Testing for coevolutionary diversification: Linking pattern with process

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 82-89

  Althoff, David M ^a   Segraves, Kari A ^a   Johnson, Marc T J ^b  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Divergent selection; Macroevolution; Microevolution; Reproductive isolation; Speciation; Species interactions

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; EVOLUTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SELECTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

HEXAPODA;

ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; COEVOLUTION; DIVERGENT SELECTION; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SELECTION; INSECT; MACROEVOLUTION; MICROEVOLUTION; PLANT; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SPECIES INTERACTIONS;

COEVOLUTION; DIVERGENT SELECTION; MACROEVOLUTION; MICROEVOLUTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION; SPECIES INTERACTIONS;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SPECIATION; INSECTS; PLANTS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 84892974151     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.11.003     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Darwin C.R. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life 1859, John Murray Publishing.
2. Darwin C.R. On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids are Fertilised by Insects, and on the Good Effects of Intercrossing 1862, John Murray Publishing.
3. Ehrlich P.R., Raven P.H. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 1964, 18:586-608.
4. Janzen D.H. When is it coevolutionα. Evolution 1980, 34:611-612.
5. Brockhurst M.A., Koskella B. Experimental coevolution of species interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28:367-375.
6. Thompson J.N. Interaction and Coevolution 1982, John Wiley & Sons.
7. Thompson J.N. The Coevolutionary Process 1994, University of Chicago Press.
8. Thompson J.N. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution 2005, University of Chicago Press.
9. Janz N. Ehrlich and Raven revisited: mechanisms underlying codiversification of plants and enemies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2011, 42:71-89.
10. Berenbaum M. Coumarins and caterpillars: a case for coevolution. Evolution 1983, 37:163-179.
11. Cruaud A., et al. An extreme case of plant-insect codiversification: figs and fig-pollinating wasps. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:1029-1047.
12. Becerra J.X. Synchronous coadaptation in an ancient case of herbivory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:12804-12807.
13. Kato M., et al. An obligate pollination mutualism and reciprocal diversification in the tree genus Glochidion (Euphorbiaceae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:5264-5267.
14. Bucheli S.R., et al. A phylogenetic test of Ehrlich and Raven's theory of escape and radiation in insects that feed on toxic plants, based on nearctic Depressaria moths (Gelechioidea: Elachistidae: Depressariinae), with discussion of the evolution of genitalia. Entomol. Am. 2010, 116:1-24.
15. Grimaldi D. The co-radiations of pollinating insects and angiosperms in the Cretaceous. Ann. Mo. Botanical Garden 1999, 86:373-406.
16. Hu S., et al. Early steps of angiosperm pollinator coevolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:240-245.
17. Winkler I.S., Mitter C. The phylogenetic dimension of insect-plant interactions: a review of recent studies. Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: the Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects 2008, 240-263. University of California Press. K.J. Tilmon (Ed.).
18. Segraves K.A. Branching out with coevolutionary trees. Evol. Educ. Outreach 2010, 3:62-70.
19. Ricklefs R.E. Evolutionary diversification, coevolution between populations and their antagonists, and the filling of niche space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:1265-1272.
20. de Vienne D.M., et al. Cospeciation vs host-shift speciation: methods for testing, evidence from natural associations and relation to coevolution. New Phytol. 2013, 198:347-385.
21. Farrell B.D., Mitter C. The timing of insect/plant diversification: might Tetraopes (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae) have co-evolvedα. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1998, 63:553-577.
22. Futuyma D.J., Agrawal A.A. Macroevolution and the biological diversity of plants and herbivores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:18054-18061.
23. Wheat C.W., et al. The genetic basis of a plant-insect coevolutionary key innovation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:20427-20431.
24. Fordyce J.A. Host shifts and evolutionary radiations of butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 277:3735-3743.
25. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Speciation 2004, Sinauer Associates.
26. Weber M.G., Agrawal A.A. Phylogeny, ecology, and the coupling of comparative and experimental approaches. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:394-403.
27. Rundle H.D., Nosil P. Ecological speciation. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:336-352.
28. Matsubayashi K.W., et al. Ecological speciation in phytophagous insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2010, 134:1-27.
29. Nosil P. Ecological Speciation 2012, Oxford University Press.
30. Nuismer S.L., et al. Coevolutionary clines across selection mosaics. Evolution 2000, 54:1102-1105.
31. Nuismer S.L., et al. Gene flow and geographically structured coevolution. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 1999, 266:605-609.
32. Thrall P.H., et al. Rapid genetic change underpins antagonistic coevolution in a natural host-pathogen metapopulation. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15:425-435.
33. Gomez J.M., et al. A geographic selection mosaic in a generalized plant-pollinator-herbivore system. Ecol. Monogr. 2009, 79:245-263.
34. Brodie E.D., Ridenhour B.J. The evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: hotspots and coldspots in the geographic mosaic of coevolution between garter snakes and newts. Evolution 2002, 56:2067-2082.
35. Laine A.L. Role of coevolution in generating biological diversity: spatially divergent selection trajectories. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:2957-2970.
36. Toju H. Weevils and camellias in a Darwin's race: model system for the study of eco-evolutionary interactions between species. Ecol. Res. 2011, 26:239-251.
37. Bolnick D.I., Doebeli M. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 2003, 57:2433-2449.
38. Doebeli M., Dieckmann U. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am. Nat. 2000, 156:S77-S101.
39. Kopp M., Gavrilets S. Multilocus genetics and the coevolution of quantitative traits. Evolution 2006, 60:1321-1336.
40. Nuismer S.L., et al. The coevolutionary dynamics of antagonistic interactions mediated by quantitative traits with evolving variances. Evolution 2005, 59:2073-2082.
41. Zhang F., et al. Adaptive divergence in Darwin's race: how coevolution can generate trait diversity in a pollination system. Evolution 2013, 67:548-560.
42. Blount Z.D., et al. Genomic analysis of a key innovation in an experimental Escherichia coli population. Nature 2012, 489:513-518.
43. Lawrence D., et al. Species interactions alter evolutionary responses to a novel environment. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10:e1001330.
44. Kiester A.R., et al. Models of coevolution and speciation in plants and their pollinators. Am. Nat. 1984, 124:220-243.
45. Yoder J.B., Nuismer S.L. When does coevolution promote diversificationα. Am. Nat. 2010, 176:802-817.
46. Servedio M.R., et al. Magic traits in speciation: 'magic' but not rareα. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:389-397.
47. Bird C.E., et al. Sympatric speciation in the post 'Modern Synthesis' era of evolutionary biology. Evol. Biol. 2012, 39:158-180.
48. Merrill R.M., et al. Disruptive ecological selection on a mating cue. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 279:4907-4913.
49. Snowberg L.K., Benkman C.W. Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:762-769.
50. Gianluppi V., et al. Why do larvae of Utetheisa ornatrix penetrate and feed on pods of Crotalaria speciesα Larval performance vs. chemical and physical constraints. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2006, 121:23-29.
51. Iyengar V.K., Eisner T. Female choice increases offspring fitness in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:15013-15016.
52. Cogni R., et al. Varying herbivore population structure correlates with lack of local adaptation in a geographic variable plant-herbivore interaction. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e29220.
53. Doebeli M. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits. J. Evol. Biol. 2005, 18:1587-1600.
54. Burger R., et al. The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition. Evolution 2006, 60:2185-2206.
55. Nuismer S.L., et al. When do host-parasite interactions drive the evolution of non-random matingα. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:937-946.
56. Howard R.S., Lively C.M. Opposites attractα Mate choice for parasite evasion and the evolutionary stability of sex. J. Evol. Biol. 2003, 16:681-689.
57. Gandon S., Nuismer Scott L. Interactions between genetic drift, gene flow, and selection mosaics drive parasite local adaptation. Am. Nat. 2009, 173:212-224.
58. Moe A.M., Weiblen G.D. Molecular divergence in allopatric Ceratosolen (Agaonidae) pollinators of geographically widespread Ficus (Moraceae) species. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2010, 103:1025-1037.
59. Garant D., et al. The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21:434-443.
60. Smith J.W., Benkman C.W. A coevolutionary arms race causes ecological speciation in crossbills. Am. Nat. 2007, 169:455-465.
61. Thompson J.N., Cunningham B.M. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 2002, 417:735-738.
62. Blanquart F., et al. The effects of migration and drift on local adaptation to a heterogeneous environment. J. Evol. Biol. 2012, 25:1351-1363.
63. Fine P.V.A., et al. Insect herbivores, chemical innovation, and the evolution of habitat specialization in Amazonian trees. Ecology 2013, 94:1764-1775.
64. Becerra J.X., Venable D.L. Macroevolution of insect-plant associations: the revelance of host biogeography to host affiliation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:12626-12631.
65. Sonderby I.E., et al. Biosynthesis of glucosinolates: gene discovery and beyond. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15:283-290.
66. Hermann K., et al. Tight genetic linkage of prezygotic barrier loci creates a mutltifunctional speciation island in Petunia. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:873-877.
67. Hopkins R., Rausher M.D. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower color allele drives reinforcement. Science 2012, 335:1090-1092.
68. Nuismer S.L., et al. When is correlation coevolutionα. Am. Nat. 2010, 175:525-537.
69. Gomulkiewicz R., et al. Dos and don'ts of testing the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. Heredity 2007, 98:249-258.
70. Herron M.D., Doebeli M. Parallel evolutionary dynamics of adaptive diversification in Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11:e1001490.
71. Anderson B., Johnson S.D. Geographical covariation and local convergence of flower depth in a guild of fly-pollinated plants. New Phytol. 2009, 182:533-540.
72. Kawecki T.J., Ebert D. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:1225-1241.
73. Nuismer S.L., Gandon S. Moving beyond common-garden and transplant designs: insight into the causes of local adaptation in species interactions. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:658-668.
74. Blanquart F., et al. A practical guide to measuring local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16:1195-1205.
75. Thompson J.N., et al. Diversification through multitrait evolution in a coevolving interaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:11487-11492.
76. Anderson B., et al. Evolution and coexistence of pollination ecotypes in an African Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Evolution 2010, 64:960-972.
77. Fine P.V., et al. Herbivores promote habitat specialization by trees in Amazonian forests. Science 2004, 305:663-665.
78. Angert A.L., et al. Using experimental evolution to investigate geographic range limits in monkeyflowers. Evolution 2008, 62:2660-2675.
79. Smith C.I., et al. Host specificity and reproductive success of yucca moths (Tegeticula spp. Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae) mirror patterns of gene flow between host plant varieties of the Joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia: Agavaceae). Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:5218-5229.
80. Lankau R.A., Strauss S.Y. Community complexity drives patterns of natural selection on a chemical defense of Brassica nigra. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:150-161.
81. Smith D.L., et al. Co-evolutionary hot and cold spots of selective pressure move in space and time. J. Ecol. 2011, 99:634-641.
82. Anderson B. Inferring evolutionary patterns from the biogeographical distributions of mutualists and exploiters. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2006, 89:541-549.
83. Anderson B., et al. Comparative population genetic structures and local adaptation of two mutualists. Evolution 2004, 58:1730-1747.
84. Althoff D., Pellmyr O. Examining genetic structure in the bogus yucca moth: a sequential approach to phylogeography. Evolution 2002, 56:1632-1643.
85. Maddison W.P., et al. Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:701-710.
86. FitzJohn R.G. Quantitative traits and diversification. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:619-633.
87. Fischer H.M., et al. Evolutionary origins of a novel host plant detoxification gene in butterflies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:809-820.
88. Ridenhour B.J. Identification of selective sources: partitioning selection based on interactions. Am. Nat. 2005, 166:12-25.
89. Martins E.P. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15:296-299.
90. Paradis E. Statistical analysis of diversification with species traits. Evolution 2005, 59:1-12.
91. Paradis E. Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution with R 2012, Springer.
92. Litsios G., et al. Mutualism with sea anemones triggered the adaptive radiation of clownfishes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2012, 12:212.
93. Lankau R.A., et al. Evolutionary limits ameliorate the negative impact of an invasive plant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:15362-15367.
94. Stanton-Geddes J., Anderson C.G. Does a facultative mutualism limit species range expansionα. Oecologia 2011, 167:149-155.
95. Joy J.B. Symbiosis catalyses niche expansion and diversification. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2013, 280:20122820.
96. Benkman C.W. Adaptation to single resources and the evolution of crossbill (Loxia) diversity. Ecol. Monogr. 1993, 63:305-325.
97. Benkman C.W. The impact of tree squirrels (Tamiasciurus) on limber pine seed dispersal adaptations. Evolution 1995, 49:585-592.
98. Benkman C.W. The selection mosaic and diversifying coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine. Am. Nat. 1999, 155:s75-s91.
99. Benkman C.W., et al. Patterns of coevolution in the adaptive radiation of crossbills. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010, 1206:1-16.
100. Parchman T.L., Benkman C.W. Diversifying coevolution between crossbills and black spruce on Newfoundland. Evolution 2002, 56:1663-1672.