Visual knowledge modeling for semantic web technologies: Models and ontologies

Visual Knowledge Modeling for Semantic Web Technologies: Models and Ontologies

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-473

  Paquette, Gilbert ^a  

^a Tel e University of Quebec   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898373108     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-839-5     Document Type: Book

References (467)

1. Anderson, J. A. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.
2. Anderson, J. A. (1990). Hybrid computation in cognitive science: Neural networks and symbols. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 337-347. doi:10.1002/acp.2350040408
3. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
4. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bloom, B. S. (1975). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: D.M
6. Bond, A. H., & Gasser, L. (Eds.). (1988). Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
7. Booch, G., Jacobson, J., & Rumbaugh, I. (1999). The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Bruner, J. (1973). Beyond the Information Given. New York: Norton.
9. Chen, P. P. S. (1976). The entity-relationship model-toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 9-36. doi:10.1145/320434.320440
10. Dansereau, D. F. (1978). The development of a learning strategies curriculum. In O'Neil, H. F. Jr., (Ed.), Learning Strategies (pp. 1-29). New York: Academic Press.
11. Dansereau, D. F., & Holley, C. D. (1982). Development and evaluation of a text mapping strategy. In Flammer, A., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.), Discourse Processing (pp. 536-554). doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62718-1
12. Ferber, J. (1994). Coopération réactive et émergence. Intellectica, 2, 19-52.
13. Gagné, R. M. (1970). The Conditions of Learning (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
14. Gasser, L. (1991). Social conceptions of knowledge and action: DAI foundations and open systems semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 107-138. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(91)90052-L
15. Horn, R. E. (1969). Information Mapping for Learning and Reference. Lexington, MA: Information Resources Inc.
16. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence. New York: Basic Books. doi:10.1037/10034-000
17. Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural Knowledge: techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Merrill, M. D. (1994). Principles of Instructional Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
19. Minsky, M. (1975). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In Winston, P. H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision (pp. 211-277). New York, NJ: McGraw-Hill.
20. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Paquette, G., & Bergeron, G. (1989). L'intelligence articielle- comprendre et prolonger l'intelligence humaine (2nd ed.). Montréal, Canada: Beauchemin.
22. Paquette, G., & Roy, L. (1990). Systèmes à base de connaissances. Montréal, Canada: Beauchemin.
23. Pitrat, J. (1991). Métaconnaissance, avenir de l'intelligence artificielle. Paris: Hermès.
24. Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). Designing Instructional Systems. New York: Kogan Page and Nichols Publishing.
25. Rumbaugh, I., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., & Lorensen, W. (1991). Object-oriented Modelling and Design. Englewood Clliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schoolling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp.93-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence.
27. Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B., & Breuker, J. (1993). KADS - A Principled Approach to Knowledgebased System Development. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Sowa, J. F. (1984). Conceptual Structures, Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29. Sycara, K. P. (1998). The many faces of Agents. AI Magazine, (Summer): 1998.
30. Tennyson, R. (1990). Cognitive learning theory linked to instructional theory. Journal of Structural Learning, 10(3), 249-25.
31. Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive Thinking. New York: Harper & Row.
32. West, C. K., Farmer, J. A., & Wolff, P. M. (1991). Instructional design: implications from cognitive science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33. Williams, R. G. (1977). A behavioural typology of educational objectives for the cognitive domain. Educational Technology, 17(6), 39-46.
34. Winograd, T. (1985). Beyond the declarative/procedural controversy. In Brachman, R. J., & Lévesque, H. J. (Eds.), Readings in Knowledge Representation (pp. 357-370). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
35. Yourdon, E. (1989). Modern Structured Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36. Paquette, G., Crevier, F., & Aubin, C. (1994). ID knowledge in a course design workbench. Educational Technology, 34(9), 50-57.
37. Paquette, G., & Roy, L. (1990). Systèmes à base de connaissances. Montréal, Canada: Téléuniversité et Beauchemin. Merrill, M. D. (1994). Principles of Instructional Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
38. Paris, S., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-31. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(83)90018-8
39. Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). Designing Instructional Systems. London: Kogan Page andNichols Publishing.
40. Tennyson, R. (1990). Cognitive learning theory linked to instructional theory. Journal of Structural Learning, 10(3), 249-25.
41. Paquette, G. (1996 April). La modélisation par objets typés: une méthode de représentation pour les systèmes d'apprentissage et d'aide a la tâche. Sciences et techniques éducatives, 9-42.
42. Paquette, G. (2002). Modélisation des connaissances et des compétences, un langage graphique pour concevoir et apprendre. Québec, Canada: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
43. Paquette, G. (2003). Instructional Engineering for Network-Based Learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer/Wiley Publishing Co.
44. Paquette, G., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., & Léonard, M. (2008). The MOT+ Visual Language for Knowledge-Based Instructional Design. In Botturi, L., & Stubs, T. (Eds.), Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design Languages-Theories and Practices. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
45. ACRL. (2009). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm
46. ANMC. (2009). National Competency Standards for the Registered Nurse. Retrieved from http://www.anmc.org.au/docs/Competency_standards_RN.pdf
47. Bélisle, C., & Linard, M. (1996). Quelles nouvelles compétences des acteurs de la formation dans le contexte des TIC? Éducation permanente, 127(2), 19-47.
48. Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The Competent Manager: a Model for Effective Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
49. DISCAS. (2009). Proil de competence de l'élève en apprentissage (tableau-synthèse). Retrieved from http://www.csrdn.qc.ca/discas/taxonomie/Profilcompetence.html
50. Friedlander, P. (1996). Competency-Driven, Component-Based Curriculum Architecture. Performance and Instruction, 35(2), 14-21. doi:10.1002/pfi.4170350206
51. IBSTPI. (2000). Instructional Design Competencies: A standard. Retrieved from http://ibstpi.org/Competencies/instruct_design_competencies.htm
52. IMS-RDCEO. (2002). Reusable Definition of Competency and Educational Objective. Retrieved from http://www.imsglobal.org/
53. Kierstead, J. (1998). Compétences et CCHA. Direction générale des politiques, de la recherche et des communications. Commission de la fonction publique du Canada. Retrieved from http://www.psagencyagencefp.gc.ca/arc/research/personnel/comp_ksao_f.asp
54. Le Boterf, G. (1999). L'ingénierie des compétences (2nd ed.). Paris: Éditions d'Organisation.
55. Public Service Commission of Canada. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.psc-cfp.gc.ca/ppccpp/hrm-grh/comptcs-eng.htm
56. Report, I. (1997). Reaffirming the Mission of Our Schools - A New Direction for Success. Retrieved from http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/reforme/curricu/anglais/school.htm
57. TechnoCompétences. (2009). Multimedia - 14 Profils de competences de professions. Retrieved from http://www.technocompetences.qc.ca/apropostic/profilsdecompetences/multimedia
58. Aloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
59. Anderson, J. A. (1990). Hybrid computation in cognitive science: Neural networks and symbols. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 337-347. doi:10.1002/acp.2350040408
60. Breuker, J., & Van de Velde, W. (1994). CommonKads Library for Expertise Modelling. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
61. Breuker, J. A., Bredeweg, B., Valente, A., & van de Velde, W. (1993). Reusable Problem Solving Components: the CommonKADS library. In Ch. Löckenhoff, D. Fensel, & R. Studer (Eds.), Proceedings of the third KADS Meeting (pp. 251-270). Munich, Germany: Siemens ZFE.
62. Bruner, J. S. (1973). La compétence, sa nature et comment on la cultive. Le développement de l'enfant: savoir faire, savoir dire. Paris: PUF.
63. Chandrasekaran, B. (1983). Towards a taxonomy of problem solving types. AI Magazine, 4(4), 9-17.
64. Chandrasekaran, B. (1987). Towards a Functional Architecture for Intelligence Based on Generic Information Processing Tasks. In Proceedings IJCAI-87, Milan-Italy (pp. 1183-1192).
65. Foshay, W. R. (1978). An alternative for task analysis in the affective domain. Journal of Instructional Development, 1(2), 22-24. doi:10.1007/BF02968231
66. Gagné, R. M. (1970). The Conditions of Learning (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
67. Goleman, D. P. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ for Character, Health and Lifelong Achievement. New York: Bantam Books.
68. Harrow, A. J. (1972). A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain. New York: David McKay Co.
69. Hayes-Roth, F., Waterman, D. A., & Lenat, D. B. (1984). Building Expert Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
70. Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1980). Models of Teaching (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
71. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: Longman.
72. LeDoux, J. (1996). The Emotional Brain. New-York: Simon & Shuster.
73. Leontiev, A. N. (1976). Le développement du psychisme (3rd ed.). Paris: Éditions Sociales.
74. Martin, B. L., & Briggs, L. (1986). The Affective and Cognitive Domains: Integration for Instruction and Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
75. McDermott, J. (1988). Preliminary steps towards a taxonomy of problem-solving methods. In Marcus, S. (Ed.), Automating Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems (pp. 225-255). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
76. Merrill, M. D. (1994). Principles of Instructional Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
77. Minsky, M. (1975). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In Winston, P. H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
78. Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human Problem-Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
79. Noël, B. (1991). La métacognition. Bruxelles, Belgium: De Boeck-Wesmael.
80. Paquette, G., & Roy, L. (1990). Systèmes à base de connaissances. Montréal, Canada: Beauchemin.
81. Pitrat, J. (1990). Métaconnaissance, avenir de l'intelligence artificielle. Paris: Hermès.
82. Pitrat, J. (1993). Penser l'informatique autrement. Paris: Hermès.
83. Polya, G. (1967). La découverte des mathématiques (Vol. 1 & 2). Paris: Dunod.
84. Popper, K. R. (1967). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
85. Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). Designing Instructional Systems. New York: Nichols Publishing.
86. Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B., & Breuker, J. (1993). KADS - A Principled Approach to Knowledgebased System Development. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
87. Steels, L. (1990). Components of expertise. AI Magazine, 11(2), 29-49.
88. Thayse, A. (1988). Approche logique de l'intelligence artificielle. Paris: Dunod.
89. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
90. Waterman, D. A. (1986). A Guide to Expert Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
91. Bloom, B. S. (1975). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the Classification of Educational Goals. New York: D. McKay.
92. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. New York: Basic Books.
93. Goleman, D. (1997). L'intelligence émotionnelle. (Robert Laffont, Trans.).
94. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: Longman.
95. Laurière, J. L. (1986). Intelligence Artificielle, résolution de problèmes par l'Homme et la machine. Paris: Eyrolles.
96. Martin, B. L., & Briggs, L. (1986). The Affective and Cognitive Domains: Integration for Instruction and Research. Educational Technology Publications.
97. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems - Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge. San Francisco: Morgan-Kaufmann.
98. Winston, P. (1984). Artificial Intelligence (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
99. Aalst, W., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A., & Wohed, P. (2002). Pattern Based analysis of BPML and WSCI. FIT Technical Report, FIT-TR-2002-05 Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
100. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology, A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
101. Bolcer, G., & Taylor, R. (1998). Advanced workflow management technologies. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 4(3), 125-171. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1670(199809)4:3<125::AID-SPIP100>3.0.CO;2-J
102. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Towards a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
103. Collins, A., & Stevens, A. L. (1983). A cognitive theory of inquiry teaching. In Reigeluth, C. (Ed.), Instructional Theories in Action: Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories and Models (pp. 247-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
104. Correal, D., & Marino, O. (2007). Software Requirements Specification Document for General Purpose Function's Editor (Technical Report V0.4). Montréal, Canada: Télé-université LICEF Research Centre.
105. Dewey, J. (1900). Psychology and social practice. Psychological Review, (7): 105-124. doi:10.1037/h0066152
106. Duval, E., & Robson, R. (2001). Guest Editorial on Metadata. Interactive Learning Environments (Special issue: Metadata), 9(3), 201-206.
107. Eder, J., & Gruber, W. (2002). A Meta Model for Structured Workflows Supporting Workflow Transformation. In Lecture Notes on Computer Science (Vol. 2435).
108. Gagné, R. M. (1970). The Conditions of Learning (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
109. Griffiths, D., Blat, J., Garcia, R., Votgen, H., & Kwong, K. L. (2005). Learning Design Tools. In Koper, R., & Tattersall, C. (Eds.), Learning Design - A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training (pp. 109-136). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
110. Hollingsworth, P. (1995). The Workflow Reference Model. Technical Report TC00-1003, WfMC.
111. IDLD. (2006). Implementation and Deployment of the Learning Design Specification Portal. Retrieved from http://www.idld.org
112. IMS-LD. (2003). IMS Learning Design. Information Model, Best Practice and Implementation Guide, Binding Schemas. Retrieved October 3, 2003, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/index.cfm
113. Koper, R. (2002). Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective - The pedagogical metamodel behind EML. Retrieved from http://www.eml.ou.nl/introduction/articles.htm
114. Landa, L. (1976). Instructional regulation and control: Cybernetics, algorithmization, and heuristics in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
115. Lei, Y., & Singh, M. (1997). A Comparison of Workflow Metamodels. In Proceedings of the ER-97 Workshop on Behavioral Modeling and Design Transformations: Issues and Opportunities in Conceptual Modeling, Los Angeles, November 1997.
116. Lemoigne, J. L. (1995). Les épistémologies constructivistes. Paris: PUF.
117. Magnan, F., & Paquette, G. (2006). TELOS: An ontology driven eLearning OS. Presented at SOA/AIS-06 Workshop, Dublin, Ireland, June 2006.
118. Mariño, O., Casallas, R., Villalobos, J., Correal, D., & Contamines, J. (2006). Bridging the Gap between e-learning Modeling and Delivery through the Transformation of Learnflows into Workflows. In E-learning networked. Environments and Architectures: A Knowledge Processing Perspective. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
119. Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component Display Theory. In Reigeluth, C. (Ed.), Instructional Theories in Action: Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories and Models (pp. 279-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
120. Paquette, G. (2001). Designing Virtual Learning Centers. In Adelsberger, H., Collis, B., & Pawlowski, J. (Eds.), Handbook on Information Technologies for Education & Training (pp. 249-272). Amsterdam: Springer-Verlag.
121. Paquette, G. (2002). TeleLearning systems engineering: Towards a new ISD model. Journal of Structural Learning, 14, 1-35.
122. Paquette, G. (2004). Instructional Engineering for Network-Based Learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer/Wiley Publishing Co.
123. Paquette, G., Léonard, M., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Mihaila, S., & Gareau, D. (2006 January). Learning Design based on Graphical Knowledge-Modeling. Journal of Educational technology and Society ET&S.
124. Paquette, G., Rosca, I., De la Teja, I., Léonard, M., & Lundgren-Cayrol, K. (2001). Web-based Support for the Instructional Engineering of E-learning Systems. Presented at WebNet'01 Conference, Orlando 2001.
125. Paquette, G., Rosca, I., Mihaila, S., & Masmoudi, A. (2006). Telos, a service-oriented framework to support learning and knowledge management. In Pierre, S. (Ed.), E-Learning Networked Environments and Architectures: a Knowledge Processing Perspective. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
126. Reigeluth, C. M., & Rodgers, C. A. (1980). The Elaboration Theory of Instruction: Prescription for Task Analysis and Design. NSPI Journal.
127. RELOAD. (2004). Retrieved January 23, 2004, from http://www.reload.ac.uk
128. Scandura, J. M.(1973). Strutural Learning I: Theory and Research. New York: Gordon & Breach Science Publishers.
129. Simon, H. A. (1981). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
130. Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86-97.
131. Vantroys, T., & Peter, Y. (2004). COW, a Flexible Platform for the Enactment of Learning Scenarios. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Groupware (CRIWG 2003). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
132. Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC). (2002). Workflow Process Definition Interface - XML Process Definition Language, Version 1. Final Draft WFMC-TC-1025. 1 This section summarizes previous articles and books on the subject. For more details, please consult (Paquette 2002, 2004)
133. ePortConsortium. (2003). Electronic Portfolio White Paper.
134. IMS. (2004). IMS ePortfolio Best Practice and implementation Guide, Version 1.0 Final Specification. IMS Global Learning Consortium.
135. Mariño, O., Rechenmann, F., & Uvietta, P. (1990). Multiple Perspectives and Classification mechanism in object-oriented representation. In 9th. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence ECAI.
136. Moulet, L., Marino, O., Hotte, R., & Labat, J.-M. (2008). Framework for a Competency-driven, Multi-viewpoint and Evolving Learner Model. In B. Woolf et al. (Ed.), Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 9th International Conference, ITS 2008, Montréal, Canada, June 2008 (LNCS 5091, pp. 702-705). Berlin: Springer.
137. Paquette, G. (2001). Designing Virtual Learning Centers. In Adelsberger, H., Collis, B., & Pawlowski, J. (Eds.), Handbook on Information Technologies for Education & Training. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
138. Paquette, G. (2003). Instructional Engineering for Network-Based Learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer/Wiley.
139. Paquette, G., Aubin, C., & Crevier, F. (1999 August). MISA, A Knowledge-based Method for the Engineering of Learning Systems. Journal of Courseware Engineering, 2.
140. Paquette, G., Crevier, F., & Aubin, C. (1994). ID knowledge in a course design workbench. Educational Technology, 34(9), 50-57.
141. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems- Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge. San Francisco: Morgan-Kaufmann.
142. Winkels, R. (1992). Explorations in intelligent tutoring and help. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
143. W3C-OWL. (2004). Ontology Web Language (OWL), Overview Document. Retrieved December 10, 2008, at http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/
144. W3C - UseCases. (2008). Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/public/UseCases/
145. Amorim, R., Lama, M., & Sanchez, E. (2006). Using Ontologies to model and execute IMS Learning Design Documents. In Proceedings of the the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Kerkrade, The Netherlands, July 5-7, 2006 (pp. 115-116).
146. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., & Patel-Schneider, P. (Eds.). (2003). The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
147. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5), 34-43. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34
148. Brachman, R. J., & Schmolze, J. (1985). An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 9(2). doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0902_1
149. Clancey, W. (1993). The knowledge level reinterpreted, modelling socio technical systems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 8, 33-49. doi:10.1002/int.4550080104
150. Devedzic, V. (2006). Semantic Web and Education. Berlin: Springer.
151. Feigenbaum, L., Herman, I., Hongsermeier, T., & Neumann, E. (2007, December). Semantic Web: How the internet is getting smarter. Scientific American, 90-97. Retrieved from http://www.SciAm.com. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1207-90
152. Gomez-Perez, A., Fernandez, M., & de Vicente, A. (1996). Towards a Method to Conceptualize Domain Ontologies. Workshop on Ontological Engineering, ECAI'96, Budapest, Hungary.
153. IMS-LD. (2003). IMS Learning Design - Information Model, Best Practice and Implementation Guide, XML Binding document. Retrieved October 3, 2003, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/index.cfm
154. Kotis, K., & Vouros, G. (2006). Human-centered ontology engineering: the HCOME methodology. [KAIS]. International Journal of Knowledge and Information Systems, 10(1), 109-131. doi:10.1007/s10115-005-0227-4
155. Magnan, F., & Paquette, G. (2006). TELOS: An ontology driven eLearning OS. Presented at SOA/AIS-06, Workshop, Dublin, Ireland, June 2006.
156. Minski, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In Winston, P. H. (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-227). New York: McGraw-Hill.
157. Mizoguchi, R., & Ikeda, M. (1996). Towards Ontology Engineering. Technical Report AI-TR-96-1, I.S.I.R., Osaka University, Japan.
158. Newell, A. (1982). The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence, 18, 87-127. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(82)90012-1
159. Paquette, G. (2007). An ontology and a software framework for competency modeling and management. Educational Technology and Society, 10(3), 1-21.
160. PROTÉGÉ. (2006). Stanford Medical Informatics. Protégé. Retrieved May 29, 2006, from http://protege.stanford.edu/
161. Quillian, M. R. (1968). Semantic Memory. In Minsky, M. (Ed.), Semantic Information Processing (pp. 227-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
162. Staab, S., Studer, R., Schnurr, H. P., & Sure, Y. (2001, January). Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26-34. doi:10.1109/5254.912382
163. Sunagawa, E., Mizoguchi, R., et al.(2003). An Environment for Distributed Ontology Development Based on Dependency Management. Paper presented at the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Florida, USA.
164. Vrandecic, D., Sofia Pinto, H. S., Sure, Y., & Tempich, C. (2005, October). The DILIGENT knowledge processes. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(5), 85-96. doi:10.1108/13673270510622474
165. Ding, Y., & Fensel, D. (2001). Ontology Library Systems: The key for successful Ontology Reuse. Paper presented at the First Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS'1), Stanford, USA.
166. Haase, P., & Sure, Y. (2004). State-of-the-Art on Ontology Evolution: Technical report, SEKT informal deliverable 3.1.1.b, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe (2004).
167. Heflin, J., & Hendler, J. (2000). Dynamic Ontology on the Web. Paper presented at the AAAI, 17th National Conference on artificial Intelligence.
168. Klein, M. (2004). Change Management for Distributed Ontologies. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
169. Klein, M., & Noy, N. (2003). A component-based framework for the ontology evolution. Paper presented at the Workshop on Ontologies and Distributed Systems, IJCAI-2003, Acapulco, Mexico.
170. Maedche, A., Motik, B., & Stojanovic, L. (2003). Managing Multiple and Distributed Ontologies in the Semantic Web. VLDB Journal - Special Issue on Semantic Web, 12, 286-302.
171. Noy, N., & Klein, M. (2003). Ontology evolution: Not the same as schema evolution. Knowledge and Information Systems, 5.
172. Noy, N., Kunnatur, S., Klein, M., & Musen, M. (2004). Tracking Changes During Ontology Evolution. Paper presented at the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2004), Hiroshima, Japan.
173. Pinto, S., Staab, S., & Tempich, C. (2004). DILIGENT: Towards a fine-grained methodology for Distributed Loosely-controllled and evolvInG Engineering of oNTologies. I. Paper presented at the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence ECAI-2004, Valencia.
174. Rogozan, D. (2008). Management of the ontology evolution: methods and tools for an evolving semantic referencing based on analysis of changes applied to ontology versions (in french). Université de Québec à Montréal (UQAM)/Télé-université. Montréal: TELUQ.
175. Rogozan, D., & Paquette, G. (2005). Managing Ontology Changes on the Semantic Web. Paper presented at the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'05), Compiegne, France.
176. Stojanovic, L. (2004). Method and tools for ontology evolution. Karlsruhe, Germany: University of Karlsruhe.
177. Stojanovic, L., Maedche, A., Motik, B., & Stojanovic, N. (2002). User-driven Ontology Evolution Management. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW02), Sigüenza, Spain.
178. Stojanovic, L., Maedche, A., Stojanovic, N., & Studer, R. (2003). Ontology Evolution as Reconfiguration-Design Problem Solving. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture.
179. Sunagawa, E., Mizoguchi, R., et al. (2003). An Environment for Distributed Ontology Development Based on Dependency Management. Paper presented at the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Florida, USA. 1 This chapter is a synthesis of part of the doctoral thesis of Délia Rogozan (2008) achieved under the supervision of the author.
180. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., & Marengo, E. (2007). Curricula Modeling and Checking. In Basili, R., & Pazienza, M. T. (Eds.), AI*IA 2007: Artificial Intelligence and Human-Oriented Computing (pp. 471-482). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74782-6_41
181. Baldoni, M., & Marengo, E. (2007). Curriculum Model Checking: Declarative Representation and Verification of Properties. In E. Duval, R. Klamma & M. Wolpers (Eds.), Creating New Learning Experiences on a Global Scale, Second European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2007), Crete, Greece, September 17-20 (pp. 432-437). Berlin: Springer.
182. Baron, M., & Paquette, G. (2007). Technologies, Web sémantique et éducation: quelques défis et tendances. In M. Baron, D. Guin & L. trouche (Eds.), Environnements informatisés et ressources numériques pour l'apprentissage (pp. 315-341). Paris: Hermès/Lavoisier.
183. Basque, J., & Page-Lamarche, V. (2007). Un outil d'autodiagnostic des compétences au service d'une approche multi-scénarios pédagogiques dans un cours à distance... ou lorsque la différenciation pédagogique cesse d'être un mythe? In Actes du colloque Scénario 2007-Scénariser les activités de l'apprenant: une activité de modélisation, Montréal, Canada.
184. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
185. Brisebois, A., Ruelland, D., & Paquette, G. (2005). Supporting Self-Assessment in a Competency Approach to Learning. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005 (pp. 2828-2835). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
186. Brusilovsky, P. L., & Vassileva, J. (2003). Course sequencing techniques for large-scale web-based education. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 13(1/2), 75-94.
187. Caeiro-Rodriguez, M. (2008). poEML: A Separation of Concerns Proposal to Instructional Design. In L. Botturi & G. Stubbs (Eds.), Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: Theories and Practice (pp. 185-209). Hershey, PA: Informing Science Reference.
188. Chandrasekaran, B. (1986). Generic tasks in knowledge-based reasoning: High-level building blocks for expert system design. IEEE Expert, 1(3), 23-30. doi:10.1109/MEX.1986.4306977
189. Devedzic, V. (2006). Semantic Web and Education. Berlin: Springer.
190. Devedzic, V., Jovanovic, J., & Gasevic, D. (2007). The pragmatics of current e-learning standards. IEEE Internet Computing, 11(3), 19-27. doi:10.1109/MIC.2007.73
191. Dodero, J. M., Sanchez-Alonso, S., & Frosch-Wilke, D. (2007). Generative instructional engineering of competence development programmes. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 13(9), 1213-1233.
192. Grant, S. (2006). Frameworks of competence: common or specific? In R. Koper & K. Stefanov (eds.), Proceedings of International Workshop in Learning Networks for Lifelong Competence Development, March 30-31, Sofia, Bulgaria (pp. 111-116). Shoumen, Bugaria: INCOMA.
193. Grant, S. (2007). Towards competence-related interoperability. In TEN Competence workshop, Manchester.
194. Karampiperis, P., & Sampson, D. (2004). Adaptive instructional planning using ontologies. In D. Sampson (ed.), Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'04), 30 August-1st September, Joensuu, Finland (pp. 126-130). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
195. Knight, C., Gasevic, D., & Richards, G. (2006). An ontology-based framework for bridging learning design and learning content. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 23-37.
196. Knolmayer, G. F. (2003). Decision Support Models for composing and navigating through e-learning objects. In Proceedings of 36th IEEE Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
197. Marino, O., & Correal, D. (2006). General Purpose Function's Editor. Rapport technique, Réseau LORNET, Télé-université du Québec, Montréal, Canada.
198. Melia, M., & Pahl, C. (2007a). An Information Architecture for Courseware Validation. In First International Workshop on Learning Object Discovery & Exchange (LODE'07), Crete, Greece.
199. Melia, M., & Pahl, C. (2007b). Pedagogical Validation of Courseware. In E. Duval, R. Klamma & M. Wolpers (Eds.), Creating New Learning Experiences on a Global Scale, Second European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2007), Crete, Greece, September 17-20 (pp. 499-504). Berlin: Springer.
200. Mohan, P., Greer, J., & McCalla, G. (2003). Instructional Planning with Learning Objects. In Workshop on Knowledge Representation and Automated Reasoning for E-Learning Systems, Acapulco, Mexico.
201. Ng, A., Hatala, M., & Gasevic, D. (2006). Ontology-based Approach to Learning Objective Formalization. In Sicilia, M. A. (Ed.), Competencies in Organizational E-Learning: Concepts and Tools. Hershey, PA: Informing Science Reference.
202. Paquette, G. (2003). Instructional Engineering in Networked Environments. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
203. Paquette, G., & Rosca, I. (2004). An ontologybased referencing of actors, operations and resources in eLearning systems. In [Eindhoven, The Netherlands.]. Proceedings of Workshop SW-EL, 04(March), 23.
204. Psyché, V., Bourdeau, J., Nkambou, R., & Mizoguchi, R. (2005). Making Learning Design Standards Work with an Ontology of Educationnal Theories. In C.-K. Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg & J. Breuker (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology (AIED'05) (pp. 539-546). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
205. Radevski, V., & Trichet, F. (2006). OntologyBased Systems Dedicated to Human Resources Management: An Application in e-Recruitment. In R. Meersman, Z. Tari & P. Herrero (Eds.), Workshops On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (OTM'06), 29 November-3 December, Montpellier, France (pp. 1068-1077). Berlin: Springer.
206. Roldan Garcia, M. M., & Aldana-Montes, J. F. (2005). A tool for storing owl using database technology. In First Int'l Workshop on OWL Experiences and Directions, Galway, Ireland.
207. Santacruz-Valencia, L. P., Navarro, A., Delgado Kloos, C., & Aedo, I. (2008). ELO-Tool: Taking action in the challenge of assembling learning objects. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 102-117.
208. Schmidt, A., & Kunzmann, C. (2006). Towards a Human Resource Development Ontology for Combining Competence Management and Technology-Enhanced Workplace Learning. In R. Meersman, Z. Tari & P. Herrero (Eds.), Workshops On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (OTM'06), 29 November-3 December, Montpellier, France (pp. 1078-1087). Berlin: Springer.
209. Sicilia, M. A. (2005). Ontology-based competency management: Infrastructures for the knowledgeintensive learning organization. In Lytras, M. D., & Naeve, A. (Eds.), Intelligent learning infrastructures in knowledge intensive organizations: A semantic web perspective (pp. 302-324). Hershey, PA: Informing Science Press.
210. Sitthisak, O., Gilbert, L., & Davis, H. C. (2007). Towards a competency model for adaptive assessment to support lifelong learning. In Proceedings of TENCompetence Open Workshop on Service Oriented Approaches and Lifelong Competence Development Infrastructures, 11th - 12th January, Manchester, United Kingdom.
211. van der Aalst, W. M. P., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., Kiepuszewski, B., & Barros, A. P. (2003). Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1), 5-51. doi:10.1023/A:1022883727209
212. Wiley, D. A. (2002). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In Wiley, D. A. (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects (pp. 3-23). Bloomington, IN: Agency for Instructional Technology.
213. Allen, P., & Frosts, S. (1998 March). Tackling the Key Issues in CBD. Select Software Tools.
214. Bachman, E. A. (2000). Volume II: Technical Concepts of Component-Based Software Engineering. CMU/SEI-2000-TR-008 ESC-TR-2000-007.
215. Bechhofer, S. (2003). DIG Specifications, version 1.1. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester.
216. D'Souza, D. F., & Wills, A. C. (1998). Objects, components, and frameworks with UML: the catalysis approach. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
217. Daconta, M. C., Obrst, L. J., & Smith, K. T. (2003). The Semantic Web, A Guide to the Future of XML. Web Services, and Knowledge Management.
218. Haines, C. G., Carney, D., & Foreman, J. (1997). Component-Based Software Development/COTS Integration. Paper presented at the CBSE 1997.
219. Kleppe, A., Warmer, J., & Bast, W. (2003). MDA Explained-The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
220. Magnan, F., & Paquette, G. (2006). Telos: An Ontology Driven eLearning OS. In S. Weibelzahl & A. Cristea (Eds.), Proceedings of Workshops held at the Fourth International Conference on Adaptative Hypermedia and Adaptative Web-Based Systems (AH2006), Dublin, National College of Ireland (pp. 131-139).
221. Masmoudi, A., & Paquette, G. (2005). Agrégation de composants dirigée par les métadonnées (ACODIM). Paper presented at the INFORSID Conference, 2005, Grenoble, France.rx
222. Masmoudi, A., Paquette, G., & Champagne, R. (2006, June 1). Implémentation à l'aide de BPEL de trois processus d'agrégation de composants, dirigée par les modèles. Paper presented at the INFORSID'06, Hammamet-Tunisie.rx
223. Masmoudi, A., Paquette, G., & Champagne, R. (2007). Metadata-Driven software components aggregation process with reuse. Int. J. Advanced Media and Communication, 1(1).
224. Mili, H., Mili, A., Yacoub, S., & Addy, E. (2002). Reuse based software engineering: techniques, organization, and measurement. New York: Wiley.
225. Object Management Group. (2003). Deployment and Configuration of Component-based Distributed Applications Specification. Draft Adopted Specification ptc/03-07-02. Retrieved January 24, 2005, from http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/03-07-02.pdf
226. Paquette, G., & Magnan, F. (2008). An Executable Model for Virtual Campus Environments. In H. H. Adelsberger, Kinshuk, J. M. Pawlowski, & D. Sampson (Eds.), International Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training (2nd Ed.) (pp. 365-405). Berlin: Springer.
227. Paquette, G., Rosca, I., Mihaila, S., & Masmoudi, A. (2007). TELOS, a service-oriented framework to support learning and knowledge Management. In Pierre, S. (Ed.), E-Learning Networked Environments and Architectures: a Knowledge Processing Perspective. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
228. Pellet. (2003). DL compliant inference engine. Retrieved from http://www.mindswap.org/2003/pellet/
229. Raistrick, C. (2004). Model driven architecture with executable UML. New York: Cambridge University Press.
230. Szyperski, C., Gruntz, D., & Murer, S. (2002). Component software: beyond object-oriented programming (2nd ed.). New York: ACM Press.
231. Torchiano, M., Jaccheri, L., Srensens, C.-F., & Wang, A. I.(2002). COTS Products Characterization. Paper presented at the Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE'02), Ischia, Italy.
232. Apostel, L. (1960). Towards the formal study of models in the non-formal sciences. Synthese, 12(2), 125-161. doi:10.1007/BF00485092
233. Basque, J., Paquette, G., Pudelko, B., & Léonard, M. (2008). Collaborative Knowledge Modeling with a Graphical Knowledge Representation Tool: A Strategy to Support the Transfer of Expertise in Organizations. In Okada, A., Shum, S. B., & Sherborne, T. (Eds.), Knowledge Cartography. Mapping Techniques and Software Tools. London: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-149-7_17
234. Chen, P. P.-S. (1976). The entity-relationship model: Toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1, 9-36. doi:10.1145/320434.320440
235. Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., & Gómez-Pérez, A. (2006). Principles, Methods, Tools and Languages. In Ontologies for Software Engineering and Software Technology (pp. 1-48). Ontological Engineering. doi:10.1007/3-540-34518-3_1
236. Davies, J., Fensel, D., & Harmelen, F. V. (2003). Towards The Semantic Web: Ontology-Driven Knowledge Management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
237. Dietz, J. L. G. (2006). Entreprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/3-540-33149-2
238. Gašević, D., Djurić, D., & Devedžić, V. (2006). Model Driven Architecture and Ontology Development. New York: Springer-Verlag.
239. Gómez-Pérez, A. (2004). Ontology Evaluation. In Staab, R. S. S. (Ed.), Handbook on Ontologies (pp. 251-274). New York: Springer.
240. Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., & Corcho, O. (2003). Ontological Engineering: with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web (1st ed.). New York: Springer.
241. Gruber, T. (1993). Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation, 23.
242. Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199-220. doi:10.1006/knac.1993.1008
243. Guarino, N. (1997). Understanding, building, and using ontologies: A commentary to using explicit ontologies in KBS development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, (46): 293-310. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1996.0091
244. Horridge, M., Knublauch, H., Rector, A., Stevens, R., & Wroe, C. (2004). A Practical Guide To Building OWL Ontologies Using The Protege-OWL Plugin and CO-ODE Tools Ed. 1.0.
245. Kadima, H. (2005). MDA: Conception orientée objet guidée par les modèles. Paris: Dumond.
246. OMG MDA. (2007, April 17). OMG Model Driven Architecture. Retrieved September 30, 2008, from http://www.omg.org/mda/
247. OMG ODM. (2007 November). Ontology Definition Meta-model: OMG Adopted Specification. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from http://www.omg.org/spec/ODM/1.0/Beta2/PDF/
248. Paquette, G. (2002). Modélisation des connaissances et des compétences: un langage graphique pour concevoir et apprendre. Sainte-Foy, Canada: Presses de l'UQ.
249. Paquette, G. (2008). Graphical Ontology Modeling Language for Learning Environments. In Technology, Instruction., Cognition and Learning (Vol. 5, pp.133-168). Philadelphia, PA: Old City Publishing, Inc.
250. Paquette, G., & Rogozan, D. (2006). Correspondance avec le langage graphique MOT-OWL et le langage des prédicats du premier ordre. Montréal, Canada: LICEF.
251. Paris, S., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(83)90018-8
252. Pitrat, J. (1990). Métaconnaissance, futur de l'intelligence artificielle. Paris: Hermès.
253. Staab, S., Studer, R., Schnurr, H.-P., & Sure, Y. (2001). Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(1), 26-34. doi:10.1109/5254.912382
254. Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 93-155. doi:10.1017/S0269888900007797
255. W3C. (2004). OWL Overview Document. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/
256. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., & Patel-Schneider, P. (Eds.). (2003). The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
257. Correal, D., & Marino, O. (2007). Software Requirements Specification Document for General Purpose Function's Editor (V0.4). LORNET Technical Documents, LICEF research centrer, Télé-université.
258. Davies, J., van Harmelen, F., & Fensel, D. (Eds.). (2002). Towards the Semantic Web: Ontologydriven Knowledge Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
259. ELF - e-Learning framework. (2007). Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://www.elframework.org/
260. IMS-LD. (2003). IMS Learning Design. Information Model, Best Practice and Implementation Guide, Binding document. Schemas.
261. Kleppe, A. G., Warmer, J. B., & Bast, W. (2003). MDA explained: the model driven architecture: practice and promise. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
262. Magnan, F., & Paquette, G. (2006). TELOS: An ontology driven eLearning OS. Presented at SOA/AIS-06 Workshop, Dublin, Ireland, June 2006.
263. OKI - Open Knowledge Initiative. (2007). Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://www.okiproject.org/
264. Paquette, G. (2001). Designing virtual learning centers. In Adelsberger, H., Collis, B., & Pawlowski, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook on Information Technologies for Education & Training (pp. 249-272). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
265. Paquette, G. (2003). Instructional Engineering for Network-Based Learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
266. Paquette, G. (2008). Graphical Ontology Modeling Language for Learning Environments. In Technology, Instruction., Cognition and Learning (Vol. 5, pp.133-168). Philadelphia, PA: Old City Publishing, Inc.
267. Paquette, G., & Magnan, F. (2007). Learning Resource Referencing, Search and Aggregation At the eLearning System Level. Presented at LODE Workshop, ECTEL-07 Conference, Crete, September 18-21, 2007
268. Paquette, G., & Magnan, F. (2008). From a Conceptual Ontology to the TELOS Operational System. ITS Workshop on Ontology-based Learning Resource Repositories. Retrieved December 2008, from http://www.lornet.org
269. Paquette, G., & Magnan, F. (2008). An Executable Model for Virtual Campus Environments. In H. H. Adelsberger, Kinshuk, J. M. Pawlowski & D. Sampson (Eds.), International Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training (2nd Ed.) (pp. 365-405). New York: Springer.
270. Paquette, G., & Rogozan, D. (2006). Primitives de représentation OWL-DL - Correspondance avec le langage graphique MOT+OWL et le langage des prédicats du premier ordre. TELOS documentation. Montreal, Canada: LICEF Research Center.
271. Paquette, G., & Rosca, I. (2003). Modeling the delivery physiology of distributed learning systems. Technology, Instruction, cognition and Learning, 1-2, 183-209.
272. Paquette, G., Rosca, I., Masmoudi, A., & Mihaila, S. (2005). Telos conceptual framework v0.8. Lornet technical documentation. Télé-Université.
273. Paquette, G., Rosca, I., Mihaila, S., & Masmoudi, A. (2006). Telos, a service-oriented framework to support learning and knowledge management. In Pierre, S. (Ed.), E-Learning Networked Environments and Architectures: a Knowledge Processing Perspective. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
274. Alpert, S. (2004). Flexibility of Expressiveness: State of the Practice. In Kommers, P. (Ed.), Cognitive Support for Learning: Imagining the Unknown (pp. 253-268). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
275. Anderson-Inman, L., & Ditson, L. (1999). Computer-based concept mapping: A tool for negotiating meaning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(8).
276. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Rhinehart & Winston.
277. Basque, J. (2004). Le transfert d'apprentissage: Qu'en disent les contextualistes? In Frenay, M., & Presseau, A. (Eds.), Le transfert des apprentissages: Comprendre pour mieux intervenir. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval.
278. Basque, J., Doré, S., & Henri, F. (2000). Facilitating a techno-pedagogical change in higher education: Lessons from the SAVOIR and AMETIST projects. In Proceedings of the XVIIIth Conference of the International Council for Innovation in Higher Education, November 5-9, 2000, Quebec.
279. Basque, J., Imbeault, C., Pudelko, B., & Léonard, M. (2004). Collaborative knowledge modeling between experts and novices: A strategy to support transfer of expertise in an organization. In A. J. Canas, J. D. Novak & F. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping (CMC 2004), Pamplona, September 14-17 (Vol. 1, pp. 75-81). Pamplona,Spain: Universidad Publica de Navarra.
280. Basque, J., & Lavoie, M.-C. (2006). Collaborative Concept Mapping in Education: Major Research Trends. In A. J. Canas & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology - Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping (Vol. 1, pp. 79-86). San Jose, Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica.
281. Basque, J., Nault, T., Saint-Pierre, M., Toussaint, P., Lajoie, J., Brunet, L., et al. (2006). Un modèle de formation universitaire intégrant le mentorat, la communauté de pratique et la modélisation des connaissances. In Actes du XXIIIème Congrès de l'Association Internationale de Pédagogie Universitaire: Innovation, Formation et Recherche en Pédagogie Universitaire, Monastir, Tunisie, 15-18 May 2006.
282. Basque, J., Paquette, G., Pudelko, B., & Léonard, M. (2008). Collaborative Knowledge Modeling with a Graphical Knowledge Representation Tool: A Strategy to Support the Transfer of Expertise in Organizations. In A. L. P. Okada, S. J. Buckingham Shum & T. Sherborne (Eds.), Knowledge Cartography. Software Tools and Mapping Techniques (pp. 357-382). London: Springer-Verlag.
283. Basque, J., & Pudelko, B. (2003). Using a concept mapping software as a knowledge construction tool in a graduate online course. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2003, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Honolulu, June 23-28, 2003 (pp. 2268-2264). Norfolk, VA: AACE.
284. Basque, J., & Pudelko, B. (in press). Intersubjective Meaning-Making in Dyads Using Object-Typed Concept Mapping In P. L. Torres & R. C. V. Marriott (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Collaborative Learning Using Concept Mapping. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
285. Basque, J., Rocheleau, J., Paquette, G., & Paquin, C. (1998). An Object-Oriented Model of a Computer-Enriched High School. In T. Ottmann & I. Tomek (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM 98. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
286. Baudet, S., & Denhière, G. (1991). Mental models and acquisition of knowledge from text: Representation and acquisition of functional systems. In Denhière, G., & Rossi, J. P. (Eds.), Text and text processing (pp. 155-187]). Amsterdam: North-Holland. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61552-6
287. Bruillard, E., & Baron, G.-L. (2000). Computer-based concept mapping: A review of a cognitive tool for students. Paper presented at the IFIP, Beijing, China.
288. Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1996). The mind map book. New York: Penguin Books.
289. Cañas, A., & Carvalho, M. (2004). Concept Maps and AI: an Unlikely Marriage? In Proceedings of SBIE 2004 -Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática Educativa. Manaus, Brasil: SBC.
290. Carlson, R. A. (1997). Expertise, skill, and everyday action. In Experienced Cognition (pp. 242-263). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
291. Chiou, C.-C. (2006). Effects of concept mapping strategy on business and economics statistics learning performance. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=918200
292. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in Communication excerpt. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10096-006
293. Coffey, J. W. (2007). A meta-cognitive tool for courseware development, maintenance. and reuse. Computers & Education, 48(4), 548-566. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.03.008
294. Czerniak, C. M., & Haney, J. J. (1998). The effect of collaborative concept mapping on elementary preservice teachers' anxiety, efficacy, and achievement in physical science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(4), 303-320. doi:10.1023/A:1009431400397
295. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
296. Doré, S., & Basque, J. (2002). Why not apply an engineering methodology when creating courses? Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE), Montréal, June 2002.
297. Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 170-198). New York: Macmillan Library Reference/AECT.
298. Dufresne, A., Basque, J., Paquette, G., Léonard, M., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., & Prom Tep, S. (2003). Vers un modèle générique d'assistance aux acteurs du téléapprentissage. STICEF, Numéro spécial: Technologies et formation à distance, 10(3).
299. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (1999). Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
300. Fayol, M., & Gaonac'h, D. (2003). La compréhension, une approche de psychologie cognitive. In Gaonac'h, D., & Fayol, M. (Eds.), Aider les élèves à comprendre: du texte au multimédia (pp. 5-73). Paris: Hachette.
301. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213-232. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00005-6
302. Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2001). Facilitating the construction of shared knowledge with graphical representation tools in face-to-face and computermediated scenarios. Paper presented at the Euro CSCL, Maastricht.
303. Gérin-Lajoie, S. (2008). Conception et validation d'un module d'entraînement à la construction de cartes de connaissances, dédié à des étudiants à distance. Télé-université, Quebec.
304. Gérin-Lajoie, S., & Basque, J. (2006). Training Students at a Distance to Create Concept Maps. In A. J. Canas & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology - Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping (Vol. 2, pp. 254-257). San Jose, Costa Rica.
305. Grabowski, B. L. (1996). Generative learning: Past, present, and future. In Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 897-918). New York: Macmillan.
306. Graesser, A. C., Leon, J., & Otero, J. (2002). Introduction to the Psychology of Science Text Comprehension. In Otero, J., León, J. A., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.), The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension (pp. 1-15). Marwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
307. Holley, C. D., & Dansereau, D. F. (1984). Spatial Learning Strategies. Techniques, applications, and related issues. New York: Academic Press.
308. Horton, P. B., McConney, A. A., Gallo, M., Woods, A. L., Senn, G. J., & Hamelin, D. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77(1), 95-111. doi:10.1002/sce.3730770107
309. Immonen-Orpana, P., & Åhlberg, M. (2008). Learning, pedagogical thinking and collaborative knowledge building by CMapTools. In A. J. Cañas, P. Reiska, M. Åhlberg & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept Mapping: Connecting Educators - Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Concept Mapping (Vol. 2, pp. 485-492). Tallinn, Estonia: Tallinn University.
310. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
311. Kealy, W. A. (2001). Knowledge maps and their use in computer-based collaborative learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(4), 325-349. doi:10.2190/VM66-FFUK-KJPD-RYW1
312. Khamesan, A., & Hammond, N. (2004). Synchronous collaborative concept mapping via ICT: Learning effectiveness and personal and interpersonal awareness. In A. J. Canas, J. D. Novak & F. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain, 2004. Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Publica de Navarra.
313. Kharatmal, M., & Nagarjuna, G. (2006). A proposal to refine concept mapping for effective science learning. In A. J. Canas & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology - Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping (Vol. 1, pp. 151-158). San José, Costa Rica: Universidad
314. Kintsch, W. (2004). The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications. In Ruddell, R. B., & Unrau, N. J. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1270-1328). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
315. Komis, V., Ergazaki, M., & Zogza, V. (2007). Comparing computer-supported dynamic modeling and 'paper & pencil' concept mapping tehnique in students' collaborative activity. Computers & Education, 49, 991-1017. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.007
316. Kommers, P. A. M., Jonassen, D. H., & Mayes, J. T. (Eds.). (1992). Cognitive tools for learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
317. Lajoie, S. P., & Derry, S. J.(1993). Computers as cognitive tools.
318. Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
319. Lin, S.-Y., Strickland, J., Ray, B., & Denner, P. (2004). Computer-based concept mapping as a prewriting strategy for Middle School Students. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 7(2).
320. Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43-62. doi:10.1007/BF02299633
321. Nardi, B. A. (2001). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
322. Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413-448. doi:10.3102/00346543076003413
323. Norman, D. A. (1991). Cognitive artefacts. In Carroll, J. M. (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 17-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
324. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
325. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
326. O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71-86. doi:10.1023/A:1013132527007
327. Osmundson, E., Chung, G. K., Herl, H. E., & Klein, D. C.(1999). Knowledge mapping in the classroom: A tool for examining the development of students' conceptual understandings (Technical report No. 507). Los Angeles: CRESST/University of California.
328. Paquette, G. (2002). Modélisation des connaissances et des compétences. Sainte-Foy, Canada: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
329. Paquette, G. (2003). Instructional Engineering in Networked Environments. San Francisco: Pfeiffer/Wiley.
330. Paquette, G. (2007). Graphical ontology modeling language for learning environments. Technology Instruction Cognition and Learning, 5, 133-168.
331. Prezler, R. (2004). Cooperative concept mapping: Improving performance in undergraduate biology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(6), 30-35.
332. Pudelko, B. (2006). Étude microgénétique des médiations épistémiques d'un outil informatisé de représentation graphique des connaissances au cours d'une activité de compréhension de texte: Propositions pour une approche instrumentale étendue des médiations des outils cognitifs dans l'apprentissage. Published Doctoral Thesis, UFR Sciences Humaines et Sociales, Université Paris 8.
333. Pudelko, B., & Basque, J. (2005). Logiciels de construction de cartes de connaissances: des outils pour apprendre. In Dossiers pédagogiques. Montréal, Québec: Profetic, (CREPUQ) Conférence des recteurs et des principaux des universités du Québec.
334. Pudelko, B., Basque, J., & Legros, D. (2003 April). Vers une méthode d'évaluation des cartes conceptuelles fondée sur l'analyse en systèmes. Paper presented at the Environnements informatiques pour l'Apprentissage Humain: Actes de la conférence EIAH 2003, 15 - 17 April, Strasbourg.
335. Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies: Approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris: Armand Colin.
336. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Kogan Page. doi:10.4324/9780203413937
337. Reader, W. R., & Hammond, N. (1994). A comparison of structured and unstructured knowledge mapping tools in psychology teaching. In Proceedings of CiP '94, New York.
338. Rojas-Drummond, S., & Anzures, A. (2006). Oracy, Literacy and Concept Maps as Mediators of the Social Construction of Knowledge Among Peers. In A. J. Canas & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping (Vol. 2, pp. 196-199). San José, Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica.
339. Roth, W., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 305, 503-554. doi:10.1002/tea.3660300508
340. Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1992). The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science Education, 76(5), 531-557. doi:10.1002/sce.3730760507
341. Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: new perspectives for the teacher. International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 437-455. doi:10.1080/0950069940160405
342. Ruelland, D., & Brisebois, A. (2002). An electronic performance support system for the eLearner. Paper presented at the E-Learn, Montreal.
343. Ryve, A. (2004). Can collaborative concept mapping create mathematically productive discourses? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(2-3), 157-177. doi:10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040395.17555.c2
344. Sizmur, S., & Osborne, J. (1997). Learning processes and collaborative concept mapping. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 1117-1135. doi:10.1080/0950069970191002
345. Steketee, C. (2006). Modelling ICT integration in teacher education courses using distributed cognition as a framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 126-144.
346. Stoyanova, N., & Kommers, P. (2002). Concept mapping as a medium of shared cognition in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(1/2), 111-133.
347. Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315-337. doi:10.1007/s11412-006-9660-y
348. Suthers, D. D. (2003). Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. In Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Eds.), Arguing to Learn (pp. 27-46). London: Kluwer.
349. Suthers, D. D., Toth, E. E., & Weiner, A. (1997, October 14). An integrated approach to implementing collaborative inquiry in the classroom. Paper presented at the Computer support fo collaborative learning, Toronto.
350. van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 311-330. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5
351. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
352. Boudon, R. (1998). Études sur les sociologues classiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
353. Duplàa, E. (2006). On-line instructional relationship. Doctoral dissertation, Université du Maine, France.
354. Gauthier, M. (2006). Virtual Communities of Practice (vCoP) at the Canada School of Public Service (CECP). In Proceedings of I2LOR 2006, Montréal, November 8-11. Retrieved from http://www.lornet.org/Default.aspx?tabid=644
355. Gery, G. (1997). Granting three wishes through performance-centered design. NATO Communications of the ACM, 40(7), 54-59. doi:10.1145/256175.256185
356. Harasim, L. (1990). Online Education: An Environment for Collaboration and Intellectual Amplification. In Harasim, L. (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger Publishers.
357. Harmbrech, W. R. (2001). Corporate e-Learning: Exploring new frontiers.
358. Hiltz, R. (1990). Evaluating the Virtual Classroom. In Harasim, L. (Ed.), Online education: perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger Publishers.
359. Hotte, R. (2007). Tutors, Instrumentation and Virtual communities. FQRSC Report File No. 89746. Montreal, Canada: LICEF research Center of TELUQ.
360. Hotte, R., Duplàa, E., & Lecomte, N. (2005). La relation pédagogique en ligne. La relation comme entité structurante de la communauté d'apprentissage en ligne. Communication au colloque Le tutorat: les étudiants à distance en ont-ils vraiment besoin? du GIREFAD, 73ième Congrès de l'Acfas, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (Chicoutimi), 9 au 13 mai 2005.
361. IMS-LD. (2003). IMS Learning Design specification. Retrieved September 2009, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/
362. LOM. (2003). Learning Object Metadata. Retrieved September 2009, from http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/
363. O'Brien, R. (1998). An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research. Retrieved from http://www.web.net/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html
364. Paquette, G. (2002). L'ingénierie pédagogique. Pour construire l'apprentissage en réseau. Canada: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
365. Paquette, G. (2002). Modélisation des connaissances et des compétences. Montreal, Canada: Presses de l'université du Québec
366. Paquette, G. (2004). Educational Modeling Languages, from an Instructional Engineering Perspective. In McGreal, R. (Ed.), Online education using learning objects (pp. 331-346). London: Routledge/Falmer.
367. Paquette, G. (2004). Instructional Engineering for Network-Based Learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
368. Paquette, G., De la Teja, I., & Dufresne, A. (2000). Explora: An Open Virtual Campus. Actes de la conférence ED-Media 2000, Montréal 2000.
369. Paquette, G., de la Teja, I., & Léonard, M. (2000). Presentation of the MISA Learning Engineering Method. Montréal, Canada: Internal Research Report, Licef Research Centre.
370. Paquette, G., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., & Léonard, M. (2008). The MOT+ Visual Language for Knowledge-Based Instructional Design. In Handbook on Virtual Instructional Design Languages. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
371. Paquette, G., & Rosca, I. (2003). Modeling the physiology of eLearning Delivery Models (Vol. 1, pp. 1-30). Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning.
372. Ricciardi-Rigault, C., & Henri, F. (1994 June). Developing Tools for Optimizing the Collaborative Learning Process. In Proceedings of the International Distance Education Conference, Penn State University, USA.
373. Rosca, I. (1999). Vers une vision systémique du processus de l'explication- Récit d'une recherche sur l'intégration de la pédagogie, de l'ingénierie et de la modélisation. Thèse de Doctorat en technologie éducationnelle, Université de Montréal, 1999. Retrieved from http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~rosca/index.htm
374. Ruelland, D., & Lundgren, K. (2007). Apprentissage mixte en milieu de travail. Collaboration École de la fonction publique du Canada et la Chaire de recherche en ingénierie cognitive et éducative. Rapport de la Phase II, August 2007. Montréal: Téluq.
375. Ruelland, D., Lundgren, K., & Bloomfield, D. (2006). Implementation of IMS-LD and IEEE LOM specifications in the workplace: A Best Practice Study. Québec: Report for the Canada School of Public Service.
376. Stoyko, P., & Fuchs, A. (2003). L'apprentissage @la portée de tous: Un guide d'apprentissage en ligne pour gestionnaires. Canadian Center for Management Development. Retrieved from http://www.myschool-monecole.gc.ca/main_f.html
377. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.1037/11193-000
378. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
379. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
380. Bailey, C., Mohd, T. Z., Davis, H. C., Fill, K., & Conole, G. (2006). Panning for gold: designing pedagogically inspired learning nuggets. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 113-122. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/19642/
381. Currier, S., & Campbell, L. M. (2006). Evaluating Learning Resources for Reusability: The "Dner & Learning Objects" Study. Retrieved February 6, 2006, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland02/proceedings/papers/059.pdf
382. De la Teja, I., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., & Paquette, G. (2005). Transposing MISA Learning Scenarios into IMS Units of Learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society (Special Issue).
383. IMS-LD. (2006). Learning Design. Information Model, Best Practice and Implementation Guide, Binding document, Schemas. Retrieved February 4, 2006, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/index.html
384. Koper, R. (2005). An Introduction to Learning Design. In Koper, R., & Tattersall, C. (Eds.), Learning Design - A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training (pp. 3-20). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
385. Lundgren-Cayrol, K., & Léonard, M. (2006). IDLD Modelling Technique. Retrieved from http://www.idld.org/Methodology/tabid/174/Default.aspx
386. Martens, H., & Votgen, H. (2006). A Reference Implementation of a Learning Design Engine. In Koper, R., & Tattersall, C. (Eds.), Learning Design - A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training (pp. 91-108). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
387. McGreal, R., Anderson, T., Babin, G., Downes, S., Friesen, N, Harrigan, K., Hatala, M., MacLeod, D., Mattson, M., Paquette, G., Richards, G., Roberts, R., & Schafer, S. (2004 March). EduSource: Canada's Learning Object Repository Network. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning.
388. Paquette, G. (1999). Meta-knowledge Representation for Learning Scenarios Engineering. In S. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.), Proceedings of AI-Ed'99 in AI and Education - Open learning environments. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
389. Paquette, G. (2004). Instructional Engineering for Network-Based Learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
390. Paquette, G. (2004). IMS-LD: The road ahead. Canadian Journal of Learning Technologies, 30(3).
391. Paquette, G., De la Teja, I., Léonard, M., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., & Marino, O. (2005). An Instructional Engineering Method and Tool for the Design of Units of learning. In Kopper, R., & Tattersall, C. (Eds.), Learning Design: A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training (pp. 161-184). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
392. Paquette, G., Léonard, M., de la Teja, I., Dessaint, M.P., & Lundgren-Cayrol, K. (2000). Method for Engineering Learning Systems - MISA 4.0 Description of Documentation Elements. LICEF Research Center, Télé-université.
393. Paquette, G., Léonard, M., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Mihaila, S., & Gareau, D.(2006). Learning Design based on Graphical Knowledge-Modeling. Journal of Educational technology and Society ET&S.
394. Paquette, G., Marino, O., De la Teja, I., Léonard, M., & Lundgren-Cayrol, K. (2005b). Delivery of Learning Design: the Explor@System's Case. In Koper, R., & Tattersall, C. (Eds.), Learning Design - A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training (pp. 311-326). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
395. Paquette, G., Marino, O., De la Teja, I., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Léonard, M., & Contamines, J. (2005). Implementation and deployment of the IMS learning design specification. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(2), 85-104.
396. Paquette, G., Marino, O., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Léonard, M., & de la Teja, I. (2006). Learning Design Repositories: Structure Ontology and Processes. Presented at TenCompetence workshop, Sofia, Bulgaria, April 2006.
397. Paquette, G., Miara, A., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., & Guérette, L. (2004). The Explor@2 Learning Object Manager. In McGreal, R. (Ed.), Online education using learning objects (pp. 254-268). London: Routledge/Falmer.
398. RELOAD Project. (2006). Retrieved February 4, 2006, from http://www.reload.ac.uk
399. Apostolou, D., Mentzas, G., Young, R., & Abecker, A.(2000). Consolidating the product versus process approaches in knowledge management: The Know-net approach. Paper presented at the Conference Practical Application of Knowledge Management (PAKeM 2000) - April 12-14, 2000, Manchester, UK.
400. Basque, J., Desjardins, C., Pudelko, B., & Léonard, M. (2008). Gérer les connaissances stratégiques dans des entreprises manufacturières de la Montérégie: Expérimentation de la co-modélisation des connaissances dans 3 PME. Rapport de recherche. Montreal, Canada: CEFRIO.
401. Basque, J., Imbeault, C., Pudelko, B., & Léonard, M. (2004). Collaborative knowledge modeling between experts and novices: A strategy to support transfer of expertise in an organization. In A. J. Canas, J. D. Novak & F. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping (CMC 2004), Pamplona, September 14-17 (Vol. 1, pp. 75-81). Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Publica de Navarra.
402. Basque, J., & Pudelko, B. (2004). La modélisation des connaissances à l'aide d'un outil informatisé à des fins de transfert d'expertise: Recension d'écrits. Montréal, Canada: Centre de recherche LICEF, Télé-université.
403. Basque, J., & Pudelko, B. (2008). La co-modélisation des connaissances à l'aide d'un outil informatisé. Une stratégie de transfert d'expertise en milieu de travail. Rapport final des expérimentations menées à la Régie des Rentes du Québec. Montréal, Canada: Centre de recherche LICEF, Télé-université.
404. Basque, J., Rocheleau, J., Winer, L., Michaud, P., Bergeron, G., Paquette, G., & Paquin, C. (1998). Un modèle adaptable d'une école informatisée. École informatisée Clés en main du Québec Inc et Centre de recherche LICEF, Télé-université.
405. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovitch, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorisation and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
406. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
407. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
408. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. The American Psychologist, 49(3), 725-747. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.725
409. Ermine, J.-L., Boughzala, I., & Tounkara, T. (2006). Critical knowledge map as a decision tool for knowledge transfer actions. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 128-140.
410. Glaser, R. (1986). On the Nature of Expertise. In Hagendorf, H. (Ed.), Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilitis: Mechanisms and Performances (pp. 915-928). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
411. Imbeault, C. (2007 November). Projet GIT, Gestion de l'information technique Automatismes de Production. Rapport d'étape. Hydro-Quebec internal document.
412. Paquette, G. (2003). Instructional Engineering in Networked Environments. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
413. Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review, 5(3), 205-221. doi:10.1007/BF01323044
414. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionnals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
415. Sternberg, R. (1997). Cognitive Conceptions of Expertise. In Hoffman, R. R. (Ed.), Expertise in Context. Human and Machine (pp. 149-162). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
416. Sternberg, R. (1999). What Do We Know About Tacit Knowledge? Making the Tacit Become Explicit. In Horvath, J. A. (Ed.), Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice (pp. 231-236). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
417. Sveiby, K.-E. (2001). A knowledge-based, theory of the firm to guide strategy formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(4). doi:10.1108/14691930110409651
418. Allal, L. (1999). Impliquer l'apprenant dans le processus d'évaluation: promesses et pièges de l'autoévaluation. In Depover, C., & Noel, B. (Eds.), L'Évaluation des compétences et des processus cognitifs, Modèles, pratiques et contextes (pp. 35-58). Bruxelles, Belgium: De Boeck University.
419. Basque, J., Ruelland, D., & Lavoie, M. C. (2006). Conception d'un outil interactif d'autodiagnostic des compétences informationnelles. Montréal, Canada: Téluq-Université du Québec.
420. Braincuts. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.categoricaldesign.com/
421. Brisebois, A., Ruelland, D., & Paquette, G. (2005). Supporting Self-Assessment in a Competency Approach to Learning. In eLearn 2005 proceedings, Vancouver, Canada.
422. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, Executive control, Self-regulation, and other more Mysterious Mechanisms. In Weinert, F. E., & Kluwe, R. H. (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
423. Brown, N. C., Hedberg, J., & Harper, H. (1994). Metacognition as a basis for learning support software. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(2), 3-26.
424. Burge, E. J. (1994). Learning in computer conference contexts: The learners' perspective. Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), 19-43.
425. Cancore. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.cancore.ca/
426. Gauthier, B. (1993). Recherche sociale: De la problématique à la collecte de données. Sainte-Foy, Canada: PUQ.
427. Habel, G. (2009). Préparer un cours interactif pour le web, la baladodiffusion et le mode présentiel à l'ère des web 2.0 et 3.0. Master's thesis, Université du Québec à Montréal.
428. Habel, G., Reyes, M. L., Magnan, F., & Reyes, G. E. (2007). General poncelet meets the semantic web: a concrete example of the usage of ontologies to support creation and dissemination of elearning contents. In Proceedings of E-Learn 2007 - World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education.
429. Hotte, R., Basque, J., Lavoie-Page, V., & Ruelland, D. (2007). Ingénierie des compétences et scénarisation pédagogique. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 4(2). Retrieved October 26, 2008, from http://www.profetic.org/revue
430. Kommers, P., Jonassen, D. H., & Mayes, T. (1992). Cognitive Tools for Learning. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
431. Livingston, J. (1997). Metacognition: An Overview. Retrieved from http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/Metacog.htm
432. Mayes, T. (1993). Hypermédias et outils cognitifs. In G. I. Baron, J. Baude, & B. de la Passardière (Éds.), Deuxièmes journées francophones hypermédias et apprentissage (pp. 39-47). Paris, France: INRP.
433. Noël, B. (1997). Métacognition. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.
434. Normétic. (2009). Retrieved from http://gtnquebec.org/Normetic
435. Paquette, G. (2002). L'ingénierie pédagogique. Pour construire l'apprentissage en réseau. Quebec, Canada: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
436. Paquette, G. (2002). Modélisation des connaissances et des compétences. Quebec, Canada: Presses de l'université du Québec
437. Paquette, G. (2004a). L'ingénierie pédagogique à base d'objets et le référencement par les compétences. Montréal. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 1(3). Retrieved August 29, 2007, from http://www.profetic.org/revue
438. Paquette, G. (2004b). Instructional Engineering in Networked Environments. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
439. Paquette, G. (2008). Graphical ontology modeling language for learning environments. Technology, Instruction. [ Philadelphia, PA: Old City Publishing, Inc.]. Cognition and Learning, 5, 133-168.
440. Paquette, G., de la Teja, I., & Léonard, M. (2000). Presentation of the MISA Learning Engineering Method. Montréal, Canada: Internal Research Report, Licef Research Centre.
441. Paquette, G., De La Teja, I., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Léonard, M., & Ruelland, D. (2002). La modélisation cognitive, un outil de conception des processus et des méthodes d'un campus virtuel. Revue de l'Association Canadienne de l'Éducation à Distance. ACED.
442. Paquette, G., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., & Léonard, M. (2008). Visual Language for Knowledge-Based Instructional Design. In Handbook on Virtual Instructional Design Languages (pp. 133-154). The MOT.
443. Paquette, G., Miara, A., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., & Guérette, L. (2004). The Explor@2 Learning Object Manager. In McGreal, R. (Ed.), Online education using learning objects (pp. 254-268). London: Routledge/Falmer.
444. Ross, D., & Ruelland, D. (2008). Rapport du banc d'essai de Compétences+. Montréal, Canada: Centre de recherche LICEF, Réseau Lornet.
445. Ruelland, D. (2000). Vers un modèle d'autogestion en situation de télé-apprentissage. Thèse de doctorat en didactique. Montréal, Faculté des Études Supérieures, Université de Montréal.
446. Ruelland, D., Ross, D. (2008). Rapport Compétences+: Cas d'utilisation. Katimavik, Chaire de recherche en ingénierie cognitive et educative. Montréal, Canada: Centre de recherche LICEF, Télé-Université.
447. Ruelland, D., & Brisebois, A. (2003). Rapport d'évaluation du prototype Autodiagnostic. Montréal, Canada: Centre de recherche LICEF, Télé-Université.
448. Ruelland, D., & Brisebois, A. (2004). Outil d'autodiagnostic des compétences. Rapport du banc d'essai du prototype. Lornet, Montréal, Centre de recherche LICEF, Télé-Université.
449. Ruelland, D., Brisebois, A., & Paquette, G. (2003). A Performance Support Tool for the eLearner. In International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE2002), Aukland, New Zealand.
450. Ruelland, D., & Lundgren-Cayrol, K. (2007). Apprentissage mixte en milieu de travail, Rapport de la recherche-action Phase II. Montréal, Canada: Réseau Lornet.
451. Scallon, G. (2004). L'évaluation des apprentissages dans l'approche par compétences. Montreal, Canada: ERPI.
452. Scorm Metadata. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.scormsoft.com/scorm/cam/metadata
453. ST-Pierre, L. (2004). L'habileté d'Autoévaluation: pourquoi et comment la développer? Pédagogie collégiale, 18(1), 33-38.
454. Basque, J., Dufresne, A., Paquette, G., Léonard, M., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., & Prom Tep, S. (2003). Vers un modèle conceptuel générique de système d'assistance pour le téléapprentissage. Revue STICEF, 10.
455. Crevier, F. (1996). Conception et validation d'une méthode d'ingénierie didactique. Thèse de doctorat. Sciences de l'Éducation, Université de Montréal.
456. Girard, J., Paquette, G., Miara, A., & Lundgren-Cayrol, K. (1999). Intelligent Assistance for Web-based TeleLearning. In S. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.), Proceedings of AI-Ed'99. In AI and Education, open learning environments (pp. 561-569). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
457. Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Paquette, G., Miara, A., Bergeron, F., Rivard, J., & Rosca, I. (2001). Explor@Advisory Agent: Tracing the Student's Trail. Presented at WebNet'01 ConferenceOrlando.
458. Noël, B. (1991). La métacognition. Bruxelles, Belgium: De Boeck-Wesmael.
459. Paquette, G. (2001). Designing Virtual Learning Centers. In Adelsberger, H., Collis, B., & Pawlowski, J. (Eds.), Handbook on Information Technologies for Education & Training (pp. 249-272). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
460. Paquette, G. (2002). L'ingénierie du télé-apprentissage, pour construire l'apprentissage en réseaux. Quebec, Canada: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
461. Paquette, G. (2004). Instructional Engineering for Network-Based Learning. New York: Pfeiffer/Wiley Publishing Co.
462. Paquette, G., Aubin, C., & Crevier, F. (1999 August). MISA, A Knowledge-based Method for the Engineering of Learning Systems. Journal of Courseware Engineering, 2.
463. Paquette, G., Crevier, F., & Aubin, C. (1994, November). ID knowledge in a course design workbench. Educational Technology, 34(9), 50-57.
464. Paquette, G., Pachet, F., Giroux, S., & Girard, J. (1996). EpiTalk, Generating Advisor Agents for Existing Information Systems. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7(3-4).
465. Paquette, G., Rosca, I., De la Teja, I., Léonard, M., & Lundgren-Cayrol, K. (2001). Web-based Support for the Instructional Engineering of E-learning Systems. Presented at WebNet'01 Conference, Orlando.
466. Paquette, G., & Tchounikine, P. (1999). Towards a Knowledge Engineering Method for the Construction of Advisor Systems. In S. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.), Proceedings of AI-Ed'99. In AI and Education, open learning environments. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
467. Ruelland, D. (2000). Un modèle des processus d'autogestion de l'apprentissage. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Montréal.