA: Impaction allografting with cement for the management of femoral bone loss. Orthop Clin North Am 29:297-305, 1998.
8. Eldridge JD, Smith EJ, Hubble MJ, Whitehouse SL, Learmonth ID: Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 12:535-540, 1997.
9. Elting JJ, Mikhail WE, Zicat BA, et al: Preliminary report of impaction grafting for exchange femoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 319:159-167, 1995.
10. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE: Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 257:107-128, 1990.
11. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, et al: Contained morselized allograft in revision total hip arthroplasty: Surgical technique. Orthop Clin North Am 24:717-725, 1993.
12. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, et al: Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 75B: 14-21, 1993.
13. Gross AE, Hutchison CR: Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am 29: 313-317, 1998.
14. Gross AE, Hutchison CR: Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 21:999-1001, 1998.
15. Grunig R, Morscher E, Ochsner PE: Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:187-197, 1997.
16. Karrholm J, Hultmark P, Carlsson L, Malchau H: Subsidence of a non-polished stem in revisions of the hip using impaction allograft: Evaluation with radiostereometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Joint Surg 81B:135-142, 1999.
17. Knight JL, Helming C: Collarless polished tapered impaction grafting of the femur during revision total hip arthroplasty: Pitfalls of the surgical technique and follow-up in 31 cases. J Arthroplasty 15:159-165, 2000.
18. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG: 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 12: 839-847, 1997.
19. Leopold SS, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, et al: Impaction allografting with cement for revision of the femoral component: A minimum four-year follow-up study with use of a precoated femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg 81A:1080-1092, 1999.
20. Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM: Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty: A minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 79A: 1834-184, 1997.
21. Moreland JR, Bernstein ML: Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop 319:141-150, 1995.
22. Mulroy WF, Harris WH: Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component: A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 78A:325-330, 1996.
23. Pellicci PM, Wilson Jr PD, Sledge CB, et al: Long-term results of revision total hip replacement: A follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg 67A:513-516, 1985.
24. Ponziani L, Rollo G, Bungaro P, Pascarella R, Zinghi GF: Revision of the femoral prosthetic component according to the Wagner technique. Chir Organi Mov 80:385-389, 1995.
25. Rinaldi E, Marenghi P, Vaienti E: The Wagner prosthesis for femoral reconstruction by transfemoral approach. Chir Organi Mov 79:353-356, 1994.
26. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG: Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1):134-137, 2002.