Effectiveness of interactive multimedia module with pedagogical agent (IMMPA) in the learning of electrochemistry: A preliminary investigation

Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Lee, Tien Tien ^a   Osman, Kamisah ^b  

^a SULTAN IDRIS EDUCATION UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861155719     PISSN: 16094913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Atkinson, R.K. (2002). Optimizing Learning From Examples Using Animated Pedagogical Agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 416-427.
2. Baylor, A.L. & Kim, Y. (2004). Pedagogical Agent Design: The Impact of Agent Realism, Gender, Ethnicity and Instructional Role. Presented at International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Maceio, Brazil, 2004.
3. Baylor, A.L. (2005). The Impact of Pedagogical Agent Image on Affective Outcomes. Proceedings of Workshop on Affective Interactions: Computers in the Affective Loop, International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, San Diego, CA, 2005.
4. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Belynne, K., Viswanath, K., Vye, N., Schwartz, D., Davis, J. (2004). Incorporating Self-Regulated Learning Techniques into Learning by Teaching Environments. http://www.cogsci.northwestern.edu/cogsci2004/papers/paper365.pdf (accessed July 2009).
5. Bojczuk, M. (1982). Topic Difficulties in O- and A-Level Chemistry. School Science Review, 64, 545-551.
6. Chou, C.Y., Chan, T.W. & Lin, C.J. (2003). Redefining the learning companion: the past, present and future of educational agents. Computers & Education, 40, 255-269.
7. Clarebout, G. & Elen, J. (2007). In Search of Pedagogical Agents' Modality and Dialogue Effects in Open Learning Environments. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/e- jist/docs/vol10_no1/papers/full_papers/clarebout_elen.pdf (accessed July 2009).
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Craig, S.D., Gholson, B. & Driscoll, D.M. (2002). Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features and Redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 428-434.
10. Doymus, K., Karacop, A. & Simsek, U. (2010). Effects of jigsaw and animation techniques on students' understanding of concepts and subjects in electrochemistry. Education Technology Research & Development, 58, 671-691.
11. Farah Mohamad Zain, Hanafi Atan, Noorizdayantie Samar, Omar Majid & Zuraidah AbdRahman. (2008). Kesan Maklum Balas Yang Berbeza oleh Agen Pedagogi Terhadap Pencapaian Pelajar yang Berbeza Lokus Kawalan. Paper presented at 2nd International Malaysian Educational Technoloy Convention, 4-7 November, Kuantan, Pahang.
12. Garnett, P.J. & Hackling, M.W. (1993). Chemistry Misconceptions at the Secondary-Tertiary Interface. Chemistry in Australia, 60(3), 117-119.
13. Garnett, P.J. & Treagust, D.F. (1992). Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Senior High School Students of Electrochemistry: Electrochemical (Galvanic) and Electrolytic Cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1079-1099.
14. Garnett, P.J., Garnett, P.J. & Hackling, M.W. (1995). Students' Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry: A Review of Research and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69-95.
15. Gerlach, V.S. & Ely, D.P. (1980). Teaching and Media: A Systematic Approach. 2nd ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
16. Gois, J.Y., Giordan, M. (2009). Evolution of virtual learning environments in chemistry education. In Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Número Extra VIII Congreso Internacional sobre Investigación en Didáctica de las Ciencias, Barcelona, 2009; pp 2864-2867.
17. Gustafson, K.L. & Branch, R.M. (1997). Survey of Instructional Development Model. 3rd ed., NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Technology.
18. Hayes-Roth, B., Maldonado, H., & Moraes, M. (2002). Designing for diversity: Multi cultural characters for a multi-cultural world. http://www.stanford.edu/~kiky/Design4Diversity.pdf (accessed July 2009).
19. Hill, J.R. & Hannafin, M.J. (2001). Teaching and Learning in Digital Environments: The Resurgence of Resourse-Based Learning. ETR&D, 49(3), 37-52.
20. Johnson, W.L., Rickel, J.W. & Lester, J.C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 47-78.
21. Karsli, F. & Çalik, M. (2012). Can Freshman science Student Teachers' Alternative Conceptions of 'Electrochemical Cells' be Fully Diminished? Asian Journal of Chemistry, 24(2), 485-491.
22. Kemp, J.E., Morrison, G.R. and Ross, S.V. (2004). Design Effective Instruction, 4th ed., New York, John Wiley & Sons.
23. Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L. & PALS Group. (2006). Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions: The Role of Agent Competency and Type of Interaction. ETR&D, 54(3), 223-243.
24. Kirk, K. (2008). Performance, Perception and Choice of Animated Pedagogical Agent. Ph.D Thesis, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
25. Kizilkaya, G. & Askar, P. (2008). The effect of an embedded pedagogical agent on the students' science achievement. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 5(4), 208-216.
26. Land, S.M. (2000). Cognitive Requirements for Learning with Open-Ended Learning Environments. ETR&D, 48(3), 61-78.
27. Lee, T.T. & Kamisah Osman. (2010). Pembinaan Modul Multimedia Interaktif dengan Agen Pedagogi (IMMPA) dalam Pembelajaran Elektrokimia: Analisis Keperluan. Paper presented at Prosiding Kolokium Kebangsaan Pasca Siswazah Sains & Matematik 2010, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 22 Disember 2010.
28. Lee, T.T. & Mohammad Yusof Arshad. (2009). Miskonsepsi Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Mengenai Elektrokimia. Jurnal Sains dan Matematik UPSI, 1(2), 52-64.
29. Lee, T.T. (2008). Kefahaman Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Mengenai Elektrokimia. Master Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
30. Lerman, Z. M. (2001). Visualizing the Chemical Bond. Chemical Education International [Online] 2: 6-13. http://old.iupac.org/publications/cei/vol2/0201x0006.html (accessed April 21, 2011).
31. Lerman, Z. M. & Morton, D. (2009). Using the Arts and Computer Animation to Make Chemistry Accessible to All in the Twenty-First Century. In Gupta-Bhowan, M.; Jhaumeer-Laulloo, S.; Li Kam Wah, H.; Ramasami, P. (Eds.), Chemistry Education in the ICT Age (pp 31-40). Springer Science + Business Media B.V.: Mauritius.
32. Lin, H.S., Yang T.C., Chiu, H.L. & Chou, C.Y. (2002). Students' Difficulties in Learning Electrochemistry. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC(D), 12(3), 100-105.
33. Maldonado, H. & Hayes-Roth, B. (2004). Toward Cross-Cultural Believability in Character Design. http://hci.stanford.edu/publications/2004/CrossCultBelievability0304/CrossCultBelievability0304.pdf (accessed July 2009).
34. Maldonado, H., Roselyn Lee, J. E., Brave, S., Nass, C., Nakajima, H., Yamada, R., Iwamura, K., Morishima, Y. (2005). We Learn Better Together: Enhancing eLearning with Emotional Characters. In. Koschmann, T., Suthers, D. & Chan T. W. (Ed.). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: The Next 10 Years! (pp. 408-417). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Mohd Feham Md. Ghalib. (2006). Design, Development & Evaluation of a Web Courseware with a Pedagogical Agent. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
36. Moreno, R. & Mayer, R.E. (2000). Pedagogical agents in constructivist multimedia environments: The role of image and language in the instructional communication. http://www.unm.edu/~moreno/PDFS/Roundtble.pdf (accessed July 2009).
37. Moreno, R. & Mayer, R.E. (2005). Role of Guidance, Reflection, and Interactivity in an Agent-Based Multimedia Game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 117-128.
38. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E. & Lester, J. C. (2000). Life-Like Pedagogical Agents in Constructivist Multimedia Environments: Cognitive Consequences of their Interaction. http://www.unm.edu/~moreno/PDFS/ED-MEDIA-DAP.pdf. (accessed July 2009).
39. Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M. & Kemp, J.E. (2007). Designing Effective Instruction. 5th ed., NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
40. Moundridou, M. & Virvou, M. (2002). Evaluating the Persona Effect of an Interface Agent in an Intelligent Tutoring System. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18(2). http://thalis.cs.unipi.gr/~mariam/JCAL.pdf (accessed August 2009).
41. Nabila Akbal Noorul Kamar, Omar Majid, Zuraidah Abd. Rahman & Hanafi Atan. (2008). Kesan Agen Pedagogi Terhadap Pencapaian dan Motivasi Pelajar dalam Pembelajaran Fizik: Dapatan Kajian Rintis. Paper presented at 2nd International Malaysian Educational Technoloy Convention, 4-7 November, Kuantan, Pahang.
42. Needham, R. (1987). CLIS in the Classroom: Teaching Strategies for Developing Understanding in Science. Leeds: University of Leeds.
43. Norsiati Mohd Ghazali. (2008). Pembangunan Dan Penilaian Perisian Kursus Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Multimedia Interaktif "Analisis Kualitatif Garam" Dalam Subjek Kimia. Master Thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
44. Özkaya, A. R., Üce, M. & ?ahin, M. (2003). Prospective Teachers' Conceptual Understanding of Electrochemistry: Galvanic and Electrolytic Cells. University Chemistry Education, 7(1), 1-12.
45. Pintrich, R.R., & DeGroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
46. Predinger, H., Saeyor, S. & Ishizuka, M. n.d. Animated Agents for Language Conversation Training. http://www.miv.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/papers/helmut-edmedia01.pdf (accessed July 2009).
47. Qureshi, E. (2001, 2004), Instructional Design Models [online] available at http://web2.uwindsor.ca/courses/edfac/morton/instructional_design.htm (accessed April 2011).
48. Qureshi, E. (2003). Instructional Design Models. http://home.comcast.net/~elenaqureshi/IDModels.htm (accessed September 2009).
49. Roziah Abdullah. (2005). Pembangunan dan Keberkesanan Pakej Multimedia Kemahiran Berfikir bagi Mata Pelajaran Kimia. PhD. Thesis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
50. Sadiah Baharom., Ong, E.T., Marzita Putih., Sopia Mad Yassin., Nurul Huda Abd. Rahman. & Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad. (2009). The Validation and adaptation of MLSQ aimed to assess student use of self regulated learning. Paper presented at 1st International Conference on Educational Research and Practice Enhancing Human Capital through Teacher Education. Faculty of Educational Studies, UPM. Serdang, 10-11 June.
51. Sanger, M.J. & Greenbowe, T.J. (1997a). Common Student Misconceptions in Electrochemistry: Galvanic, Electrolytic, and Concentration Cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 377-398.
52. Sanger, M.J. & Greenbowe, T.J. (1997b). Students' Misconceptions in Electrochemistry: Current Flow in Electrolyte Solutions and the Salt Bridge. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 819-823.
53. Slater, D. (2000). Interactive Animated Pedagogical Agents Mixing the Best of Human and Computer-Based Tutors. Master Thesis, Stanford University.
54. Wu Hsin Kai & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring Visuospatial Thinking in Chemistry Learning. Science Education, 88, 465-492.
55. Xiao, J., Stasko, J., & Catrambone, R. (2004). An empirical study of the effect of agent competence on user performance and perception. Paper presented at the Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York City. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~john.stasko/papers/aamas04.pdf (accessed November 2009).
56. Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social-cognitive perspective. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R. & Zeidner, M. (Eds), Handbook of Self-Regulation, San Diego: Academic Press.