Does a facultative mutualism limit species range expansion?

Oecologia

Volumn 167, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 149-155

  Stanton Geddes, John ^a   Anderson, Carolyn G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Chamaecrista fasciculata; Mutualism; Range limits; Rhizobia; Transplant study

Indexed keywords

FACULTATIVE BEHAVIOR; GREENHOUSE ECOSYSTEM; HOST RANGE; LEGUME; MUTUALISM; RANGE EXPANSION; RANGE SIZE; RHIZOBACTERIUM; TRANSPLANTATION;

ARTICLE; BRADYRHIZOBIUM; FABACEAE; GEOGRAPHY; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GROWTH; SYMBIOSIS;

BRADYRHIZOBIUM; FABACEAE; GEOGRAPHY; POPULATION GROWTH; SYMBIOSIS;

CHAMAECRISTA; CHAMAECRISTA FASCICULATA; RHIZOBIACEAE;

EID: 80051668269     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-1958-4     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ackerly DD (2003) Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. Int J Plant Sci 164(3 Supp): S165-S184.
2. Angert A, Schemske D (2005) The evolution of species' distributions: reciprocal transplants across the elevation ranges of Mimulus cardinalis and M. lewisii. Evolution 59: 1671-1684.
3. Antonovics J (2009) The effect of sterilizing diseases on host abundance and distribution along environmental gradients. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: 1443-1448.
4. Béna G, Lyet A, Huguet T, Olivieri I (2005) Medicago-Sinorhizobium symbiotic specificity evolution and the geographic expansion of Medicago. J Evol Biol 18: 1547-1558.
5. Burdon J, Gibson A, Searle S, Woods M, Brockwell J (1999) Variation in the effectiveness of symbiotic associations between native rhizobia and temperate Australian Acacia: within-species interactions. J Appl Ecol 36: 398-408.
6. Bushnell O, Sarles W (1937) Studies on the root-nodule bacteria of wild leguminous plants in Wisconsin. Soil Sci 44: 409-423.
7. Case T, Taper M (2000) Interspecific competition, environmental gradients, gene flow, and the coevolution of species' borders. Am Nat 155: 583-605.
8. Case T, Holt RD, McPeek M, Keitt TH (2005) The community context of species' borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Oikos 108: 28-46.
9. Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292: 673-679.
10. Doyle JJ, Luckow MA (2003) The rest of the iceberg. Legume diversity and evolution in a phylogenetic context. Plant Physiol 131: 900-910.
11. Geber MA, Eckhart VM (2005) Experimental studies of adaptation in Clarkia xantiana. II. Fitness variation across a subspecies border. Evolution 59: 521-531.
12. Heath KD (2010) Intergenomic epistasis and coevolutionary constraint in plants and rhizobia. Evolution 64: 1446-1458.
13. Heath KD, Tiffin P (2007) Context dependence in the coevolution of plant and rhizobial mutualists. Proc R Soc Lond B 269: 1905-1912.
14. Holt RD, Barfield M (2009) Trophic interactions and range limits: the diverse roles of predation. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: 1435-1442.
15. Irwin HS, Barneby RC (1982) The American Cassiinae. A synoptical revision of the Leguminosae tribe Cassieae subtribe Cassiinae in the New World. New York Botanical Garden Press, New York.
16. Milliken GA, Johnson DE (2009) Analysis of messy data, vol 1. Designed experiments, 2nd edn. CRC Press, New York.
17. Morris W et al (2007) Direct and interactive effects of enemies and mutualists on plant performance: a meta-analysis. Ecology 88: 1021-1029.
18. Naisbitt T, Sprent JI (1993) The long-term effects of nitrate on the growth and nodule structure of the caesalpinioid herbaceous legume Chamaecrista fasciculata Michaux. J Exp Bot 44: 829-836.
19. Nuñez MA, Horton TR, Simberloff D (2009) Lack of belowground mutualisms hinders Pinaceae invasions. Ecology 90: 2352-2359.
20. Parker MA (2001) Mutualism as a constraint on invasion success for legumes and rhizobia. Divers Dist 7: 125-136.
21. Parker MA, Kennedy DA (2006) Diversity and relationships of Bradyrhizobia from legumes native to eastern North America. Can J Microbiol 52: 1148-1157.
22. Parker MA, Malek W, Parker IM (2006) Growth of an invasive legume is symbiont limited in newly occupied habitats. Divers Dist 12: 563-571.
23. Price TD, Kirkpatrick M (2009) Evolutionarily stable range limits set by interspecific competition. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: 1429.
24. Pringle A, Bever JD, Gardes M, Parrent JL, Rillig MC, Klironomos JN (2009) Mycorrhizal symbioses and plant invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40: 699-715.
25. Purves DW (2009) The demography of range boundaries versus range cores in eastern US tree species. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: 1477-1484.
26. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
27. Ratcliff WC, Kadam SV, Denison RF (2008) Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) supports survival and reproduction in starving rhizobia. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 65: 391-399.
28. Rehfeldt G, Ferguson D, Crookston N (2008) Quantifying the abundance of co-occurring conifers along inland northwest (USA) climate gradients. Ecology 89: 2127-2139.
29. Sagarin RD, Gaines SD (2002) The 'abundant centre' distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographical rule? Ecol Lett 5: 137-147.
30. Somasegaran P, Hoben HJ (1994) Handbook for rhizobia: methods in legume-Rhizobium technology. Springer, Heidelberg.
31. Spoerke JM, Wilkinson HH, Parker MA (1996) Nonrandome genotypic associations in a legume-Bradyrhizobium mutualism. Evolution 50: 146-154.
32. Tlusty B, Grossman JM, Graham PH (2004) Selection of rhizobia for prairie legumes used in restoration and reconstruction programs in Minnesota. Can J Microbiol 50: 977-983.