Political Diversity in Social and Personality Psychology

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 496-503

  Inbar, Yoel ^a   Lammers, Joris ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

conservative; diversity; political ideology; social psychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866056650     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691612448792     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allport G. W.The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1954:.
2. Ball T.,Bellamy R.The Cambridge history of twentieth century political thought. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
3. Cardiff C.,Klein D.Faculty partisan affiliations in all disciplines: A voter-registration study.Critical Review. 2005;17:237-255.
4. Duckitt J.A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2001;33:41-113.
5. Gallup. (2010). In 2010, conservatives still outnumber moderates, liberals. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/141032/2010-conservatives-outnumber-moderates-liberals.aspx.
6. GilbertD. (2011). Comment on "The bright future of post-partisan social psychology."Retrieved from http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/haidt11/haidt11_index.html#gilbert.
7. Gross N.,Fosse E.Why are professors liberal?.Theory and Society. 2012;41:127-168.
8. Haidt J.The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.Psychological Review. 2001;108:814-834.
9. HaidtJ. (2011, January). The bright future of post-partisan social psychology. Talk given at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX. Retrieved from http://people.virginia.edu/~jdh6n/postpartisan.html.
10. Hurwitz J.,Peffley M.How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model.The American Political Science Review. 1987;81:1099-1120.
11. JacquetJ. (2011). Comment on "The bright future of post-partisan social psychology."Retrieved from http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/haidt11/haidt11_index.html#jacquet.
12. Jost J.The end of the end of ideology.American Psychologist. 2006;61:651-670.
13. Jost J.,Glaser J.,Kruglanski A.,Sulloway F.Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.Psychological Bulletin. 2003;129:339-375.
14. Keeter S.,Kennedy C.,Dimock M.,Best J.,Craighill P.Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone Survey.Public Opinion Quarterly. 2006;70:759-779.
15. Keltner D.,Robinson R. J.Extremism, power, and the imagined basis of social conflict.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 1996;5:101-105.
16. Klein D. B.,Stern C.Professors and their politics: The policy views of social scientists.Critical Review. 2005;17:257-303.
17. Lipset S. M.Political man: The social bases of politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1981:.
18. Lord C. G.,Ross L.,Lepper M. R.Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979;37:2098-2109.
19. Mueller C. M.Nurturance and mastery: Competing qualifications for women's access to high public office?.Research in Politics and Society. 1986;2:211-232.
20. Prentice D. A.,Miller D. T.Advances in experimental social psychology. Zanna M. P., ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1996:161-209.
21. Redding R.Sociopolitical diversity in psychology: The case for pluralism.American Psychologist. 2001;56:205-215.
22. Robinson R. J.,Keltner D.,Ward A.,Ross L.Actual versus assumed differences in construal: "Naive realism" in intergroup perception and conflict.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;68:404-417.
23. Rosenwasser S. M.,Seale J.Attitudes toward a hypothetical male or female presidential candidate: A research note.Political Psychology. 1988;9:591-598.
24. 1977
25. Tetlock P.Political psychology or politicized psychology: Is the road to scientific hell paved with good moral intentions?.Political Psychology. 1994;15:509-529.
26. White R. K.Fearful warriors: A psychological profile of U.S.-Soviet relations. New York, NY: Free Press; 1984:.