IMPACT OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA MODULE WITH PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS ON STUDENTS' UNDERSTANDING AND MOTIVATION IN THE LEARNING OF ELECTROCHEMISTRY

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 395-421

  Osman, Kamisah ^a   Lee, Tien Tien ^b  

^a UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b SULTAN IDRIS EDUCATION UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

electrochemistry; interactive multimedia module; pedagogical agent

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899456450     PISSN: 15710068     EISSN: 15731774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-013-9407-y     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Anthony, C. (2006). Exam oriented education system, 13. 10. 2011. Available from http://drca. wordpress. com/2006/04/01/exam-oriented-education-system/.
2. Atkinson, R. K. (2002). Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 416-427.
3. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D. & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
4. Barak, M. (2007). Transition from traditional to ICT-enhanced learning environments in undergraduate chemistry courses. Computers in Education, 48, 30-43.
5. Baylor, A. L. (2005). The impact of pedagogical agent image on affective outcomes. Proceedings of Workshop on Affective Interactions: Computers in the Affective Loop, International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, San Diego, CA, 2005.
6. Baylor, A. L. & Kim, Y. (2004). Pedagogical agent design: The impact of agent realism, gender, ethnicity and instructional role. Paper presented in International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Maceio, Brazil, 2004.
7. Bojczuk, M. (1982). Topic difficulties in O- and A-level chemistry. School Science Review, 64, 545-551.
8. Bowen, C. W. (1998). Item design considerations for computer-based testing of student learning in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(9), 1172-1175.
9. Burewicz, A. & Miranowicz, N. (2002). Categorization of visualization tools in aspects of chemical research and education. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 88, 549-563.
10. Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J. & Windschitl, M. A. (1998). Developing and using conceptual computer animations for chemistry instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 5(12), 1658-1661.
11. Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand Mcnally College Publishing Company.
12. Chang, H. H. (2005). The relationship between extrinsic/intrinsic motivation and language learning strategies among college students of English in Taiwan. Master Thesis, Ming Chuan University.
13. Chou, C. Y., Chan, T. W. & Lin, C. J. (2003). Redefining the learning companion: The past, present and future of educational agents. Computers in Education, 40, 255-269.
14. Clarebout, G. & Elen, J. (2007). In search of pedagogical agents' modality and dialogue effects in open learning environments. 23. 7. 2009, Available from http://www. ascilite. org. au/ajet/e-jist/docs/vol10_no1/papers/full_papers/clarebout_elen. pdf.
15. Craig, S. D., Gholson, B. & Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 428-434.
16. Doymus, K., Karacop, A. & Simsek, U. (2010). Effects of jigsaw and animation techniques on students' understanding of concepts and subjects in electrochemistry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 671-691.
17. Gabel, D. (2003). Enhancing the conceptual understanding of science. Educational Horizons, 81(2), 70-76.
18. Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J. & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students' alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69-95.
19. Garnett, P. J. & Hackling, M. W. (1993). Chemistry misconceptions at the secondary-tertiary interface. Chemistry in Australia, 60(3), 117-119.
20. Garnett, P. J. & Treagust, D. F. (1992a). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: Electric circuits and oxidation-Reduction equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 121-142.
21. Garnett, P. J. & Treagust, D. F. (1992b). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: Electrochemical (galvanic) and electrolytic cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1079-1099.
22. Gois, J. Y. & Giordan, M. (2009). Evolution of virtual learning environments in chemistry education. In Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Número Extra VIII CongresoInternacionalsobreInvestigación en Didáctica de lasCiencias, Barcelona, pp. 2864-2867.
23. Gustafson, K. L. & Branch, R. M. (1997). Survey of instructional development model (3rd ed.). NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Technology.
24. Hamza, K. M. & Wickman, P.-O. (2008). Describing and analyzing learning in action: An empirical study of the importance of misconceptions in learning science. Science Education, 92(1), 141-164.
25. Hasnira Embong. (2005). Pembinaan dan Keberkesanan Penggunaan Perisian Multimedia Elektrokimia Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Kimia Tingkatan 4. (Development and effectiveness of electrochemistry multimedia software in the teaching and learning of form 4 chemistry). Master Thesis, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
26. Hayes-Roth, B., Maldonado, H., & Moraes, M. (2002). Designing for diversity: Multi cultural characters for a multi-cultural world. 15. 7. 2009, Available from http://www. stanford. edu/~kiky/Design4Diversity. pdf.
27. Hill, J. R. & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resourse-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37-52.
28. Jackson, S. L. (2003). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.
29. Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W. & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 47-78.
30. Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701-705.
31. Juriševič, M., Glažar, S. A., Vogrinc, J. & Devetak, I. (2009). Intrinsic motivation for learning science through the educational vertical in Slovenia. 30. 7. 2012, Available from http://www. self. ox. ac. uk/documents/Jurisevicetal.pdf.
32. Kamisah, O., & Lee, T. T. (2012). Interactive multimedia module with pedagogical agent in Electrochemistry. In I. Deliyannis, (Ed.), Interactive Multimedia (pp. 29-48). Croatia: InTech.
33. Kamisah, O., Zanaton, H. I., & Lilia, H. (2007). Sikap terhadap sains dan sikap saintifik di kalangan pelajar sains. (Attitudes toward science and scientific attitudes among science students). Jurnal Pendidikan, 32, 39-60.
34. Karsli, F. & Çalik, M. (2012). Can freshman science student teachers' alternative conceptions of 'electrochemical cells' be fully diminished? Asian Journal of Chemistry, 24(2), 485-491.
35. Keeman (2007). Malaysia-Exam-oriented nation? 13. 10. 2011, Available from http://keemanxp. com/blog/2007/malaysia-exam-oriented-nation. html.
36. Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R. & Ross, S. V. (2004). Design effective instruction (4th ed.). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
37. Kim, Y., Baylor, A. L. & PALS Group (2006). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The role of agent competency and type of interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(3), 223-243.
38. Kivinen, K. (2003). Assessing motivation and the use of learning strategies by secondary school students in three international schools. PhD Thesis. University of Tampere, Finland. 6. 4. 2010. Available from http://acta. uta. fi/pdf/951-44-5556-8. pdf.
39. Kizilkaya, G. & Askar, P. (2008). The effect of an embedded pedagogical agent on the students' science achievement. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 5(4), 208-216.
40. Lai, S. P. (2003). Keberkesanan perisian multimedia bagi pengajaran dan pembelajaran elektrokimia (sel elektrolisis dan sel kimia): Satu kajian kes. [Effectiveness of multimedia software on the teaching and learning of electrochemistry (electrolytic cell and voltaic cell): A case study]. Master thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
41. Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 61-78.
42. Lee, T. T. (2008). Kefahaman pelajat Tingkatan Empat mengenai Elektrokimia. (Form four students' understanding of Electrochemistry). Master Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
43. Lee, T. T. & Kamisah, O. (2010). Pembinaan modul multimedia interaktif dengan agen pedagogi (IMMPA) dalam pembelajaran Elektrokimia: Analisis keperluan. [The development of interactive multimedia module with pedagogical agent (IMMPA) in the learning of Electrochemistry: Needs Assessment]. Proceedings of Kolokium Kebangsaan Pasca Siswazah Sains & Matematik 2010, pp. 25, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Indris, December 22, 2010.
44. Lee, T. T. & Kamisah, O. (2011). Effectiveness of interactive multimedia module with pedagogical agent (IMMPA) in the learning of Elechtrochemistry: A preliminary investigation. Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(2): Article 9.
45. Lee, T. T. & Mohammad, Y. A. (2009). Miskonsepsi pelajar Tingkatan Empat mengenai Elektrokima. (Form four students' misconception about Electrochemistry). Jurnal Sains dan Matematik UPSI, 1(2): 52-64.
46. Lerman, Z. M. (2001). Visualizing the chemical bond. Chemical Education International, vol. 2, (August 2001), pp. 6-13. 21. 4. 2011, Available from http://old. iupac. org/publications/cei/vol2/0201x0006. html.
47. Lerman, Z. M. & Morton, D. (2009). Using the arts and computer animation to make chemistry accessible to all in the twenty-first century. In M. Gupta-Bhowan, S. Jhaumeer-Laulloo, H. Li KamWah & P. Ramasami (Eds.), Chemistry education in the ICT age (pp. 31-40). Mauritius: Springer Science + Business Media B. V.
48. Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A. & Bhogal, R. S. (1997). The persona effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. 16. 7. 2009, Available from http://research. csc. ncsu. edu/intellimedia/papers/dap-chi-97. pdf.
49. Lim, M. F. (2011). Boys and girls. Sin Chew Daily. 10. 3. 12, Available from http://www. mysinchew. com/node/60916.
50. Lin, H. S., Yang, T. C., Chiu, H. L. & Chou, C. Y. (2002). Students' difficulties in learning electrochemistry. Proceedings of the National Science Council R. O. C.: Part D, 12(3), 100-105.
51. Maldonado, H. & Hayes-Roth, B. (2004). Toward cross-cultural believability in character design. 15. 7. 2009, Available from http://hci. stanford. edu/publications/2004/CrossCultBelievability0304/CrossCultBelievability0304. pdf.
52. Maldonado, H., Roselyn Lee, J. E., Brave, S., Nass, C., Nakajima, H., Yamada, R., Iwamura, K. & Morishima, Y. (2005). We learn better together: Enhancing elearning with emotional characters. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning: The next 10 years! (pp. 408-417). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Melissa Ng, L. Y. A. & Kamariah Abu Bakar. (2006). Motivational belief and self-regulated learning a study on Malaysian students. In: Eras 2006 Conference. Singapore, 29-31 May 206. 7. 4. 2010, Available from http://eprints. usm. my/4891/1/Motivational_Belief_And_Self-Regulated_Learning_A_Study_On_Malaysian_Students. pdf.
54. Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2005). Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 117-128.
55. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E. & Lester, J. C. (2000). Life-like pedagogical agents in constructivist multimedia environments: Cognitive consequences of their interaction. 16. 7. 2009, Available from http://www. unm. edu/~moreno/PDFS/ED-MEDIA-DAP. pdf.
56. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M. & Kemp, J. E. (2007). Designing effective instruction (5th ed.). NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
57. Moundridou, M. & Virvou, M. (2002). Evaluating the persona effect of an interface agent in an intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2). 26. 8. 2009, Available from http://thalis. cs. unipi. gr/~mariam/JCAL. pdf.
58. Needham, R. (1987). CLIS in the classroom: Teaching strategies for developing understanding in science. Leeds: University of Leeds.
59. Norsiati Mohd Ghazali (2008). Pembangunan dan penilaian perisian kursus pengajaran dan pembelajaran multimedia interaktif "analisis kualitatif garam" dalam subjek kimia. (Development and assessment of interactive multimedia teaching and learning courseware "qualitative analysis of salt" in chemistry). Master Thesis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
60. Oldham, V. (2003). Effective use of ICT in secondary science: Guidelines and case studies. School Science Review, 84(309), 53-60.
61. Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P. & Macnob, J. S. (2010). Visualizations and science. In L. M. Phillips, S. P. Norris & J. S. Macnob, Visualization in mathematics, reading and science education, models and modeling in science education, 2010, 5(2), 63-74.
62. Pintrich, R. R. & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
63. Predinger, H., Saeyor, S. & Ishizuka, M. (2009). Animated agents for language conversation training. 15. 7. 2009, Available from http://www. miv. t. u-tokyo. ac. jp/papers/helmut-edmedia01. pdf.
64. Qureshi, E. (2001, 2004). Instructional design models. 24. 9. 2009, Available afrom http://web2. uwindsor. ca/courses/edfac/morton/instructional_design. htm.
65. Qureshi, E. (2003). Instructional design models. 24. 9. 2009, Available from http://home. comcast. net/~elenaqureshi/IDModels. htm.
66. Rodrigues, S., Smith, A. & Ainley, M. (2001). Video clips and animation in chemistry CD-ROMS: Student interest and preference. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 47(2), 9-15.
67. Roziah Abdullah (2005). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan pakej multimedia kemahiran berfikir bagi mata pelajaran kimia. (Development and effectiveness of a multimedia pakage on thinking skill for subject chemistry). PhD. Thesis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
68. Russell, J. W., Kozma, R. B., Jones, T., Wykoff, J., Marx, N. & Davis, J. (1997). Use of simultaneous-synchronized macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic representations to enhance the teaching and learning of chemical concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(3), 330-334.
69. Sadiah Baharom, Ong, E. T., Marzita Putih, Sopia Mad Yassin, Nurul Huda Abd. Rahman & Muhamad Ikhwan Mat. Saad. (2009). The validation and adaptation of MLSQ aimed to assess student use of self regulated learning. Paper presented at 1st International Conference on Educational Research and Practice Enhancing Human Capital through Teacher Education, 10-11 June, Faculty of Educational Studies, UPM, Serdang.
70. Sanger, M. J. & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997a). Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic, and concentration cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 377-398.
71. Sanger, M. J. & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997b). Students' misconceptions in electrochemistry: Current flow in electrolyte solutions and the salt bridge. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 819-823.
72. Sanger, M. J. & Greenbowe, T. J. (2000). Addressing student misconceptions concerning electron flow in aqueous solutions with instruction including computer animations and conceptual change strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 521-537.
73. Shores, M. L. & Shannon, D. M. (2007). The effects of self-regulation, motivation, anxiety, and attributions on mathematics achievement for fifth and sixth grade students. School Science and Mathematics, 107(6), 225. 6. 4. 2010, Available from http://www. thefreelibrary. com/The+effects+of+self-regulation%2c+motivation%2c+anxiety%2c+and+attributions+...-a0171211906.
74. Slater, D. (2000). Interactive animated pedagogical agents mixing the best of human and computer-based tutors. Master Thesis. Stanford University.
75. Tan, Y. T., Loh, W. L. & Tan, O. T. (2007). Success chemistry SPM. Shah Alam: Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.
76. Wu, H. K. & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88, 465-492.
77. Xiao, J., Stasko, J., & Catrambone, R. (2004). An empirical study of the effect of agent competence on user performance and perception. Paper presented at the Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York City, 24. 11. 2009, Available from http://www. cc. gatech. edu/~john. stasko/papers/aamas04. pdf.
78. Zanaton, H. I., Lilia, H. & Kamisah, O. (2006). Sikap terhadap sains dalam kalangan pelajar sains di peringkat menengah dan matrikulasi. (Attitudes toward science among science students at the secondary and matriculation). Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 14(2), 131-147.