When do host-parasite interactions drive the evolution of non-random mating?

Ecology Letters

Volumn 11, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 937-946

  Nuismer, Scott L ^a   Otto, Sarah P ^b   Blanquart, François ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Coevolution; Disassortative mating; Major histocompatibility complex; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; COEVOLUTION; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PARASITE; PLANT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, GENETIC; PARASITES; PLANTS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 49249108324     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01207.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Agrawal, A.F. (2006). Similarity selection and the evolution of sex: revisiting the red queen. PLOS Biol., 4, 1364 1371.
2. Barton, N.H. Turelli, M. (1991). Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics, 127, 229 255.
3. Burdon, J.J. (1997). The evolution of gene-for-gene interactions in natural pathosystems. In : The Gene-for-Gene Relationship in Plant-Parasite Interactions (eds Crute, I.R., Holub, E.B. Burdon, J.J.). CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 245 262.
4. Bush, G.L. (1994). Sympatric speciation in animals: new wine in old bottles. TREE, 9, 285 288.
5. Craig, T.P., Itami, J.K., Abrahamson, W.G. Horner, J.D. (1993). Behavioral evidence for host-race formation in Eurosta solidaginis. Evolution, 47, 1696 1710.
6. Dieckmann, U. Doebeli, M. (1999). On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature, 400, 354 357.
7. Dieckmann, U., Doebeli, M., Metz, J.A.J. Tautz, D. (2004). Adaptive Speciation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
8. Doebeli, M. (1996). A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. J. Evol. Biol., 9, 893 909.
9. Doebeli, M. Dieckmann, U. (2000). Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am. Nat., 156, S77 S101.
10. Doebeli, M. Dieckmann, U. (2003). Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature, 421, 259 264.
11. Dybdahl, M.F. Lively, C.M. (1998). Host-parasite coevolution: evidence for rare advantage and time-lagged selection in a natural population. Evolution, 52, 1057 1066.
12. Ekblom, R., Saether, S.A., Grahn, M., Fiske, P., Kalas, J.A. Hoglund, J. (2004). Major histocompatibility complex variation and mate choice in a lekking bird, the great snipe (Gallinago media). Mol. Ecol., 13, 3821 3828.
13. Frank, S.A. (2002). Immunology and the Evolution of Infectious Disease. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
14. Froeschke, G. Sommer, S. (2005). MHC class II DRB variability and parasite load in the striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) in the southern Kalahari. Mol. Biol. Evol., 22, 1254 1259.
15. Gandon, S. Otto, S.P. (2007). The Evolution of Sex and Recombination in Response to Abiotic or Coevolutionary Fluctuations in Epistasis. Genetics, 175, 1835 1853.
16. Gavrilets, S. (2004). Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
17. Hamilton, W.D. (1980). Sex vs. non-sex vs. parasite. Oikos, 35, 282 290.
18. Hedrick, P.W. (2002). Pathogen resistance and genetic variation at MHC loci. Evolution, 56, 1902 1908.
19. Howard, R.S. Lively, C.M. (1998). The maintenance of sex by parasitism and mutation accumulation under epistatic fitness functions. Evolution, 52, 604 610.
20. Howard, R.S. Lively, C.M. (2003). Opposites attract? Mate choice for parasite evasion and the evolutionary stability of sex. J. Evol. Biol., 16, 681 689.
21. Howard, R.S. Lively, C.M. (2004). Good vs complementary genes for parasite resistance and the evolution of mate choice. BMC Evol. Biol., 4, Article No. 48.
22. Kirkpatrick, M. Nuismer, S.L. (2004). Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 271, 687 693.
23. Kirkpatrick, M., Johnson, T. Barton, N. (2002). General models of multilocus evolution. Genetics, 161, 1727 1750.
24. Landry, C., Garant, D., Duchesne, P. Bernatchez, L. (2001). 'Good genes as heterozygosity': the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 268, 1279 1285.
25. Lively, C.M., Dybdahl, M.E., Jokela, J., Osnas, E.E. Delph, L.E. (2004). Host sex and local adaptation by parasites in a snail-trematode interaction. Am. Nat., 164, S6 S18.
26. Milinski, M. (2006). The major histocompatibility complex, sexual selection, and mate choice. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 37, 159 186.
27. Nagylaki, T.J. (1993). The evolution of multilocus systems under weak selection. Genetics, 134, 627 647.
28. Nuismer, S.L. (2006). Parasite local adaptation in a geographic mosaic. Evolution, 60, 83 88.
29. Nuismer, S.L. Otto, S.P. (2004). Host-parasite interactions and the evolution of ploidy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 101, 11036 11039.
30. Nuismer, S.L. Otto, S.P. (2005). Host-parasite interactions and the evolution of gene expression. PLOS Biol., 3, 1283 1288.
31. Otto, S.P. Nuismer, S.L. (2004). Species interactions and the evolution of sex. Science, 304, 1018 1020.
32. Otto, S.P., Servedio, M.R. Nuismer, S.L. (2008). Frequency-dependent selection and the evolution of assortative mating. Genetics (in press).
33. Penn, D.J. Potts, W.K. (1999). The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am. Nat., 153, 145 164.
34. Penn, D.J., Damjanovich, K. Potts, W.K. (2002). MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99, 11260 11264.
35. Peters, A.D. Lively, C.M. (1999). The red queen and fluctuating epistasis: a population genetic analysis of antagonistic coevolution. Am. Nat., 154, 393 405.
36. Potts, W.K., Manning, C.J. Wakeland, E.K. (1994). The role of infectious-disease, inbreeding and mating preferences in maintaining MHC genetic diversity - an experimental test. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 346, 369 378.
37. Sasaki, A. (2000). Host-parasite coevolution in a multilocus gene-for-gene system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 267, 2183 2188.
38. Schwensow, N., Eberle, M. Sommer, S. (2008). Compatibility counts: MHC-associated mate choice in a wild promiscuous primate. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 275, 555 564.
39. Via, S. (1999). Reproductive isolation between sympatric races of pea aphids. I. Gene flow restriction and habitat choice. Evolution, 53, 1446 1457.
40. Waxman, D. Gavrilets, S. (2005). 20 questions on adaptive dynamics. J. Evol. Biol., 18, 1139 1154.
41. Westerdahl, H., Waldenstrom, J., Hansson, B., Hasselquist, D., von Schantz, T. Bensch, S. (2005). Associations between malaria and MHC genes in a migratory songbird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 272, 1511 1518.