Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain?

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 103-134

  Sengupta, Sima ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042643731     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism and Popper's world 3. Educational Researcher, 23(7) 21-23.
2. Berge, Z. L., & Collins, M. P. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and the online classroom. Volume I: Overview and perspectives. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
3. Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
4. Braine, G., & Yorozu, M. (1998). Local area network (LAN) computers in ESL and EFL writing classes: Promises and realties. JALT Journal, 20, 47-59.
5. Bruffee, K. A. (1986). Social construction: Language and the authority of knowledge. A bibliographic essay. College English, 48, 773-779.
6. Butt, D., Fahey, R., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (1997). Using functional grammar: An explorer's guide. Sydney: Macquarie University.
7. Candlin, C., & Plum, G. (1999). Engaging with challenges of interdicursivity in academic writing: researchers, students and tutors. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 193-217). Essex, UK: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.
8. Carey, S. (1999). The use of WebCT for a highly interactive virtual graduate seminar. CALL Journal, 12(4), 371-380.
9. Crago, M. B. (1992). Communicative interaction and second language acquisition. An Inuit example, TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 487-506.
10. Curtis, A., & Roskams, T.(1999). Language learning in networked writing labs: A view from Asia. In J. A. Inman & D. N. Sewell (Eds.), Taking flight with OWLs: Examining electronic writing center work (pp. 29-39). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Davis, B., & Thiede, R. (2000). Writing into change: Style shifting in asynchronous electronic discourse. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Networked-based Language Teaching: concepts and practice (pp. 87-120). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (1994). Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 484-496.
13. Dornyei, Z. (1995). On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1) 55-86.
14. Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (1997). Casual conversation. London: Cassell.
15. Evans, T., & Nation, D. (Eds.). (2000). Changing university teaching. London: Kogan Page.
16. Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method. London: Rutledge.
17. Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. New York: Academic Press.
18. Goldstein, L. M., & Conrad, S. M. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences, TESOL Quarterly, 24(3), 443-460.
19. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93-116.
20. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
21. Hartman, K., Neuwirth, C., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Cochran, C., Palmquist, M., & Zubrow, D. (1991). Patterns of social interaction and learning to write: Some effects of network technologies. Written Communication, 8, 19-113.
22. Hasan, R., & Williams, G. (1996). Introduction. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. xi-xxi). New York: Longman.
23. Johnson, D. M. (1992). Compliments and politeness in peer-review texts, Applied Linguistics. 13(1), 50-71.
24. Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1998). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Kern, R., & Warshauer, M. (2000). Introduction: Theory and practice in network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Networked-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Keeves, J. P., & Lakomski, G. (Eds.). (1999). Issues in educational research. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
27. Kivela, R. (1996). Working on networked computers: Effects on ESL writer attitude and comprehension. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 6, 85-93.
28. Kress, G. R. & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: A grammar of visual design. London: Routeledge.
29. Kress, G. R. & van Leeuwen, T. (1997). The multi-modal text. London: Edward Arnold.
30. Lamy, M. N., & Goodfellow, R. (1999). "Reflective conversation" in the virtual language classroom. Language Learning & Technology. 2(2), 43-61. Retrieved October 7, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/article2/index.html.
31. Lantoff, J. P., & Appel, G. (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32. Laurillard, D. (2000). New technologies, students and the curriculum: The impact of communication and information technology on higher education. In P. Scott (Ed.), Higher education re-formed (133-153). London: Falmer Press.
33. Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routeledge.
34. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (Eds.). (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1999). Writing as academic literacies: Understanding textual practices in higher education. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 62-81). Essex, UK: Addison Wesley Longman.
36. Mabrito, M. (1991). Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response: Conversations of highand low-apprehensive writers. Written Communication, 8, 509-532.
37. Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), 113-131.
38. Nelson, G. L. (1997). How cultural differences affect written and oral communication. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 70, 77-84.
39. Norton, B. (1997). Language, identity, and the ownership of English, TESOL Quarterly, 13(3), 409-431.
40. Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82-93. Retrieved October 7, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/ortega/default.html.
41. Pathey-Chavez, G. G., & Ferris, D. (1997). Writing conferences and the weaving of multivoiced texts in college composition. Research in the teaching of English, 31(1) 51-90.
42. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Networked-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
44. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
46. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1995). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
47. Sengupta, S. (1999). Rhetorical consciousness raising in the L2 reading classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3) 291-319.
48. Shetzer, H., & Warschauer, M. (2000). An electronic literacy approach to network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 171-185). New York: CUP.
49. Sinclair, J. McH., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Longman.
50. Spack, R. (1997). The rhetorical construction of multilingual students. TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), 765-774.
51. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
52. Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29(4), 491-501.
53. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
55. Trias, V. J. (1997). Democracy or difference: A literature review of gender differences in online communication. Philadelphia: Temple University. Retrieved October 17, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://nimbus.temple.edu/~jvaughn/papers/litrev.html
56. Tsui, A. B. M. (1994). English conversation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57. Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1997a). Discourse as structure and process. Discourse studies 1: A multidisciplinary introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
58. Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1997b). Discourse as social interaction. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction 2. Hillsdale NJ: Earlbaum.
59. Villamil, O. S., & De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Socialcognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 51-75.
60. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26.
62. Warschauer, M. (1997). A sociocultural approach to literacy and its significance for CALL. In K. Murphy-Judy & R. Sanders (Eds.), Nexus: The convergence of research & teaching through new information technologies (pp. 88-97). Durham: University of North Carolina.
63. Warschauer, M. (1998). Online learning in sociocultural context. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 29(1), 68-88.
64. Warschauer, M. (2000). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65. Warschauer, M., & Lepeintre, S. (1997). Freire's dream on Foucault's nightmare? Teacherstudent relations on an international computer network. In R. Debski, J. Gassin, & M. Smith (Eds.), Language learning through social computing: Applied Linguistics of Australia Occasional Papers Number 16 (pp. 67-89). Parkville, Australia: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.
66. Warschauer, M., Turbee, L., & Roberts, B. (1996). Computer learning networks and student empowerment. System, 24, 1-14.
67. Wells, G. (1994). The complimentary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a "language-based theory of learning." Linguistics and Education, 6, 41-90.
68. Woods, E. (1995). Introducing grammar. London: Penguin.
69. Yip, V. (1994). Grammatical consciousness-raising and learnability. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 123-139). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70. Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class, Journal of second Language Writing, 4(3), 209-222.
71. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.