Genetics of single-cell protein abundance variation in large yeast populations

Nature

Volumn 506, Issue 7489, 2014, Pages 494-497

  Albert, Frank W ^a,b   Treusch, Sebastian ^b   Shockley, Arthur H ^c   Bloom, Joshua S ^a,d   Kruglyak, Leonid ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Synthetic Genomics Inc   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN;

ALLELE; CELL ORGANELLE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN; PROTEOMICS; YEAST;

ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENETICS; FUNGAL GENOME; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENES, FUNGAL; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, FUNGAL; GENOTYPE; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, MESSENGER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84896724814     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12904     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Rockman, M. V. & Kruglyak, L. Genetics of global gene expression. Nature Rev. Genet. 7, 862-872 (2006).
2. Smith, E. N.&Kruglyak, L. Gene-environment interaction in yeast gene expression. PLoS Biol. 6, e83 (2008).
3. Rockman, M. V., Skrovanek, S. S. & Kruglyak, L. Selection at linked sites shapes heritable phenotypic variation in C. elegans. Science 330, 372-376 (2010).
4. Huang, G. J. et al. High resolution mapping of expression QTLs in heterogeneous stock mice in multiple tissues. Genome Res. 19, 1133-1140 (2009).
5. West, M. A. L. et al. Global eQTL mapping reveals the complex genetic architecture of transcript-level variation in Arabidopsis. Genetics 175, 1441-1450 (2007).
6. Lappalainen, T. et al. Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans. Nature 501, 506-511 (2013).
7. Brem, R. B. & Kruglyak, L. The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1572-1577 (2005).
8. Foss, E. J. et al. Genetic basis of proteome variation in yeast. Nature Genet. 39, 1369-1375 (2007).
9. Foss, E. J. et al. Genetic variation shapes protein networks mainly through nontranscriptional mechanisms. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001144 (2011).
10. Ghazalpour, A. et al. Comparative analysis of proteome and transcriptome variation in mouse. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001393 (2011).
11. Wu, L. et al. Variation and genetic control of protein abundance in humans. Nature 499, 79-82 (2013).
12. Khan, Z., Bloom, J. S., Garcia, B. A., Singh, M. & Kruglyak, L. Protein quantification across hundreds of experimental conditions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15544-15548 (2009).
13. Skelly, D. A. et al. Integrative phenomics reveals insight into the structure of phenotypic diversity in budding yeast. Genome Res. 23, 1496-1504 (2013).
14. Ehrenreich, I. M. et al. Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants. Nature 464, 1039-1042 (2010).
15. Huh, W.-K. et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425, 686-691 (2003).
16. Edwards, M. D. & Gifford, D. K. High-resolution genetic mapping with pooled sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 13, S8 (2012).
17. Picotti, P. et al.A completemass-spectrometricmapof the yeast proteome applied to quantitative trait analysis. Nature 494, 266-270 (2013).
18. Brem, R. B., Yvert, G., Clinton, R.& Kruglyak, L. Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 296, 752-755 (2002).
19. Litvin, O., Causton, H. C., Chen, B. J. & Pe'er, D. Modularity and interactions in the genetics of gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6441-6446 (2009).
20. Zitomer, R. S. & Lowry, C. V. Regulation of gene expression by oxygen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 56, 1-11 (1992).
21. Gaisne, M., Bécam, A. M., Verdiere, J. & Herbert, C. J. A. A 'natural' mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains derived from S288c affects the complex regulatory gene HAP1 (CYP1). Curr. Genet. 36, 195-200 (1999).
22. Harbison, C. T. et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431, 99-104 (2004).
23. Butler, G. Hypoxia and gene expression in eukaryotic microbes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 67, 291-312 (2013).
24. Zaman, S., Lippman, S. I., Zhao, X. & Broach, J. R. How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 27-81 (2008).
25. Zaman, S., Lippman, S. I., Schneper, L., Slonim, N.& Broach, J. R. Glucose regulates transcription in yeast through a network of signaling pathways. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 245 (2009).
26. Spor, A. et al. Niche-driven evolution of metabolic and life-history strategies in natural and domesticated populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.BMCEvol. Biol. 9, 296 (2009).
27. Warringer, J. et al. Trait variation in yeast is defined by population history. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002111 (2011).
28. Fraser, H. B., Moses, A. M. & Schadt, E. E. Evidence for widespread adaptive evolution of gene expression in budding yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2977-2982 (2010).
29. Lewis, J. A. & Gasch, A. P. Natural variation in the yeast glucose-signaling network reveals a new role for the Mig3p transcription factor.G3Gene Genomes Genetics 2, 1607-1612 (2012).
30. Henras, A. K. et al. The post-transcriptional steps of eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 2334-2359 (2008).
31. Howson, R. et al. Construction, verification and experimental use of two epitopetagged collections of budding yeast strains. Comp. Funct. Genomics 6, 2-16 (2005).
32. Tong, A. H. Y. & Boone, C. High-throughput strain construction and systematic synthetic lethal screeningin Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Methods in Microbiology36, 369-707 (2007).
33. Newman, J. R. S. et al. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441, 840-846 (2006).
34. Adey, A. et al. Rapid, low-input, low-bias construction of shotgun fragment libraries by high-density in vitro transposition. Genome Biol. 11, R119 (2010).
35. Bloom, J. S., Ehrenreich, I. M., Loo, W. T., Lite, T.-L. V. & Kruglyak, L. Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross. Nature 494, 234-237 (2013).
36. Meyer, M. & Kircher, M. Illumina Sequencing Library Preparation for Highly Multiplexed Target Capture and Sequencing. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5448 (2010).
37. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
38. Broman, K. W.,Wu, H., Sen,S.&Churchill, G. A. R/qtl:QTLmapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19, 889-890 (2003).
39. Yvert, G. et al. Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeand the role of transcription factors. Nature Genet. 35, 57-64 (2003).
40. Storey, J. D. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440-9445 (2003).
41. Spivak, A. T. & Stormo, G. D. ScerTF: a comprehensive database of benchmarked position weight matrices for Saccharomyces species. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D162-D168 (2012).