The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 143, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1600-1615

  Gray, Kurt ^a   Schein, Chelsea ^a   Ward, Adrian F ^b  

^a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Moral dyad; Moral foundations; Morality; Politics; Values

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ETHICAL THEORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL STRESS; MORALITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIGION;

ADULT; COGNITION; ETHICAL THEORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MORALS; RELIGION; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 84897529037     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0036149     Document Type: Article

References (167)

1. Alicke, M. D. (1992). Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 368-378. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.368
2. Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556-574. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.556
3. Ames, D. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2013). Intentional harms are worse, even when they're not. Psychological Science, 24, 1755-1762. doi:10.1177/ 0956797613480507
4. Appiah, A. (2008). Experiments in ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bain, P., Park, J., Kwok, C., & Haslam, N. (2009). Attributing human uniqueness and human nature to cultural groups: Distinct forms of subtle dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 789- 805. doi:10.1177/1368430209340415
6. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364 -374. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
7. Bastian, B., Costello, K., Loughnan, S., & Hodson, G. (2012). When closing the human-animal divide expands moral concern: The importance of framing. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 421- 429. doi:10.1177/1948550611425106
8. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1, 319-322. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00226.x
9. Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
10. Brown, R., & Fish, D. (1983). The psychological causality implicit in language. Cognition, 14, 237-273. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90006-9
11. Bryant, A. (1977). The Anita Bryant story: The survival of our nation's families and the threat of militant homosexuality. Grand Rapids, MI: Revell.
12. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/ 1745691610393980
13. Carlsmith, K. M. (2006). The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 437-451.
14. Castano, E., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804-818. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.804
15. Chalmers, D. J. (1997). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16. Craik, K. J. W. (1967). The nature of explanation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
17. Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353-380. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006
18. Cushman, F., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure. Social Neuroscience, 7, 269-279. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2011.614000
19. Cushman, F., & Young, L. (2011). Patterns of moral judgment derive from nonmoral psychological representations. Cognitive Science, 35, 1052- 1075. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01167.x
20. Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17, 1082-1089. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x
21. Davis, M. H. (1996). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22. Decety, J., & Cacioppo, S. (2012). The speed of morality: A high-density electrical neuroimaging study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108, 3068- 3072. doi:10.1152/jn.00473.2012
23. Decety, J., & Meyer, M. (2008). From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 1053-1080. doi:10.1017/ S0954579408000503
24. DeScioli, P. (2008). Investigations into the problems of moral cognition (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania). Retrieved from http:// repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI3309424/
25. DeScioli, P., Gilbert, S., & Kurzban, R. (2012). Indelible victims and persistent punishers in moral cognition. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 143- 149. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2012.666199
26. DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2013). A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 477-496. doi:10.1037/a0029065
27. Deutsch, R., & Gawronski, B. (2009). When the method makes a difference: Antagonistic effects on "automatic evaluations" as a function of task characteristics of the measure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 101-114. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.001
28. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
29. Ditto, P. H., & Koleva, S. P. (2011). Moral empathy gaps and the American culture war. Emotion Review, 3, 331-332. doi:10.1177/ 1754073911402393
30. Ditto, P. H., & Liu, B. (2011). Deontological dissonance and the consequentialist crutch. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 51-70). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31. Eibach, R. P., Libby, L. K., & Ehrlinger, J. (2009). Priming family values: How being a parent affects moral evaluations of harmless but offensive acts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1160-1163.
32. Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327-339. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
33. Epley, N., & Waytz, A. (2009). Mind perception. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 498-541). New York, NY: Wiley.
34. Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22, 295-299. doi:10.1177/0956797611398497
35. Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210. doi:10.1037/h0041593
36. Frimer, J. A., Biesanz, J. C., Walker, L. J., & MacKinlay, C. W. (2013). Liberals and conservatives rely on common moral foundations when making moral judgments about influential people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 1040-1059. doi:10.1037/a0032277
37. Gardner, W. L., & Knowles, M. L. (2008). Love makes you real: Favorite television characters are perceived as "real" in a social facilitation paradigm. Social Cognition, 26, 156-168. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.156
38. Gawronski, B., & Ye, Y. (2014). What drives priming effects in the affect misattribution procedure? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 3-15. doi:10.1177/0146167213502548
39. Gendler, T. S. (2008). Alief and belief. Journal of Philosophy, 105, 634-663.
40. Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Moral intuition _ fast and frugal heuristics? In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 1-26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Gilbert, D. T., & Gill, M. J. (2000). The momentary realist. Psychological Science, 11, 394-398. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00276
42. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
43. Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 292-306. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292
44. Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213-224. doi:10.1002/bdm.1753
45. Goodwin, G. P., & Darley, J. M. (2008). The psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism. Cognition, 106, 1339 -1366. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.007
46. Gorney, C. (2011). Too young to wed: The secret world of child brides. National Geographic, 219(6), 78-99.
47. Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140-150. doi:10.1177/1088868309353415
48. Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S., & Ditto, P. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55-130. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
49. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141
50. Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385. doi:10.1037/a0021847
51. Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007, February 2). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619. doi:10.1126/science.1134475
52. Gray, K. (2012). The power of good intentions: Perceived benevolence soothes pain, increases pleasure, and improves taste. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 639 - 645. doi:10.1177/ 1948550611433470
53. Gray, K., Jenkins, A. C., Heberlein, A. S., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Distortions of mind perception in psychopathology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 477-479. doi:10.1073/pnas.1015493108
54. Gray, K., & Keeney, J. (2013). Domains or dimensions: Severity and atypicality explain the role of intention across moral content areas. Manuscript in preparation, University of North Carolina.
55. Gray, K., Knickman, T. A., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). More dead than dead: Perceptions of persons in the persistent vegetative state. Cognition, 121, 275-280. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.014
56. Gray, K., & Schein, C. (2012). Two minds vs. two philosophies: Mind perception defines morality and dissolves the debate between deontology and utilitarianism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3, 405- 423. doi:10.1007/s13164-012-0112-5
57. Gray, K., Waytz, A., & Young, L. (2012). The moral dyad: A fundamental template unifying moral judgment. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 206-215. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2012.686247
58. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2008). The sting of intentional pain. Psychological Science, 19, 1260-1262. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02208.x
59. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505-520. doi:10.1037/a0013748
60. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2010a). Blaming God for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 7-16. doi:10.1177/1088868309350299
61. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2010b). Torture and judgments of guilt. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 233-235. doi:10.1016/ j.jesp.2009.10.003
62. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2011a). Dimensions of moral emotions. Emotion Review, 3, 258-260. doi:10.1177/1754073911402388
63. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2011b). To escape blame, don't be a hero-Be a victim. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 516-519. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.012
64. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2012). Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 125, 125-130. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007
65. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2013). Six guidelines for interesting research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 549 -553. doi:10.1177/ 1745691613497967
66. Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 101-124. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387
67. Greenberg, K. J., & Dratel, J. L. (Eds.). (2005). The torture papers: The road to Abu Ghraib. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
68. Greene, J., & Cohen, J. (2004). For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359, 1775-1785. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1546
69. Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144-1154. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004
70. Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389-400. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
71. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001, September 14). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108. doi:10.1126/ science.1062872
72. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
73. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41. doi:10.1037/a0015575
74. Guglielmo, S., Monroe, A. E., & Malle, B. F. (2009). At the heart of morality lies folk psychology. Inquiry, 52, 449-466. doi:10.1080/ 00201740903302600
75. Gutierrez, R., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2007). Anger, disgust, and presumption of harm as reactions to taboo-breaking behaviors. Emotion, 7, 853-868. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.853
76. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
77. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Pantheon.
78. Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2007). Social intuitionists answer six questions about morality. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 181- 217). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F., & Murphy, S. (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia.
80. Haidt, J., & Hersh, M. A. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 191-221. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02489.x
81. Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind (Vol. 3, pp. 367-391). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
82. Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613-628. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613
83. Harm. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster's online dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/harm?show_0&t_ 1391643541
84. Hart, H. L. A., & Honoré, T. (1985). Causation in the law (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
85. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252-264. doi:10.1207/ s15327957pspr1003_4
86. Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., Kashima, Y., & Bain, P. (2008). Attributing and denying humanness to others. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 55-85. doi:10.1080/10463280801981645
87. Hauser, M., Young, L., & Cushman, F. (2007). Reviving Rawls's linguistic analogy: Operative principles and the causal structure of moral actions. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 107-144). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88. Hempel, C. G. (1945). Studies in the logic of confirmation (I.). Mind, 54, 1-26. doi:10.1093/mind/LIV.213.1
89. Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X0999152X
90. Hollingsworth v. Perry. (2013, March 26). Retrieved from http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/12-144.pdf
91. Hume, D. (2003). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/9662 (Original work published 1748)
92. Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Bernhardt, J., Dierksmeier, A., & Banse, R. (2011). An inkblot for sexual preference: A semantic variant of the affect misattribution procedure. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 676-690. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.508260
93. Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 496-503. doi:10.1177/1745691612448792
94. Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Cushman, F. (2012). Benefiting from misfortune: When harmless actions are judged to be morally blameworthy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 52-62. doi:10.1177/ 0146167211430232
95. Jacobson, D. (2012). Moral dumbfounding and moral stupefaction. In M. Timmons (Ed.), Oxford studies in normative ethics (Vol. 2, pp. 289- 316). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
96. Jahoda, G. (1998). Images of savages: Ancient roots of modern prejudice in western culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
97. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
98. Janoff-Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2013). Surveying the moral landscape: Moral motives and group-based moralities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 219-236. doi:10.1177/1088868313480274
99. Kahan, D. M. (2007). The cognitively illiberal state. Stanford Law Review, 60, 115-154.
100. Kapelner, A., & Chandler, D. (2010, October.). Preventing satisficing in online surveys: A "kapcha" to ensure higher quality data. Paper presented at CrowdConf, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from http://www.danachandler.com/files/kapcha.pdf
101. Karpman, S. (1968). Fairy tales and script drama analysis. Transactional Analysis Bulletin, 7, 39-43.
102. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18-35. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.18
103. Kellogg, J. H. (1890). Plain facts for old and young: Embracing the natural history and hygiene of organic life. Retrieved from http:// archive.org/details/plainfactsforol00kell
104. Knobe, J. (2003). Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63, 190-194. doi:10.1093/analys/63.3.190
105. Knobe, J., & Prinz, J. (2008). Intuitions about consciousness: Experimental studies. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7, 67-83. doi: 10.1007/s11097-007-9066-y
106. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 151-235). New York, NY: Academic Press.
107. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7
108. Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 121-143. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X11000446
109. Liu, B. S., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). What dilemma? Moral evaluation shapes factual belief. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 316-323. doi:10.1177/1948550612456045
110. Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93-120. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93
111. Mercier, H. (2011). What good is moral reasoning? Mind & Society, 10, 131-148. doi:10.1007/s11299-011-0085-6
112. Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57-74. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10000968
113. Mikhail, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 143-152. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007
114. Mill, J. S. (2008). Utilitarianism. In M. Warnock (Ed.), Utilitarianism and On Liberty (2nd ed., pp. 181-235). doi:10.1002/9780470776018.ch4 (Original work published 1863)
115. Monroe, A. E., Guglielmo, S., & Malle, B. F. (2012). Morality goes beyond mind perception. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 179-184. doi:10.1080/ 1047840X.2012.668271
116. Müller-Lyer, F. C. (1889). Optische urteilstäuschungen [Optical illusions judgment]. Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie, Physiologische Abteilung, 2(Suppl.), 263-270.
117. Nichols, S. (2002). Norms with feeling: Towards a psychological account of moral judgment. Cognition, 84, 221-236. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00048-3
118. Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008, October 3). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58-62. doi:10.1126/ science.1158757
119. Oldridge, D. J. (2004). Strange histories: The trial of the pig, the walking dead, and other matters of fact from the medieval and renaissance worlds. New York, NY: Routledge.
120. Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872. doi:10.1016/ j.jesp.2009.03.009
121. Osofsky, M. J., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2005). The role of moral disengagement in the execution process. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 371-393. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-4930-1
122. Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36, 163-177. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x
123. Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277-293. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
124. Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (2004). Walking with the scarecrow: The information-processing approach to decision research. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 110-132). Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
125. Peery, D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2008). Black _ White _ Black: Hypodescent in reflexive categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Psychological Science, 19, 973-977. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02185.x
126. Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 148-158. doi:10.1038/nrn2317
127. Philippa, F. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Virtues and Vices, 19-32.
128. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child
129. Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2003). The intelligence of the moral intuitions: A comment on Haidt (2001). Psychological Review, 110, 193- 196. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.193
130. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific inquiry. London, England: Hutchinson.
131. Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1-20. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X02000018
132. Pronin, E., Wegner, D. M., McCarthy, K., & Rodriguez, S. (2006). Everyday magical powers: The role of apparent mental causation in the overestimation of personal influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 218-231. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.218
133. Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118, 57-75. doi:10.1037/a0021867
134. Ropeik, D. (2010). How risky is it, really? Why our fears don't always match the facts. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional.
135. Rottman, J., & Kelemen, D. (2012). Aliens behaving badly: Children's acquisition of novel purity-based morals. Cognition, 124, 356-360. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.001
136. Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574-586. doi:10.1037/ 0022-3514.76.4.574
137. Sava, F. A., MaricuToiu, L. P., Rusu, S., Macsinga, I., Vîrgǎ , D., Cheng, C. M., & Payne, B. K. (2012). An inkblot for the implicit assessment of personality: The semantic misattribution procedure. European Journal of Personality, 26, 613-628. doi:10.1002/per.1861
138. Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096-1109. doi:10.1177/0146167208317771
139. Sheikh, H., Ginges, J., Coman, A., & Atran, S. (2012). Religion, group threat and sacred values. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 110-118.
140. Shenhav, A., & Greene, J. D. (2010). Moral judgments recruit domaingeneral valuation mechanisms to integrate representations of probability and magnitude. Neuron, 67, 667-677. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.020
141. Shukla, G. D., Sahu, S. C., Tripathi, R. P., & Gupta, D. K. (1982). Phantom limb: A phenomenological study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 54-58. doi:10.1192/bjp.141.1.54
142. Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1-83). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
143. Skitka, L. J., & Bauman, C. W. (2008). Moral conviction and political engagement. Political Psychology, 29, 29-54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00611.x
144. Skitka, L. J., & Sargis, E. G. (2006). The Internet as psychological laboratory. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 529-555. doi:10.1146/ annurev.psych.57.102904.190048
145. Smith, A. (1982). The theory of moral sentiments (D. D. Raphael & A. L. Macfie, Eds.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. (Original work published 1759)
146. Sood, A. M., & Darley, J. M. (2007, November). The plasticity of harm in the service of punishment goals: An experimental demonstration. Paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, New Haven, CT.
147. Sousa, P., Holbrook, C., & Piazza, J. (2009). The morality of harm. Cognition, 113, 80-92. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.015
148. Spranca, M., Minsk, E., & Baron, J. (1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 76-105. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(91)90011-T
149. Stone, J., Perry, W., & Darley, J. M. (1997). "White men can't jump": Evidence for the perceptual confirmation of racial stereotypes following a basketball game. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 291-306. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1903_2
150. Strickland, B., Fisher, M., & Knobe, J. (2012). Moral structure falls out of general event structure. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 198 -205. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.668272
151. Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Moral heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 531-573. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000099
152. Svenson, O., & Maule, A. J. (Eds.). (1993). Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
153. Tam, K.-P., Lee, S.-L., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 514-521. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001
154. Tannenbaum, D., Uhlmann, E. L., & Diermeier, D. (2011). Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1249-1254. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.010
155. Thomson, J. J. (1976). Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist, 59, 204-217. doi:10.5840/monist197659224
156. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
157. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974, September 27). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124 -1131. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
158. van Leeuwen, F., & Park, J. H. (2009). Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 169-173. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.017
159. Ward, A. F., Olsen, A. S., & Wegner, D. M. (2013). The harm-made mind observing victimization augments attribution of minds to vegetative patients, robots, and the dead. Psychological Science, 24, 1437-1445. doi:10.1177/0956797612472343
160. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
161. Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219 -232. doi:10.1177/ 1745691610369336
162. Waytz, A., Epley, N., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Social cognition unbound. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 58-62. doi:10.1177/ 0963721409359302
163. Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 383-388. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.006
164. Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of conduct of social conduct. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
165. Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780-784. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x
166. Widen, S. C., & Russell, J. A. (2002). Gender and preschoolers' perception of emotion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 48, 248-262. doi:10.1353/mpq.2002.0013
167. Wright, J. C., & Baril, G. (2011). The role of cognitive resources in determining our moral intuitions: Are we all liberals at heart? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1007-1012. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.014