Educational innovations beyond technology: Nurturing leadership and establishing learning organizations

Educational Innovations Beyond Technology: Nurturing Leadership and Establishing Learning Organizations

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-243

  Law, Nancy ^a   Yuen, Allan ^a   Fox, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895262135     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-71148-5     Document Type: Book

References (192)

1. Adelman, C., Jenkins, D., & Kemmis, S. (Eds.). (1983). Rethinking case study: Notes from the Second Cambridge Conference. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
2. Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (2003). On sustainability of project innovations as systemic change. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14(1), 1-25.
3. Alexander, R. J. (2000). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Anderson, G. L. (1998). Toward authentic participation: Deconstructing the discourses of participatory reform in education. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 571-603.
5. Anderson, R. E., & Plomp, T. (2008). National contexts. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp. 37-66). Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
6. APEC Education Foundation. (2009). White paper on APEC Education Foundation 1997-2008. Seoul, Korea: APEC Education Foundation.
7. Applegate, L. M., McFarlan, F. W., & McKenney, J. L. (1999). Corporate information systems management. Irwin: McGraw-Hill.
8. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
9. Atkin, J. M. (1998). The OECD study of innovation in science, mathematics, and technology education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(6), 647-660.
10. Banathy, B. H. (1991). Systems design of education: A journey to create the future. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
11. Banathy, B. H. (1994). Designing educational systems: Creating our future in a changing world. In C. M. Reigeluth & R. J. Garfinkle (Eds.), Systemic change in education (pp. 27-34). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
12. Banathy, B. H., & Jenlink, P. M. (2004). Systems inquiry and its application in education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 37-57). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Barnett, H. (1953). Innovation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Bar-Yam, Y. (2002). Complexity rising: From human beings to human civilization, a complexity profile. In Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Oxford, UK: UNESCO, EOLSS.
15. Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing technological change: Strategies for college and university leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Bennett, C. K. (1996). Schools, technology, and educational leadership: A framework for change. NASSP Bulletin, 80(577), 57-65.
17. Black, H. C. (1979). Case law: Black's law dictionary (5th ed.). St Paul: West Publishing.
18. Black, P., & Atkin, J. M. (Eds.). (1996). Changing the subject: Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. London: Routledge and OECD.
19. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149-164.
20. Bransford, J., Slowinski, M., Vye, N., & Mosborg, S. (2008). The learning sciences, technology and designs for educational systems: Some thoughts about change. In J. Visser & M. Visser-Valfrey (Eds.), Learners in a changing learning landscape: Reflections from a dialogue on new roles and expectations (pp. 37-67). London: Springer.
21. Cash, J. I., & McLeod, P. L. (1985). Managing the introduction of information systems technology in strategically dependent companies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1(4), 5-23.
22. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
23. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
24. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Crainer, S. (1998). Key management ideas (3rd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
26. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
27. Davis, N. (2008). How may teacher learning be promoted for educational renewal with IT? In J. M. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.
28. Department of Education, Queensland (1995a). Guidelines for the Use of Computers in Learning. Queensland: Publishing Services for Studies Directorate.
29. Department of Education, Queensland (1995b). Computers in Learning-Policy. Queensland: Publishing Services for Studies Directorate.
30. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2003). Building schools for the future: Consultation on a new approach to capital investment. Retrieved from www.teachernet.gov.uk/-doc/3611/Building%20schools%20for%20the%20future.pdf
31. Dill, D. D., & Friedman, C. P. (1979). An analysis of frameworks for innovation and change in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 49(3), 411-435.
32. Drucker, P. (1994). Post-capitalist society. New York: HarperCollins.
33. Edwards, P., Fox, R., & Phillips, R. (1997). Microbiology project case study. In R. Phillips (Ed.), The developer's handbook to interactive multimedia (pp. 157-175). London: Kogan Page.
34. Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Boston: Harvard Education Press.
35. Ely, D. P. (1990). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(2), 298-305.
36. EMB (Education and Manpower Bureau HKSAR). (1998). Information technology for learning in a new era: Five-year strategy 1998/99 to 2002/03. Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManager/EN/Content-2309/ five%20year%20strategy%2099%20to%2003.zip
37. EMB (Education and Manpower Bureau HKSAR). (2001). Learning to learn: The way forward in curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/index. aspx?langno=1&nodeID=2877
38. EMB (Education and Manpower Bureau HKSAR). (2004). Empowering learning and teaching with information technology. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/ index.aspx?langno=1&nodeID=2497
39. Engeström, Y. (2005). Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (2nd ed., pp. 157-176). Hove: Routledge.
40. Erstad, O. (2008). Changing assessment practices and the role of IT. In J. M. Voogt & G. A. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 181-194). New York: Springer.
41. European Round Table of Industrialists. (1997). Investing in knowledge: The integration of technology in European education. Brussels: European Round Table of Industrialists.
42. Evans, P. (1995). Hathaway on CD: An interactive multimedia case study of a school. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne95/ smtu/papers/evans.pdf
43. Fenstermacher, G. D., & Soltis, J. F. (2004). Approaches to teaching (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
44. Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, A. L. (1985). Organizational learning. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813.
45. Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43-76.
46. Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 124-142.
47. Fullan, M. (1992). Successful school improvement: The implementation perspective and beyond. London: Open University Press.
48. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depth of educational reform. London: Falmer.
49. Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer.
50. Fullan, M. (2000). The three stories of education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(8), 581-584.
51. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
53. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
54. Fullan, M., Cuttress, C., & Kilcher, A. (2005). Forces for leaders of change. Journal of Staff Development, 26(4), 54-58.
55. Fullan, M., Hill, P., & Crévola, C. (2006). Breakthrough. Toronto: Ontario Principals' Council.
56. Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
57. Goodman, J. (1994). External change agents and grassroots school reform: Reflections from the field. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 9(2), 113-135.
58. Graetz, F. (2000). Strategic change leadership. Management Decision, 38(8), 550-562.
59. Gregorio, L. C., & Byron, I. (2001). Capacity-building for curriculum specialists in East and South-east Asia: Final report of the training seminar. Bangkok: Thai Ministry of Education.
60. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood, P. Hallinger, K. Seashore-Louis, G. Furman-Brown, P. Gronn, W. Mulford, & K. Riley (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 697-734). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
61. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1988). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191.
62. Halverson, R., & Collins, A. (2006). Information technologies and the future of schooling in the United States. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 145-156.
63. Hannan, A., English, S., & Silver, H. (1999). Why innovate? Some preliminary findings from a research project on Innovations in teaching and learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 279-289.
64. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
65. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2004). Seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 8-13.
66. Hargreaves, A., & Giles, C. (2003). The knowledge society school: An endangered entity. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity (pp. 98-124). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
67. Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3.
68. Harris, A., & Chapman, C. (2002). Democratic leadership for school improvement in challenging contexts. Paper presented at the the International Congress on School Effectiveness and Improvement, Copenhagen, Denmark.
69. Hendricks-Lee, M. S., Soled, S. W., & Yinger, R. J. (1995). Focus on research sustaining reform through teacher learning. Language Arts, 72(4), 288-292.
70. Herried, CF. (2004). the Case Study: Can Case Studies Be Used to Teach Critical Thinking? Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(6), 12-15
71. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., & Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study (No. NCES 2003-013). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
72. Hill, P., & Crévola, C. (2003). Organizational learning. In B. Davis & J. West-Burnham (Eds.), Handbook of educational leadership and management (pp. 394-403). London: Pearson Education.
73. Hopkins, D. (2001). School improvement for real. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
74. Hopkins, D., & Levin, B. (2000). Government policy and school development. School Leadership and Management, 20(1), 15-30.
75. Hutchins, C. L. (1994). State systems of education and systemic change. In C. M. Reigeluth & R. J. Garfinkle (Eds.), Systemic change in education (pp. 15-25). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
76. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (1998). National educational technology standards for students. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
77. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). National educational technology standards for students (2nd ed.). Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
78. Istance, D. (2008). Directions for schooling and educational innovation from recent OECD analyses. Paper presented at the Slovenian Presidency Conference on Promoting Innovation and Creativity: Schools' Response to the Challenges of Future Societies, Brdo, Slovenia, 8-10 April. Retrieved from http://www.mss.gov.si/en/zakonodaja-in-dokumenti/events/conference-promoting- innovation-and-creativity/
79. Jackson, B., & Kelley, C. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 192.
80. James, C., & Connolly, U. (2000). Effective change in schools. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
81. Johnston, C., & Caldwell, B. (2001). Leadership and organisational learning in the quest for world class schools. The International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 94-101.
82. Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2000). Models of teaching (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
83. Karsten, S., Voncken, E., & Voorthuis, M. (2000). Dutch primary schools and concept of the learning organization. The Learning Organization, 7(3), 145-155.
84. Kearsley, G., & Lynch, W. (1992). Educational leadership in the age of technology: The new skills. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25(1), 50-60.
85. Kezar, A. J. (2001). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century: Recent research and conceptualizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
86. King, N., & Anderson, N. (1995). Innovation and change in organizations. New York: Routledge.
87. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computer Research, 32(2), 131-152.
88. Kozma, R. (Ed.). (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
89. Kozma, R. (2005). ICT, education reform, and economic growth: A white paper. San Francisco, CA: Intel Corporation. Retrieved from http://download. intel.com/education/wsis/ICT-Education-Reform-Economic-Growth.pdf
90. Kozma, R. (2008). ICT, education reform, and economic growth: A conceptual framework. San Francisco, CA: Intel Corporation. http://download. intel.com/education/EvidenceOfImpact/Kozma-ICT-Framework.pdf
91. Kramer, R. (2007). Leading change through action learning. Public Manager, 36(3), 38-44.
92. Larsson, P., Löwstedt, J., & Shani, A. B. (2001). IT and the learning organization: Exploring the myths of change. Organizational Development Journal, 19(1), 73-91.
93. Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (1998). Management information systems: New approaches to organization and technology. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
94. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95. Law, N. (2003). Innovative classroom practices and the teacher of the future. In C. Dowling & K. W. Lai (Eds.), Information and communication technology and the teacher of the future (pp. 171-182). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
96. Law, N. (2004). Teachers and teaching innovations in a connected world. In A. Brown & N. Davis (Eds.), Digital technology, communities and education (pp. 145-163). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
97. Law, N. (2008). Technology-supported pedagogical innovations: The challenge of sustainability and transferability in the information age. In C. H. Ng & P. Renshaw (Eds.), Reforming learning: Issues, concepts and practices in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 319-344). Dordrecht: Springer.
98. Law, N., & Chow, A. (2008a). Teacher characteristics, contextual factors, and how these affect the pedagogical use of ICT. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp. 181-219). Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
99. Law, N., & Chow, A. (2008b). Pedagogical orientations in mathematics and science and the use of ICT. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp. 121-179). Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
100. Law, N., Chow, A., & Yuen, H. K. (2004). Methodological approaches to comparing pedagogical innovations using technology. Paper presented at the First IEA International Research Conference, Lefkosia, Cyprus.
101. Law, N., Kankaanranta, M., & Chow, A. (2005). Technology-supported educational innovations in Finland and Hong Kong: A tale of two systems. Human Technology, 1(2), 176-201.
102. Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
103. Law, N., Yuen, A., & Chow, A. (2003). SITES-Module 2 Hong Kong Study Centre secondary analysis. Hong Kong: Centre for Information Technology in Education, University of Hong Kong.
104. Law, N., Yuen, H. K., Ki, W. W., Li, S. C., Lee, Y., & Chow, Y. (Eds.). (2000). Changing classrooms and changing schools: A study of good practices in using ICT in Hong Kong schools. Hong Kong: Centre for Information Technology in Education, University of Hong Kong.
105. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. London: Open University Press.
106. Lemke, J., & Sabelli, N. (2008). Complex systems and educational change: Towards a new research agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 118-129.
107. Leskes, A., Grogan, W. R., Canham, R. P., & O'Brien, J. (2003). Designing institutional change. Liberal Education, 89(1), 32-41.
108. Lorange, P. (1996). A business school as a learning organization. The Learning Organization, 3(5), 5-12.
109. Louis, K. S. (2006). Organizing for school change. London: Taylor and Francis.
110. Lueddeke, G. R. (1999). Toward a constructivist framework for guiding change and innovation in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 70(3), 235-260.
111. Marsick, V. J., & O'Neil, J. (1999). The many faces of action learning. Management Learning, 30(2), 159-176.
112. McDade, S. A. (1995). Case study pedagogy to advance critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 9-10.
113. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
114. Merseth, K. (1991). Supporting beginning teachers with computer networks. Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 140-147.
115. Michigan Institute of Technology Sloan Management. (2004). Distibuted leadership model. Retrieved from http://sloanleadership.mit.edu/index.php
116. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
117. Milligan, G. W. (1980). An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrika, 45, 325-342.
118. Milligan, G. W. (1981). A review of Monte Carlo tests of cluster analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 379-407.
119. Mioduser, D., Nachimias, R., Tubin, D., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2003). Analysis schema for the study of domains and levels of pedagogical innovation in schools using ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 8(1), 23-36.
120. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054.
121. Mooij, T., & Smeets, E. (2001). Modelling and supporting ICT implementation in secondary schools. Computers & Education, 36(3), 265-281.
122. Morey, L. C., Blashfield, R. K., & Skinner, H. A. (1983). A comparison of cluster analysis techniques within a sequential validation framework. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 309-329.
123. Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 9(3), 319-342.
124. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
125. Oakes, J., Quartz, K., Ryan, S., & Lipton, M. (2002). Becoming good American schools: The struggle for civic virtue in education reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
126. Oblinger, D., & Hawkins, B. (2006). The myth about no significant difference: Using technology produces no significant difference. Educause Review, 41(6), 14-15.
127. Olson, J. (2002). Systemic change/teacher tradition: Legends of reform continue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(2), 129-137.
128. Owston, R. D. (2003). School context, sustainability and transferability of innovation. In R. B. Kozma (Ed.), Technology, innovation and educational change: A global perspective (pp. 125-161). Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
129. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2003). Learning for the 21st century: A report and MILE guide for 21st century skills. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/downloads/P21-Report.pdf
130. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). The intellectual and policy foundations of the 21st century skills framework. Tucson: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
131. Pelgrum, W. J., & Anderson, R. E. (Eds.). (1999). ICT and the emerging paradigm for life long learning: A worldwide educational assessment of infrastructure, goals and practices. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement and The University of Twente.
132. Pelgrum, W. J., & Law, N. (2003). ICT in education around the world: Trends, problems and prospects. Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.
133. Pierson, M. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-430.
134. Plomp, T., Anderson, R. E., Law, N., & Quale, A. (Eds.). (2003). Cross-national information and communication technology policy and practices in education. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
135. Plomp, T., Anderson, R. E., Law, N., & Quale, A. (Eds.). (2009). Cross-national information and communication technology policies and practices in education (2nd ed.). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
136. Plomp, T., ten Brummelhuis, A., & Rapmund, R. (Eds.). (1996). Teaching and learning for the future. Den Haag: Committee on Multimedia in Teacher Training, Dutch Ministry of Education.
137. Reigeluth, C. M., & Garfinkle, R. J. (Eds.). (1994). Systemic change in education. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
138. Richardson, B. (1994). Towards a comprehensive view of the case method in management development. Industrial and Commercial Training, 26(9), 3-10.
139. Riel, M. (1998). Teaching and learning in the educational communities of the future. In C. Dede (Ed.), Learning with technology: ASCD yearbook 1998. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
140. Robitaille, D. F., & Garden, R. A. (Eds.). (1996). TIMSS monograph No 2: Research questions & study design. Vancouver: Pacific Education Press.
141. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
142. Russell, T. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Raleigh: North Carolina State University. Russell, T. L. (n.d.). No significant difference phenomenon. Retrieved from http://nosignificantdifference.wcet.info/ about.asp
143. Schlossman, S. R., Gleeson, M., Sedlak, D., & Grayson, A. (1994). The beginnings of graduate education in the United States. Santa Monica: Graduate Management Admission Council.
144. Scoter, J. V. (2008). The potential of IT to foster literacy development in kindergarten. In J. M. Voogt & G. A. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 149-162). New York: Springer.
145. Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS). (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington: SCANS, US Department of Labor.
146. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and science of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
147. Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Doubleday.
148. Senge, P., & Käufer, K. H. (2000). Communities of leaders or no leadership at all. In S. Chowdhury (Ed.), Management 21C (pp. 186-204). London: Prentice Hall.
149. Seperich, G. J., Woolverton, M. J., Beierlein, J. G., & Hahn, D. E. (Eds.). (1996). Cases in agribusiness management (2nd ed.). Scottsdale: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
150. Sergiovanni, T. (2001). Leadership: What's in it for schools? London: RoutledgeFalmer.
151. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
152. Singapore Ministry of Education. (1997). Masterplan for IT in education. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/edumall/mpite/index.html
153. Singapore Ministry of Education. (2002). Masterplan for IT in education. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/edumall/mp2/mp2.htm
154. Smith, L. M. (Ed.). (1978). An evolving logic of participant observation: Educational ethnography and other case studies. Itasca: Peacock.
155. Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass.
156. Spillane, J., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34.
157. Spratt, C., Palmer, S., & Coldwell, J. (2000). Using technologies in teaching: An initiative in academic staff development. Educational Technology and Society, 3(3), 455-461.
158. Stake, R. (1981). Case study methodology: An epistemological advocacy. Paper presented at the Minnesota Evaluation Conference, Minneapolis.
159. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
160. Stein, M., & Coburn, C. (2008). Architectures for learning: A comparative analysis of two urban school districts. American Journal of Education, 114(4), 583-626.
161. Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: Methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan and the United States (research and development report). Washington: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
162. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
163. Sudzina, M. R. (1997). Case study as a constructivist pedagogy for teaching educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 9(2), 199-217.
164. Suharwoto, G. (2006). Developing and implementing a technology pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for teaching mathematics with technology. In C. M. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (pp. 3824-3828). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
165. Tarragó, F. R. (2009). National policies and practices on ICT in education: Catalonia, Spain. In T. Plomp, R. E. Anderson, N. Law, & A. Quale (Eds.), Cross-national information and communication technology policy and practices in education (2nd ed., pp. 135-152). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
166. Taylor, P. G. (1998). Institutional change in uncertain times: Lone ranging is not enough. Studies in Higher Education, 23(3), 269-279.
167. Taylor, L., Nelson, P., & Adelman, H. (1999). Scaling-up reforms across a school district. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15, 303-325.
168. Telem, M. (1996). MIS implementation in schools: A systems socio-technical framework. Computers & Education, 27(2), 85-93.
169. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge: Harvard Educational Press.
170. UNESCO. (2003). Building the capacities of curriculum specialists for educational reform. Final report of the regional seminar held in Vientiane, Lao PDR on 9-13 September 2002. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok.
171. UNESCO. (2008). UNESCO's ICT competency standards for teachers: Towards ICT skills for teachers. Retrieved from http://cst.unesco-ci.org/sites/projects/ cst/default.aspx
172. Venezky, R. L., & Davis, C. (2002). Quo vademus? The transformation of schooling in a networked world. Paris: OECD and CERI.
173. Voogt, J. M., & Knezek, G. A. (Eds.). (2008). International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.
174. Voogt, J. M., & Odenthal, L. E. (1998). Emergent practices geportretteerd: Conceptueel raamwerk [Portraits of emergent practices: Conceptual framework]. Enschede: University of Twente.
175. Walker, R. (2002). Case study, case records and multimedia. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(1), 109-127.
176. Wallace, M. (2002). Modelling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: Primary school senior management teams in England and Wales. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(2), 163-186.
177. Wassermann, S. (1994). Introduction to case method teaching: A guide to the galaxy. New York: Teachers College Press.
178. Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
179. Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
180. Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (Eds.). (1996). In action: Creating the learning organization. Alexandria: ASTD.
181. Webb, M. (2008). Impact of IT on science education. In J. M. Voogt & G. A. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 133-148). New York: Springer.
182. Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235-286.
183. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 1-5.
184. West, M. (2000). Supporting school improvement: Observations on the inside, reflections from the outside. School Leadership and Management, 20(1), 43-60.
185. Wheatley, M. J. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
186. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
187. Yin, R. (2003). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
188. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
189. Yuen, H. K., Fox, B., & Law, N. (2004). Curriculum innovations and multi-level e-leadership requirements: Putting research into practice. Asia-Pacific Cybereducation Journal, 1(1), 11-18.
190. Yuen, H. K., Law, N., & Wong, K. C. (2003). ICT implementation and school leadership: Case studies of ICT integration in teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 158-170.
191. Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
192. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807-840.