Erratum: Integrating incomplete fossils by isolating conflicting signal in saturated and non-independent morphological characters (Systematic Biology (2014) 63 (582-600) DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syu022);Integrating incomplete fossils by isolating conflicting signal in saturated and non-independent morphological characters

Systematic Biology

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 582-600

  Dávalos, Liliana M ^a   Velazco, Paúl M ^b   Warsi, Omar M ^a   Smits, Peter D ^c   Simmons, Nancy B ^b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAT; CLASSIFICATION; EXON; FOSSIL; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; INTRON; MITOCHONDRIAL GENE; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TOOTH;

ANIMALS; CHIROPTERA; CLASSIFICATION; EXONS; FOSSILS; GENES, MITOCHONDRIAL; INTRONS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; TOOTH;

EID: 84902439951     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syw110     Document Type: Erratum

References (111)

1. Alheit K., Reif J., Maurer H., Hahn V., Weissmann E., Miedaner T., Wurschum T. 2011. Detection of segregation distortion loci in triticale (x Triticosecale Wittmack) based on a high-density DArT marker consensus genetic linkage map. BMC Genomics 12:380.
2. Asher R.J., Geisler J.H., Sánchez-Villagra M.R. 2008. Morphology, paleontology, and placental mammal phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 57:311-317.
3. Baker R.J., Bininda-Emonds O.R.P., Mantilla-Meluk H., Porter C.A., Van Den Bussche R. 2010. Molecular timescale of diversification of feeding strategy and morphology in New World leaf-nosed bats (Phyllostomidae): a phylogenetic perspective. In: Gunnell G.F., Simmons N.B., editors. Evolutionary History of Bats: Fossils, Molecules and Morphology. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.
4. Baker R.J. Porter C.A., Hoofer S.R., Van Den Bussche R.A. 2003. DiversificationamongNewWorld Leaf-Nosed bats: an evolutionary hypothesis and classification inferred from digenomic congruence of DNA sequence. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University 230:1-32.
5. Baker R.J., Porter C.A., Patton J.C., Van Den Bussche R.A. 2000. Systematics of bats of the family Phyllostomidae based on RAG2 DNA sequences. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University 202:1-16.
6. Baurain D., Brinkmann H., Philippe H. 2007. Lack of resolution in the animal phylogeny: closely spaced cladogeneses or undetected systematic errors? Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:6-9.
7. Bininda-Emonds O.R.P. 2005. transAlign: using amino acids to facilitate the multiple alignment of protein-coding DNA sequences. BMC Bioinform. 6:156.
8. Blanquart S., Lartillot N. 2008. A site- and time-heterogeneous model of amino-acid replacement. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:842-858.
9. Bollback J.P. 2006. SIMMAP: stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies. BMC Bioinform. 7:88.
10. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference. New York: Springer-Verlag.
11. Carrier D.R., Chase K., Lark K.G. 2005. Genetics of canid skeletal variation: size and shape of the pelvis. Genome Res. 15: 1825-1830.
12. Carstens B.C., Lundrigan B.L., Myers P. 2002. A phylogeny of the neotropical nectar-feeding bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) based on morphological and molecular data. J. Mamm. Evol. 9:23-53.
13. Castoe T.A., de Koning A.P.J., Kim H.-M., Gu W., Noonan B.P., Naylor G., Jiang Z.J., Parkinson C.L., Pollock D.D. 2009. Evidence for an ancient adaptive episode of convergent molecular evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106:8986-8991.
14. Choate J.R., Birney E.C. 1968. Sub-recent Insectivora and Chiroptera from Puerto Rico, with the description of a new bat of the genus Stenoderma. J. Mammal. 49:400-412.
15. Clare E.L.,LimB.K., EngstromM.D.,Eger J.L., HebertP.D.N. 2007.DNA barcoding of Neotropical bats: species identification and discovery within Guyana. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7:184-90.
16. Clare E.L., Lim B.K., Fenton M.B., Hebert P.D.N. 2011. Neotropical bats: estimating species diversity with DNA barcodes. PLoS One 6:e22648.
17. Czaplewski N.J., Krejca J., Miller T.E. 2003a. Late quaternary bats from Cebada Cave, Chiquibul Cave System, Belize. Caribb. J. Sci. 39:23-33.
18. Czaplewski N.J., Takai M., Naeher T.M., Shigehara N., Setoguchi T. 2003b. Additional bats from the middle Miocene La Venta fauna of Colombia. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Fsicas, Exactas y Naturales 27:263-282.
19. Datzmann T., von Helversen O.,Mayer F. 2010. Evolution of nectarivory in phyllostomid bats (Phyllostomidae Gray, 1825, Chiroptera: Mammalia). BMC Evol. Biol. 10:165.
20. Dávalos L.M. 2010. Earth history and the evolution of Caribbean bats. In: Fleming T.H., Racey P.A., editors. Island bats: ecology, evolution, and conservation. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press. p. 96-115.
21. Dávalos L.M., Cirranello A.L., Geisler J.H., Simmons N.B. 2012. Understanding phylogenetic incongruence: lessons from Phyllostomid bats. Biol. Rev. 87:991-1023.
22. Dávalos L.M., Perkins S.L. 2008. Saturation and base composition bias explain phylogenomic conflict in Plasmodium. Genomics 91:433-442.
23. Dávalos L.M., Russell A.L. 2012. Deglaciation explains bat extinction in the Caribbean. Ecol. Evol. 2:1-7.
24. Dávalos L.M., Turvey S. 2012. West Indian mammals: the old, the new, and the recently extinct. In: Patterson B.D., Acosta L.P., editors. Bones, clones, and biomes: an extended history of recent neotropical mammals. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press, p. 157-202.
25. Davies K.T.J., Cotton J.A., Kirwan J.D., Teeling E.C., Rossiter S.J. 2012. Parallel signatures of sequence evolution among hearing genes in echolocating mammals: an emerging model of genetic convergence. Heredity 108:480-489.
26. Davis B.H., PoonA.F.Y.,WhitlockM.C. 2009.Compensatory mutations are repeatable and clustered within proteins. Proc. R. Soc. B 276:1823-1827.
27. de QueirozA., Gatesy J. 2007. The supermatrix approach to systematics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:34-41.
28. Drummond A.J., Ashton B., Buxton S., Cheung M., Cooper A., Duran C., Field M., Heled J., Kearse M., Markowitz S., Moir R., Stones- Havas S., Sturrock S., Thierer T.,WilsonA. 2011. Geneious. Geneious version 5.3.6. Available from http://www.geneious.com/.
29. Dumont E.R., Dávalos L.M., Goldberg A., Voigt C.C., Rex K., Santana S.E. 2012. Morphological innovation, diversification and the invasion of a new adaptive zone. Proc. R. Soc. B 279: 1797-1805.
30. Eick G.N., Jacobs D.S., Matthee C.A. 2005.AnuclearDNAphylogenetic perspective on the evolution of echolocation and historical biogeography of extant bats (Chiroptera). Mol. Biol. Evol. 22: 1869-1886.
31. Emerson S.B., Hastings P.A. 1998. Morphological correlations in evolution: consequences for phylogenetic analysis. Q Rev Biol 73:141-162.
32. Evans A.R., Wilson G.P., Fortelius M., Jernvall J. 2007. High-level similarity of dentitions in carnivorans and rodents. Nature 445: 78-81.
33. Fracasso M.P.D.A., Salles L.D.O. 2005. Diversity of quaternary bats from Serra da Mesa (State of Goiás, Brazil). Zootaxa 817:1-19.
34. Geeta R., Dávalos L.M., Levy A., Bohs L., Lavin M., Mummenhoff K., Sinha N., Wojciechowski M. F. 2012. Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves. New Phytol. 193:481-493.
35. Gower J.C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325-338.
36. Gregorin R., Ditchfield D.A. 2005. New genus and species of nectar-feeding bat in the tribe Lonchophyllini (Phyllostomidae: Glossophaginae) from northeastern Brazil. J. Mammal. 86:403-414.
37. Gruber K., Voss R., Jansa S. 2007. Base-compositional heterogeneity in the RAG1 locus among didelphid marsupials: implications for phylogenetic inference and the evolution of GC content. Syst. Biol. 56:83-96.
38. Gu X., Fu Y.X., Li W.H. 1995. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:546-57.
39. Guindon S., Dufayard J.-F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O. 2010. New Algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59:307-21.
40. HandcockM.S. 2013. reldist: relative distribution methods. R package. Available from http://www.stat.ucla.edu/handcock/RelDist/.
41. Handcock M.S., Morris M. 1999. Relative distribution methods in the social sciences. New York: Springer.
42. Hermsen E.J., Hendricks J.R. 2008. Whither fossils? Studying morphological character evolution in the age of molecular sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 95:72-100.
43. Holland B.R., Spencer H.G.,WorthyT.H.,Kennedy M. 2010. Identifying cliques of convergent characters: concerted evolution in the cormorants and shags. Syst. Biol. 59:433-445.
44. Hoorn C., Guerrero J., Sarmiento G.A., Lorente M.A. 1995. Andean tectonics as a cause for changing drainage patterns in Miocene northern South America. Geology 23:237-240.
45. Huelsenbeck J.P., Nielsen R., Bollback J.P. 2003. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 52:131-158.
46. Jansa S.A., Goodman S.M., Tucker P.K. 1999. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the native rodents of Madagascar (Muridae: Nesomyinae): A test of the single-origin hypothesis. Cladistics 15:253-270.
47. Jukes T.H., Cantor C.R. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro H.N., editor.Mammalian protein metabolism.NewYork:Academic Press. p. 21-132.
48. KangasA.T., EvansA.R., Thesleff I., Jernvall J. 2004.Nonindependence of mammalian dental characters. Nature 432:211-214.
49. Katoh K., Kuma K.-I., Toh H., Miyata T. 2005. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:511-518.
50. Katoh K., Toh H. 2008. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief. Bioinform. 9:286-298.
51. Lanfear R., Calcott B., Ho S.Y.W., Guindon S. 2012. PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29:1695-1701.
52. Lee M.S.Y., Camens A.B. 2009. Strong morphological support for the molecular evolutionary tree of placental mammals. J. Evol. Biol. 22:2243-2257.
53. Legendre P., Gallagher E. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271-280.
54. Lewis P.O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50:913-925.
55. Li G., Wang J., Rossiter S.J., Jones G., Cotton J.A., Zhang S. 2008. The hearing gene Prestin reunites echolocating bats. Proc.NatlAcad. Sci. USA 105:13959-13964.
56. Li Y., Liu Z., Shi P., Zhang J. 2010. The hearing gene Prestin unites echolocating bats and whales. Curr. Biol. 20:R55-R56.
57. Liu Y., Cotton J.A., Shen B., Han X., Rossiter S.J., Zhang S. 2010. Convergent sequence evolution between echolocating bats and dolphins. Curr. Biol. 20:R53-R54.
58. Maechler M., Rousseeuw P., Struyf A., Hubert M., Hornik K. 2012. cluster: cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 1.15.2.
59. Manos P.S., Soltis P.S., Soltis D.E., Manchester S.R., Oh S.-H., Bell C.D., Dilcher D.L., Stone D.E. 2007. Phylogeny of extant and fossil juglandaceae inferred from the integration of molecular and morphological data sets. Syst. Biol. 56:412-430.
60. Mantilla-Meluk H. 2007. Lonchophyllini, the Chocoan bats. Revista Institucional Universidad Tecnológica del Chocó 26:49-57.
61. Marengo E., Robotti E., Gianotti V., Righetti P.G., Cecconi D., Domenici E. 2003. A new integrated statistical approach to the diagnostic use of two-dimensional maps. Electrophoresis 24:225-236.
62. Miller M.A., Pfeiffer W., Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 2010. p. 1-8.
63. MuggeoV.M.R. 2008. Segmented: anRpackage to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R News 8:20-25.
64. MurphyW.J., OBrien S.J. 2007. Designing and optimizing comparative anchor primers for comparative gene mapping and phylogenetic inference. Nat. Protoc. 2:3022-3030.
65. Muse S.V., Gaut B.S. 1994. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11: 715-24.
66. OKeefe FR, Wagner P.J. 2001. Inferring and testing hypotheses of cladistic character dependence by using character compatibility. Syst. Biol. 50:657-675.
67. OLeary M.A., Kaufman S.G. 2012. MorphoBank 3.0: Web application for morphological phylogenetics and taxonomy. Available from http://morphobank.org.
68. Page lM. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. B 255:37-45.
69. Pagel M., Meade A. 2006. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167:808-825.
70. Paradis E., Claude J., Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290.
71. Peterson L.E. 2003. Partitioning large-sample microarray-based gene expression profiles using principal components analysis. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 70:107-119.
72. Phillips M.J., Delsuc F., Penny D. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1455-1458.
73. Pyron R.A. 2011. Divergence time estimation using fossils as terminal taxa and the origins of Lissamphibia. Syst. Biol. 60:466-480.
74. R Development Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
75. Rambaut A., Drummond A.J. 2007. Tracer. Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
76. Rambaut A., Drummond A.J. 2010. TreeAnnotator: MCMC Output analysis. Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk.
77. Rojas D., Vale Á., Ferrero V., Navarro L. 2011.When did plants become important to leaf-nosed bats? Diversification of feeding habits in the family Phyllostomidae. Mol. Ecol. 20:2217-2228.
78. Rojas D., Vale Á., Ferrero V., Navarro L. 2012. The role of frugivory in the diversification of bats in the Neotropics. J. Biogeogr. 39: 1948-1960.
79. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
80. Ronquist F., Klopfstein S., Vilhelmsen L., Schulmeister S., Murray D.L., Rasnitsyn A.P. 2012a. A total-evidence approach to dating with fossils, applied to the early radiation of theHymenoptera. Syst. Biol. 61:973-999.
81. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. 2012b. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61:539-542.
82. Santana S.E., Geipel I., Dumont E.R., KalkaM.B., Kalko E.K.V. 2011. All youcan eat: high performance capacity and plasticity in thecommon big-eared bat, Micronycteris microtis (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). PLoS One 6:e28584.
83. Santana S.E., Grosse I.R., Dumont E.R.. 2012. Dietary hardness, loading behavior, and the evolution of skull formin bats. Evolution 66:2587-2598.
84. Schöniger M., Von Haeseler A. 1994. A stochastic model for the evolution of autocorrelatedDNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3:240-247.
85. Simmons M.P., Freudenstein J.V. 2003. The effects of increasing genetic distance on alignment of, and tree construction from, rDNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26: 444-451.
86. Simmons N.B. 1996. A new species of Micronycteris (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) from northeastern Brazil, with comments on phylogenetic relationships. Am. Mus. Novit. 3158:1-35.
87. SimmonsN.B. 1998.Areappraisal of interfamilial relationships of bats. In: Kunz T.H., Racey P.A., editors. Bats: phylogeny, morphology, echolocation and conservation. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press. p. 3-26.
88. Simmons N.B. 2005. Order Chiroptera. In: Wilson D.E., Reeder D.M., editors. Mammal species of theWorld: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 313-529.
89. Skelly D.A., Merrihew G.E., Riffle M., Connelly C.F., Kerr E.O., Johansson M., Jaschob D., Graczyk B., Shulman N.J., Wakefield J., Cooper S.J., Fields S., Noble W.S., Muller E.G.D., Davis T.N., Dunham M.J., MacCoss M.J., Akey J.M. 2013. Integrative phenomics reveals insight into the structure of phenotypic diversity in budding yeast. Genome Res. 23:1496-1504.
90. SmithS., Beaulieu J.,DonoghueM.2009.Mega-phylogeny approachfor comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:37.
91. Springer M.S., Burk-Herrick A., Meredith R., Eizirik E., Teeling E., OBrien S.J., Murphy W.J. 2007. The adequacy of morphology for reconstructing the early history of placental mammals. Syst. Biol. 56:673-684.
92. Springer M.S., Meredith R.W., Eizirik E., Teeling E., Murphy W.J. 2008. Morphology and placental mammal phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 57: 499-503.
93. Springer M.S., Teeling E.C., Madsen O., Stanhope M.J., de Jong W.W. 2001. Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98:6241-6246.
94. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688-2690.
95. Stamatakis A., Hoover P., Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst. Biol. 57:758-771.
96. Swofford D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
97. Tavaré S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect. Math. Life Sci. 17:57-86.
98. Teeling E.C., Springer M.S., Madsen O., Bates P., OBrien S.J., Murphy W.J. 2005.Amolecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science 307:580-584.
99. Wagner P.J. 2000. Exhaustion of morphologic character states among fossil taxa. Evolution 54:365-386.
100. Wake D.B. 1991. Homoplasy: the result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitations? Am. Nat. 138:543-567.
101. Wetterer A.L., Rockman M.V., Simmons N.B. 2000. Phylogeny of phyllostomid bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): data from diverse morphological systems, sex chromosomes, and restriction sites. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 248:1-200.
102. Wiens J.J. 2004. The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 53:653-661.
103. Wiens J.J. 2009. Paleontology, genomics, and combined-data phylogenetics: can molecular data improve phylogeny estimation for fossil taxa? Syst. Biol. 58:87-99.
104. Wiens J.J., Chippindale P.T., Hillis D.M. 2003. When are phylogenetic analyses misled by convergence? A case study in Texas cave salamanders. Syst. Biol. 52:501-514.
105. Wiens J.J., Kuczynski C.A., Townsend T., Reeder T.W., Mulcahy D.G., Sites J.W. 2010. Combining phylogenomics and fossils in higher-level squamate reptile phylogeny: molecular data change the placement of fossil taxa. Syst. Biol. 59:674-688.
106. Wiens J.J., Moen D.S. 2008. Missing data and the accuracy of Bayesian phylogenetics. J. Syst. Evol. 46:307-314.
107. Wiens J.J., Tiu J. 2012. Highly incomplete taxa can rescue phylogenetic analyses from the negative impacts of limited taxon sampling. PLoS One 7:e42925.
108. Wilcoxon F. 1945. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometr. Bull. 1:80-83.
109. Wilkinson M. 1995. A comparison of two methods of character construction. Cladistics 11:297-308.
110. Yang Z. 1994.Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation fromDNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
111. Zharkikh A. 1994. Estimation of evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 39:315-329.