A cooperative expert based support vector regression (Co-ESVR) system to determine collar dimensions around bridge pier

Neurocomputing

Volumn 140, Issue , 2014, Pages 172-184

  Jahangirzadeh, Afshin ^a   Shamshirband, Shahaboddin ^b   Aghabozorgi, Saeed ^a   Akib, Shatirah ^a   Basser, Hossein ^a   Anuar, Nor Badrul ^a   Kiah, Miss Laiha Mat ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Collar; Cooperative; Expert system; Multi agent system; Scour; Support vector regression

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE PIERS; EXPERT SYSTEMS; FORECASTING; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

COLLAR; COOPERATIVE; DETERMINATION METHODS; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; OPTIMUM DIMENSIONS; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; SHARING STRATEGIES; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION (SVR);

SCOUR;

EID: 84901360343     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: 18728286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Fayyadh M.M., Akib S., Othman I., Razak H.A. Experimental investigation and finite element modelling of the effects of flow velocities on a skewed integral bridge. Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory 2011, 19:1795-1810.
2. I.R.R. TO, Federal Highway Administration, 1996.
3. Link O., Pfleger F., Zanke U. Characteristics of developing scour-holes at a sand-embedded cylinder. Int. J. Sediment Res. 2008, 23:258-266.
4. Heidarpour M., Afzalimehr H., Izadinia E. Reduction of local scour around bridge pier groups using collars. Int. J. Sediment Res. 2010, 25:411-422.
5. M. Heidarpour, Z. Khodarahmi, S. Mousavi, Control and reduction of local scour at bridge pier groups using slot, in: Proceedings of XXX International Association of Hydraulic Research Congress, Thessaloniki, Greece, August 2003, pp. 24-29.
6. Muzzammil M., Gangadharaiah T., Gupta A. An experimental investigation of a horseshoe vortex induced by a bridge pier. Proc. ICE: Water Manage. 2004, 157:109-119.
7. Dey S., Raikar R. Characteristics of horseshoe vortex in developing scour holes at piers. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2007, 133:399-413.
8. Kirkil G., Constantinescu S., Ettema R. Coherent structures in the flow field around a circular cylinder with scour hole. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2008, 134:572-587.
9. A. Hendrickson, J. Marr, C. Ellis, V. Winsted, M. Lueker, Bridge Scour Monitoring Technologies: Development of Evaluation and Selection Protocols for Application on River Bridges in Minnesota, Scour and Erosion), pp. 949-957.
10. Karami H., Basser H., Ardeshir A., Hosseini S.H. Verification of numerical study of scour around spur dikes using experimental data. Water Environ. J. 2012, (n/a-n/a).
11. Melville B. Local scour at bridge abutments. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1992, 118:615-631.
12. Z.M. Christensen, Reduction of local scour around bridge piers: Combined system of aerofoil and slot, Bachelor thesis, University of Southern Queensland, 2009.
13. Zarrati A., Nazariha M., Mashahir M. Reduction of local scour in the vicinity of bridge pier groups using collars and riprap. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2006, 132:154-162.
14. Chiew Y. Scour protection at bridge piers. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1992, 118:1260-1269.
15. Canada T.A.o. Guide to Bridge Hydraulics 2004, Thomas Telford.
16. R. Ettema, Scour at Bridge Piers, 1980.
17. Dey S. Local scour at piers, Part 1: a review of development of research. Int. J. Sediment Res. 1997, 12:23-44.
18. Kumar V., Raju K., Vittal N. Reduction of local scour around bridge piers using slots and collars. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1999, 125:1302-1305.
19. Zarrati A.R., Gholami H., Mashahir M.B. Application of collar to control scouring around rectangular bridge piers. J. Hydraul. Res. 2004, 42:97-103.
20. P.D. Alabi, Time Development of Local Scour at a Bridge Pier Fitted with a Collar, 2006.
21. Moncada-M A.T., Aguirre-Pe J., Bolívar J.C., Flores E.J. Scour protection of circular bridge piers with collars and slots. J. Hydraul. Res. 2009, 47:119-126.
22. Jahangirzadeh A., Akib S Experimental study for determination of collar dimensions around bridge pier (accepted). Baltic J. Road Bridge Eng. 2013.
23. S. Akib, F. Othman, I. Othman, A. Amini, M.S. Marzuki, Local scour at integral bridges with single and double row piles in a two-stage channel, in: Proceedings of H2O 09: 32nd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Newcastle: Adapting to Change, Engineers Australia, 2009, pp. 1224.
24. Ismail A., Jeng D.S., Zhang L.L., Zhang J.S. Predictions of bridge scour: application of a feed-forward neural network with an adaptive activation function. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2013, 26:1540-1549.
25. Firat M., Gungor M. Generalized regression neural networks and feed forward neural networks for prediction of scour depth around bridge piers. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2009, 40:731-737.
26. Lee T.L., Jeng D.S., Zhang G.H., Hong J.H. Neural network modeling for estimation of scour depth around bridge piers. J. Hydrodyn. Ser. B 2007, 19:378-386.
27. Bateni S.M., Borghei S.M., Jeng D.S. Neural network and neuro-fuzzy assessments for scour depth around bridge piers. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2007, 20:401-414.
28. Yang X., Yu Q., He L., Guo T. The one-against-all partition based binary tree support vector machine algorithms for multi-class classification. Neurocomputing 2013, 113:1-7.
29. Keshavarzi A., Gazni R., Homayoon S.R. Prediction of scouring around an arch-shaped bed sill using neuro-fuzzy model. Appl. Soft Comput. 2012, 12:486-493.
30. Pal M., Singh N.K., Tiwari N.K. Support vector regression based modeling of pier scour using field data. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2011, 24:911-916.
31. Pal M., Deswal S. Modelling pile capacity using Gaussian process regression. Comput. Geotech. 2010, 37:942-947.
32. Goel A., Pal M. Application of support vector machines in scour prediction on grade-control structures. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2009, 22:216-223.
33. Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 1995, 20:273-297.
34. Cristianini N., Shawe-Taylor J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods 2000, Cambridge University Press.
35. Suykens J.A.K., Vandewalle J. Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process. Lett. 1999, 9:293-300.
36. Behzad M., Asghari K., Eazi M., Palhang M. Generalization performance of support vector machines and neural networks in runoff modeling. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36:7624-7629.
37. Lin J.-Y., Cheng C.-T., Chau K.-W. Using support vector machines for long-term discharge prediction. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2006, 51:599-612.
38. Liong S.-Y., Sivapragasam C. Flood stage forecasting with support vector machines 1. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2002, 38:173-186.
39. Choy K.Y., Chan C.W. Modelling of river discharges and rainfall using radial basis function networks based on support vector regression. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 2003, 34:763-773.
40. Yu X., Liong S.-Y. Forecasting of hydrologic time series with ridge regression in feature space. J. Hydrol. 2007, 332:290-302.
41. Smola A., Schölkopf B. A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat. Comput. 2004, 14:199-222.
42. Barakat N., Bradley A.P. Rule extraction from support vector machines: a review. Neurocomputing 2010, 74:178-190.
43. Masjedi A., ShafaEi Bejestan M., Esfandi A. Experimental study on local scour around single oblong pier fitted with a collar in a 180 degree flume bend. Int. J. Sediment Res. 2010, 25:304-312.
44. Aldewereld H., Tranier J., Dignum F., Dignum V. Agent-based crisis management. Collaborative Agents-Research and Development 2011, 31-43. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. C. Guttmann, F. Dignum, M. Georgeff (Eds.).
45. Alpadin E. Introduction to Machine Learning 2010, MIT Press.
46. Wooldridge M. An Introduction to Multiagent Systems 2009, John Wiley & Sons.
47. Cheng M.-Y., Wu Y.-W. Multi-agent-based data exchange platform for bridge disaster prevention: a case study in Taiwan. Nat. Hazards 2013, 1-16.
48. León O., Román R., Hernández-Serrano J. Towards a Cooperative Intrusion Detection System for Cognitive Radio Networks 2011, 231-242. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, (Networking Workshops, Lecture Notes in Computer Science).
49. Sun X., Liu Y., Li J., Zhu J., Liu X., Chen H. Using cooperative game theory to optimize the feature selection problem. Neurocomputing 2012, 97:86-93.
50. Renjit J.A., Shunmuganathan K.L. Multi-agent-based anomaly intrusion detection. Inf. Secur. J.: Global Perspect. 2011, 20:185-193.
51. S. Shamshirband, N.B. Anuar, M.L.M. Kiah, A. Patel, An appraisal and design of a multi-agent system based cooperative wireless intrusion detection computational intelligence technique, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.
52. Guo J., Zhou J., Qin H., Zou Q., Li Q. Monthly streamflow forecasting based on improved support vector machine model. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38:13073-13081.
53. Wang W.-C., Chau K.-W., Cheng C.-T., Qiu L. A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. J. Hydrol. 2009, 374:294-306.
54. Ch S., Anand N., Panigrahi B.K., Mathur S. Streamflow forecasting by SVM with quantum behaved particle swarm optimization. Neurocomputing 2013, 101:18-23.
55. Asefa T., Kemblowski M., McKee M., Khalil A. Multi-time scale stream flow predictions: the support vector machines approach. J. Hydrol. 2006, 318:7-16.
56. Ahmadabadi M.N., Asadpour M. Expertness based cooperative Q-learning. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 2002, 32:66-76.