Three to seven year follow-up of a tapered modular femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 133, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 275-281

  Wang, Long ^a   Dai, Zixun ^a   Wen, Ting ^a   Li, Mingqing ^a   Hu, Yihe ^a  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bone deficiency; Distal fixation; Femoral; Hip revision; Modularity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAPROSKY CLASSIFICATION; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RECURRENT INFECTION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TAPERED MODULAR FEMORAL PROSTHESIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878359646     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: 14343916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1644-y     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K et al (2005) Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1487-1497
2. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J et al (2009) Primary and revision arthroplasty surgery caseloads in the United States from 1990 to 2004. J Arthroplasty 24:195-203
3. Mulroy WF, Harris WH (1996) Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:325-330
4. Haydon CM, Mehin R, Burnett S et al (2004) Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component. Results at a mean of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1179-1185
5. Woolson ST, Delaney TJ (1995) Failure of a proximally porous-coated femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10(Suppl):S22-S28
6. Mulliken BD, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB (1996) Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4-to-6-year review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325:156-162
7. Malkani AL, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME et al (1996) Femoral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, long-stem prosthesis. J Arthroplast 11:411-418
8. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG (1997) 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplast 12:839-847
9. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J (1999) Minimum 10-year- results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369:230-242
10. Engh CA Jr, Young AM, Engh CA Sr et al (2003) Clinical consequences of stress shielding after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:157-163
11. Bohm P, Bischel O (2001) Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1023-1031
12. Bohm P, Bischel O (2004) The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:148-159
13. Gutierrez Del Alamo J, Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Castellanos V et al (2007) Radiographic bone regeneration and clinical outcome with the Wagner SL revision stem: a 5-year to 12-year follow-up study. J Arthroplast 22:515-524
14. Berry DJ (2002) Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems. J Arthroplast 17:142-146
15. Achermann Y, Vogt M, Leunig M et al (2010) Improved diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection by multiplex PCR of sonication fluid from removed implants. J Clin Microbiol 48:1208-1214
16. Ghanem E, Antoci V Jr, Pulido L et al (2009) The use of receiver operating characteristics analysis in determining erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels in diagnosing periprosthetic infection prior to revision total hip arthroplasty. Int J Infect Dis 13:444-449
17. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2003) Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:203-209
18. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737-755
19. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257:107-128
20. Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM et al (1985) Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1074-1085
21. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2004) Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:227-231
22. Restrepo C, Mashadi M, Parvizi J et al (2011) Modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:476-482
23. Weiss RJ, Beckman MO, Enocson A et al (2011) Minimum 5-year follow-up of a cementless, modular, tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 26:16-23
24. Rodriguez JA, Fada R, Murphy SB et al (2009) Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the Link MP modular stem. J Arthroplast 24:751-758
25. Murphy SB, Rodriguez J (2004) Revision total hip arthroplasty with proximal bone loss. J Arthroplast 19:115-119
26. Kwong LM, Miller AJ, Lubinus P (2003) A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplast 18:94-97
27. Ovesen O, Emmeluth C, Hofbauer C et al (2010) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular tapered stem with distal fixation. J Arthroplasty 25:348-354
28. Patel PD, Klika AK, Murray TG et al (2010) Influence of technique with distally fixed modular stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 25:926-931
29. Kang MN, Huddleston JI, Hwang K (2008) Early outcome of a modular femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 23:220-225
30. Lakstein D, Backstein D, Safir O et al (2009) Revision total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated modular stem: 5 to 10 years follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1310-1315
31. Fink B, Grossmann A, Fuerst M (2010) Distal interlocking screws with a modular revision stem for revision total hip arthroplasty in severe bone defects. J Arthroplast 25:759-765
32. Warren PJ, Thompson P, Fletcher MD (2002) Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:557-560
33. Procenca A, Cabral R (2005) Revision of the femoral side in total hip replacement. Eur Instr Course Lect 7:143
34. Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ (2007) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy. J Arthroplast 22:993-999
35. Köster G, Walde TA, Willert HG (2008) Five- to 10-year results using a noncemented modular revision stem without bone grafting. J Arthroplast 23:964-970
36. Richards CJ, Duncan CP, Masri BA et al (2010) Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:491-496
37. Pierson JL, Crowninshield RD, Earles DR (2005) Fatigue fracture of a modular revision femoral component: a report of 40 cases. AAOS, Washington, DC
38. Busch CA, Charles MN, Haydon CM et al (2005) Fractures of distally-fixed femoral stems after revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1333-1336
39. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Mallory TH et al (2007) Modular calcar replacement prosthesis with strengthened taper junction in total hip arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int 16:206-209