Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: A mid-term review

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 95 B, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 166-172

  Abolghasemian, M ^a   Tangsataporn, S ^a   Sternheim, A ^a   Backstein, D ^a   Safir, O ^a   Gross, A E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEBRIDEMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISEASE; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; METAL IMPLANTATION; OXFORD HIP SCORE; PELVIC DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; ROTATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TRABECULAR METAL ACETABULAR SHELL; TRABECULAR METAL AUGMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ACETABULUM PROSTHESIS; BONE ATROPHY; BONE DEFECT; HIP CENTRE OF ROTATION; HIP MALFORMATION; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; METAL IMPLANT; MIGRATION OF THE SHELL; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL PATIENT; TRABECULAR BONE; TRABECULAR METAL ACETABULAR AUGMENT;

ACETABULUM; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84874042414     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30608     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A., et al Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2001; 19:50-56.
2. Della Valle C.J., Shuaipaj T, Berger R.A., et al Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at fifteen to nineteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005; 87-A:1795-1800.
3. Slooff TJ, Schimmel JW, Buma P. Cemented fixation with bone graft: controversies in total hip replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 1993; 24:667-677.
4. Garcia-Cimbrelo E. Porous-coated cementless acetabular cups in revision surgery: a 6- to 11-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14:397-406.
5. Lee PT, Raz G, Safir O.A., Backstein DJ, Gross AE Long-term results for minor column allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468:3295-3303.
6. Chen WM, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, McAuley JP, Engh CA. Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000; 82-A:197-206.
7. Patel JV, Masonis JL, Bourne R.B., Rorabeck CH The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18:129-133.
8. Bozic KJ, Freiberg AA, Harris WH The high hip center. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 420:101-105.
9. Flecher X, Sporer S, Paprosky W. Management of severe bone loss in acetabular revision using a trabecular metal shell. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23:949-955.
10. Garbuz D, Morsi E, Gross AE Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft: study with a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1996; 78-A:693-697.
11. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron H.U., Weatherly GC, Kent GM The effect of porous surface configuration on the tensile strength of fixation of implants by bone ingrowth. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 149:291-298.
12. Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking S.A., Tanzer M., Krygier JJ Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999; 81-B:907-914.
13. Lakstein D, Backstein D, Safir O., Kosashvili Y, Gross AE Trabecular metal cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467:2318-2324.
14. Lakstein D, Backstein DJ, Safir O, Kosashvili Y., Gross AE Modified trochanteric slide for complex hip arthroplasty: clinical outcomes and complication rates. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25:363-368.
15. Lakstein D, Kosashvili Y, Backstein D., Safir O, Gross AE Modified extended trochanteric osteotomy with preservation of posterior structures. Hip Int 2010; 20:102-108.
16. Jasty M. Jumbo cups and morsalized graft. Orthop Clin North Am 1998; 29:249-254.
17. Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Hobbs A, Frampton CM An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010; 92-B:413-418.
18. Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O., Lakstein D, Gross AE Acetabular revision using an anti-protrusion (ilio-ischial) cage and trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009; 91-B:870-876.
19. Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Hobbs A, Frampton CM An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010; 92-B:413-418.
20. Moore MS, McAuley JP, Young A.M., Engh CA Sr. Radiographic signs of osseointegration in porous-coated acetabular components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 444:176-183.
21. Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen D.R., O'Gorman TW. Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 228:79-87.
22. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson R.A., Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1973; 55-A:1629-1632.
23. Morag G, Zalzal P, Liberman B., et al Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients with a previous total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005; 87-B:1068-1072.
24. Levine BR, Sporer S, Poggie R.A., Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials 2006; 27:4671-4681.
25. Sternheim A, Backstein D, Kuzyk P.R., et al Porous metal revision shells for management of contained acetabular bone defects at a mean follow-up of six years: a comparison between up to 50% bleeding host bone contact and more than 50% contact. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2012; 94-B:158-162.
26. Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri B.A., Kim WY, Garbuz DS Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467:199-205.
27. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9:33-44.
28. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21(SUPPL.):83-86.
29. Goodman S, Saastamoinen H, Shasha N., Gross A. Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19:436-446.
30. Hooten JP J.r., Engh CA Jr, Engh CA Failure of structural acetabular allografts in cementless revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994; 76-B:419-422.
31. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty 2006;21(Suppl):87-90.
32. Delp SL, Wixson RL, Komattu A.V., Kocmond JH How superior placement of the joint center in hip arthroplasty affects the abductor muscles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 328:137-146.
33. Matsuno H, Yokoyama A, Watari F., Uo M, Kawasaki T. Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of refractory metal implants, titanium, hafnium, niobium, tantalum and rhenium. Biomaterials 2001; 22:1253-1262.