Inferring and testing hypotheses of cladistic character dependence by using character compatibility

Systematic Biology

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 657-675

  O'Keefe, F Robin ^a   Wagner, Peter J ^b  

^a NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Character independence; Character weighting; Compatibility; Correlated character evolution; Similarity coefficient

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIA; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMETRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY;

AMPHIBIA; ANIMALS; BIOMETRY; EVOLUTION; MODELS, GENETIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 0035527371     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351501753328794     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ALROY, J. 1994. Four permutation tests for the presence of phylogenetic structure. Syst. Biol. 43:430-437.
2. BOOKSTEIN, F. L., B. CHERNOFF, R. ELDER, J. HUMPHRIES, G. SMITH, AND R. STRAUSS. 1985. Morphometrics in evolutionary biology - the geometry of size and shape changes, with examples from fishes. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.
3. CAMIN, J. H., AND R. R. SOKAL. 1965. A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution. 19:311-326.
4. CHEETHAM, A. H., AND J. E. HAZEL. 1969. Binary (presence-absence) similarity coefficients. J. Paleontol. 43:1130-1136.
5. CHIPPINDALE, P. T., AND J. J. WIENS. 1994. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:278-287.
6. DE QUEIROZ, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42:368-372.
7. DIXON, M. T., AND D. M. HILLIS. 1993. Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: Compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:256-267.
8. EDWARDS, A. W. F., AND L. L. CAVALLI-SFORZA. 1964. Reconstruction of evolutionary trees. Pages 67-76 in Phenetic and phylogenetic classification (J.H. Heywood and J. McNeil, eds.). Systematic Association, London.
9. EMERSON, S. B., AND P. A. HASTINGS. 1998. Morphological correlations in evolution: Consequences for phylogenetic analysis. Q. Rev. Biol. 73:141-162.
10. ESTABROOK, G. F., C. S. JOHNSON, AND F. R. MCMORRIS. 1976. A mathematical foundation for the analysis of cladistic character compatibility. Math. Biosci. 29:181-187.
11. FAITH, D. P. 1991. Cladistic permutation tests for monophyly and nonmonophyly. Syst. Zool. 40:366-375.
12. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1973. Maximum-likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Syst. Zool. 22:240-249.
13. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. A likelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 16:183-196.
14. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
15. GOWER, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325-338.
16. GOWER, J. C. 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857-874.
17. HILLIS, D. M., AND J. P. HUELSENBECK. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analysis. J. Hered. 83:189-195.
18. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND R. NIELSEN. 1999. Effects of nonindependent substitution on phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 48:317-328.
19. JACKSON, D. A. 1993. Stopping rules in principal components analysis: A comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74:2204-2215.
20. KLUGE, A. G., AND J. S. FARRIS . 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zoo. 18(1):1-32.
21. KLUGE, A. G., AND A. J. WOLF. 1993. Cladistics: What's in a word? Cladistics 9:183-199.
22. LE QUESNE, W. J. 1969. A method of selection of characters in numerical taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 18:201-205.
23. LE QUESNE, W. J. 1982. Compatibility analysis and its applications. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 74:267-275.
24. MADDISON, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 40:315-328.
25. MADDISON, W. P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: Are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? Evolution 44:539-557.
26. MCCRACKEN, K. G., J. HARSHMAN, D. A. MCCLELLAN, AND A. D. AFTON, 1999. Data set incongruence and correlated character evolution: An example of functional convergence in the hind-limbs of stifftail diving ducks. Syst. Biol. 48:683-714.
27. MCMORRIS, F. R. 1975. Compatibility criteria for cladistic and qualitative taxonomic characters. Pages 399-415 in Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Freeman International Congress on Numerical Taxonomy (B. F. Estabrook, ed.). W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
28. MEACHAM, C. A. 1980. Phytogeny of the Berberidaceae with an evaluation of classifications. Syst. Bot. 5:149-172.
29. MEACHAM, C. A. 1981. A probability measure for character compatibility. Math. Biosci. 57:1-18.
30. MEACHAM, C. A. 1984. Evaluating characters by character compatibility analysis. Pages 152-165 in Cladistics: Perspectives on the reconstruction of evolutionary history (T. Duncan, and T. F. Stuessy, eds.). Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
31. MEACHAM, C. A. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships at the basal radiation of angiosperms: Further study by probability of character compatibility. Syst. Bot. 19:506-522.
32. MICKEVICH, M. F. 1978. Taxonomic congruence. Syst. Zool. 27:143-158.
33. OCHIAI, A. 1957. Zoogeographic studies on soleoid fishes found in Japan and its neighbouring regions. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish 22:526-530.
34. O'KEEFE, F. R. 2000. Phylogeny and convergence in the Plesiosauria (Reptilia: Sauropterygia). Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Chicago, Chicago.
35. O'LEARY, M. A., AND J. H. GEISLER. 1999. The position of Cetacea within Mammalia: Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data from extinct and extant taxa. Syst. Biol. 48:455-490.
36. PAGEL, M. D. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: A general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255:37-45.
37. QUICKE, D. L. J., AND R. BELSHAW. 1999. Incongruence between morphological data sets: An example from the evolution of endoparasitism among parastic wasps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Syst. Biol. 48:436-454.
38. RAUP, D. M. 1966. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: General problems. J. Paleontol. 40:1178-1190.
39. RAUP, D. M., AND S. J. GOULD. 1974. Stochastic simulation and evolution of morphology - Towards a nomothetic paleontology. Syst. Zool. 23:305-322.
40. REYMENT, R. A., AND K. G. JÖRESKOG. 1996. Applied factor analysis in the natural sciences. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.
41. RICE, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical data. Evolution 43:223-225.
42. SANKOFF, D., AND P. ROUSSEAU. 1975. Locating the vertices of a Steiner tree in arbitrary space. Math. Progr. 9:240-246.
43. SHAFFER, H. B., J. M. CLARK, AND F. KRAUS. 1991. When molecules and morphology clash: A phylogenetic analysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Syst. Zool. 40:284-303.
44. SHARKEY, M. J. 1989. A hypothesis-independent method of character weighting for cladistic analysis. Cladistics 5:63-86.
45. SHARKEY, M. J. 1994. Discriminate compatibility measures and the reduction routine. Syst. Biol. 43:526-542.
46. SIMPSON, G. G. 1960. Notes on the measurement of faunal resemblance. Am. J. Sci. 258a:300-311.
47. SNEATH, P. H. A., M. J. SACKIN, AND R. P. AMBLER. 1975. Detecting evolutionary incompatibilities from protein sequences. Syst. Zool. 24:311-332.
48. SNEATH, P. H. A., AND R. R. SOKAL. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
49. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edition. W. H. Freeman, New York.
50. STRANG, G. 1980. Linear algebra, 2nd edition. Academic Press, New York.
51. SUTER, S. J. 1994. Cladistic analysis of cassiduloid echinoids: Trying to see the phylogeny for the trees. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 53:31-72.
52. TURNER, B. J. 1974. Genetic divergence of Death Valley pupfish species: Biochemical versus morphological evidence. Evolution 28:281-284.
53. WAGNER, P. J. 1998. A likelihood approach for estimating phylogenetic relationships among fossil taxa. Paleobiology 24:430-449.
54. WAGNER, P. J. 2000. Exhaustion of cladistic character states among fossil taxa. Evolution 54:365-386.
55. WAINWRIGHT, S. A., W. D. BIGGS, J. D. CURREY, AND J. M. GOSLINE. 1975. Mechanical design in organisms. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
56. WAKE, D. B. 1989. Phylogenetic implications of ontogenetic data. Geobios, Mém. Spéc. 12:369-378.
57. WERDELIN, L., AND N. SOLOUNIAS. 1991. The Hyaenidae: Taxonomic systematics and evolution. Fossils Strata 30:1-104.
58. WHEELER, W. C., AND R. L. HONEYCUTT. 1988. Paired sequence difference in ribosomal RNAs: Evolutionary and phylogenetic implications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:90-96.
59. WILKINSON, M. 1997. Characters, congruence and quality: A study of neuroanatomical and traditional data in caecilian phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 72:423-470.
60. WILKINSON, M. 1998. Split support and split conflict randomization tests in phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 47:673-695.
61. WRAY, G. A. 1996. Parallel evolution of nonfeeding larvae in echinoids. Syst. Biol. 45:308-322.
62. Syst. Biol. 50(5):676-688, 2001