Task-based oral computer-mediated communication and L2 vocabulary acquisition

CALICO Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 507-531

  Yanguas, Iñigo ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Audio CMC; Audioconference; L2 Vocabulary Learning; Video CMC; Videoconference

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896457021     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11139/cj.29.3.507-531     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 455-464.
2. Beauvois, M. H., & Eledge, J. (1996). Personality types and megabytes: Student attitudes toward computer mediated communication (CMC) in the language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 27-46.
3. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html
4. Blake, R. (2008). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washing-ton, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
5. Blake, R., & Zyzik, E. (2003). Who’s helping whom? Learner/heritage-speakers’ networked discussions in Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 24, 519–544.
6. Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22(1), 17-31.
7. Darhower, M. (2002). Instructional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19, 249-277.
8. De la Fuente, M. (2003). Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effects of com-puter-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learn-ing, 16(1), 47-81.
9. Dörnyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualization of student mo-tivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 519-538.
10. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Doughty, C., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50-80. Availble at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/doughty/
12. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–326.
13. Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in non-native speaker— non-native speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19, 279-294.
14. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and mo-tivation. London: Edward Arnold.
15. Gardner, R. C. (2000). Correlation, causation, motivation, and second language acquisition. Canadian Psychology, 41, 10-24.
16. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266–272.
17. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.
19. Hulstijn, J. H. (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. In P. J. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 113–125). London: MacMillan.
20. Jepson, K. (2005). Conversations — and negotiated interaction — in text and voice chat rooms. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 79-98. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/jepson/default.html
21. Kelm, O. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A pre-liminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441-454.
22. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
23. Lafford, P. A., & Lafford, B. A. (2005). CMC technologies for teaching foreign languages: What’s on the horizon? CALICO Journal, 22(3), 679-710.
24. Lee, L. (1999). Going beyond classroom learning: Acquiring cultural knowledge via on-line newspapers and intercultural exchanges via on-line chatrooms. CALICO Journal, 16(2), 101-118.
25. Lee, L. (2007). Fostering second language oral communication through constructivist interaction in desktop videoconferencing. Foreign Language Annals, 40(4), 635-649.
26. Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
27. Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversations in the second language class-room. In M. A. Clarke & J. Handscombe (Eds.), On TESOL '82 (pp. 207-225). Washington, DC: TESOL.
28. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Di-ego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31-48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2005). Foreign language learning with CMC: Forms of online instructional discourse in a hybrid Russian Class. System, 33(1), 89-105.
31. Osuna, M. M., & Meskill, C. (1998). Using the world wide web to integrate Spanish language and cul-ture: A pilot study. Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 71-92. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num2/article4/default.html
32. Payne, J. S., & Ross, B. (2005). Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency devel-opment. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 34-54. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/payne/default.html
33. Pérez, L. C. (2003). Foreign language productivity in synchronous versus asynchronous computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 89-104.
34. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning condi-tions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
35. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and second language learning (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
36. Sachs, R. & Suh, B. R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction and second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 197-227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Sato, C. (1986). Conversation and interlanguage development: Rethinking the connection. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 2-45). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
38. Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2010). Investigating L2 performance in text chat. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 554-577.
39. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
40. Sengupta, S. (2001). Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain? Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 103-134. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/sengupta/default.html
41. Shekary, M., & Tahririan, M. H.(2006). Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 557-573.
42. Shin, D. (2006). ESL students’ computer-mediated communication practices: Context configuration. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 65-84. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/shin/
43. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 38-57.
44. Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 365–398.
45. Smith, B. (2005). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 647-648.
46. Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Available at http://llt. msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/
47. Swain, M. K. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
48. Swain, M. K. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Crookes & G. Seid-hofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
49. Sykes, J. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 399-431.
50. Toyoda, E. & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 82-99. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/toyoda/
51. Ushida, E. (2005). The role of students’ attitudes and motivation in second language learning in online language courses. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 49-78.
52. Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 69–87. Available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/warner/
53. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.
54. Yanguas, I. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time! Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 72-93.