Stochastic mapping of morphological characters

Systematic Biology

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 131-158

  Huelsenbeck, John P ^a   Nielsen, Rasmus ^b   Bollback, Jonathan P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian estimation; Character correlation; Character mapping; Markov chain Monte Carlo

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; APHIDIDAE; ASTERIAS; PONTEDERIACEAE;

EID: 0038521713     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150390192780     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ADEY, N. B., T. O. TOLLEFSBOL, A. B. SPARKS, M. H. EDGELL, AND C. A. HUTCHISON. 1994. Molecular resurrection of an extinct ancestral promoter for mouse L1. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1569-1573.
2. CHANG, B. S., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2000. Recreating ancestral proteins. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:109-114.
3. CHANG, J. T., AND J. KIM. 1996. The measurement of homoplasy: A stochastic view. Pages 189-203 in Homoplasy: The recurrence of similarity in evolution (M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford, eds.). Adacemic Press, Chicago.
4. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1999. Some limitations of ancestral characterstate reconstruction when testing evolutionary hypotheses. Syst. Biol. 48:665-674.
5. FARRIS, J. S. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. Pages 7-36 in Advances in Cladistics, Volume II (N. Platnick and V. Funk, eds.). Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
6. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
7. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
8. GALTIER, N. 2001. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis under a covarion-like model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:866-873.
9. GRAHAM, S. W., J. R. KOHN, B. R. MORTON, J. E. ECKENWALDER, AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1998. Phylogenetic congruence and discordance among one morphological and three molecular data sets from Pontederiaceae. Syst. Biol. 47:545-567.
10. HART, M. W., M. BYRNE, AND M. J. SMITH. 1997. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of life-history evolution in asterinid starfish. Evolution 51:1848-1861.
11. HARVEY, P. H., AND M. PAGEL. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
12. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND T. YANO. 1985. Dating the human-ape split by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160-174.
13. HASEGAWA, M., T. YANO, AND H. KISHINO. 1984. A new molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA and the evolution of hominoids. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B 60:95-98.
14. HASTINGS, W. K. 1970. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57:97-109.
15. HUELSENBECK, J. P., B. RANNALA, AND J. P. MASLY. 2000. Accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty in evolutionary studies. Science 288:2349-2350.
16. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. RONQUIST. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
17. HUELSENBECK, J. P., F. RONQUIST, R. NIELSEN, AND J. P. BOLLBACK. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-2314.
18. JERMANN, T. M., J. G. OPITZ, J. STACKHOUSE, AND S. A. BENNER. 1995. Reconstructing the evolutionary history of the artiodactyl ribonuclease superfamily. Nature 374:57-59.
19. JUKES, T. H., AND C. R. CANTOR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pages 21-123 in Mammalian protein msetabolism (H. N. Munro, ed.). Academic Press, New York.
20. KIMURA, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
21. KOHN, J. R., S. W. GRAHAM, B. MORTON, J. J. DOYLE, AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1996. Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Pontederiaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. Evolution 50:1454-1469.
22. LARGET, B., AND D. SIMON. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759.
23. LEWIS, P. O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50:913-925.
24. LOSOS, J. B. 1994. An approach to the analysis of comparative data when a phylogeny is unavailable or incomplete. Syst. Biol. 43: 117-123.
25. LOSOS, J. B., AND D. B. MILES. 1994. Adaptation, constraint, and the comparative method: Phylogenetic issues and methods. Pages 60-98 in Ecological morphology: Integrative organismal biology (P. C. Wainwright and S. Reilly, eds.). Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
26. MADDISON, W. P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: Are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 44:539-557.
27. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
28. MALCOLM, B. A., K. P. WILSON, B. W. MATTHEWS, J. F. KIRSCH, AND A. C. WILSON. 1990. Ancestral lysozymes reconstructed, neutrality tested, and thermostability linked to hydrocarbon packing. Nature 345:86-89.
29. MARTINS, E. P. 1996. Conducting phylogenetic comparative studies when the phylogeny is not known. Evolution 50:12-22.
30. MAU, B. 1996. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte carlo methods. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. Wisconsin, Madison.
31. MAU, B., AND M. NEWTON. 1997. Phylogenetic inference for binary data on dendrograms using Markov chain Monte Carlo. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 6:122-131.
32. MAU, B., M. NEWTON, AND B. LARGET. 1999. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte carlo methods. Biometrics 55:1-12.
33. METROPOLIS, N., A. W. ROSENBLUTH, M. N. ROSENBLUTH, A. H. TELLER, AND E. TELLER. 1953. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1087-1091.
34. MOOERS, A. Ø., AND D. SCHLUTER. 1999. Support for one and two rate models of discrete trait evolution. Syst. Biol. 48:623-633.
35. NEWTON, M., B. MAU, AND B. LARGET. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo for the Bayesian analysis of evolutionary trees from aligned molecular sequences. Pages 143-162 in Statistics in molecular biology (F. Seillier-Moseiwitch, T. P. Speed, and M. Waterman, eds.). Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
36. NIELSEN, R. 2002. Mapping mutations on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 51:729-739.
37. PAGEL, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evoluton on phylogenies: A general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255:37-45.
38. PAGEL, M. D. 1999a. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884.
39. PAGEL, M. 1999b. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48:612-622.
40. RANNALA, B., AND Z. YANG. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43:304-311.
41. RIDLEY, M. 1983. The explanation of organic diversity: The comparative method and adaptations for mating. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.
42. SCHLUTER, D. 1995. Uncertainty in ancient phylogenies. Nature 377:108-109.
43. SCHLUTER, D., T. PRICE, A. Ø. MOOERS, AND D. LUDWIG. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51:1699-1711.
44. SCHULTZ, T. R., AND G. A. CHURCHILL. 1999. The role of subjectivity in reconstructing ancestral character states: A Bayesian approach to unknown rates, states, and transformation asymmetries. Syst. Biol. 48:651-664.
45. STACKHOUSE, J., S. R. PRESNELL, G. M. MCGEEHAN, K. P. NAMBIAR, AND S. A. BENNER. 1990. The ribonuclease from an ancient bovid ruminant. FEBS Lett. 262:104-106.
46. STERN, D. L. 1998. Phylogeny of the tribe Cerataphidini (Homoptera) and the evolution of the horned soldier aphids. Evolution 52:155-165.
47. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
48. TUFFLEY, C., AND M. STEEL. 1998. Modeling the covarion hypothesis of nucleotide substitution. Math. Biosci. 147:63-91.
49. YANG, Z. 1993. Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1396-1401.
50. YANG, Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: Approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
51. YANG, Z., AND B. RANNALA. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: A Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:717-724.