An ontology and a software framework for competency modeling and management

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1-21

  Paquette, Gilbert ^a  

^a Tel e University of Quebec   (Canada)

Author keywords

Competency acquisition; Ontology driven e learning system

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949183508     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, May, Retrieved June 7, 2007, from, http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00048144-10D2-1C70-84A9809EC588EF21.
2. Bloom, B. S. (1975). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the Classification of Educational Goals, New York, NY: D. McKay.
3. Breuker, J., & Van de Velde, W. (1994). CommonKads Library for Expertise Modelling, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
4. Breuker, J., Muntjewerff, A., & Bredewej, B. (1999). Ontological modelling for designing educational systems. Paper presented at the AI-ED 99 Workshop on Ontologies for Educational Systems, July 18-23, 1999, Le Mans, France.
5. Chandrasekaran B. (1987) Towards a functional architecture for intelligence based on generic information processing tasks. IJCAI-87 Proceedings (pp. 1183-1192). Milan, Italy.
6. Davies, J., van Harmelen, F., & Fensel, D. (2002). Towards the semantic web: Ontology-driven knowledge management. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
7. IMS-RDCEO (2002). IMS Reusable Definition of Competency or Educational Objective Best Practices. [Version 1.0, final specification]. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Retrieved June 7, 2007, from, http://www.imsglobal. org/competencies/index.html.
8. IMS-LD (2003). IMS learning design: Information model, best practice and implementation guide. [Binding document, schemas]. Retrieved June 7, 2007, from, http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/index.cfm.
9. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, New York, NY: Longman.
10. Martin, B. L., & Briggs L. (1986). The affective and cognitive domains: Integration for instruction and research, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
11. McDermott, J. (1988). Preliminary steps towards a taxonomy of problem-solving methods. In S. Marcus (Ed.), Automating knowledge acquisition for expert systems (pp. 225-255). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Merrill, M. D. (1994). Principles of instructional design, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
13. Paquette, G. (1999). Meta-knowledge representation for learning scenarios engineering. In S. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.), Proceedings of AI-Ed '99 in AI and Education: Open learning environments, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
14. Paquette, G. (2002a). L'ingénierie pédagogique: Pour construire l'apprentissage en réseau. Montréal: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
15. Paquette, G. (2002b). Modélisation des connaissances et des compétences, un langage graphique pour concevoir et apprendre. Montréal: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
16. Paquette, G. (2002c). TeleLearning systems engineering: Towards a new ISD model. Journal of Structural Learning, 14, 1-35.
17. Paquette, G. (2003). Instructional engineering for network-based learning, Pfeiffer/Wiley Publishing Co.
18. Paquette, G., Crevier, F., & Aubin. C.(1994). ID knowledge in a course design workbench. Educational Technology, 34(9), 50-57.
19. Paquette G., & Marino, O. (2005). Learning objects, collaborative learning designs and knowledge representation. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 3, 85-108.
20. Paquette, G., Marino, O., De la Teja, I., Léonard, M., & Lundgren-Cayrol, K., (2005). Delivery of learning design: The Explor@ System's case. In R. Koper & C. Tattersall (Eds.), Learning Design: A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training (pp. 311-326), Berlin: Springer Verlag.
21. Paquette, G., & Rosca, I. (2004). An ontology-based referencing of actors, operations and resources in eLearning systems. SW-EL 2004 Workshop, August 23, 2004, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
22. Pitrat, J. (1991). Métaconnaissance, avenir de l'Intelligence Artificielle, Paris: Hermès.
23. Polya, G. (1957). Comment poser et résoudre un problème? Paris: Dunod. Popper, K. R. (1967). The logic of scientific discovery, New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.
24. Reigeluth, C. (1983). Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
25. Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). Designing instructional systems, New York, NY: Nichols Publishing.
26. Ruelland, D., Brisebois A., & Paquette, G. (2005). Supporting self-assessment in a competency approach to learning, E-Learn 2005 Conference, October 15-19, 2005, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
27. Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B., & Breuker, J. (1993) KADS: A principled approach to knowledge-based system Development, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Steels, L. (1990). Components of Expertise. AI Magazine, 11(2), 30-49.
29. Thayse, A. (1988). Approche logique de l'intelligence artificielle, Paris: Dunod.
30. W3C (2004). OWL Overview Document, Retrieved June 7, 2007, from, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owlfeatures-20040210/.