Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: Reliable choice for stem revision in paprosky femoral type III defects

Orthopedics

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2012, Pages

  Chung, Lien Hsiang ^a,c   Wu, Po Kuei ^a,b   Chen, Cheng Fong ^a,b   Chen, Wei Ming ^a,b   Chen, Tain Hsiung ^a,b   Liu, Chien Lin ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c CHIA YI CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEBRIDEMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD PROSTHESIS; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE REDUCTION; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HUMAN; LEG DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SURGICAL INFECTION; SYNDROME DELINEATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POROSITY; PREVALENCE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS; TAIWAN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864678037     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120621-13     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gross AE, Hutchison CR, Alexeeff M, et al. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (319):151-158.
2. Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79(12):1834-1841.
3. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969; 51(4):737-755.
4. Chen WM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA. Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(9):1215-1219.
5. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (257):107-128. (Pubitemid 20246731)
6. Engh CA Sr, Hopper RH. Extensively porous-coated stems: a choice for all seasons. Orthopedics. 2000; 23(9):951-952.
7. Hamilton WG, Cashen DV, Ho H, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: a choice for all seasons. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(4 suppl 1):106-110. (Pubitemid 47001303)
8. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup D, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (319):168-177.
9. Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Sledge CB, et al. Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985; 67(4):513-516. (Pubitemid 15077716)
10. Kavanagh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985; 67(4):517-526. (Pubitemid 15077717)
11. Mulroy WF, Harris WH. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78(3):325-330.
12. Hinrichs F, Boudriot U, Hunerkopf M, Griss P. Design and first clinical results with the ZMR taper revision prosthesis [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005; 143(3):355-359. (Pubitemid 40977294)
13. McInnis DP, Horne G, Devane PA. Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(3):372-380.
14. Sotereanos N, Sewecke J, Raukar GJ, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a custom cementless stem with distal cross-locking screws. Early results in femora with large proximal segmental deficiencies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(5):1079-1084.
15. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(4 suppl 1):134-137. (Pubitemid 34663244)
16. Moreland JR, Moreno MA. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (393):194-201. (Pubitemid 33101713)
17. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (417):203-209. (Pubitemid 37499526)
18. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1997; 12(8):839-847. (Pubitemid 28037651)
19. Nadaud MC, Griffin WL, Fehring TK, et al. Cementless revision total hip arthroplasty without allograft in severe proximal femoral defects. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(6):738-744.
20. Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA Sr. Distal ingrowth components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (420):135-141.
21. McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: cylindrical and extensively coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (429):215-221. (Pubitemid 39579215)
22. Garbuz DS, Toms A, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Improved outcome in femoral revision arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular titanium stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; (453):199-202. (Pubitemid 44900984)
23. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (369):230-242.
24. Bugbee WD, Culpepper WJ II, Engh CA Jr, Engh CA Sr. Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79(7):1007-1012.
25. McAuley JP, Culpepper WJ, Engh CA. Total hip arthroplasty. Concerns with extensively porous coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; (355):182-188. (Pubitemid 28538114)
26. Chiu KY, Ng TP, Tang WM, et al. The shape and size of femoral components in revision total hip arthroplasty among Chinese patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2003; 11(1):53-58. (Pubitemid 36999110)
27. Emerson RH Jr, Malinin TI, Cuellar AD, Head WC, Peters PC. Cortical strut allografts in the reconstruction of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. A basic science and clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; (285):35-44.
28. Blackley HR, Davis AM, Hutchison CR, Gross AE. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. A nine to fifteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(3):346-354. (Pubitemid 32221563)
29. Wang JP, Chen WM, Chen CF, et al. Cementation of cross-linked polyethylene liner into well-fixed acetabular shells mean 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(3):420-424.